How graphic designers rely on intuition as an ephemeral facility to support their creative design process

References

• Alhajri, S. A. (2017). Investigating creativity in graphic design education from psychological perspectives. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 6(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v6i01.1079
   Google Scholar
• Badke-Schaub, P., & Eris, O. (2014). A theoretical approach to intuition in design: Does design methodology need to account for unconscious processes? In A. Chakrabarti & L. T. M. Blessing (Eds.), An anthology of theories and models of design (pp. 353–370). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. (2006). The rise of research in graphic design. In A. Bennett (Ed.), Design studies–– Theory and research in graphic design (pp. 14–25). Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biskjaer, M. M., Dalsgaard, P., & Halskov, K. (2017). Understanding creativity methods in design. Proceedings of DIS 2017 (pp. 839–851), Edinburg, UK. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064692
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Carson, L. (2017, July 7). The importance of intuition in the design process. Design by Bird. Retrieved November 12, 2019, from http://designbybird.com.au/perspective/intuition
   Google Scholar
• Çizgen, G., & Uraz, T. U. (2019). The unknown position of intuition in design activity. The Design Journal, 22(3), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1589414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial, Modern Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23463682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwich, B. B. (2016). Re-cognition: Intuition as knowledge. In Proceedings of FEC 2016, art. 437. libreria universitaria, Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörfler, V., & Ackermann, F. (2012). Understanding intuition: The case for two forms of intuition. Management Learning, 43(5), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507611434686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, J., & McVarish, E. (2009). Graphic design history: A critical guide. Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Faste, H. (2017). Intuition in design: Reflections on the iterative aesthetics of form. Proceedings CHI 2017 (pp. 3403–3413), Denver, CO, USA. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025534
   Google Scholar
• Frascara, J. (2004). Communication design: Principles, methods, and practice. Allworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenman, L. (2018). Understanding intuition:A journey in and out of science. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kannengiesser, U., & Gero, J. S. (2019). Design thinking, fast and slow: A framework for Kahneman’s dual-system theory in design. Design Science, 5(e10), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.9
   Google Scholar
• Laing, S., & Masoodian, M. (2016). A study of the influence of visual imagery on graphic design ideation. Design Studies, 45(Part B), 187–209. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laisney, P., & Chatoney, M. (in press). Instrumented activity and theory of instrument of Pierre Rabardel. In Philosophy of technology for technology education. Brill Sense. Retrieved May 3rd, 2021, from https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01903109
   Google Scholar
• Meggs, P. B., & Purvis, A. W. (2012). Meggs’ history of graphic design. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nini, P. J. (2006). Sharpening one’s axe: Making a case for a comprehensive approach to research in the graphic design process.”. In A. Bennett (Ed.), Design studies––theory and research in graphic design (pp. 117–129). Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, R. E., & Eggleston, R. G. (2017). Intuitive cognition. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 11(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343416686476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poincaré, H., & Crosswhite, F. J. (1969). Intuition and logic in mathematics. The Mathematics Teacher, 62 (3), 205–212. Retrieved May 3rd, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27958100.
   Google Scholar
• Policastro, E. (1995). Creative intuition: An integrative review. Creativity Research Journal, 8(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0802_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raidl, M.-H., & Lubart, T. I. (2001). An empirical study of intuition and creativity. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 20(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.2190/34QQ-EX6N-TF8V-7U3N
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Y. (2017). The principle of reflexive practice. Design Science, 3(e4), 1–27. http://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.3
   Google Scholar
• Roozenburg, N. F. M., & Cross, N. G. (1991). Models of the design process: Integrating across the disciplines. Design Studies, 12(4), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90034-T
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E. (2007). Inside Intuition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schenk, P. (1991). The role of drawing in the graphic design process. Design Studies, 12(3), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90025-R
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90020-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. (2010). Misconceptions about intuition. Psychological Inquiry, 21(4), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2010.523874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. (Ed.). (2014). Handbook of research methods on intuition. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stierand, M., & Dörfler, V. (2015). The role of intuition in the creative process of expert chefs. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(3), 178–185. http://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taffe, S. (2017). Who’s in charge? End-users challenge graphic designers’ intuition through visual verbal Co-design. The Design Journal, 20(1), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352916
   Google Scholar
• Taffe, S., & Barnes, C. (2010). Outcomes we didn’t expect: Participant’s shifting investment in graphic design.” Proceedings of PDC 2010, (pp. 211–214), Sydney, AU. ACM. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1900482
   Google Scholar
• Taura, T., & Nagai, Y. (2017). Creativity in innovation design: The roles of intuition, synthesis, and hypothesis.”. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 5(3–4), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1313132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The politics of aesthetics: What does it mean to design? (2011). That new design smell. Retrieved November 12th, 2019 from https://thatnewdesignsmell.net/daniel-van-der-velden-explains-himself
   Google Scholar
• Valtulina, J., & de Rooij, A. (2019). The predictive creative mind: A first look at spontaneous predictions and evaluations during idea generation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(article 2465), 1–14. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02465
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L. A., & Crilly, N. (2016). Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges. Design Studies, 42, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, F. S., Stappers, P. J., van der Lugt, R., & Sanders, E. B.-N. (2005). Contextmapping: Experiences from practice. CoDesign, 1(2), 119–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880500135987
   Google Scholar
• Waller, R. (1980). Graphic aspects of complex texts: Typography as macropunctuation. In P. A. Wrolstad Koelers, M. Ernest, & H. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visible language (pp. 241–253). Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J. C. (2018). The shoulders of giants: A case for non-veritism about expert authority. Topoi, 37(1), 39–53. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9421-0
   Google Scholar
• Weinert, F. E. (1999). Definition and selection of competencies: Concepts of competence.” Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research. Retrieved May 3rd, 2021, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
   Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zander, T., Öllinger, M., & Volz, K. G. (2016). Intuition and insight: Two processes that build on each other or fundamentally differ? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1395. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar