The appearance of creative behavior in later stage design processes

References

• Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2003). Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akin, Ö., & Akin, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: Analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!). Design Studies, 17, 341–361.
   Google Scholar
• Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. L. (1999). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 20, 131–152. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(98)00031-3.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, B., & Blessing, L. (2004). On the superiority of opportunistic design strategies during early embodiment design. Paper presented at the DESIGN 2004: The 8th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Blessing, L., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a design research methodology. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. C. (2010, July). The curse of creativity. Paper presented at the DCC10: The 4th international conference on design computing and cognition, Stuttgart, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. A. (1997). Supporting the creative user: A criteria-based approach to interaction design. Design Studies, 18, 185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, P. J., Hicks, B. J., & Culley, S. J. (2012). A comparison of the behaviour of student engineers and professional engineers when designing. Paper presented at the DESIGN 2012: 12th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A. (2006). Defining and supporting design creativity. Paper presented at the DESIGN 2006: The 9th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Christiaans, H., & Venselaar, K. (2005). Creativity in design engineering and the role of knowledge: Modelling the expert. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, 217–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 391–404. https://doi.org/doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design (3rd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2004a). Creative thinking by expert designers. The Journal of Design Research. https://doi.org/doi:10.1504/JDR.2004.009839.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2004b). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25, 427–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22, 425–437. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(01)00009-6.
   Google Scholar
• Duffey, M. R., & Dixon, J. R. (1990). A program of research in mechanical design: Computer-based models and representations. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 25, 383–395.
   Google Scholar
• Dym, C. L. (1994). Engineering design: A synthesis of views. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., Clarkson, P. J., & Zanker, W. (2004). Change and customisation in complex engineering domains. Research in Engineering Design, 15(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., Stacey, M., Wyatt, D., & Garthwaite, P. (2012). Change as little as possible: Creativity in design by modification. Journal of Engineering Design, 23, 337–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62–88. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00536-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11, 26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. (1996). Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9, 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. (2000). Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 64, 183–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004). The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Design Studies, 25, 373–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guindon, R. (1990). Designing the design process: Exploiting opportunistic thoughts. Human–Computer Interaction, 5, 305–344.
   Google Scholar
• Hales, C. (1986). Analysis of the engineering design process in an industrial context. (PhD). University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In J. A.Glover, R. R.Ronning, & C. R.Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (Vol. 7, pp. 135–145). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29, 160–180. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2009). The integration of systems levels and design activities to position creativity support tools. Paper presented at the ICoRD '09: International conference on research into design, Bangalore, India.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Nair, V. V., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2011). The propagation and evolution of design constraints: A case study. Paper presented at the ICoRD '11: International conference on research into design, Bangalore, India.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., & Puccio, G. J. (1988). Adaption-innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The level-style issue revisited. Psychological Reports, 63, 659–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., Kuutti, K., & Bannon, L. (1995). Activity Theory: Basic concepts and applications. Human–Computer Interaction, 1015, 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. J. (1978). Have adaptors and innovators equal levels of creativity. Psychological Reports, 42, 695–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenke, K. (2008). Qualitative research in the study of leadership. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1981). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L. (2000). A model of co-evolutionary design. Engineering with Computers, 16, 195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, H., Hicks, B. J., Huet, G., & Culley, S. J. (2006). An investigation into the use and content of the engineer's logbook. Design Studies, 27, 481–504. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.destud.2005.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, B. D., & Ullman, D. G. (1990). The evolution of commitments in the design of a component. Journal of Mechanical Design, 114, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Motte, D., Andersson, P., & Bjarnemo, R. (2004). A descriptive model of the designer's problem-solving activity during the later phases of the mechanical engineering design process. Paper presented at the CDEN design conference, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L., & Shanks, G. (2009). A framework for understanding creativity in requirements engineering. Information and Software Technology, 51, 655–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1984). Engineering design: A systematic approach. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J., & Levine Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh, S. (1990). Total design: Integrated methods for successful product engineering. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, P., & Jablokow, K. (2011). Toward an adaption-innovation strategy for engineering design. Paper presented at the ICED'11: International conference on engineering design, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Assessing design creativity. Design Studies, 32, 348–383. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24, 111–134.
   Google Scholar
• Shai, O., Reich, Y., & Rubin, D. (2009). Creative conceptual design: Extending the scope by infused design. Computer-Aided Design, 41, 117–135. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.cad.2007.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B., Candy, L., …, Hewett, T. (2006). Creativity support tools: Report from a US National Science Foundation sponsored workshop. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 20, 61–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snider, C. M., Cash, P. J., Dekoninck, E. A., & Culley, S. J. (2012). Variation in creative behaviour during the later stages of the design process. Paper presented at the ICDC2012: The 2nd international conference on design creativity, Glasgow, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Snider, C. M., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2013, in press). Analysing creative behaviour in the later stage design process. Design Studies. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.destud.2013.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Snider, C. M., Dekoninck, E. A., & Culley, S. J. (2012). Improving confidence in smaller data sets through methodology: The development of a coding scheme. Paper presented at the DESIGN 2012: The 12th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Sobek, D. K. (2002). Representation in design: Data from engineering journals. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE: 32nd frontiers in education conference, Boston, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, M. E. (2001). Managing engineering knowledge. London: Professional Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, W. (1994). Organisation of design activities: opportunistic, with hierarchical episodes. Interacting with Computers, 6, 239–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, S., & Seifert, C. M. (2011). Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design. Design Studies, 32, 384–415. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar