The effect of ambiguous visual stimuli on creativity in design idea generation

References

• Abernathy Tannehill, R. L. (1998). An analysis of selected creativity tests administered to students affiliated with the Cherokee tribe. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(7–A), 2526.
   Google Scholar
• Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. Oxford, UK: Basic.
   Google Scholar
• Ashby, F. G., & Ell, S. W. (2002). Single versus multiple systems of category learning: Reply to nosofsky and kruschke (2002). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(1), 175–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruah, J., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Enhancing group creativity: The search for synergy. Creativity in groups (pp. 29–56). UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Basadur, M. (1995). The power of innovation: How to make innovation a way of life and put creative solutions to work. UK: Financial Times Management.
   Google Scholar
• Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 80(3), 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process-analytic models of creative capacities: Operations influencing the combination-and-reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 37–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, M. A. (2014). Groups as Analogical Information Processors: Implications for Group Creativity, ( Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas, Austin, USA
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. (1997) Multiple Code Theory. (n.d.). Retrieved May, 2015, from http://www.thereferentialprocess.org/theory/multiple-code-theory
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. (2002). The referential process, consciousness, and the sense of self. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 22(5), 766–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, C., Badke-Schaub, P., & Luz, A. (2009). Design fixation on non-verbal stimuli: The influence of simple vs. rich pictorial information on design problem-solving. ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 995–1002. San Diego, CA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. (2005). Design aided by visual displays: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22, 250–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, C. I. (1985). Review of the Torrance tests of creative thinking. The Ninth Mental Measurements Yearbook, 2, 1631–1632.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, P., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. (2014). A new strategy to reduce design fixation: Presenting partial photographs to designers. Design Studies, 35(4), 374–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2016). Creative analogy use in a heterogeneous design team: The pervasive role of background domain knowledge. Design Studies, 46, 38–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition, 35(1), 29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. (1979). Quality versus quantity: The need to control for the fluency factor in originality scores from the Torrance tests. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2(2), 70-79.
   Google Scholar
• Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, M. L., & Levie, W. H. (1978). Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gabora, L. M. (2000). Conceptual closure: How memories are woven into an interconnected worldview. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 901(1), 42–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanington, B. (2003). Methods in the making: A perspective on the state of human research in design. Design Issues, 19(4), 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heausler, N. L., & Thompson, B. (1988). Structure of the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48(2), 463–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. (1998). On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. R., Chang, C., Krantzler, J., & Bailey, B. P. (2009). Getting inspired!: Understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 87–96 Boston, Mass: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Howard-Jones, P., & Murray, S. (2003). Ideational productivity, focus of attention, and context. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 153–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, S. G., & Puccio, G. J. (1988). Adaption-innovation and the Torrance tests of creative thinking: The level-style issue revisited. Psychological Reports, 63(2), 659–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israeli, N. (1962). Creative processes in painting. The Journal of General Psychology, 67(2), 251–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israeli, N. (1981). Decision in painting and sculpture. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 3(1), 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). A computational analysis of consciousness. Cognition & Brain Theory, 6(4), 499–508.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2006a). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H. (2006b). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 251–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L. (2006). The latent structure and measurement invariance of scores on the Torrance tests of creative thinking–figural. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 459–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton, M. (1978). Have adaptors and innovators equal levels of creativity? Psychological Reports, 42(3), 695–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic explorations in art. Oxford, UK: International Universities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 285–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, J. R. (2010). In search of synergy in small group performance. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Stenberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 289–332). CA, USA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malaga, R. A. (2000). The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems. Decision Support Systems, 29(2), 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249–268). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michael, W. B., Zimmerman, W. S., & Guilford, J. (1950). An investigation of two hypotheses regarding the nature of the spatial-relations and visualization factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10(2), 187–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, W. (1989). Design discipline and the significance of visuo-spatial thinking. Design Studies, 10(1), 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Nagai, Y., & Taura, T. (2009). Design motifs: Abstraction driven creativity. Special Issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 16(2), 62.
   Google Scholar
• Nagai, Y., Taura, T., & Mukai, F. (2009). Concept blending and dissimilarity: Factors for creative concept generation process. Design Studies, 30(6), 648–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1963). Decision-time without reaction-time: Experiments in visual scanning. The American Journal of Psychology, 76(3), 376–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puccio, G. J., Treffinger, D. J., & Talbot, R. J. (1995). Exploratory examination of relationships between creativity styles and creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 157–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reigeluth, C., & Stein, R. (1983). Elaboration theory. In Charles M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 335–381). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rips, L. J. (2001). Two kinds of reasoning. Psychological Science, 12(2), 129–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess: The creative process in art, science, and other fields. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2008). The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 22(2), 101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taura, T., & Nagai, Y. (2013). Concept generation for design creativity: A systematized theory and methodology. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (2013). Creative conspiracy: The new rules of breakthrough collaboration. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P., & Horng, R. Y. (1980). Creativity and style of learning and thinking characteristics of adaptors and innovators. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 5, 80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Tovey, M. J. (1992). Intuitive and objective processes in automotive design. Design Studies, 13(1), 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T., Smith, S., & Finke, R. (1999). Creative cognition. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 189–212). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B. (2004). Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. B., Patterson, M. J., & Sifonis, C. M. (2004). The role of specificity and abstraction in creative idea generation. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. Oxford, UK: Follett Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkenfeld, M. J., & Ward, T. B. (2001). Similarity and emergence in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(1), 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, E. J. (1996). Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(3), 434–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4(2), 167–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar