‘Fixation’ and ‘the pivot’: balancing persistence with flexibility in design and entrepreneurship

References

• Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80, 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addis, W. (1990). Structural engineering: The nature of theory and design. New York, NY: Ellis Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 18–26.10.1002/jocb.1997.31.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493–520.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. D. (1994). Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Brown, G. (2012). Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 60–71.10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baribeau, S. (2012, October 17). What is the pivot? We asked Intel, Zappos, Instagram, Pandora, Box … Retrieved December 18, 2014, from https://www.fastcompany.com/3002026/what-pivot-we-asked-intel-zappos-instagram-pandora-box
   Google Scholar
• Bilalić, M., & McLeod, P. (2014). Why good thoughts block better ones. Scientific American, 310, 74–79.10.1038/scientificamerican0314-74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovey, W. H., & Hede, A. (2001). Resistance to organisational change: The role of defence mechanisms. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16, 534–548.10.1108/EUM0000000006166
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Breakwell, G. M. (2006). Interviewing methods. In G. M. Breakwell, S. Hammond, C. Fife-Schaw, & J. A. Smith (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (3rd ed.). (pp. 232–253). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9–30.10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardon, M. S., Zietsma, C., Saparito, P., Matherne, B. P., & Davis, C. (2005). A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 23–45.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2011). The influence of different pictorial representations during idea generation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 130–146.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01092.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., & Nataraju, B. S. (2005). A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. AI EDAM, 19, 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43, 354–363. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheong, H., & Shu, L. (2013). Using templates and mapping strategies to support analogical transfer in biomimetic design. Design Studies, 34, 706–728.10.1016/j.destud.2013.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., & Raynor, M. E. (2013). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Constant, E. W. (1980). The origins of the turbojet revolution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crilly, N. (2010). The structure of design revolutions: Kuhnian paradigm shifts in creative problem solving. Design Issues, 26, 54–66.10.1162/desi.2010.26.1.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N. (2015). Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers. Design Studies, 38, 54–91.10.1016/j.destud.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., & Cardoso, C. (2017). Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design? Design Studies, 50, 1–38.10.1016/j.destud.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croskerry, P. (2003). The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Academic Medicine, 78, 775–780.10.1097/00001888-200308000-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Dane, E. (2010). Reconsidering the trade-off between expertise and flexibility: A cognitive entrenchment perspective. Academy of Management Review, 35, 579–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deldin, J.-M., & Schuknecht, M. (2013). The AskNature database: Enabling solutions in biomimetic design. In A. K. Goel, D. A. McAdams, & R. B. Stone (Eds.), Biologically inspired design: Computational methods and tools (pp. 17–27). London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1–113. doi:10.1037/h0093599
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1246–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 25–32.10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. J., & Reingold, E. M. (2014). The Einstellung effect in anagram problem solving: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, 5, 679.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 454–459.10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, M. J. (1998). Conceptual design for engineers (3rd ed.). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• German, T. P., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). Functional fixedness in a technologically sparse culture. Psychological Science, 16(1), 1–5.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00771.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilad, B. (1984). Entrepreneurship: The issue of creativity in the market place. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 151–161.10.1002/jocb.1984.18.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1052–1081.10.2307/256645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, W. P. (1976). Transfer and Einstellung effects of examples on devising computer algorithms ( Master of arts thesis, Department of Mathematics). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Goel, A. K., Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B., & Helms, M. (2012). Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative – four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: A study in biologically inspired design. Computer Aided Design, 44, 879–900. doi:10.1016/j.cad.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, M. G. (2012). To thine own self be true? The process and consequences of “pivoting” during idea-stage entrepreneurship ( PhD dissertation). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Hassard, S. T., Blandford, A., & Cox, A. L. (2009). Analogies in design decision-making. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: Celebrating people and technology (pp. 140–148). Cambridge, UK: British Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Maier, A., Onarheim, B., & Friis-Olivarius, M. (2013). Overcoming design fixation through education and creativity methods. In 19th international conference on engineering design: ICED 13.
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kassirer, J. P., & Kopelman, R. I. (1989). Cognitive errors in diagnosis: Instantiation, classification, and consequences. The American Journal of Medicine, 86, 433–441.10.1016/0002-9343(89)90342-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keinz, P., & Prügl, R. (2010). A user community-based approach to leveraging technological competences: An exploratory case study of a technology start-up from MIT. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 269–289.10.1111/caim.2010.19.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, S., & Butler, J. E. (2007). Creativity: A key link to entrepreneurial behavior. Business Horizons, 50, 365–372.10.1016/j.bushor.2007.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linsey, J. S., Tseng, I., Fu, K., Cagan, J., Wood, K. L., & Schunn, C. (2010). A study of design fixation, its mitigation and perception in engineering design faculty. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132, 041003.10.1115/1.4001110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton, J. D., & Walsh, S. T. (2008). A theory of innovation for process-based innovations such as nanotechnology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 583–594.10.1016/j.techfore.2007.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 54(6), 1–95. doi:10.1037/h0093502
   Google Scholar
• Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12, 181–194. doi:10.1037/h0071361
   Google Scholar
• Maine, E. (2013). Scientist-entrepreneurs as the catalysts of nanotechnology commercialization. Reviews in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 2, 301–308.10.1166/rnn.2013.1037
   Google Scholar
• Maine, E., Soh, P.-H., & Dos Santos, N. (2015). The role of entrepreneurial decision-making in opportunity creation and recognition. Technovation, 39–40, 53–72.10.1016/j.technovation.2014.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marradi, A. (1990). Classification, typology, taxonomy. Quality & Quantity, 24, 129–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezias, J., Grinyer, P., & Guth, W. D. (2001). Changing collective cognition: A process model for strategic change. Long Range Planning, 34, 71–95.10.1016/S0024-6301(00)00096-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, D. P., Hernández, A. A., Yang, M. C., Otto, K. N., Hölttä-Otto, K., Linsey, J. S., … Linden, A. (2014). Fundamental studies in Design-by-Analogy: A focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. Design Studies, 35, 232–272.10.1016/j.destud.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., & Gaddis, B. (2003). How creative leaders think: Experimental findings and cases. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 411–432.10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00045-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazar, J. (2013, August 10). 14 Famous business pivots. Retrieved December 18, 2014, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonnazar/2013/10/08/14-famous-business-pivots/
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., & Klebahn, P. (2011, February 28). The strategic pivot: Rules for entrepreneurs and other innovators. Retrieved December 18, 2014, from https://hbr.org/2011/02/how-and-when-to-pivot-rules-fo
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 84–107.10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries, E. (2009, June 22). Lessons learned: Pivot, don’t jump to a new vision. Retrieved December 18, 2014, from https://www.startuplessonslearned.com/2009/06/pivot-dont-jump-to-new-vision.html
   Google Scholar
• Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How constant innovation creates radically successful businesses. New York, NY: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. (2001). Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 287–306.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, E. (2013). Kill your darlings? Experiencing, maintaining, and changing psychological ownership in creative work ( PhD dissertation). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
   Google Scholar
• Sarri, K. K., Bakouros, I. L., & Petridou, E. (2010). Entrepreneur training for creativity and innovation. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34, 270–288. doi:10.1108/03090591011031755
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, S. (2012). Breaking Free: A qualitative analysis of entrenchment and disruptive strategies of corporate leaders (Qualitative Research Report for the Doctor of Management Program). Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., & Nicolaou, N. (2015). Creative personality, opportunity recognition and the tendency to start businesses: A study of their genetic predispositions. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 407–419.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S. A., & Ulrich, K. T. (2004). 50th anniversary article: Technological innovation, product development, and entrepreneurship in management science. Management Science, 50, 133–144. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekerjian, D. (1991). Uncommon genius: How great ideas are born. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sio, U. N., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2015). Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes. Design Studies, 39, 70–99.10.1016/j.destud.2015.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, G. T., & Winslow, E. K. (1988). Toward a descriptive profile of the entrepreneur. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 22, 162–171.10.1002/(ISSN)2162-6057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solon, O. (2012, April 16). Moonfruit’s Wendy Tan White: How to pivot your startup if necessary (Wired UK). Retrieved December 18, 2014, from https://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2012/05/how-to/how-to-pivot-if-necessary
   Google Scholar
• Stempfle, J. (2011). Overcoming organizational fixation: Creating and sustaining an innovation culture. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 116–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, T. E., & Podolny, J. M. (1996). Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246.10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todnem, R. B. (2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5, 369–380.10.1080/14697010500359250
   Google Scholar
• Töre Yargin, G., & Crilly, N. (2015). Information and interaction requirements for software tools supporting analogical design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 29, 203–214.10.1017/S0890060415000074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 439–465.10.2307/2392832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L. A., & Crilly, N. (2016). Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges. Design Studies, 42, 1–32.10.1016/j.destud.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, V. K., & Linsey, J. S. (2013). Role of sunk cost in engineering idea generation: An experimental investigation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135, 121002–121002.10.1115/1.4025290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, V., Atilola, O., Esposito, N., & Linsey, J. (2014). A study on the role of physical models in the mitigation of design fixation. Journal of Engineering Design, 25, 25–43.10.1080/09544828.2014.885934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B. (2004). Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 173–188.10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00005-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youmans, R. J., & Arciszewski, T. (2014). Design fixation: Classifications and modern methods of prevention. AI EDAM, 28(Special Issue 02), 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2007). Expanding the scope and impact of organisational creativity research. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 347–368). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar