Prototyping in smart product design: Investigating prototyping tools to support communication in the early stage smart product development

References

• Akoğlu, C., & Er, H. A. (2015). The role of interaction design in smart product development activities. Online Journal of Art and Design, 3(4), 51–65. https://eresearch.ozyegin.edu.tr/handle/10679/6376
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, G., & Lombreglia, R. (2005). Four strategies for the age of smart services. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, S. (2020). Making sense of smartness in the context of smart devices and smart systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(2), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09919-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, Q., Faas, D., & Yang, M. (2018). Interplay of sketching & prototyping in early stage product design. International Journal of Design Creativity & Innovation, 6(3–4), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2018.1429318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenMahmoud‐Jouini, S., & Midler, C. (2020). Unpacking the notion of prototype archetypes in the early phase of an innovation process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A., Bischof, A., Totzauer, S., Storz, M., Lefeuvre, K., & Kurze, A. (2019). Sensing home: Participatory exploration of smart sensors in the home. Social Internet of Things, 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94659-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Beverungen, D., Müller, O., Matzner, M., Mendling, J., & Vom Brocke, J. (2019). Conceptualizing smart service systems. Electronic Markets, 29(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0270-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogers, M., & Horst, W. (2014). Collaborative prototyping: Cross‐fertilization of knowledge in prototype‐driven problem solving. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 744–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camburn, B. A., Auernhammer, J. M., Sng, K. H. E., Mignone, P. J., Arlitt, R. M., Perez, K. B., Huang, Z., Basnet, S., Blessing, L. T., & Wood, K. L. (2017, August 6–9). Design innovation: A study of integrated practice. ASME 2017 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Canziba, E. (2018). Hands-on UX design for developers: Design, prototype, and implement compelling user experiences from scratch. Packt Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Carfagni, M., Fiorineschi, L., Furferi, R., Governi, L., & Rotini, F. (2020). Usefulness of prototypes in conceptual design: Students’ view. International Journal on Interactive Design & Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(4), 1305–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00697-2
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2016). The challenges of using design thinking in industry–experiences from five large firms. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(3), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts, E., & Pugsley, C. (2018). Physical versus Virtual prototyping and their effect on design solutions. DS 89: Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2018), University of Bath, Bath, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Coutts, E. R., Wodehouse, A., & Robertson, J. (2019, August 5–8). A comparison of contemporary prototyping methods. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, M., Daly, S. R., Sienko, K. H., & Lee, J. C. (2017). Novice designers’ use of prototypes in engineering design. Design Studies, 51, 25–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhebar, A. (1996). Information technology and product policy: ‘Smart’products. European Management Journal, 14(5), 477–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(96)00041-2
   Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, S., Christoforakos, L., Maisch, B., & Kohler, K. (2019, August 5–8). The state of prototyping practice in the industrial setting: Potential, challenges and implications. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• ElMaraghy, W., ElMaraghy, H., Tomiyama, T., & Monostori, L. (2012). Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 61(2), 793–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feliciano Filho, M., Liao, Y., Loures, E. R., & Junior, O. C. (2017). Self-aware smart products: Systematic literature review, conceptual design and prototype implementation. Procedia Manufacturing, 11, 1471–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.278
   Google Scholar
• Figliolia, A. C., Sandnes, F. E., & Medola, F. O. (2020). Experiences using three app prototyping tools with different levels of fidelity from a product design student’s perspective. International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning, Porto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorineschi, L., & Rotini, F. (2019, August 5–8). Unveiling the multiple and complex faces of fidelity. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Goudswaard, M., Gopsill, J., Harvey, M., Snider, C., Bell, A., & Hicks, B. (2021, August 16–20). Revisiting prototyping in 2020: A snapshot of practice in UK design companies. Proceedings of the Design Society, Gothenburg, Sweden. (Vol. 1, pp. 2581–2590).
   Google Scholar
• Häggman, A., Tsai, G., Elsen, C., Honda, T., & Yang, M. C. (2015). Connections between the design tool, design attributes, and user preferences in early stage design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(7). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgrimsson, B. (2012). Prototyping and modelmaking for product design. Laurence King Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. J., & Baker, M. J. (1994). The multiple convergent processing model of new product development. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339410057536
   Google Scholar
• Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do prototypes prototype? In Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 367–381). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Isa, S. S., Liem, A., & Steinert, M. (2015). The value of prototypes in the early design and development process. DS 80-5 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 5: Design Methods and Tools-Part 1, Milan, Italy, 27-30.07. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Elverum, C. W., & Steinert, M. (2017). Eliciting unknown unknowns with prototypes: Introducing prototrials and prototrial-driven cultures. Design Studies, 49, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. E., & Babrow, A. S. (2013). Communication in creative collaborations: The challenges of uncertainty and desire related to task, identity, and relational goals. Communication Education, 62(2), 210–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.769612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, L., Snider, C., Gopsill, J., & Hicks, B. (2021). Mixed reality in design prototyping: A systematic review. Design Studies, 77, 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N., & Anderson, N. (1995). Innovation and change in organizations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinsmann, M., & Dong, A. (2007). Investigating the affective force on creating shared understanding. ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Los Vegas, Nevada, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinsmann, M., & Valkenburg, R. (2008). Barriers and enablers for creating shared understanding in co-design projects. Design Studies, 29(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, D. J., van Doorn, J., Ng, I. C., Stieglitz, S., Lazovik, A., & Boonstra, A. (2021). The internet of everything: Smart things and their impact on business models. Journal of Business Research, 122, 853–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauff, C. A., Knight, D., Kotys-Schwartz, D., & Rentschler, M. E. (2020). The role of prototypes in communication between stakeholders. Design Studies, 66, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauff, C. A., Kotys-Schwartz, D., & Rentschler, M. E. (2018). What is a prototype? What are the roles of prototypes in companies? Journal of Mechanical Design, 140(6). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liker, J. K., & Pereira, R. M. (2018). Virtual and physical prototyping practices: Finding the right fidelity starts with understanding the product. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 46(4), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2018.2873792
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Roy, U., & Saltz, J. S. (2019). Towards an integrated process model for new product development with data-driven features (NPD3). Research in Engineering Design, 30(2), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-019-00308-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maioli, L. (2018). Fixing bad UX designs: Master proven approaches, tools, and techniques to make your user experience great again. Packt Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mathias, D., Snider, C., Hicks, B., & Ranscombe, C. (2019). Accelerating product prototyping through hybrid methods: Coupling 3D printing and LEGO. Design Studies, 62, 68–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurdy, M., Connors, C., Pyrzak, G., Kanefsky, B., & Vera, A. (2006). Breaking the fidelity barrier: An examination of our current characterization of prototypes and an example of a mixed-fidelity success. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative data analysis : An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed. ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, M. L., Pereira, A., & Alves, A. C. (2017). Smart products development approaches for Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1215–1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.035
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S., & Wang, Z. (2019). The exploration of smart object design method—applying user experience five elements for smart object design from theory research to design practice. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
   Google Scholar
• Pei, E., Campbell, I., & Evans, M. (2011). A taxonomic classification of visual design representations used by industrial designers and engineering designers. Design Journal, 14(1), 64–91. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630610X12877385838803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2015). How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harvard Business Review, 93(10), 96–114. https://hbr.org/2015/10/how-smart-connected-products-are-transforming-companies
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff, S., Wentzel, D., & Obwegeser, N. (2020). Smart products: Conceptual review, synthesis, and research directions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(5), 379–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranscombe, C., Bissett-Johnson, K., Mathias, D., Eisenbart, B., & Hicks, B. (2020). Designing with LEGO: Exploring low fidelity visualization as a trigger for student behavior change toward idea fluency. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(2), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09502-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodda, J., Ranscombe, C., & Kuys, B. (2022). A method to explore strategies to communicate user experience through storyboards: An automotive design case study. Ai Edam, 36, 36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060421000287
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. (2004). New theoretical approaches for human‐computer interaction. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38(1), 87–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440380103
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, C., Goodman, E., Charlier, M., Light, A., & Lui, A. (2015). Designing connected products: UX for the consumer internet of things. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, J., Seibel, K., & Rüttinger, B. (2010). The influence of user expertise and prototype fidelity in usability tests. Applied Ergonomics, 41(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharfenberger, P., Wentzel, D., Warlop, L., & Tomczak, T. (2014). Tangible possessions and the self–how objects reduce perceived distance to their symbolized meanings. ACR North American Advances.
   Google Scholar
• Self, J. A. (2019). Communication through design sketches: Implications for stakeholder interpretation during concept design. Design Studies, 63, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55–65. http://ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomiyama, T., D’Amelio, V., Urbanic, J., & ElMaraghy, W. (2007). Complexity of multi-disciplinary design. CIRP Annals, 56(1), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomiyama, T., Lutters, E., Stark, R., & Abramovici, M. (2019). Development capabilities for smart products. CIRP Annals, 68(2), 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2011). Product design and development (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill higher education.
   Google Scholar
• UX studio. (2019). UX Storyboard Creation: A Complete Guide For Beginners https://uxstudioteam.com/ux-blog/ux-storyboard/
   Google Scholar
• Valencia Cardona, A., Mugge, R., Schoormans, J. P., & Schifferstein, H. N. (2014). Challenges in the design of smart product-service systems (PSSs): Experiences from practitioners. Proceedings of the 19th DMI: Academic Design Management Conference. Design Management in an Era of Disruption, London, UK, September 2-4.
   Google Scholar
• Virzi, R. A. (1989). What can you learn from a low-fidelity prototype? Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, CA. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. H., Jr. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., & Pillan, M. (2017). From respect to change user behaviour. Research on how to design a next generation of smart home objects from user experience and interaction design. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3884–S3898. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M. C. (2004). An examination of prototyping and design outcome. ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., Steinfeld, A., Rosé, C., & Zimmerman, J. (2020). Re-examining whether, why, and how human-AI interaction is uniquely difficult to design. Proceedings of the 2020 chi conference on human factors in computing systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, F., Pasinelli, M., & Brem, A. (2018). Prototyping in theory and in practice: A study of the similarities and differences between engineers and designers. Creativity and Innovation Management, 27(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zink, L., Hostetter, R., Böhmer, A. I., Lindemann, U., & Knoll, A. (2017, June 27–29). The use of prototypes within agile product development explorative case study of a makeathon. 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Madeira Island, Portugal. Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC).
   Google Scholar