An experimental study: analyzing requirement type influence on novelty and variety of generated solutions

References

• AFNOR. (1991). NF X 50-151 Analyse de la valeur, analyse fonctionnelle [Value Analysis and Functional Analysis]. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• AFNOR. (1996). NF EN 1325-1: Vocabulaire du management par la valeur, de l'analyse de la valeur et de l'analyse fonctionnelle–Partie 1: Analyse de la valeur et analyse fonctionnelle [Management Vocabulary for Value, the Value Analysis, and the Functional Analysis: Part 1: Value Analysis and Functional Analysis]. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chulvi, V., González-Cruz, M. C., Mulet, E., & Aguilar-Zambrano, J. (2012). Influence of the type of idea-generation method on the creativity of solutions. Research in Engineering Design, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, L., & Nixon, B. A. (1995). Dealing with non-functional requirements: Three experimental studies of a process-oriented approach. 17th international conference on software engineering, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Cysneiros, L. M., & Do Prado Leite, J. C. S. (2004). Nonfunctional requirements: From elicitation to conceptual models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 30, 328–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cysneiros, L. M., Do Prado Leite, J. C. S., & De Melo Sabat Neto, J. (2001). A framework for integrating non-functional requirements into conceptual models. Requirements Engineering, 6, 97–115.
   Google Scholar
• Diev, S. (2007). Requirements development as a modeling activity. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 32(2), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Dym, C. L., & Little, P. (1999). Engineering design: A project-based introduction. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert, C. (1997). Dealing with nonfunctional requirements in large software systems. Annals of Software Engineering, 3, 367–395.
   Google Scholar
• Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goguen, J. A., & Linde, C. (1993, January 4–6). Techniques for requirements elicitation. Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, 1993, San Diego, CA, USA (pp. 152–164). 10.1109/ISRE.1993.324822.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, J. O. (2007). System verification: proving the design solution satisfies the requirements. Oxford: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, J., Rawlings, R., Hall, A., & Rawling, R. (2001). “Will it work?,” Requirements engineering, 2001. Proceedings 5th IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 102–109). Toronto: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, R., Joshi, S., & Summers, J. D. (2012). A user study of interpretability of engineering design representations. Journal of Engineering Design, 23, 443–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskins, C., & Forsberg, K. (2011). Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. San Diego, CA: INCOSE.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, B. (1998). Fundamentals of engineering design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, S., Morkos, B., Shankar, P., & Summers, J. D. (2012). Requirements in engineering design: What are we teaching? In I.Horvath, Z.Rusak, A.Albers, & M.Behrendt (Eds.), Tools and methods for competitive engineering (pp. 1319–1326). Karlsruhe: TMCE Organizing Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, S., & Summers, J. D. (2012). Representation: Metrics for analyzing sketches. International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (pp. DETC2012–71425).Chicago, IL: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtoglu, T., Campbell, M. I., & Linsey, J. S. (2009). An experimental study on the effects of a computational design tool on concept generation. Design Studies, 30, 676–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K., Oehlberg, L., & Agogino, A. (2009). Sketching in design journals: An analysis of visual representations in the product design process. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 73, 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Linsey, J. S., Clauss, E. F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J. T., Wood, K. L., & Markman, A. B. (2011). An experimental study of group idea generation techniques: Understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133, 031008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linsey, J. S., Wood, K. L., & Markman, A. B. (2008). Increasing innovation: Presentation and evaluation of the wordtree design-by-analogy method. Volume 4: 20th international conference on design theory and methodology; second international conference on micro- and nanosystems (pp. 21–32). Brooklyn, NY: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Macomber, B., & Yang, M. (2011). The role of sketch finish and style in user responses to early stage design concepts. International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. Washington, DC: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J. R. A., Ezhilan, T., Fadel, G. M., Summers, J. D., & Mocko, G. (2007). A hierarchical requirements modeling scheme to support engineering innovation. International conference for engineering design, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J. R. A., & Fadel, G. M. (2008). Affordance based design: A relational theory for design. Research in Engineering Design, 20, 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J. R. A., & Fadel, G. M. (2009). Affordance-based design methods for innovative design, redesign and reverse engineering. Research in Engineering Design, 20, 225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKoy, F. L., Vargas-Hernández, N., Summers, J. D., & Shah, J. J. (2001). Influence of design representation on effectiveness of idea generation. Proceedings of ASME design theory and methodology conference.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, J., Morkos, B., Mocko, G., & Summers, J. (2010). Requirement modeling systems for mechanical design: A systematic method for evaluating requirement management tools and languages. Volume 3: 30th computers and information in engineering conference, parts A and B (pp. 1247–1257). Montreal: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Mylopoulos, J., Chung, L., & Nixon, B. (1992). Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: A process-oriented approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18, 483–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, B. A., Wilson, J. O., Rosen, D., & Yen, J. (2009). Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 30, 737–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okudan, G. E., Chiu, M. C., Lin, C., Schmidt, L. C., Hernandez, N. V., & Linsey, J. (2010, April 29–May 1). A pilot exploration of systematic ideation methods and tools on design learning. 2010 9th international conference on information technology based higher education and training (ITHET), Cappadocia, Turkey (pp. 102–107). 10.1109/ITHET.2010.5480052.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, K., & Wood, K. (2001). Product design techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Wallace, K., & Blessing, L. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach. London: Springer-Verlag London Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Prudhomme, G., Pourray, F., & Summers, J. D. (2013). Enriching requirement-activities in design through French-US instruction comparison. International conference on engineering design. Seoul: The Design Society.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, S. (1991). Total design: Integrated methods for successful product engineering. Workingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, R., Caldwell, B. W., & Mocko, G. M. (2011). A user study to evaluate the function model and function interaction model for concept generation. Volume 9: 23rd international conference on design theory and methodology; 16th design for manufacturing and the life cycle conference (pp. 273–284). Washington, DC: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. L.III, Summers, J. D., & Mocko, G. M. (2011). Function representations in morphological charts: An experimental study on variety and novelty on means generated. Interdisciplinary design: Proceedings of the 21st CIRP design conference (p. 76). Daejeon: College International Pour La Recherché en Productique (CIRP).
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., & Robertson, J. (2006). Mastering the requirements process (Google eBook). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, L. C., Vargas, N. V, Kremer, G., & Linsey, J. (2010). Pilot of systematic ideation study with lessons learned. International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (pp. DETC2010–28785)Montreal: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, C., & Summers, J. D. (2012). A pilot protocol study on how designers construct function structures in novel design. In J.Gero (Ed.), 5th international conference on design computing and cognition (p. 37). College Station, TX: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122, 377–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernández, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24, 111–134.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J. J., Vargas-Hernández, N., Summers, J. D., & Kulkarni, S. (2001). Collaborative sketching (C-Sketch) – An idea generation technique for engineering design. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 168–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar, P., Morkos, B., & Summers, J. D. (2010). A hierarchical modeling scheme with non functional requirements. International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. (pp. DETC2010–28544).Montreal: ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., Richardson, J., Summers, J. D., & Mocko, G. M. (2012). Concept exploration through morphological charts: An experimental study. Journal of Mechanical Design, 134, pp. 051004.1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21, 837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, V., & Chakrabarti, A. (2010). Investigating novelty – Outcome relationships in engineering design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 161–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers, J., Morkos, B., & Joshi, S., (2014). “Requirements Evolution: Relating Functional and Non-Functional Requirement Change on Student Project Success”, International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Buffalo, NY, DETC2014-35023.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, D. G. (2010). The mechanical design process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K., & Eppinger, S. D. (2008). Product design and development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Hernández, N., Schmidt, L., & Kremer, G. E. O. (2012). An empirical study of the effectiveness of selected cognitive aids on multiple design tasks. In J.Gero (Ed.), Design computing and cognition. College Station, TX: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Veisz, D., Namouz, E., Joshi, S., & Summers, J. D. (2012). The impact of the disappearance of sketching: A case study. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 26, 317–335.
   Google Scholar
• Verhaegen, P. A., Vandevenne, D., Peeters, J., & Duflou, J. R. (2013). Refinements to the variety metric for idea evaluation. Design Studies, 34, 243–263.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, V. K., & Linsey, J. S. (2009). Enhancing student innovation: Physical models in the idea generation process. 39th IEEE on frontiers in education conference, 2009 (FIE'09) (pp. 1–6). San Antonio, TX: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M. C. (2009). Observations on concept generation and sketching in engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 20, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar