Non-functional biomimicry: utilizing natural patterns in order to provoke attention responses

References

• Ball, P. (2008). Water: Water – An enduring mystery. Nature, 452, 291–292.10.1038/452291a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, P. (2011). Shapes: Nature’s patterns: A tapestry in three parts (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, P., & Borley, N. R. (1999). The self-made tapestry: Pattern formation in nature (Vol. 198). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, M. E. (2008). The three-dimensional internet. EContent, 31, 52–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benyus, J. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York, NY: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Bottino, A., & Laurentini, A. (2010, June). The analysis of facial beauty: An emerging area of research in pattern analysis.In International Conference Image Analysis and Recognition (pp. 425–435). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J., Franks, H. R., Sneyd, J., Theraula, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, A. T. (2000). On the evolution of human aesthetic preferences. Assemblage: University of Sheffield Graduate Student Journal of Archaeology, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. A. (1979). The curves of life. New York, NY: Dover Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1986). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1997). Climbing mount improbable. WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devaney, R. L. (1999). The Mandelbrot set and the Farey tree and Fibonacci sequences. American Mathematical Monthly, 10, 286–302.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. A. (1988). The golden ratio and Fibonacci numbers. Singaproe: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, D. (2009). The art instinct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enquist, M., & Arak, A. (1994). Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature, 372, 169–172.10.1038/372169a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (2010). Evolutionary influence on human landscape preference. Environment and Behavior, 42, 479–493.10.1177/0013916509341244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K. T. (2007). Responses to six major terrestrial biomes in terms of scenic beauty, preference, and restorativeness. Environment & Behavior, 39, 529–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen, R. M. (2009). The emergence of patterning in life’s origin and evolution. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 53, 683–692. doi:10.1387/ijdb.092936rh
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen, R. M., Griffin, P., Carothers, J., & Szostak, J. (2007). Functional information and the emergence of biocomplexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 8574–8581.10.1073/pnas.0701744104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, S., & Brebbia, C. A. (2012). Design and nature VI: Comparing design in nature with science and engineering (Vol. 4). WIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Holldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (1990). The ants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a ‘good genes’ explanation of the attractiveness-symmetry relationship. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 417–429.10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00083-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joye, Y. (2007). Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilicarchitecture. Review of General Psychology, 11, 305.
   Google Scholar
• Joye, Y., Poels, K., Willems, K., & Saad, G. (2011). “Evolutionary Store Atmospherics” – Designing with evolution in mind.
   Google Scholar
• Judelman, G. (2004, July 14–16). Aesthetics and inspiration for visualization design: Bridging the gap between art and science. Information Visualisation, 2004. IV 2004. Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on, 245–250.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplinsky, J. (2006). Biomimicry versus humanism. Architectural Design, 76, 66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1995). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. (2006). No, Second Life is not overhyped. Fortune Magazine [ online]. Retrieved January 19, 2010, from http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/09/technology/fastforward_secondlife.fortune/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Klein, L. (2009). A phenomenological interpretation of Biomimicry and its potential value for sustainable design ( Doctoral dissertation). Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2005). Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 603–618. doi:10.1002/acp.1088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, L. B. (1971). Trees and streams: The efficiency of branching patterns. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31, 339–354.10.1016/0022-5193(71)90192-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. H., Zeng, Q. Y., Xiao, Y. L., Fu, S. Y., & Zhou, B. L. (1995). Biomimicry of bamboo bast fiber with engineering composite materials. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 3, 125–130.10.1016/0928-4931(95)00115-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R., Liaw, S., & Maini, P. (2006). Two-stage Turing model for generating pigment patterns on the leopard and the jaguar. Physical Review E, 74, 11914.10.1103/PhysRevE.74.011914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livio, M. (2008). The golden ratio: The story of phi, the world’s most astonishing number. Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot, B. B. (1983). The fractal geometry of nature. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, G., & Sarikaya, M. (2002). Rigid biological composite materials: Structural examples for biomimetic design. Experimental Mechanics, 42, 395–403.10.1007/BF02412144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinhardt, H. (1995). The algorithmic beauty of sea shells. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-13135-0
   Google Scholar
• Millonas, M. M., & Rauch, E. M. (2004). The role of trans-membrane signal transduction in turing-type cellular pattern formation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 226, 401–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orians, G. H. (1986). An ecological evolutionary approach to landscape aesthetics. Landscape Meanings and Values, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Orians, G. H., Heerwagen, J. H., Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 555–579). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Q., & Swinney, H. L. (1991). Transition from a uniform state to hexagonal and striped Turing patterns. Nature, 352, 610–612.10.1038/352610a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passino, K. M. (2004). Biomimicry for optimization, control, and automation. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, S. T., Olausson, M. S., & Reed-Daley, B. (2011). Effects of apophenia on multiple-choice exam performance. Robert Morris University.
   Google Scholar
• Peitgen, H. O., & Richter, P. H. (1986). The beauty of fractals. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-61717-1
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, S. T., & White, P. S. (Eds.). (2013). The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Prusinkiewicz, P., & Lindenmayer, A. (2012). The algorithmic beauty of plants. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 15–51.
   Google Scholar
• Reisinger, J., Kappel, J., & Cresp, J. (2008, May). Mashing the real world with virtual worlds a monetizing opportunity. In Innovations in NGN: Future Network and Services, 2008. K-INGN 2008. First ITU-T Kaleidoscope Academic Conference (pp. 111–116). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., & Sumich, A (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 659–669.10.3758/BF03208842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. W., & Peters, M. (2005). Attractiveness and sexual behaviour: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 186–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L. A., Clark, A., Kalick, S. M., Hightower, A., & McKay, R. (2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 31–46.10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00060-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, R. (2001). A new aesthetic for environmental awareness: Chaos theory, the beauty of nature, and our broader humanistic identity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41, 59–95.10.1177/0022167801412006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietkerk, M., & Van de Koppel, J. (2008). Regular pattern formation in real ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 169–175.10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. S. (2011). The handbook of knowledge-based coaching. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shu, L. H., Ueda, K., Chiu, I., & Cheong, H. (2011). Biologically inspired design. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60, 673–693.10.1016/j.cirp.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman, P. (2008). The evolution of designs: Biological analogy in architecture and the applied arts. Abingdon, OX: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A. (2001). Heuristic evaluation of website attractiveness and usability. In International workshop on design, specification, and verification of interactive systems (pp. 183–198). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Swaddle, J. P., & Cuthill, I. C. (1995). Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: Symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proceedings: Biological Sciences, 261, 111-116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teuscher, C. (2004). Life and legacy of a great thinker.10.1007/978-3-662-05642-4
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. W. (1915). On growth and form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tinsley, A., Midha, P. A., Nagel, R. L., McAdams, D. A., Stone, R. B., & Shu, L. H. (2007). Exploring the use of functional models as a foundation for biomimetic conceptual design. In ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 79–92). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230.10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wannarumon, S., & Bohez, E. L. J. (2006). A new aesthetic evolutionary approach for jewelry design. Computer-Aided Design & Applications, 3, 385–394.10.1080/16864360.2006.10738477
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. C. (1966). Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinemento of Lack’sp rinciple. The American Naturalist, 100, 687–690.10.1086/282461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaidel, D. W., & Hessamian, M. (2010). Asymmetry and symmetry in the beauty of human faces. Symmetry, 2, 136–149.10.3390/sym2010136
   Google Scholar