596
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Multi-dimensional creativity: a computational perspective

&
Pages 26-50 | Received 08 Apr 2014, Accepted 03 Mar 2015, Published online: 07 Apr 2015

References

  • Adamatzky, A. (2014). Cellular automata conductivity, memristivity and creativity in cellular automata. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8751, 1–5.
  • Adesope, O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research, 80, 207–245. doi:10.3102/0034654310368803.
  • Agustini, T., & Manurung, R. (2012). Automatic evaluation of punning riddle template extraction. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 134–139). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Albert, R. (1996). Some reasons why childhood creativity often fails to make it past puberty into the real world. New Directions in Child Development, 72, 3–30.
  • Alexiou, K., Zamenopoulos, T., & Gilbert, S. (2011). Imaging the designing brain: A Neurocognitive exploration of design thinking. In Design computing and cognition'10  (pp. 489–504). Netherlands: Springer.
  • al-Rifaie, M. M., & Bishop, J. M. (2015). Weak vs. strong computational creativity. In Computational creativity research: Towards creative machines  (pp. 37–49). Atlantis Press.10.2991/978-94-6239-085-0.
  • Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491–503. doi:10.1037/a0014201.
  • Axelrod, R. M. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Aziz-Zadeh, L., Liew, S. L., & Dandekar, F. (2013). Exploring the neural correlates of visual creativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 475–480. doi:10.1093/scan/nss021.
  • Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 169–175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.00337.x.
  • Basu, N., Nadeem, N. A., & Wani, T. A. (2011). A comparative study of creative potential and study habits of academically gifted male and female students. European Journal of Education and Learning, 10, 14–19.
  • Baydin, A. G., De Mantaras, R. L., & Ontanon, S. (2012). Automated generation of cross-domain analogies via evolutionary computation. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 25–32). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Becker, H. S. (1997). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279–286. doi:10.3758/BF03212593.
  • Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products – three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 333–346. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1104_7.
  • Bhawuk, D. P. (2003). Culture's influence on creativity: The case of Indian spirituality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(1), 1–22. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(02)00059-7.
  • Björkman, H. (2004). Design dialogue groups as a source of innovation: Factors behind group creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 97–108.
  • Blunt, S. (2010). The creative brain: Fundamental features, associated conditions and unifying neural mechanisms. In F. C. Rose (Ed.), Neurology of music (pp. 31–61). London: World Scientific.
  • Burnett, A., Khor, E., Pasquier, P., & Eigenfeldt, A. (2012). Validation of harmonic progression generator using classical music. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 126–133). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Cardoso, A., Veale, T., & Wiggins, G. A. (2009). Converging on the divergent: The history (and future) of the international joint workshops in computational creativity. AI Magazine, 30, 15–22.
  • Casas, A. K. (2003). Childhood playfulness as a predictor of adult playfulness and creativity: A longitudinal study(Ph.D. dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  • Charnley, J., Pease, A., & Colton, S. (2012). On the notion of framing in computational creativity. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 77–82). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Chen, M. H. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 105–116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00373.x.
  • Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–509.
  • Colton, S., Goodwin, J., & Veale, T. (2012). Full face poetry generation. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 95–102). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Crespo Cuaresma, J., Hlouskova, J., & Obersteiner, M. (2008). Natural disasters as creative destruction? Evidence from developing countries. Economic Inquiry, 46, 214–226. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00063.x.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325–339). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Davis, IV, H., van Anders, S. M., Ngan, E. T., Woodward, T. S., Van Snellenberg, J. X., Mayberg, H. S., & Liotti, M. (2012). Neural, mood, and endocrine responses in elite athletes relative to successful and failed performance videos. Journal of Clinical Sport Psychology, 6, 6–21.
  • DeFelipe, J. (2011). The evolution of the brain, the human nature of cortical circuits, and intellectual creativity. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 5, 29.10.3389/fnana.2011.00029.
  • Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1011–1026. doi:10.3758/BF03196731.
  • Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 822–848. doi:10.1037/a0019749.
  • Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_4.
  • Duffy, B. (2006). Supporting creativity and imagination in the early years. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill International.
  • Duflou, J. R., & Verhaegen, P. A. (2011). Systematic innovation through patent based product aspect analysis. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60, 203–206. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.007.
  • Eigenfeldt, A., Burnett, A., & Pasquier, P. (2012). Evaluating musical metacreation. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 140–144). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Elias, S. (2012). Origins of human innovation and creativity (Vol. 16). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Ellen Mathisen, G., Einarsen, S., Mykletun, R. (2012). Creative leaders promote creative organizations. International Journal of Manpower, 33, 367–382. doi:10.1108/01437721211243741.
  • Evans, G. (2009). Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Studies, 46, 1003–1040. doi:10.1177/0042098009103853.
  • Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Gebauer, D., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., & Ebner, F. (2010). Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 52, 1687–1695. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.072.
  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Fischer, G., Scharff, E., & Ye, Y. (2004). Fostering social creativity by increasing social capital. In M. Huysman & V. Wulf (Eds.), Social capital and information (pp. 55–399). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. London: Sage.
  • Fleck, L. (1981). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.
  • Gabora, L., & Dipaola, S. (2012). How did humans become so creative? A computational approach. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 203–210). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Gardner, H. E. (2011). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity as seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Ghandi. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gatti, L., Guerini, M., Callaway, C., Stock, O., & Strapparava, C. (2012). Creatively subverting messages in posters. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 175–179). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11, 26–36.
  • Gero, J. S. (2011). Fixation and commitment while designing and its measurement. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 45, 108–115. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01090.x.
  • Gilbert, N. (2006). When does social simulation need cognitive models? In Cognition and multi-agent interaction: From cognitive modeling to social simulation (pp. 428–432). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gilhooly, K. J., Georgiou, G., & Devery, U. (2013). Incubation and creativity: Do something different. Thinking and Reasoning, 19, 137–149. doi:10.1080/13546783.2012.749812.
  • Glăveanu, V. P (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 79–93. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007.
  • Gloor, P. A., Grippa, F., Putzke, J., Lassenius, C., Fuehres, H., Fischbach, K., & Schoder, D. (2012). Measuring social capital in creative teams through sociometric sensors. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, 2, 380–401. doi:10.1504/IJODE.2012.051442.
  • Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science, 23, 545–560. doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0071.
  • Goldenberg, J., & Efroni, S. (2001). Using cellular automata modeling of the emergence of innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 68, 293–308. doi:10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00095-0.
  • Grace, K., Gero, J., & Saunders, R. (2012). Representational affordances and creativity in association-based systems. Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 195–202). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Green, A. E., Kraemer, D. J., Fugelsang, J. A., Gray, J. R., & Dunbar, K. N. (2012). Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 264–272. doi:10.1037/a0025764.
  • Haller, C. S., Courvoisier, D. S., & Cropley, D. H. (2011). Perhaps there is accounting for taste: Evaluating the creativity of products. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 99–109. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.571182.
  • Hansen, H. K., & Niedomysl, T. (2009). Migration of the creative class: evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 191–206. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbn046.
  • Hempel, P. S., & Sue-Chan, C (2010). Culture and the assessment of creativity. Management and Organization Review, 6, 415–435. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2010.00189.x.
  • Hennessey, B. A. (2003). Is the social psychology of creativity really social? In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 181–201). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hoover, A. K., Szerlip, P. A., Norton, M. E., & Brindle, T. A. (2012). Generating a complete multipart musical composition from a single monophonic melody. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 111–118). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Hotho, S., & Champion, K. (2011). Small businesses in the new creative industries: innovation as a people management challenge. Management Decision, 49, 29–54. doi:10.1108/00251741111094428.
  • Indurkhya, B. (2012). Whence is creativity? In International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 62–66). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Isaksen, S. G., Puccio, G. J., & Treffinger, D. J. (1993). An ecological approach to creativity research: Profiling for creative problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 27, 149–170. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1993.tb00704.x.
  • Iyer, L. R., Doboli, S., Minai, A. A., Brown, V. R., Levine, D. S., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Neural dynamics of idea generation and the effects of priming. Neural Networks, 22, 674–686. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.019.
  • James, K., Brodersen, M., & Eisenberg, J. (2004). Workplace affect and workplace creativity: A review and preliminary model. Human Performance, 17, 169–194. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1702_3.
  • Jennings, K. E. (2012). Creative search trajectories and their implications. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 49–56). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Johnson, C. (2012). The creative computer as romantic hero? In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 57–61). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Jones, C. (2010). Finding a place in history: Symbolic and social networks in creative careers and collective memory. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 31, 726–748. doi:10.1002/job.704.
  • Jordanous, A. (2011). Evaluating evaluation: Assessing progress in computational creativity research. In Second International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 102–107). Mexico City, MX: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Jordanous, A., & Keller, B. (2012). Weaving creativity into the Semantic Web. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 216–220). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Jung, R. E., Segall, J. M., Jeremy Bockholt, H., Flores, R. A., Smith, S. M., Chavez, R. S., & Haier, R. J. (2010). Neuroanatomy of creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 31, 398–409.
  • JuršiČ, M., Cestnik, B., UrbanČiČ, T., & LavraČ, N. (2012). Cross-domain literature mining. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 33–40). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Kahl, C. H., & Hansen, H. (2015). Simulating creativity from a systems perspective: CRESY. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18, 4. Retrieved form http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/18/1/4.html.
  • Kaplan, S., Brooks-Shesler, L., King, E. B., & Zaccaro, S. (2009). Thinking inside the box: How conformity promotes creativity and innovation. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & J. A. Goncalo (Eds.), Creativity in groups (pp. 229–265). London: Emerald.
  • Kaufman, A. B., Butt, A. E., Kaufman, J. C., & Colbert-White, E. N. (2011). Towards a neurobiology of creativity in nonhuman animals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125, 255–272. doi:10.1037/a0023147.
  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.1037/a0013688.
  • Keegan, R. (1996). Creativity from childhood to adulthood: A difference of degree and not of kind. New Directions in Child Development, 72, 3–30.
  • Keller, R. M., Toman-Yih, A., Schofield, A., & Merritt, Z. (2012). A creative improvisational companion based on idiomatic harmonic bricks. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 155–159). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Kijkuit, B., & Van Den Ende, J. (2007). The organizational life of an idea: Integrating social network, creativity and decision-making perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 863–882. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00695.x.
  • Kim, K. H. (2007). Exploring the interactions between Asian culture (Confucianism) and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 41, 28–53. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01280.x.
  • Kim, M. J., Choi, J. N., & Park, O. S. (2012). Intuitiveness and creativity in groups: Cross-level interactions between group conflict and individual cognitive styles. Social Behaviour and Personality: An International Journal, 40, 1419–1434. doi:10.2224/sbp.2012.40.9.1419.
  • Koestler, A., & Smythies, J. R. (Eds.). (1969). Beyond reductionism: New perspectives in the life sciences. London: Hutchinson.
  • Kowatari, Y., Lee, S. H., Yamamura, H., Nagamori, Y., Levy, P., Yamane, S., & Yamamoto, M. (2009). Neural networks involved in artistic creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1678–1690. doi:10.1002/hbm.20633.
  • Krapivsky, P. L., Redner, S., & Volovik, D. (2011). Reinforcement-driven spread of innovations and fads. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2011, P12003, doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/12/P12003.
  • Kuhn, S. L. (2012). Emergent patterns of creativity and innovation in early technologies. In Origins of human innovation and creativity (pp. 69–88). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Lee, N., & Drever, E. (2013). The creative industries, creative occupations and innovation in London. European Planning Studies, 21, 1977–1997. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722969.
  • Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, Z. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies, 38, 879–891. doi:10.1080/0034340042000280910.
  • Lemons, G. (2005). When the horse drinks: Enhancing everyday creativity using elements of improvisation. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 25–36. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_3.
  • Leon, N. (2009). The future of computer-aided innovation. Computers in Industry, 60, 539–550. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2009.05.010.
  • Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin Press HC.
  • Li, B., Zook, A., Davis, N., & Riedl, M. O. (2012). Goal-driven conceptual blending. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 9–16). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Linson, A., Dobbyn, C., & Laney, R. (2012). Critical issues in evaluating freely improvising interactive music systems. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 145–149). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Lubart, T. (2010). Cross-cultural perspectives on creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 265–276). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Maher, M. L. (2012). Computational and collective creativity: Who's being creative? In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 67–71). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Maher, M. L., Hammond, K., Pease, A., Perez y Perez, R., Ventura, D., & Wiggins, G. (Eds.). (2012). Third International Conference on Computational Creativity. Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Mahmood, B. (2008). Sociological study of behavioural change in textile manufacturing(Ph.D. dissertation). University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad.
  • Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14, 227–249. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj017.
  • Mainemelis, C. (2002). Time and timelessness: Creativity in (and out of) the temporal dimension. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 227–238. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_9.
  • Maquet, P., & Ruby, P. (2004). Psychology: Insight and the sleep committee. Nature, 427, 304–305.
  • Marshall, P. (2009). Six renaissance men and women: Innovation, biography and cultural creativity in Tudor England, c. 1450–1560. The English Historical Review, CXXIV, 1160–1162. doi:10.1093/ehr/cep229.
  • Martinsen, Ø. L. (2011). The creative personality: A synthesis and development of the creative person profile. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 185–202. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.595656.
  • Mayer, J. D., & Lang, J. L. (2011). A three-dimensional view of personality. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 36–39. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.544635.
  • McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204.
  • McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 409–426. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_11.
  • McGrew, S. (2012). Creativity in nature. In L. Swan, R. Gordon, & J. Seckbach (Eds.), Origin(s) of design in nature (pp. 43–55). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Meyer, M., Lorscheid, I., & Troitzsch, K. G. (2009). The development of social simulation as reflected in the first ten years of JASSS: A citation and co-citation analysis. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12, 12. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/4/12.html.
  • Miller, B. L., & Hou, C. E. (2004). Portraits of artists: Emergence of visual creativity in dementia. Archives of Neurology, 61, 842. doi:10.1001/archneur.61.6.842.
  • Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.
  • Monteith, K., Martinez, T., & Ventura, D. (2012). Automatic generation of melodic accompaniments for lyrics. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 87–94). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Montfort, N., & Fedorova, N. (2012). Small-scale systems and computational creativity. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 82–86). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Mora, E. (2006). Collective production of creativity in the Italian fashion system. Poetics, 34, 334–353. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2006.10.003.
  • Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity and development (pp. 61–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Morin, E. (1992). Method, towards a study of humankind. Berne, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
  • Morris, R. G., Burton, S. H., Bodily, P. M., & Ventura, D. (2012). Soup over bean of pure joy: Culinary ruminations of an artificial chef. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 119–125). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Nemeth, C. J., Personnaz, B., Personnaz, M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2004). The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 365–374. doi:10.1002/ejsp.210.
  • Noori, M. M., Ahadi, H., Askari, P., Hashemian, K., & Mazaheri, M. M. (2012). The link between creativity and mental health among the students of the universities in Tehran. Journal of American Science, 8 , 709–718.
  • Nowak, A., & Lewenstein, M. (1996). Modelling social change with cellular automata. In Modelling and simulation in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view (pp. 249–285). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Noy, L., Hart, Y., Andrew, N., Ramote, O., Mayo, A., & Alon, U. (2012). A quantitative study of creative leaps. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 72–76). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • O'Donoghue, D. P., & Keane, M. T. (2012). A creative analogy machine: Results and challenges. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 17–24). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Ogawa, S., Indurkhya, B., & Byrski, A. (2012). A meme-based architecture for modeling creativity. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 170–174). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Ohly, S., Kase, R., & Škerlavaj, M. (2010). Networks for generating and for validating ideas: The social side of creativity. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 12, 41–52. doi:10.5172/impp.12.1.41.
  • Otte, A. (2001). The plasticity of the brain. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 28, 263–265. doi:10.1007/s002590000381.
  • Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (Eds.). (2003). Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Paulus, P. B., Levine, D. S., Brown, V., Minai, A. A., & Doboli, S. (2010). Modeling ideational creativity in groups: Connecting cognitive, neural, and computational approaches. Small Group Research, 41, 688–724. doi:10.1177/1046496410369561.
  • Pérez y Pérez, R. P., Morales, N., & Rodríguez, L. (2012). Illustrating a computer generated narrative. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 103–110). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Rank, S., Hoffmann, S., Struck, H. G., Spierling, U., & Petta, P. (2012). Creativity in configuring affective agents for interactive storytelling. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 165–169). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Ritchie, G. (2012). A closer look at creativity as search. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 41–48). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Rosenthal, R. N., & Westreich, L. M. (2010). Cosmetic psychopharmacology: Drugs that enhance wellbeing, performance, and creativity. In D. Brizer & R. Castaneda (Eds.), Clinical Addiction Psychiatry  (pp. 72–87). Cambridge University Press.
  • Russell, S. J, & Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Sak, U. (2004). About creativity, giftedness, and teaching the creatively gifted in the classroom. Roeper Review, 26, 216–222. doi:10.1080/02783190409554272.
  • Saracho, O. (2012). Creativity theories and related teachers' beliefs. Early Child Development and Care, 182, 35–44. doi:10.1080/03004430.2010.535899.
  • Saunders, M. N., Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2011). Research methods for business students. New York: Pearson Education.
  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34, 148–165. doi:10.1177/0305735606061850.
  • Scott, A. J. (2006). Creative cities: Conceptual issues and policy questions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(1), 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.0735-2166.2006.00256.x.
  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004.
  • Sheldon, K. M., Cheng, C., & Hilpert, J. (2011). Understanding well-being and optimal functioning: Applying the multilevel personality in context (MPIC) model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.532477.
  • Shepard, B. (2011). Play, creativity, and social movements. New York: Routledge.
  • Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in Science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, R., Dennis, A., & Ventura, D. (2012). Automatic composition from non-musical inspiration sources. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 160–164). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Smith, S. M., Gerkens, D. R., Shah, J. J., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2006). Empirical studies of creative cognition in idea generation. In Creativity and innovation in organizational teams (pp. 3–20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.). (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Snyder, A. W., Ellwood, S., & Chi, R. P. (2012). Switching on creativity. Scientific American Mind, 23, 58–62. doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind1112-58.
  • Sosa, R., & Gero, J. S. (2005). A computational study of creativity in design: The role of society. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, Design and Manufacturing (AIEDAM), 19, 229–244.
  • Sosa, R., & Gero, J. S. (2012). Brainstorming in solitude and teams: The role of group influence. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 188–196). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Sosa, R., & Gero, J. S (2013). Multilevel computational creativity. In Fourth International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 198–204). Sydney, Australia: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Sosa, R., Gero, J. S, & Jennings, K. (2009). Growing and destroying the worth of ideas. In 7th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 295–304). Berkeley, CA: Association for Computing Machinery.
  • Starko, A. J. (2009). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight. New York: Routledge.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Unified psychology. The American Psychologist, 56, 1069–1079. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.12.1069.
  • Storm, B. C., & Angello, G. (2010). Overcoming fixation: Creative problem solving and retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 21, 1263–1265. doi:10.1177/0956797610379864.
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Why societies need dissent. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Syed, M. (2010). Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckham, and the science of success. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Tan, A. G. (1997). What can we learn from a century of cultivating creative thinking in Japan? Teaching and Learning, 18, 9–18.
  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 277–293. doi:10.1037/a0020952.
  • Toivanen, J., Toivonen, H., Valitutti, A., & Gross, O. (2012). Corpus-based generation of content and form in poetry. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 211–215). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Torrance, E. (1981). Predicting the creativity of elementary school children (1958–80) and the teacher who ‘made a difference’. Gifted Children Quarterly, 25, 55–62. doi:10.1177/001698628102500203.
  • Van Mierlo, H., Rutte, C. G., Kompier, M. A., & Doorewaard, H. A. (2005). Self-managing teamwork and psychological well-being: Review of a multilevel research domain. Group and Organization Management, 30, 211–235. doi:10.1177/1059601103257989.
  • Veale, T. (2012). From conceptual ‘mash-ups’ to ‘bad-ass’ blends. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 1–8). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1990). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 28, 84–96. doi:10.2753/RPO1061-0405280184.
  • Webb, G. R., & Chevreau, F. R. (2006). Planning to improvise: the importance of creativity and flexibility in crisis response. International Journal of Emergency Management, 3, 66–72. doi:10.1504/IJEM.2006.010282.
  • Wehner, L., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Magyari–Beck, I. (1991). Current approaches used in studying creativity: An exploratory investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 261–271.
  • Weisberg, R. (1993). Creativity, beyond the myth of genius. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
  • Westmeyer, H. (2009). Kreativität als relationales Konstrukt [Creativity as a relational construct]. In E. H. Witte & C. H. Kahl (Eds.), Sozialpsychologie der Kreativität und Innovation (pp. 11–26). Lengerich: Pabst Science.
  • Wiggins, G. (2012). Crossing the threshold paradox. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 180–187). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.
  • Wong, T. (2012). To copy or not to copy, that is the question: The game theory approach to protecting fashion designs. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 160, 1139–1193.
  • Zhang, W., & Niu, W. (2013). Creativity in the later life: Factors associated with the creativity of the Chinese elderly. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 47, 60–76. doi:10.1002/jocb.23.
  • Zhu, J. (2012). Towards a new evaluation approach in computational narrative systems. In Third International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 150–154). Dublin, Ireland: Association for Computational Creativity.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.