Forms of stimuli and their effects on idea generation in terms of creativity metrics and non-obviousness

References

• Atilola, O., Tomko, M., & Linsey, J. S. (2016). The effects of representation on idea generation and design fixation: A study comparing sketches and function trees. Design Studies, 42, 110–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Aurup, G. M., & Akgunduz, A. (2012). Pair-wise preference comparisons using alpha-peak frequencies. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 16(4), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2012-0021
   Google Scholar
• Bacciotti, D., Borgianni, Y., & Rotini, F. (2016). An original design approach for stimulating the ideation of new product features. Computers in Industry, 75, 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Borgianni, Y., Cascini, G., & Rotini, F. (2018). Investigating the future of the fuzzy front end: Towards a change of paradigm in the very early design phases? Journal of Engineering Design, 29(11), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2018.1520971
   Google Scholar
• Borgianni, Y., Rauch, E., Maccioni, L., & Mark, B. G. (2019). User experience analysis in industry 4.0-the use of biometric devices in engineering design and manufacturing. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (pp. 192–196). IEEE, Bangkok, Thailand, 16-19 December 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, C., Gonçalves, M., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2012). Searching for inspiration during idea generation: Pictures or words? In DS 70: Proceedings of DESIGN 2012, the 12th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Cascini, G., Fiorineschi, L., & Rotini, F. (2019). Impact of design representations on creativity of design outcomes. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 1–30. in press. https://doi.org/10.3233/JID180012
   Google Scholar
• Cash, P., & Štorga, M. (2015). Multifaceted assessment of ideation: Using networks to link ideation and design activity. Journal of Engineering Design, 26(10–12), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1070813
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J., Dow, S. P., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration? Design Studies, 36, 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. J., & Do, E. Y. L. (2011). What you see is what you design: Exploring the influence of inspiration images in designers’ ideation. In Proceedings of the second conference on creativity and innovation in design (pp. 53–60). Eindhoven, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, I., & Shu, L. H. (2012). Investigating effects of oppositely related semantic stimuli on design concept creativity. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.603298
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, R. M. (2012). What hypotheses do “nonparametric” two-group tests actually test? The Stata Journal, 12(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1201200202
   Google Scholar
• Du, P., Miller, C., MacDonald, E., & Gormley, P. (2015). Review of supporting and refuting evidence for innovation engineering practices. Design Science, 1, E5. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2015.5
   Google Scholar
• Fu, K., Chan, J., Cagan, J., Kotovsky, K., Schunn, C., & Wood, K. (2013). The meaning of “near” and “far”: The impact of structuring design databases and the effect of distance of analogy on design output. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(2), 021007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023158
   Google Scholar
• Georgiev, G. V., Sumitami, N., & Taura, T. (2017). Methodology for creating new scenes through the use of thematic relations for innovative designs. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 5(1–2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2015.1119658
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., & Sever, A. L. (2011). Inspiring design ideas with texts. Design Studies, 32(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2013). Inspiration peak: Exploring the semantic distance between design problem and textual inspirational stimuli. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(4), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.799309
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2014). What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design Studies, 35(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Goucher-Lambert, K., & Cagan, J. (2019). Crowdsourcing inspiration: Using crowd generated inspirational stimuli to support designer ideation. Design Studies, 61, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Goucher-Lambert, K., Moss, J., & Cagan, J. (2019). A neuroimaging investigation of design ideation with and without inspirational stimuli—understanding the meaning of near and far stimuli. Design Studies, 60, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J., & McLeod, P. L. (2014). The impact of semantic relevance and heterogeneity of pictorial stimuli on individual brainstorming: An extension of the SIAM model. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929433
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., Shi, F., Chen, L., & Childs, P. R. (2018a). The Combinator–a computer-based tool for creative idea generation based on a simulation approach. Design Science, 4, e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2018.7
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., Shi, F., Chen, L., & Childs, P. R. (2018b). A computational tool for creative idea generation based on analogical reasoning and ontology. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 32(4), 462–477. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060418000082
   Google Scholar
• Hao, J, Zhou, Y, Zhao, Q, & Xue, Q. (2019). An evolutionary computation based method for creative design inspiration generation. In Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 30, 1673–1691. doi: 10.1007/s10845-017-1347-x .
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., Camburn, B., Luo, J., Yang, M. C., & Wood, K. L. (2019). Visual sensemaking of massive crowdsourced data for design ideation. In Proceedings of the design society: International conference on engineering design, 1( 1),409–418. Cambridge University Press, Delft, the Netherlands, 5-8 August 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. H., & Lu, Y. N. (2014). Can pupil size be measured to assess design products? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3), 436–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.009
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Culley, S., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2011). Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(8), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544821003598573
   Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Dekoninck, E. A., & Culley, S. J. (2010). The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation. Research in Engineering Design, 21(4), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-010-0091-4
   Google Scholar
• Jagtap, S. (2019). Design creativity: Refined method for novelty assessment. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 7(1–2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2018.1463176
   Google Scholar
• Jang, S. H., Oh, B., Hong, S., & Kim, J. (2018). The effect of ambiguous visual stimuli on creativity in design idea generation. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 7(1–2), 70–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2018.1473809
   Google Scholar
• Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
   Google Scholar
• Jia, L., Becattini, N., Cascini, G., & Tan, R. (2020). Testing ideation performance on a large set of designers: Effects of analogical distance. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 8(1), 31-45. doi: 10.1080/21650349.2019.1618736 .
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, N. W., & Smith, S. M. (2011). Collaborative fixation: Effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1699
   Google Scholar
• Koronis, G., Chia, P., Kang, Z., Kai Siang, J., Silva, A., Yogiaman, C., & Raghunath, N. (2019). An empirical study on the impact of design brief information on the creativity of design outcomes with consideration of gender and gender diversity. Journal of Mechanical Design, 141(7), 071102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043207
   Google Scholar
• Koronis, G., Silva, A., & Kang, J. (2018). The impact of design briefs on creativity: A study on measuring student designers outcomes. In DS92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th international design conference (pp. 2461–2472), Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Laamanen, T. K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2014). Constraining an open-ended design task by interpreting sources of inspiration. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 13(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.13.2.135_1
   Google Scholar
• Laing, S., & Masoodian, M. (2016). A study of the influence of visual imagery on graphic design ideation. Design Studies, 45, 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.04.002
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   Google Scholar
• Linsey, J. S., Clauss, E. F., Kurtoglu, T., Murphy, J. T., Wood, K. L., & Markman, A. B. (2011). An experimental study of group idea generation techniques: Understanding the roles of idea representation and viewing methods. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(3), 031008. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003498
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Mesa, B., Mulet, E., Vidal, R., & Thompson, G. (2011). Effects of additional stimuli on idea-finding in design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820902911366
   Google Scholar
• Maccioni, L., & Borgianni, Y. (2018). A Product success scale for supporting research in engineering design. In DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th international design conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 21-24 May 2018 (pp. 69–80).
   Google Scholar
• Mougenot, C., Watanabe, K., Bouchard, C., & Aoussat, A. (2009). Visual materials and designers’ cognitive activity: Towards in-depth investigations of design cognition. International Association of Societies of Design Research, Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Oman, S. K., Tumer, I. Y., Wood, K., & Seepersad, C. (2013). A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects. Research in Engineering Design, 24(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-012-0138-9
   Google Scholar
• Perttula, M., & Sipilä, P. (2007). The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600679679
   Google Scholar
• Saliminamin, S., Becattini, N., & Cascini, G. (2019). Sources of creativity stimulation for designing the next generation of technical systems: Correlations with R&D designers’ performance. Research in Engineering Design, 30(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0299-2
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2008). The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 22(2), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060408000073
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Assessing design creativity. Design Studies, 32(4), 348–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Sauder, J., & Jin, Y. (2016). A qualitative study of collaborative stimulation in group design thinking. Design Science, 2, E4. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2016.1
   Google Scholar
• Schaffhausen, C. R., & Kowalewski, T. M. (2015). Assessing quality of user-submitted need statements from large-scale needfinding: Effects of expertise and group size. Journal of Mechanical Design, 37(12), 121102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031655
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0
   Google Scholar
• Shen, T., & Nagai, Y. (2018). Effects of unfolding techniques as design stimuli in building design. In DS 89: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2018) (pp. 15–22), University of Bath, Bath, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Singanapalli, S. (2017). Designing Static Visual Narratives as Prompts for Practising Creative Writing. In International conference on research into design (pp. 421–431). Springer, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• song, H. I., Lopez, R., Fu, K., & Linsey, J. (2018). characterizing the effects of multiple analogs and extraneous information for novice designers in design-by-analogy. Journal of Mechanical Design, 140(3), 031101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038565
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, V., Song, B., Luo, J., Subburaj, K., Elara, M. R., Blessing, L., & Wood, K. (2018). Does analogical distance affect performance of ideation? Journal of Mechanical Design, 140(7), 071101. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4040165
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Münster, S. (2018). A look at the research on design idea generation in industrial design: Literature review from 2003 to 2017. In DS 89: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2018) (pp. 31–38), University of Bath, Bath, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, I., Moss, J., Cagan, J., & Kotovsky, K. (2008). The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design. Design Studies, 29(3), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, W. S. W. (2018). Can visual ambiguity facilitate design ideation? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(2), 523–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9393-9
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L. A., & Crilly, N. (2016). Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges. Design Studies, 42, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L. A., Neroni, M. A., Cardoso, C., & Crilly, N. (2018a). Idea representation and elaboration in design inspiration and fixation experiments. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 6(1–2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1362360
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L. A., Neroni, M. A., & Crilly, N. (2018b). The effect of explicit instructions in idea generation studies. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 32(3), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060417000658
   Google Scholar
• Verhaegen, P. A., Vandevenne, D., Peeters, J., & Duflou, J. R. (2013). Refinements to the variety metric for idea evaluation. Design Studies, 34(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, V., & Linsey, J. (2013). Examining design fixation in engineering idea generation: The role of example modality. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.774689
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. O., Rosen, D., Nelson, B. A., & Yen, J. (2010). The effects of biological examples in idea generation. Design Studies, 31(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2016). Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation. Design Studies, 46, 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.001
   Google Scholar