Guidance through the jungle of behavioral science theories, models, and concepts for non-behavioral scientists

References

• Acheson, P., Dagli, C., & Kilicay-Ergin, N. (2013). Model based systems engineering for system of systems using agent-based modeling. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 11–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Adams, M. (2014). Approaching nature, ‘sustainability’ and ecological crises from a critical social psychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(6), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12104
   Google Scholar
• Agu, A. G., Kalu, O. O., Esi-Ubani, C. O., & Agu, P. C. (2021). Drivers of sustainable entrepreneurial intentions among university students: An integrated model from a developing world context. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(3), 659–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2020-0277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akenji, L., Lettenmeier, M., Toivio, V., Nielsen, S., & Kamei, M. (2019). 1.5-degree lifestyles: Targets and options for reducing lifestyle carbon footprintsr (pp. 49). Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Aalto University and D-mat ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Armah, F. A. 2020. Systems thinking, approach. International encyclopedia of human geography (Second Edition). In A. Kobayashi, (Ed.), Oxford: Elsevier, 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10434-2
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, V. 2021. Behavioral economics. Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science. T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford. Springer International Publishing. 525–533.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, C. M., & Gross, C. (2017). Sustainability policy as if people mattered: Developing a framework for environmentally significant behavioral change. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(1), 53–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-016-9238-3
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., & Terjesen, M. D. (2020). Rational emotive, cognitive behavioral approaches to the challenge of child and adolescent mental health. In M. Bernard & M. D. Terjesen (Eds.), Rational-emotive and cognitive-behavioral approaches to child and adolescent mental health: theory, practice, research, applications. (pp. 3–30). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, L. M. A., & Kaur, J. (2011). Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19540–19545. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102712108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickel, W. K., & Christensen, D. R. (2010). Behavioral Economics. In P. Stolerman & L. H. Price (Eds.), Encyclopedia of psychopharmacology (Vol. I, pp. 1–7). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Biely, K. (2022). The behavioral perspective (pp. 133). Delft, Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Biernat, E., Buchholtz, S., & Bartkiewicz, P. (2018). Motivations and barriers to bicycle commuting: Lessons from Poland. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 492–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögel, P. M., & Upham, P. (2018). Role of psychology in sociotechnical transitions studies: Review in relation to consumption and technology acceptance. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, C. D. (1963). Is sociology a behavioral science? The Pacific Sociological Review, 6(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388293
   Google Scholar
• Bouman, T., & Steg, L. (2022). A spiral of (in)action: Empowering people to translate their values in climate action. One Earth, 5(9), 975–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.08.009
   Google Scholar
• Bouman, T., van der Werff, E., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2021). Environmental values and identities at the personal and group level. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2010). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowes, S. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2020). Rationality. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 4294–4301). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brosch, T. (2021). Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: A review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosch, T., & Steg, L. (2021). Leveraging emotion for sustainable action. One Earth, 4(12), 1693–1703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Buck, M., & Nurse, A. (2021). Cycling in an ‘ordinary city’: A practice theory approach to supporting a modal shift. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1983674
   Google Scholar
• Bujold, P. M., Williamson, K., & Thulin, E. (2020). The Science of Changing Behavior for Environmental Outcomes: A Literature Review., Rare Center for Behavior & the Environment and the Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility.
   Google Scholar
• Carlitz, A., & Rios, K. (2020). Beliefs. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 435–439). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterton, T., & Wilson, C. (2014). The ‘Four dimensions of behaviour’ framework: A tool for characterising behaviours to help design better interventions. Transportation Planning and Technology, 37(1), 38–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2013.850257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Jacobson, R. P. (2021). Influences of social norms on climate change-related behaviors. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieciuch, J., & Schwartz, S. H. (2020). Values. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 5704–5708). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cinner, J. (2018). How behavioral science can help conservation. Science, 362(6417), 889–890. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collet, F. (2009). Does Habitus matter? A comparative review of Bourdieu’s Habitus and Simon’s bounded rationality with some implications for economic sociology. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01356.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, J. (2016). Elias and habitus: Explaining bureaucratisation processes in the Gaelic Athletic Association. Culture and Organization, 22(5), 452–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2014.1001394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskun, A., Zimmerman, J., & Erbug, C. (2015). Promoting sustainability through behavior change: A review. Design Studies, 41, 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnton, A. (2008). Reference Report: An overview of behaviour change models and their uses, GSR Behaviour Change Knowledge Review.
   Google Scholar
• Darnton, A., & Evans, D. (2013). Influencing Behaviors: A technical Guide to the ISM Tool The Scottish Government. The Scottish Government. https://digital.nls.uk/pubs/scotgov/2013/9781782565666.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeBacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (1999). Variations on an expectancy-value model of motivation in science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(2), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Coninck, H., Revi, A., Babiker, M., Bertoldi, P., Buckeridge, M., Cartwright, A., Dong, W., Ford, J., Fuss, S., Hourcade, J.-C., Ley, D., Mechler, R., Newman, P., Revokatova, A., Schultz, S., Steg, L. & Sugiyama, T. (2018). Strengthening and implementing the global response. In P. Z. Masson- Delmotte & H.-O. Pörtner (Eds.), Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press (pp. 131). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.006
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahrenbach, F., & Kragulj, F. (2019). The ever-changing personality: Revisiting the concept of triple-loop learning. The Learning Organization. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-01-2019-0016
   Google Scholar
• Farrow, K., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2017). Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics, 140, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, J., Dyball, R., Fazey, I., Gross, C., Dovers, S., Ehrlich, P. R., Brulle, R. J., Christensen, C., & Borden, R. J. (2012). Human behavior and sustainability. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(3), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1890/110079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornara, F., Pattitoni, P., Mura, M., & Strazzera, E. (2016). Predicting intention to improve household energy efficiency: The role of value-belief-norm theory, normative and informational influence, and specific attitude. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Agency, structure. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis (pp. 49–95). Macmillan Education UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2002). Introduction – heuristics and biases: Then and now. In D. Griffin, D. Kahneman, & T. Gilovich (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gintis, H. (2007). A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07000581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greaves, M., Zibarras, L. D., & Stride, C. (2013). Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grills, S. 2014. Emotions, sociology of encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. A. C. Michalos. Springer Netherlands. 1876–1880.
   Google Scholar
• Günther, H. (2009). The environmental psychology of research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, B. H. W., Yiu, T. W., & González, V. A. (2015). Identifying behaviour patterns of construction safety using system archetypes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 80, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, J.-S. (2018). ‘Niklas Luhmann before relational sociology: The cybernetics roots of systems theory’. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 35(6), 856–868. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, S., & Adams, R. (2018). Behavioural economics vs social practice theory: Perspectives from inside the United Kingdom government. Energy Research & Social Science, 46, 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, H. (2021). Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: A review of theories, concepts, and latest research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(7), 1021–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1903019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimlich, J. E., & Ardoin, N. M. (2008). Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802148881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., & Laakso, S. (2019). Editing out unsustainability from consumption: From information provision to nudging and social practice theory. In Mont, O. (Ed.), A Research Agenda for Sustainable Consumption Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, (pp. 156–171). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117814.00020
   Google Scholar
• Hogenson, G. B. (2009). Archetypes as action patterns1. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 54(3), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5922.2009.01783.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson, T. (2002). Evolutionary psychology in ecological economics: Consilience, consumption and contentment. Ecological Economics, 41(2), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00040-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic literature studies: Database searches vs. backward snowballing. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement.
   Google Scholar
• Javaid, A., Creutzig, F., & Bamberg, S. (2020). Determinants of low-carbon transport mode adoption: Systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 103002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Schnelles Denken, Langsames Denken. München, Penguin Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, D. (2009). Ecological habitus:Toward a better understanding of socioecological relations. Organization & Environment, 22(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026609343098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper, D. (2016). Re-conceptualizing (environmental) sociology. Environmental Sociology, 2(4), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2016.1197474
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S., Saeri, A., Raven, R., Malekpour, S., & Smith, L. (2021). Behaviour in sustainability transitions: A mixed methods literature review. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 40, 586–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaniecki, K., Wuropulos, K., & Hager, C. P. (2018). Behaviour change for sustainable development. In Encyclopedia of sustainability in higher education (pp. 1–10). W. Leal Filho, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Klotz, L., Weber, E., Johnson, E., Shealy, T., Hernandez, M., & Gordon, B. (2018). Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 1(5), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0054-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
   Google Scholar
• Kopnina, H. (2017). Working with human nature to achieve sustainability: Exploring constraints and opportunities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhnhenn, K., Costa, L., Mahnke, E., Schneider, L., & Lange, S. (2021). A societal transformation scenario for staying below 1.5°C. Publication series economic ± social issues. Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 23. https://eu.boell.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/A%20Societal%20Transformation%20Scenario%20for%20Staying%20Below%201.5C.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, T., Gardner, B., Verplanken, B., & Abraham, C. (2015). Habitual behaviors or patterns of practice? Explaining and changing repetitive climate-relevant actions. WIREs Climate Change, 6(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.327
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. R., & Silva, E. A. (2020). Mapping the landscape of behavioral theories: Systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Literature, 35(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412219881135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaCaille, L. 2013. Theory of reasoned action. encyclopedia of behavioral medicine. M. D. Gellman & J. R. Turner. Springer New York. 1964–1967.
   Google Scholar
• Laland, K. N., & Brown, G. R. (2006). Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 15(3), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, F. (2022). Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review. Behavior Research Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Laszlo, E., & Laszlo, A. (1997). The contribution of the systems sciences to the humanities. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199701/02)14:1<5::AID-SRES150>3.0.CO;2-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A., Ettekal, A., & Simpkins, S. D. (2018). Expectancy value models. In Encyclopedia of adolescence. R. J. R. Levesque, ed. (pp. 1264–1271). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lippke, S. 2020. Self-efficacy theory. Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford. Springer International Publishing. 4722–4727.
   Google Scholar
• Lissack, M. 2021. Cybernetics and control. Handbook of systems sciences. In G. S. Metcalf, K. Kijima, & H. Deguchi. (Eds.), Springer: Singapore. (pp. 87–106). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0720-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual’s pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, E. K. Y. (2019). What we know about expectancy-value theory, and how it helps to design a sustained motivating learning environment. System, 86, 102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, P. (2015). The joy of biking together: Sharing everyday experiences of vélomobility. Mobilities, 10(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2013.844950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage points: places to intervene in a system. Hartland. https://donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Leverage_Points.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. G. (1995). Forty years of behavioral science. Behavioral Science, 40(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830400102
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. G. (1997). Statement from the founding editor of behavioral science: about the merger. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 14(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199701/02)14:1<3::AID-SRES153>3.0.CO;2-F
   Google Scholar
• Mobus, G. E., & Kalton, M. C. (2015). Principles of systems science. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. (2005). Structuration theory, habitus and complexity theory: Elective affinities or old wine in new bottles? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690500128809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscarello, J. M., & Hartley, C. A. (2017). Agency and the calibration of motivated behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(10), 725–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neil, C., & Melissa, B. (2016). Physiology of behavior, global edition. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., Daley, F., & Twena, M. (2021). Changing our ways? Behaviour change and the climate crisis. The report of the Cambridge Sustainability Commission on Scaling Behaviour Change, The Cambridge Sustainability Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P., Twena, M., & Daley, F. (2021). Scaling behaviour change for a 1.5 degree world: Challenges and opportunities. Global Sustainability, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.23
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. S., Clayton, S., Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Capstick, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021). How psychology can help limit climate change. American Psychologist, 76(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordfjærn, T., & Zavareh, M. F. (2017). Does the value-belief-norm theory predict acceptance of disincentives to driving and active mode choice preferences for children’s school travels among Chinese parents? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, D., & Lollo, N. (2015). Transforming consumption: From decoupling, to behavior change, to system changes for sustainable consumption. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40(1), 233–259. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, S., & Driffill, L. (2008). How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4412–4418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peschl, M. F. (2007). Triple-loop learning as foundation for profound change, individual cultivation, and radical innovation. Construction Processes beyond Scientific and Rational Knowledge, 2, 136–145. http://constructivist.info/2/2-3/136
   Google Scholar
• Pezzey, J. (1992). Sustainability: An interdisciplinary guide. Environmental Values, 1(4), 321–362. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327192776680034
   Google Scholar
• Pichert, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008). Green defaults: Information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quackenbush, S. (2004). The rationality of rational choice theory. International Interactions, 30(2), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620490462595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices:A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Rehbein, B., & Saalmann, G. 2014. Habitus (habitus). Bourdieu-Handbuch: Leben — Werk — Wirkung. G. Fröhlich & B. Rehbein. Metzler. 110–118.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, K., Tortoriello, G. K., & Hart, W. (2020). Attitudes. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 310–312). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rubaltelli, E. (2020). Heuristics. In The Palgrave encyclopedia of the possible. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_1-1
   Google Scholar
• Salonen, A., & Helne, T. (2012). Vegetarian diets: A way towards a sustainable society. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v5n6p10
   Google Scholar
• Sarigil, Z. (2015). Showing the path to path dependence: The habitual path. European Political Science Review, 7(2), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffernicht, M. (2019). Unrecognized interdependencies in mental models—The case for taking feedback loops into account. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(4), 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schill, C., Anderies, J. M., Lindahl, T., Folke, C., Polasky, S., Cárdenas, J. C., Crépin, A.-S., Janssen, M. A., Norberg, J., & Schlüter, M. (2019). A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nature Sustainability, 2(12), 1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0419-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., Ramos, A., Verkasalo, M., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., & Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secchi, D., & Bui, H. T. M. (2018). Group effects on individual attitudes toward social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 725–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3106-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• See, Y. H. M. (2020). Cognitive-affective processing system. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 733–739). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shahadu, H. (2016). Towards an umbrella science of sustainability. Sustainability Science, 11(5), 777–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0375-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipley, N. J., & van Riper, C. J. (2022). Pride and guilt predict pro-environmental behavior: A meta-analysis of correlational and experimental evidence. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, R. D. A., & Braga, R. T. V. (2020). Simulating systems-of-systems with agent-based modeling: A systematic literature review. IEEE Systems Journal, 14(3), 3609–3617. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2020.2980896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K. (2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G. (2003). Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 16(8), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spalding, A. K., Biedenweg, K., Hettinger, A., & Nelson, M. P. (2017). Demystifying the human dimension of ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(3), 119. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spotswood, F., Chatterton, T., Tapp, A., & Williams, D. (2015). Analysing cycling as a social practice: An empirical grounding for behaviour change. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 29, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg, L., Lindenberg, S., & Keizer, K. (2016). Intrinsic motivation, norms and environmental behaviour: The dynamics of overarching goals. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(1–2), 179–207. https://doi.org/10.1561/101.00000077
   Google Scholar
• Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707060
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Kalof, L., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(18), 1611–1636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. (2021). Nudge: The final edition. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Thoits, P. A. (1995). Social psychology: The interplay between sociology and psychology*. Social Forces, 73(4), 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, H., & Liu, X. (2022). Pro-environmental behavior research: Theoretical progress and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1977). Cross-cultural social and personality psychology. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727700300202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1979). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27, 195–259.
   Google Scholar
• Van Egeren, L. F. (2009). A cybernetic model of global personality traits. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(2), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309334860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B., & Whitmarsh, L. (2021). Habit and climate change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vest, A. E., & Simpkins, S. D. (2011). Expectancy value models. In R. Levesque (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 895–900). Springer New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, N.-F. (2021). Habits and narrative agency. Topoi, 40(3), 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-020-09695-1
   Google Scholar
• Wallnoefer, L. M., & Riefler, P. (2021). Concepts describing and assessing individuals’ environmental sustainability: An integrative review and taxonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee, B. V., & Banister, D. (2016). How to write a literature review paper? Transport Reviews, 36(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1065456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendel, S. (2020). Designing for behavior change: Applying psychology and behavioral economics. O’Reilly UK Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, T. M. (2013). Nudging and manipulation. Political Studies, 61(2), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00974.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, K., Bujold, P. M., & Thulin, E. (2020). Behavior Change. Interventions in Practice: A synthesis of criteria, approaches, case studies & indicators. Rare Center for Behavior & the Environment and the Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel to the Global Environment Facility. https://behavior.rare.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Behavior-Change-Interventions-in-Practice-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, K., Satre-Meloy, A., Velasco, K., & Green, K. (2018). Climate change needs behavior change: Making the case for behavioral solutions to reduce global warming. RARE.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, M., Davidson, G., Kao, D., & Teschke, K. (2011). Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: Comparing influences on decisions to ride. Transportation, 38(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9284-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woiwode, C., Schäpke, N., Bina, O., Veciana, S., Kunze, I., Parodi, O., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Wamsler, C. (2021). Inner transformation to sustainability as a deep leverage point: Fostering new avenues for change through dialogue and reflection. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 841–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00882-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worldbank. (2015). World Development Report 2015: Mind, Society, and Behavior.
   Google Scholar
• Yamin, P., Fei, M., Lahlou, S., & Levy, S. (2019). Using social norms to change behavior and increase sustainability in the real world: A systematic review of the literature. Sustainability, 11(20), 5847. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar