489
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Neurophysiological Monitoring of the Spinal Sensory and Motor Pathways during Embolization of Spinal Arteriovenous Malformations – Propofol: A Safe Alternative

, &
Pages 125-137 | Published online: 30 Jan 2015

  • Barr JD, Mathis JM, Horton JA. Provocative pharmacologic testing during arterial embolization. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1994 Jul; 5(3):403–11.
  • Berenstein A, Young W. Ransohoff J. Benjamin V, Merkin H. Somatosensory evoked potentials during spinal angiography and therapeutic transvascular embolization. J Neurosurg 1984 Apr; 60(4):777–85.
  • Ben-David B, Taylor PD, Haller GS. Posterior spinal fusion complicated by posterior column injury. A case report of a false-negative wake-up test. Spine 1987 Jul-Aug, 12(6):540–43.
  • Doppman JL, Girton M, Oldfield EH. Spinal Wada test. Radiology 1986 Nov; 161(2):319–21.
  • Eager M, Shimer A, Jahangiri FR, Shen F. Arlet V. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM): lessons learned from 32 case events in 2069 spine cases. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 2011 Dec; 51(4):247–63
  • Feliciano CE, de León-Berra R, Hernández-Gaitán MS, Torres HM, Creagh O, Rodríguez-Mercado R. Provocative test with propofol: experience in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations who underwent neuroendovascular procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010 Mar, 31(3):470–75.
  • Fitzsimmons BF, Marshall RS, Pile-Spellman J, Lazar RM. Neurobehavioral differences m super-selective Wada testing with amobarbital versus lidocaine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003 Aug; 24(7):1456–60.
  • Ginsburg HH, Shetter AG, Raudzens PA. Postoperative paraplegia with Preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Case report. J Neurosurg 1985 Aug; 63(2):296–300.
  • Hacke W. Neuromonitoring during interventional neuroradiology. Cent Nerv Syst Trauma 1985 Summer 2(2):123–36.
  • Jahangiri FR, Crowley RW, Persyn JJ, Kassell NF, Vega-Bermudez F. Predicting surgical outcome by somatosensory evoked potentials and transcranial electric motor evoked potentials in a cervical-medullary junction hemangioblastoma. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 2010a; 20(2):101–10.
  • Jahangiri FR, Khan P. Holmberg A, Dumont A, Willis M, Vega-Bermudez F. Protecting the sensory and motor spinal pathways during the embolization of spinal AVM in INR suite. Abstract. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol 2010b; 50(4):343.
  • Katsuta T, Morioka T. Hasui K, Miyahara S, Fukui M, Masuda K. Discrepancy between provocative test and clinical results following endovascular obliteration of spinal arteriovenous malformation. Surg Neurol 1993 Aug; 40:142–45.
  • Lesser RP, Raudzens P, Luders H, Nuwer MR, Goldie WD, Morris HH 3rd, Dinner DS, Klem G, Hahn JF, Shetter AG. Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 1986; 19:22–25.
  • Magee JA, Pender NP, Abrahams S, Thornton J, Delanty N, Fortune GM. A comparison of propofol and amobarbital for use in the Wada test. Seizure 2012; 21(5):399–401.
  • Medel R, Crowley RW, Dumont AS. Endovascular management of spinal vascular malformations: history and literature review. Neurosurg Focus 2009 Jan; 26(1):E7.
  • Meléndez EM, Flynn J, Noriega Sánchez A. Somatosensory cortical evoked potentials for intraoperative monitoring of spinal surgery. Bol Asoc Med P R 1986 Feb; 78(2):61–63.
  • Niimi Y, Sala F, Deletis V, Setton A, Camargo AB, Berenstein A. Neurophysiologic monitoring and pharmacologic provocative testing for embolization of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004 Aug; 25:1131–38.
  • Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH. Somatosensory- and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery An accepted standard of care. Spine 1998 Jun 15; 23(12): 1392–400.
  • Sala F, Niimi Y, Krzan MJ, Berenstein A, Deletis V. Embolization of a spinal arteriovenous malformation. correlation between motor evoked potentials and angiographic findings: technical case report. Neurosurgery 1999 Oct; 45(4):932–37; discussion 937–38.
  • Sala F, Niimi Y, Berenstein A, Deletis V. Neuroprotective role of neurophysiological monitoring during endovascular procedures in the spinal cord. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001 Jun; 939:126–36.
  • Tamkus AA, Rice KS, Kim HL. Differential rates of false-positive findings in transcranial electric motor evoked potential monitoring when using inhalational anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia during spine surgeries. Spine J 2013 Oct; 24.
  • Tanaka K, Yamasaki M. Blocking of cortical inhibitory synapses by intravenous lidocaine. Nature 1966 Jan 8; 209(5019):207–08.
  • Terada T, Nakai K. The differential action of lidocaine and amytal on the central nervous system as the provocative test drug. In: Proceedings of 7th Annual Meeting of Japanese Society of Intravascular Neurosurgery, Mie, Japan 1991; 95–101.
  • Toleikis JR, American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials: A position statement by the American Society of Neuro physiological Monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput Dec 2005; 19(3):241–58.
  • Young W, Mollin D. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials monitoring of spinal surgery In. Desmedt JE (Editor). Neuromonitoring in Surgery. 1989; Amsterdam: Elsevier; p. 165–73.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.