References
- Cascini, G., Nagai, Y., Georgiev, G. V., Zelaya, J., Becattini, N., Boujut, J. F., Casakin, H., Crilly, N., Dekoninck, E., Gero, J., Goel, A., Goldschmidt, G., Gonçalves, M., Grace, K., Hay, L., Le Masson, P., Maher, M. L., Marjanović, D., Motte, D., … Wodehouse, A. (2022). Perspectives on design creativity and innovation research: 10 years later. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 10(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2022.2021480
- Cash, P. J. (2018). Developing theory-driven design research. Design Studies, 56, 84–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.002
- Editorial board of IJDCI.(2013). Perspectives on design creativity and innovation research. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(1), 1, 1–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.754657
- Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Reich, Y., & Subrahmanian, E. (2018). Design theory: A foundation of a new paradigm for design science and engineering. Research in Engineering Design, 29(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-017-0275-2
- Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2009). CK design theory: An advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design, 19(4), 181–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0043-4
- Kolberg, E., Reich, Y., & Levin, I. (2007, July 28-31). Express engineering change management. In DS 42: Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, (pp. 659–660). The Design Society, Paris, France.
- Kolberg, E., Reich, Y., & Levin, I. (2014). Designing winning robots by careful design of their development process. Research in Engineering Design, 25(2), 157–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-014-0171-y
- Konda, S., Monarch, I., Sargent, P., & Subrahmanian, E. (1992). Shared memory in design: A unifying theme for research and practice. Research in Engineering Design, 4(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02032390
- Le Masson, P., Dorst, K., & Subrahamanian, E. (2013). Special issue on design theory: History, state of the arts and advancements. Research in Engineering Design, 24(2), 212–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-013-0154-4
- Le Masson, P., Weil, B., & Hatchuel, A. (2010). Strategic management of innovation and design. Cambridge University Press.
- Newell, A. (1973). You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual Information Processing (pp. 283–308). Academic Press.
- Newell, A. (1994). Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press.
- Petersson, A. M., & Lundberg, J. (2016). Evaluating an ideation method in a real-life context: A field test from the railway sector. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference Vol .50190, p. V007T06A011). Charlotte, North Carolina, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
- Petersson, A. M., & Lundberg, J. (2018). Developing an ideation method to be used in cross-functional inter-organizational teams by means of action design research. Research in Engineering Design, 29(3), 433–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0283-x
- Price, R., Wrigley, C., & Matthews, J. (2021). Action researcher to design innovation catalyst: Building design capability from within. Action Research, 19(2), 318–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750318781221
- Reich, Y. (2017). The principle of reflexive practice. Design Science 3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.3.
- Reich, Y., Hatchuel, A., Shai, O., & Subrahmanian, E. (2012). A theoretical analysis of creativity methods in engineering design: Casting and improving ASIT within C–K theory. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2010.493505
- Reich, Y., Konda, S., Subrahmanian, E., Cunningham, D., Dutoit, A., Patrick, R., Thomas, M., & Westerberg, A. W. (1999). Building agility for developing agile design information systems. Research in Engineering Design, 11(2), 67–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00003884
- Reich, Y., & Shai, O. (2012). The interdisciplinary engineering knowledge genome. Research in Engineering Design, 23(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-012-0129-x
- Reich, Y., & Subrahmanian, E. (2019). The PSI network model for studying diverse complex design scenarios. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1 (1), 1283–1292. Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2973238
- Reich, Y., & Subrahmanian, E. (2020). The PSI framework and theory of design. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
- Reich, Y., & Subrahmanian, E. (2021). Mapping and enhancing design studies with PSI meta-theoretic design framework. Proceedings of the Design Society Chalmers, Sweden (Vol. 1), (pp. 2007–2016). Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.462.
- Reich Y, and Subrahmanian E. (2022). Documenting design research by structured multilevel analysis: supporting the diversity of the design research community of practice. Design Science, 8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.28.
- Schønheyder, J. F., & Nordby, K. (2018). The use and evolution of design methods in professional design practice. Design Studies, 58, 36–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.04.001
- Subrahmanian, E., Reich, Y., Konda, S. L., Dutoit, A., Cunningham, D., Patrick, R., Thomas, M., & Westerberg, A. W. (1997). The n-dim approach to creating design support systems. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 80456, p. V003T30A009). Sacramento, California, USA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
- Subrahmanian, E., Reich, Y., & Krishnan, S. (2020). We are not users: Dialogues, diversity, and design. MIT Press.
- Wrigley, C. (2017). Principles and practices of a design-led approach to innovation. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 5(3–4), 235–255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1292152
- Wrigley, C., Wolifson, P., & Matthews, J. (2021). Supervising cohorts of higher degree research students: Design catalysts for industry and innovation. Higher Education, 81(6), 1177–1196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00605-3