Two decades of smart growth in Maryland (U.S.A): impact assessment and future directions of a national leader

References

• American Planning Association. (2002). Planning for smart growth: 2002 state of the states. Chicago, IL: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Avin, U., Welch, T. F., Knaap, G., Ducca, F., Mishra, S., Cui, Y., & Erdogan, S. (2014). Even smarter growth? Land use, transportation, and greenhouse gas in Maryland. Proceedings of the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Guerra, E. (2011). Urban densities and transit: A multi-dimensional perspective. Berkeley, CA. Retrieved from http://www.its.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/publications/UCB/2011/VWP/UCB-ITS-VWP-2011-6.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chapin, T. (2012). From growth controls, to comprehensive planning, to smart growth: Planning’s emerging fourth wave. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78, 5–15.10.1080/01944363.2011.645273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. R. (2002). Maryland’s “smart growth”: Using incentives to combat sprawl. In G. D. Squires (Ed.), Urban sprawl: Causes, consequences, and policy responses. 293–324.  Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Conder, S., & Lawton, K. (2002). Alternative futures for integrated transportation and land-use models contrasted with Trend-Delphi models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1805, 99–107.10.3141/1805-12
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, C., & Moeckel, R. (2016). Transit-induced gentrification: Who will stay, and who will go? Housing Policy Debate, 26, 801–818. doi:10.1080/10511482.2016.1138986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmar, H., Belzer, D., & Autler, G. (2004). An introduction towards transit-oriented development. In H. Dittmar & G. Ohland (Eds.), The New Transit town: Best practices in transit-oriented development. 1–18.  Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gini, C. (1909/1997). Concentration and dependency ratios. Rivista di Politica Economica, 87, 769–792. Translation of Gini’s article Variabilità e mutabilità from 1909.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (2005). Smart growth and the transportation-land use connection: What does the research tell us? International Regional Science Review, 28, 146–167.10.1177/0160017604273626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanlon, B., Howland, M., & McGuire, M. (2010). Hotspots for growth: Land use change in a transitional county in the US. University of Maryland. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. D., Kriger, D. S., & Miller, E. J. (2005). Current operational urban land-use-transport modelling frameworks: A review. Transport Reviews, 25, 329–376.10.1080/0144164052000336470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaap, G. J., & Frece, J. (2007). Smart growth in Maryland: Looking forward and looking back. Idaho Law Review, 43 (2), 445–473.
   Google Scholar
• Knaap, G.-J. (2005). A requiem for smart growth? In D. R. Mandelker (Ed.), Planning reform in the new century. 103–128.  Chicago, IL: American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Knaap, G. J., & Lewis, R. (2007). State agency spending under Maryland’s Smart Growth Areas Act: who’s tracking, who’s spending, how much, and where? Report released by the national center for  smart growth research and education, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Knaap, G. J. & Lewis, R. (2009). Maryland case study. In G. K. Ingram, A. Carbonell, Y-H. Hong, & A. Flint (Eds.), Smart growth policies: an evaluation of programs and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R. (2011). Do smart growth instruments in Maryland make a difference? ( PhD dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, R., & Knaap, G.-J. (2012). Targeting spending for land conservation: An evaluation of Maryland’s rural legacy program. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78, 34–52.10.1080/01944363.2011.645275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R., Knaap, G.-J., & Sohn, J. (2009). Managing growth with priority funding areas: A good idea whose time has yet to come. Journal of the American Planning Association, 75, 457–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maryland Department of Planning. (2008). Where do we grow from here? A report of the task force on the future for growth and development in Maryland. Baltimore, MD: Maryland Department of Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., Iseki, H., & Moeckel, R. (2014). Multi entity perspective freight demand modeling technique: Varying objectives and outcomes. Transport Policy, 35, 176–185.
   Google Scholar
• Moeckel, R., & Donnelly, R. (2011). Nationwide estimate of long-distance travel (NELDT). Generating external trips for local travel demand models. Conference Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Forum. Long Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Moeckel, R., & Donnelly, R. (2016). A model for national freight flows, distribution centers, empty trucks and urban truck movements. Transportation Planning and Technology, 39, 693–711.10.1080/03081060.2016.1204091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Cole-Hunter, T., de Nazelle, A., Dons, E., Gerike, R., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2015). Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 76, 103–114.10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Smart Growth. (2011). Indicators of smart growth in Maryland. College Park, MD: National Center for Smart Growth. Retrieved from http://smartgrowth.umd.edu/assets/documents/indicators/2011_smart_growth_indicators_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SHA. (2013). The Maryland statewide transportation model. Model Documentation (version 1.0). Baltimore, MD. 187 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, J., & Knaap, G. J. (2005). Does job creation tax credit program in Maryland help concentrate employment growth? Economic Development Quarterly, 19, 313–326.10.1177/0891242405278183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, H. (2007). The saga of integrated land use-transport modeling: How many more dreams before we wake up? In K. W. Axhausen (Ed.), Moving through nets: The physical and social dimensions of travel (pp. 219–248). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Towe, C., Lewis, R., & Lynch, L. (2014). Using quasi-experimental methods to evaluate land policies: Application to Maryland’s priority funding legislation. In J. Duke & J. Wu (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of land economics. 452–480.  Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, M. (2014). Land-use transport interaction models. In M. Fischer & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Handbook of regional science (pp. 741–758). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, M., & Fürst, F. (1999). Land-use transport interaction: State of the art ( Working Paper 46). University of Dortmund. Retrieved from https://eldorado.tu-dortmund.de/bitstream/2003/26574/1/46.pdf
   Google Scholar