Product creativity assessment of innovations: considering the creative process

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996a). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996b). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (2012). Componential theory of creativity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, J., & Smith, D. C. (1996). In search of marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 174–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrini-Feyerabend, G., & Tarnowski, C. B. (2005). Participatory democracy in natural resource management: A “Columbus's Egg”? In P. J.Brosius (Ed.), Communities and conservation: Histories and politics of community-based natural resource management (pp. 69–89). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Schwarz, N. (2006). If I don't understand it, it must be new: Processing fluency and perceived product innovativeness. Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 319–320.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, M. M. (2011). Testing/measurement/assessment. In M.Runco & S. R.Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 458–464). Boston, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cramer, P. (2004). Storytelling, narrative, and the thematic apperception test. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communications Monographs, 51, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galak, J., & Nelson, L. D. (2011). The virtues of opaque prose: How lay beliefs about fluency influence perceptions of quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 250–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go-Gulf. (2012, January). Blog. Retrieved from June 25, 2013, from Smartphone users around the world – statistics and facts: www.go-gulf.com/blog/smartphone.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Bush, R. P., & Ortinau, D. J. (2009). Marketing research: In a digital information environment. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Helmholtz, H. V. (1896). Vorträge und Reden. Braunschweig: Vieweg.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006a). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 16, 155–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006b). Product creativity: Conceptual model, measurement and characteristics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 7, 395–412.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring consumer perception of product creativity: Impact on satisfaction and purchasability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 19, 223–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langellier, K. (2011). Storytelling in daily life: Performing narrative. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creative Research Journal, 13, 395–408.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J.Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 449–460). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Onarheim, B., & Christensen, B. T. (2012). Distributed idea screening in stage–gate development processes. Journal of Engineering Design, 23, 660–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, L., & Elliott, R. (2009). Strategic advertising management (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M., & Kim, D. (2011). The four P's of creativity: Person, process, product and press. In M.Runco & S. R.Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 534–537). Boston, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, R., Smith, D. C., & Park, C. (2001). Cross-functional product development teams, creativity and the innovativeness of new consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2009). If it's difficult to pronounce, it must be risky. Psychological Science, 20, 135–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger, D. (2013). Innovation commercialization and licensing in entrepreneurial business education. NCIIA's 17th annual conference, NCIIA, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Yannou, B. (2013). Which research in design creativity and innovation? Let us not forget the reality of companies. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1, 72–92.
   Google Scholar