Mitigating lack of knowledge: a study of ideas in innovative projects

References

• Bakker, H., Boersma, K., & Oreel, S. (2006). Creativity (ideas) management in industrial R&D organizations: A crea-political process model and an empirical illustration of Corus RD&T. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 296–309. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00397.x.
   Google Scholar
• Boeddrich, H.–J. (2004). Ideas in the workplace: A new approach towards organizing the fuzzy front end of the innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 274–285. doi:10.1111/j.0963-1690.2004.00316.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bracewell, R., Wallace, K., Moss, M., & Knott, D. (2009). Capturing design rationale. Computer-Aided Design, 41, 173–186. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2008.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation IDEO, the world bank. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10986/6068.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A. (2013). Understanding influences on engineering creativity and innovation: A biographical study of 12 outstanding engineering designers and innovators. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1, 56–68. doi:10.1080/21650349.2013.754643.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25, 427–441. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N., & Cross, A. C. (1996). Winning by design: The methods of Gordon Murray, racing car designer. Design Studies, 17, 91–107. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(95)00027-O.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22, 425–437. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activities. Design Studies, 16, 261–274. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(94)00012-3.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–35. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florén, H., & Frishammar, J. (2012). From preliminary ideas to corroborated product definitions: Managing the front end of new product development. California Management Review, 54, 20–43. doi:10.1525/cmr.2012.54.4.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. The journal of product innovation management, 19, 110–132. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1920110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gish, L., & Hansen, C. T. (2013). A socio-technical analysis of work with ideas in NPD: An industrial case study. Research in Engineering Design, 24, 411–427. doi:10.1007/s00163-013-0159-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., Belliveau, P., & Somermeyer, S. (2002). Fuzzy front end: Effective methods, tools, and techniques in the PDMA tool book for new product development. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gurteen, D. (1998). Knowledge, creativity and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2, 5–13. doi:10.1108/13673279810800744.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. T., & Andreasen, M. M. (2005). On the content of a product idea. In International conference on engineering design – ICED'05, Melbourne, Australia, August. Retrieved from http://www.designsociety.org/publication/22864/on_the_content_of_a_product_idea.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, C. T., & Andreasen, M. M. (2006). Conceiving product ideas in an initial and uncertain design situation. In NordDesign conference, Reykjavik, Iceland. Retrieved from http://www.designsociety.org/publication/24261/conceiving_product_ideas_in_an_initial_and_uncertain_design_situation.
   Google Scholar
• Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2003). A new approach of innovative design: An introduction to C–K theory. www.designsociety.org/publication/24204/a_new_approach_of_innovative_design_an_introduction_to_c–k_theory.
   Google Scholar
• Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2009). C–K design theory: An advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design, 19, 181–192. doi:10.1007/s00163-008-0043-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, C., & Hellström, T. (2002). Highways. Alleys and by-lanes: Charting the pathways for ideas and innovation in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11, 107–114. doi:10.1111/1467-8691.00242.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29, 160–180. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ive, J. (2011). Ive remembering jobs: Memorial talk live on apple campus. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2011/10/24/jonathan-ive-on-steve-jobs-and-the-fragility-of-ideas/.
   Google Scholar
• Kazakçi, A. O., & Tsoukias, A. (2005). Extending the C–K design theory: A theoretical background for personal design assistants. Journal of Engineering Design, 16, 399–411. doi:10.1080/09544820500131300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijkuit, B., & Van den Ende, J. (2007). The organizational life of an idea: Integrating social network, creativity and decision-making perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 863–882. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00695.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: Harnessing technology for economic growth. Washington, DC: National Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Langrish, J. Z. (2004). Darwinian design: The memetic evolution of design ideas. Design Issues, 20, 4–19. doi:10.1162/0747936042311968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michanek, J., & Breiler, A. (2009). The idea agent: A handbook on creative processes (1st ed.). Malmö: Idélaboratoriet i Skandinavien. ISBN: 9789163354502.
   Google Scholar
• Minneman, S. L. (1991). The social construction of a technical reality: Empirical studies of group engineering design practice. (Ph.D. Thesis), Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, B., Elg, M., & Bergman, B. (2002). Managing ideas for the development of new products. International Journal of Technology Management, 24, 498–513. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2002.003067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenheijm, S., van Genuchten, M., & Geurts, J. (1998, January 6–9). What's the problem? [electronic meeting systems]. In Proceedings of the thirty-first Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 1998, Kohala Coast, HI (Vol. 1, pp. 555–565). IEEE. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1109/HICSS.1998.653141.
   Google Scholar
• Poltrock, S., Grudin, J., Dumais, S., Fidel, R., Bruce, H., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2003, November). Information seeking and sharing in design teams. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work (pp. 239–247). ACM. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1145/958160.958198.
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, C., May, N., Finzen, J., Stathel, S., Kaufman, V., & Kremar, H. (2009). An idea ontology for innovation management. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(4), 1–18. doi:10.4018/jswis.2009100101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, F., & Tellier, A. (2011). How do actors shape social networks during the process of new product development? European Management Journal, 29, 414–430. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2011.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulders, F. E., & Bakker, H. J. (2012). Modeling the inter–subjective level of innovation. International Journal of Technology Management, 60, 221–241. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2012.049443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Managing innovation (2nd ed.). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32, 590–607. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbosch, B., Saatcioglu, A., & Fay, S. (2006). Idea management: A systemic view. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 259–288. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00590.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, J. (2000). Achieving innovation or the Holy Grail: Managing knowledge or managing commitment. International journal of Technology Management, 20, 819–838. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2000.002897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltschning, S., Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2013). Collaborative problem-solution co-evolution in creative design. Design Studies, 34, 515–542. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar