Bike Kitchens and the sociomateriality of practice change: exploring cycling-repair relations

References

• Alkemeyer, T., & Buschmann, N. (2016). Learning in and across practices: Enablement as subjectivation. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & Shove E. (Eds.), The nexus of practices (pp. 20–23). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, N., Clement, I., & Aldred, R. (2018). Invisible cyclists? Disabled people and cycle planning–A case study of London. Journal of Transport & Health, 8, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.11.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckström, S., & Gustafsson, M. (2017). Skill, drill, and intelligent performance: Ryle and intellectualism. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.15173/jhap.v5i5.3205
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2011). Cities, mobility and climate change. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1538–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batterbury, S. P. J., & Dant, T. (2019). The imperative of repair: Fixing bikes, for free. In S. I. B. A. In & P. Sormani (Eds.), Repair work ethnographies: Revisiting breakdown, relocating materiality (pp. 283–312). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2110-8_10
   Google Scholar
• Batterbury, S. P. J., & Manga, A. (2022). The sociality of cycling. In G. Norcliffe (Ed.), The cycling companion (pp. 42–51). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003142041-6
   Google Scholar
• Batterbury, S., & Vandermeersch, I. (2016). Community bicycle workshops and “invisible cyclists” in Brussels. In Bicycle justice and urban transformation (pp. 189–202). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1978). Arts and crafts. American Journal of Sociology, 83(4), 862–889. https://doi.org/10.1086/226635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, K. (2018). Bike Kitchens – spaces for convivial tools. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1676–1683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, K., & Persson, O. (2022). Community repair in the circular economy – fixing more than stuff. Local Environment, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2041580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caimotto, M. C., & Caimotto. (2020). Discourses of cycling, road users and sustainability: An ecolinguistic investigation (1st ed). Springer INternational Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44026-8
   Google Scholar
• Cass, N., & Faulconbridge, J. (2016). Commuting practices: New insights into modal shift from theories of social practice. Transport Policy, 45, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetina, K. K. (2001). objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, W., Parkin, J., & Billington, C. (2017). Cycling and disability: A call for further research. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 452–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotnam, V. (2020). Exploring the Effects of the Cycling Without Age Program on Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care [ Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Western Ontario (Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. (2019). Cycling: A sociology of vélomobility. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. (2022). Vélomobility is to degrowth as automobility is to growth: Prefigurative cycling imaginaries. Applied Mobilities, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2022.2087134
   Google Scholar
• Cox, P. & Koglin, T. (2020). The politics of cycling infrastructure. Policy, Bristol. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447345152.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• de Chatillion, M. A. (2021). Feminine Vélonomy. In D. Zuev, K. Psarikidou, & C. Popan (Eds.), Cycling societies (pp. 137–155). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Chatillon, M.A. (2022a). Velonomy and material mobilities: practices of cycle repair and maintenance in Lyon, France and Melbourne, Australia. Social Anthropology and ethnology. École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État [ENTPE].
   Google Scholar
• de Chatillon, M.A. (2022b). Appropriating the bicycle: Repair and maintenance skills and the bicycle-cyclist relationship. In M. Adam & N. Ortar (Eds.), Becoming urban cyclists (pp. 215–243). Chester University press.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, S. E., & Dreyfus, H. L. (1980). A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. University of California.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2023). Transport and the Environment Report 2022 Digitalisation in the Mobility System: Challenges and Opportunities. No 07/2022.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. M. (2020). After practice? Material semiotic approaches to consumption and economy. Cultural Sociology, 14(4), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975520923521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, E., Schepers, P., & Kamphuis, C. B. M. (2015). Dutch cycling: Quantifying the health and related economic benefits. American Journal of Public Health, 105(8), e13–e15. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302724
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, N., Parrique, T., & Cosme, I. (2022). Exploring degrowth policy proposals: A systematic mapping with thematic synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, G. (2013). Towards an archaeology of'know-how'. Cultural Studies Review, 19(1), 271–295.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. (2007). Critical mass, urban space and vélomobility. Mobilities, 2(2), 299–319.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1994). The constitution of society. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, D. M., Price, L. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2022). Repair, consumption, and sustainability: Fixing fragile objects and maintaining consumer practices. The Journal of Consumer Research, 49(2), 229–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Thrift, N. (2007). Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., & Gow, A. J. (2020). Cycling without age: Assessing the impact of a cycling-based initiative on mood and wellbeing. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 6, 2333721420946638. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721420946638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540510390500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksson, M., & Scalzotto, J. G. (2023). Bike-sharing under pressure: The role of cycling in building circular cycling futures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 395, 136368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrle, P., Fokdal, J., & Ley, A. (2015). Transnational networks of urban poor: key for a more collaborative urban governance? In P. Herrle, J. Fokdal, & A. Ley (Eds.), From LocalAction to Global Networks: Housing the Urban Poor (pp. 195–202). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hielscher, S., & Jaeger-Erben, M. (2021). From quick fixes to repair projects: Insights from a citizen science project. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchings, R. (2012). People can talk about their practices. Area, 44(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01060.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, D. (2006). Environmentalism and the bicycle. Environmental Politics, 15(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010500418712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, A. (Eds.). (2016). The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315560816
   Google Scholar
• Hult, A., & Bradley, K. (2017). Planning for sharing–providing infrastructure for citizens to be makers and sharers. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(4), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1321776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• José Zapata Campos, M., Carenzo, S., Kain, J. H., Oloko, M., Reynosa, J. P., & Zapata, P. (2021). Inclusive recycling movements: A green deep democracy from below. Environment and Urbanization, 33(2), 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247820967621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• José Zapata Campos, M., & Zapata, P. (2017). Infiltrating citizen-driven initiatives for sustainability. Environmental Politics, 26(6), 1055–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1352592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, J. L. (2022). The use of practice theory in transport research. Transport Reviews, 42(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1961918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koglin, T. (2013). Vélomobility: A critical analysis of planning and space (No. 284).
   Google Scholar
• Lange, B. (2017). Offene Werkstätten und Postwachstumsökonomien: kollaborative Orte als Wegbereiter transformativer Wirtschaftsentwicklungen? Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 61(1), 38–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, B., & Bürkner, H. J. (2018). Flexible value creation: Conceptual prerequisites and empirical explorations in open workshops. Geoforum, 88, 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. (2017a). Auto) ethnography and cycling. In M. D. Giardina & M. K. Donnelly (Eds.), Physical culture, ethnography and the body: Theory, method and praxis (pp. 230–244). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. (2017b). The making of a pro-cycling city: Social practices and bicycle mobilities. Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 49(4), 876–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16682732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J., & Christensen, M. D. (2015). The unstable lives of bicycles: The ‘unbecoming’ of design objects. Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 47(4), 988–938. https://doi.org/10.1068/a140282p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehner, M. (2019). Prosumption for sustainable consumption and its implications for sustainable consumption governance. In O. Mont (Ed.) A research agenda for sustainable consumption governance (pp. 105–120). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leyendecker, K., & Cox, P. (2022). Cycle campaigning for a just city. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 15, 100678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100678
   Google Scholar
• Löwenstein, D. (2017). Know-how as competence. A rylean responsibilist account. In Studies in theoretical philosophy (Vol. 4). Vittario Klostermann: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783465138808
   Google Scholar
• Marletto, G., & Sillig, C. (2019). Lost in mainstreaming? Agrifood and urban mobility grassroots innovations with multiple pathways and outcomes. Ecological Economics, 158, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. (2016). Making ‘sense’ in the bike mechanic’s workshop. In M. T.H. (Ed.), Craftwork as Problem Solving Ethnographic Studies of Design and Making (pp. 71–86). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, F. (2019). Introduction: Insiders’ Manual to Breakdown. In F. Martinez, & P. Laviolette, (Eds.), Repair, Brokenness, Breakthrough. Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• McNiel, P., & Westphal, J. (2020). Cycling without age program: The impact for residents in long-term care. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 42(9), 728–735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919885130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R., & Virkkunen, J. (2016). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization, 12(3), 437–456. Mock, M. (2023) Making and breaking links: the transformative potential of shared mobility from a practice theories perspective, Mobilities, 18:3, 374-390, DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2022.2142066. 10.1177/1350508405051279
   Google Scholar
• Mock, M. (2023). Making and breaking links: The transformative potential of shared mobility from a practice theories perspective. Mobilities, 18(3), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2142066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, A., Adey, P., Cresswell, T., Lee, J. Y., Nóvoa, A., & Temenos, C. (2019). Commoning mobility: Towards a new politics of mobility transitions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(2), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbuanya, T. C., & Chukwuedo, S. O. (2017). Career-training mentorship intervention via the Dreyfus model: Implication for career behaviors and practical skills acquisition in vocational electronic technology. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 103, 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, Q. M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2014). Boundaries as junctures: Collaborative boundary work for building efficient resilience. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rea, D., & Jacques, R. (1987). Beginner’s guide to car maintenance, fault-finding and repair. Heinemann Newman Book.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. 10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2016). Practices and their affects. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices (pp. 126–137). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rigal, A. (2023). Changing habits in the cycling subculture: The case of two bike workshops in France. Mobilities, 18(2), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2071630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, P. (2004). Up the velorution! In R. Eglash, J. L. Croissant, G. DiChiro, & R. Fouché (Eds.), Appropriating technology: Vernacular science and social power (pp. 365–390). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryghaug, M., Subotički, I., Smeds, E., von Wirth, T., Scherrer, A., Foulds, C., Robison, R., Bertolini, L., Beyazit İ̇nce, E., Brand, R., Cohen-Blankshtain, G., Dijk, M., Pedersen, M. F., Gössling, S., Guzik, R., Kivimaa, P., Klöckner, C., Nikolova, H. L., & Schatzki, T. R. (2022). A Social Sciences and Humanities research agenda for transport and mobility in Europe: key themes and 100 research questions. Transport Reviews, 43(4), 755–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2167887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Practice mind-ed orders. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 42–55). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2012). A primer on practices. In J. H. Barnett, R. Billet, S. M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and Strategie (pp. 13–26). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2019). Social change in a material world. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032127
   Google Scholar
• Scheurenbrand, K., Parsons, E., Cappellini, B., & Patterson, A. (2018). Cycling into headwinds: Analyzing practices that inhibit sustainability. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 37(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618810440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, B. (2019). Repair’s diverse transformative geographies: Lessons from a repair community in Stuttgart. Ephemera, 19(2), 229–251.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing grassroots innovations: Exploring the role of community-based initiatives in governing sustainable energy transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2020). Mobility Justice and the Velomobile Commons in Urban America. In M. Emanuel, F. Schipper, & R. Oldenziel (Eds.), A U-Turn to the Future: Sustainable Urban Mobility Since 1850 (pp. 285–304). Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2012). The shadowy side of innovation: Unmaking and sustainability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2016). Matters of practice. In A. Hui, E. Shove, & T. Schatzki (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners (pp. 155–168). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Trentmann, F.2019Infrastructures in practice: The dynamics of demand in networked societies. E Shove and F Trentmann (Eds.), Routledgehttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781351106177
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2020). Understanding urban cycling: Exploring the relationship between mobility, sustainability and capital. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. (2022). Situating the mobility fix of contemporary urban cycling policy. In Routledge companion to cycling (pp. 232–240). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spotswood, F., Chatterton, T., Tapp, A., & Williams, D. (2015). Analysing cycling as a social practice: An empirical grounding for behaviour change. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 29, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistic Sweden. (2023). Retrieved September 9, 2023, from https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverige-i-siffror/miljo/tatorter-i-sverige/.
   Google Scholar
• Te Brömmelstroet, M., Mladenović, M. N., Nikolaeva, A., Gaziulusoy, İ., Ferreira, A., Schmidt-Thomé, K., Ritvos, R., Sousa, S., & Bergsma, B. (2022). Identifying, nurturing and empowering alternative mobility narratives. Journal of Urban Mobility, 2, 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2022.100031
   Google Scholar
• Törrönen, J. (2002). Semiotic theory on qualitative interviewing using stimulus texts. Qualitative Research, 2(3), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410200200304
   Google Scholar
• Uppsala Municipality. (2013a). Cykelpolicy. KSN-2013-191. Uppsala Kommun: Kommunfullmaektige.
   Google Scholar
• Uppsala Municipality. (2013b). Riktlinjer för arbete med cykeltrafik. KSN-2013-0190. Uppsala Kommun: Kommunstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Uppsala Municipality. (2016). Handlingsplan för arbete med cykeltrafik. Uppsala Kommun: Stadsbyggnadsförvaltningen.
   Google Scholar
• Uppsala Municipality. (2023). Cykelåret 2022. Uppsala Kommun: Stadsbyggnadsförvaltningen.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2004). The ‘system’ of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Tuinen, S. (2017). The cosmic artisan: Mannerist virtuosity and contemporary crafts. In R. Van den Akker, A. Gibbons, & T. Vermeulen (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism (pp. 69–82). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M., & Shove, E. (2022). How infrastructures and practices shape each other: Aggregation, integration and the Introduction of gas central heating. Sociological Research Online, 28(2), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804211055495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (2014). Technologies as forms of life. In R. L. Sandler (Ed), Ethics and emerging technologies (pp. 48–60). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349088_4
   Google Scholar
• Zapata Campos, M José, Zapata, P, & Ordoñez, I. (2020). Urban commoning practices in the repair movement: Frontstaging the backstage. Environment and Planning A, 52(6), 1150–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19896800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar