Simulating bicycle wayfinding mechanisms in an urban environment

References

• Allen, G. (1999). Cognitive abilities in the service of wayfinding: A functional approach. The Professional Geographer, 51, 555–561.10.1111/0033-0124.00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriotti, G. K. F. K. (2006). Agent-based simulation versus econometrics – From macro to microscopic approaches to route choice simulation. Lecture notes in computer Science, 4196, 61–72.10.1007/11872283
   Google Scholar
• Aultman-Hall, L., Hall, F. L., & Baetz, B. B. (1997). Analysis of bicycle commuter routes using geographic information systems: Implications for bicycle planning. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 102–110.10.3141/1578-13
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. (1997). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. Complexity, 3, 16–22.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0526
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, G., & Krizek, K. (2005). Estimating bicycling demand. Transportation Research Record, 1939, 45–51.10.3141/1939-06
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., Desyllas, J., & Duxbury, E. (2003). The discrete dynamics of small-scale spatial events: Agent-based models of mobility in carnivals and street parades. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17, 673–697.10.1080/1365881031000135474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B, 6, 47–65.10.1068/b060047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, W. R. (2010). Sustainable transportation: Problems and solutions. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonabeau, E. (2002). Predicting the unpredictable. Harvard Business Review, 80, 109–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. (2003). Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco bay area. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1478–1483.10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D, 2, 199–219.10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Meaker, J. W., & Zhan, F. B. (2006). Agent-based modeling and analysis of hurricane evacuation procedures for the Florida keys. Natural Hazards, 38, 321–338.10.1007/s11069-005-0263-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, K. C. (1997). Getting started with geographic information systems. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Colditz, G. A. (1999). Economic costs of obesity and inactivity. Medicine & Science in Sports and Exercise, 31, S663.10.1097/00005768-199911001-00026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. C. (2003). The secret is to follow your nose: Route path selection and angularity. Environment and Behavior, 35, 107–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desyllas, J., & Duxbury, E. (2001). Axial maps and visibility graph analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Space Syntax, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J. (2009). Bicycling for transportation and health: The role of infrastructure. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30, S95–S110.10.1057/jphp.2008.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L., Bradley, M., Kavage, S., Chapman, J., & Lawton, T. K. (2008). Urban form, travel time, and cost relationships with tour complexity and mode choice. Transportation, 35, 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L., Engelke, P. O., & Schmid, T. L. (2003). Health and community design: The impact of the built environment on physical activity. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., & Pivo, G. (1995). Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: Single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Research Record, 1466, 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, G., & Wiener, J. M. (2008). From space syntax to space semantics: A behaviorally and perceptually oriented methodology for the efficient description of the geometry and topology of environments. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35, 574–592.10.1068/b33050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatersleben, B., & Haddadb, H. (2010). Who is the typical bicyclist? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13, 41–48.10.1016/j.trf.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G. (Ed.). (1999). Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groff, E. R. (2007). ‘Situating’ simulation to model human spatio–temporal interactions: An example using crime events. Transactions in GIS, 11, 507–530.10.1111/tgis.2007.11.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S., Xing, Y., & Buehler, T. J. (2010). Factors associated with bicycle ownership and use: A study of six small US cities. Transportation, 37, 967–985.10.1007/s11116-010-9269-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., Wee, B. V., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30, 59–96.10.1080/01441640903187001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. (2006). Studying cities to learn about minds: How geometric intuitions shape urban space and make it work. In C. Hoelscher, A. Turner, & R. Conroy-Dalton (Eds.), Space syntax and spatial cognition – Proceedings of the workshop in Bremen (pp. 11–31). Bremen: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 29–66.10.1068/b200029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., & Vaughan, L. (2007). The city as one thing. Progress in Planning, 67, 205–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., Forest, B., & Sengupta, R. (2008). Agent-based simulation of urban residential dynamics and land rent change in a gentrifying area of Boston. Transactions in GIS, 12, 475–491.10.1111/tgis.2008.12.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., & Jia, T. (2011). Agent-based simulation of human movement shaped by the underlying street structure. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25, 51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. (1995). Modeling bicycle demand as a mainstream transportation planning function. Transportation Research Record, 1502, 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Komanoff, C., & Roelofs, C. (1993). The environmental benefits of bicycling and walking. In FHWA (Ed.), National bicycling and walking study case study #15 (p. 15). Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, B. W., Vattikuti, V. R., & Brannick, M. T. (1997). Real-time human perceptions: Toward a bicycle level of service. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 119–126.10.3141/1578-15
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. (1986). An efficient transportation and land use system. Cambridge, MA: Transportation Systems Center.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (1994). Bicycling and transportation demand management. Transportation Research Record, 1441, 134–140.
   Google Scholar
• McCahill, C., & Garrick, N. W. (2008). The applicability of space syntax to bicycle facility planning. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2074, 46–51.10.3141/2074-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, C. H., & Burns, E. K. (2001). Cycling to work in phoenix: Route choice, travel behavior, and commuter characteristics. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mottram, C., Conroy, R., & Turner, A. (1999). Virtual beings: Emergence of population level movement behaviors from individual rule sets. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Space Syntax, Universidad de Brasil, Brasilia.
   Google Scholar
• Najlis, R., & North, M. J. (2004). Repast for GIS. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Agent 2004: Social Dynamics: Interaction, Reflexivity and Emergence, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, J., Ryley, T., & Jones, T. (2007). On barriers to cycling: An exploration of quantitative analysis. In P. R. D. Horton & P. Cox (Eds.), Cycling and Society (pp. 67–82). London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, A., & Turner, A. (2002). Space syntax based agent simulation. In M. Schreckenberg & S. D. Sharma (Eds.), Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics (Vol. XIX, pp. 99–114). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, A., & Turner, A. (2003). Space layout affects search efficiency for agents with vision. Paper presented at the Proceedings 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London.
   Google Scholar
• Peponis, J., Zimring, C., & Choi, Y. K. (1990). Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment & Behavior, 22, 555–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, C., Suhrbier, J., & Schwartz, W. L. (1999). Forecasting bicycle and pedestrian travel: State of the practice and research needs. Transportation Research Record, 1674, 94–101.10.3141/1674-13
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, M., Macera, C. A., & Blanton, C. (1999). Levels of physical activity and inactivity in children and adults in the United States: Current evidence and research issues. Medicine & Science in Sports and Exercise, 31, S526–533.10.1097/00005768-199911001-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., Dill, J., & Handy, S. (2010). Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventative Medicine, 50, 106–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raford, N., Chiaradia, A., & Gil, J. (2005). Critical mass: Emergent cyclist route choice in central London. In The 5th Space Syntax Symposium, TU Delft, Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Raford, N., Chiaradia, A. J. F., & Gil, J. (2007). Space syntax: The role of urban form in cyclist route choice in central London. Paper presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Raford, N., & Ragland, D. (2004). Space syntax: Innovative pedestrian volume modeling tool for pedestrian safety. Transportation Research Record, 1878, 66–74.10.3141/1878-09
   Google Scholar
• Raubal, M., & Winter, S. (2002). Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In E. Egenhofer & D. Mark (Eds.), Geographic information science – second international conference, GIScience (Vol. 2478, pp. 243–259). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrı́guez, D. A., & Joo, J. (2004). The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9, 151–173.10.1016/j.trd.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronald, N., Sterling, L., & Kirley, M. (2009). An agent-based approach to modelling pedestrian behaviour. International Journal of Simulation, 8, 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Saneinejad, S., Roorda, M. J., & Kennedy, C. (2012). Modelling the impact of weather conditions on active transportation travel behaviour. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17, 129–137.10.1016/j.trd.2011.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, B. (2008). Case statement for the Madison, Wisconsin metropolitan area rails-to-trails conservancy 2010 campaign for active transportation. Madison, WI: Madison Area Transportation Planning Board (pp. 1–13).
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, P. M. (2012). Moving agent pedestrians through space and time. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 35–66.10.1080/00045608.2011.595658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. (2000). Depthmap, Version 7: From Isovist analysis to generic spatial network analysis. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. (2001). Angular analysis. In J. Peponis, J. Wineman, & S. Bafna (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on space syntax Georgia Institute of Technology (pp. 30.1–30.11). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. (2003). Analysing the visual dynamics of spatial morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 657–676.10.1068/b12962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. (2004). Depthmap 4 – A researcher’s handbook. London: Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, UCL (pp. 58).
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. (2007). The ingredients of an exosomatic cognitive map: Isovists, agents and axial lines? In C. Hölscher, R. C. Dalton, & A. Turner (Eds.), Space syntax and spatial cognition: Proceedings of the workshop held in Bremen, 24th September 2006 (pp. 163–180). Bremen: Universität Bremen.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A., & Penn, A. (1999). Making isovists syntactic: Isovist integration analysis. In F. Holanda (Ed.), Proceedings, second international symposium on space syntax (Vol. 1, p. 08). Brasillia: Universidade de Brasillia.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440–442.10.1038/30918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters, M., Brauer, M., Setton, E. M., & Teschke, K. (2010). Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: Bicycling versus driving. Journal of Urban Health, 87, 969–993.10.1007/s11524-010-9509-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, J. C., Arrowsmith, C., Jackson, M., & Cartwright, W. (2008). The wayfinding process relationships between decision-making and landmark utility. Tourism Management, 29, 445–457.10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar