Lightweight composite from fly ash geopolymer and glass foam

References

• European Commission. Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the circular economy. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nemes R, Józsa Z. Strength of lightweight glass aggregate concrete. J Mater Civ Eng. 2006; 18:710–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza MT, Maia BGO, Teixeira LB, et al. Glass foams produced from glass bottles and eggshell wastes. Process Saf Environ Protect. 2017;111:60–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann L. Process for (especially) waste of glass materials to produce closed pore-structured silicate-foam, and product. Patent no. HU 224,808 B1. 1998. Geoil-Bubble.
   Google Scholar
• König J, Petersen RR, Yue Y. Influence of the glass–calcium carbonate mixture’s characteristics on the foaming process and the properties of the foam glass. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2014;34:1591–1598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhaoua F, Ayadi A, Stiti N, et al. Elaboration and characterization of an insulation material based waste glass. Verres Céram Compos. 2013;2:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Lim TY, Park YM, Hwang JH, et al. Fabrication and characterization of porous ceramic panel using recycled glass powder. MSF. 2006;510–511:642–645.
   Google Scholar
• Mucsi G, Csőke B, Kertész M, et al. Physical characteristics and technology of glass foam from waste cathode ray tube glass. J Mater. 2013;696428.
   Google Scholar
• Ayadi A, Stiti N, Boumchedda K, et al. Elaboration and characterization of porous granules based on waste glass. Powder Technol. 2011;208:423–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardo E, Albertini F. Glass foams from dismantled cathode ray tubes. Ceram Int. 2006;32:603–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis JL, Duxson P, van Deventer JSJ. The role of particle technology in developing sustainable construction materials. Adv Powder Technol. 2010;21:2–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temuujin J, Rickard W, van Riessen A. Characterization of various fly ashes for preparation of geopolymers with advanced applications. Adv Powder Technol. 2013;24:495–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis JL. Alkali-activated materials. Cem Concr Res. 2018;114:40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Kumar S, Mehrotra SP. Towards sustainable solutions for fly ash through mechanical activation. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2007;52:157–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temuujin J, Riessen A, van, MacKenzie K. Preparation and characterisation of fly ash based geopolymer mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2010;24:1906–1910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuenzel C, Ranjbar N. Dissolution mechanism of fly ash to quantify the reactive aluminosilicates in geopolymerisation. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;150:104421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhász AZ, Opoczky L. 1990. Mechanical activation of minerals by grinding: pulverizing and morphology of particles. Akadémiai Kiadó - Ellis. Budapest, Chichester: Horwood Ltd Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mucsi G. Mechanical activation of power station fly ash by grinding – a review. Epitoanyag - JSBCM. 2016; 68:56–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djobo JNY, Elimbi A, Tchakout HK, et al. Mechanical activation of volcanic ash for geopolymer synthesis: effect on reaction kinetics, gel characteristics, physical and mechanical properties. RSC Adv. 2016;45:39106–39117.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Kumar R. Mechanical activation of fly ash: Effect on reaction, structure and properties of resulting geopolymer. Ceram Int. 2011;37:533–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath SK, Kumar S. Reaction kinetics of fly ash geopolymerization: role of particle size controlled by using ball mill. Adv Powder Technol. 2019;30:1079–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen RR, König J, Yue Y. The viscosity window of the silicate glass foam production. J Non-Cryst Solids 2017;456:49–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcaro S, Maia BGO, Souza MT, et al. Thermal insulating foams produced from glass waste and banana leaves. Mater Res. 2016;19:1064–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attila Y, Güden M, Demirci TA. Foam glass processing using a polishing glass powder residue. Ceram Int. 2013; 39 :5869–5877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinnam RK, Francis AA, Will J, et al. Functional glasses and glass-ceramics derived from iron rich waste and combination of industrial residues. J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 2013;365:63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rincon A, Desideri D, Bernardo E. Functional glass-ceramic foams from inorganic gel casting and sintering of glass/slag mixtures. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;187:250–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajimohammadi A, Ngo T, Kashani A. Sustainable one-part geopolymer foams with glass fines versus sand as aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2018;171:223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera JF, Cuarán-Cuarán ZI, Vanegas-Bonilla N, et al. Novel use of waste glass powder: Production of geopolymeric tiles. Adv Powder Technol. 2018;29:3448–3454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai C, Li H, Bernardo E, et al. Waste-to-resource preparation of glass-containing foams from geopolymers. Ceram Int. 2019;45:7196–7202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letelier V, Henríquez-Jara BI, Manosalva M, et al. Combined use of waste concrete and glass as a replacement for mortar raw materials. Waste Manage (Oxford). 2019; 94:107–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiva C, Luna-Galiano Y, Arenas C, et al. A porous geopolymer based on aluminum-waste with acoustic properties. Waste Manage (Oxford). 2019;95:504–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roviello G, Menna C, Tarallo O, et al. Lightweight geopolymer-based hybrid materials. Compos Part B. 2017;128:225–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongsa A, Sata V, Nuaklong P, et al. Use of crushed clay brick and pumice aggregates in lightweight geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2018;188:1025–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Hui D, Singh R, et al. Recycling of plastic solid waste: a state of art review and future applications. Compos Part B Eng. 2017;115:409–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colangelo F, Cioffi R, Liguori B, et al. Recycled polyolefins waste as aggregates for lightweight concrete. Compos Part B Eng. 2016;106:234–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colangelo F, Cioffi R. Mechanical properties and durability of mortar containing fi ne fraction of demolition wastes produced by selective demolition in South Italy. Compos Part B Eng. 2017;115:43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colangelo F, Messina F, Di Palma L, et al. Recycling of non-metallic automotive shredder residues and coal fly-ash in cold-bonded aggregates for sustainable concrete. Compos Part B Eng. 2017; 116:46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaetang Y, Wongsa A, Sata V, et al. Use of lightweight aggregates in pervious concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2013;48:585–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posi P, Lertnimoolchai S, Sata V, et al. Pressed lightweight concrete containing calcined diatomite aggregate. Constr Build Mater. 2013;47:896–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain KMA. Properties of volcanic pumice based cement and lightweight concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34:283–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debieb F, Kenai S. The use of coarse and fine crushed bricks as aggregate in concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2008;22:886–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Z, Guo L, Zhang Z, et al. Influence of different fibers on properties of thermal insulation composites based on geopolymer blended with glazed hollow bead. Constr Build Mater. 2019;203:525–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotwica Ł, Pichór W, Kapeluszna E, et al. Utilization of waste expanded perlite as new effective supplementary cementitious material. J Clean Prod. 2017;140:1344–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun D, Wang L. Utilization of paraffin/expanded perlite materials to improve mechanical and thermal properties of cement mortar. Constr Build Mater. 2015;101:791–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergamonti L, Taurino R, Cattani L, et al. Lightweight hybrid organic-inorganic geopolymers obtained using polyurethane waste. Constr Build Mater. 2018;185:285–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounanga P, Gbongbon W, Poullain P, et al. Proportioning and characterization of lightweight concrete mixtures made with rigid polyurethane foam wastes. Cem Concr Compos. 2008;30:806–814. :
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadea J, Rodríguez A, Campos PL, et al. Lightweight mortar made with recycled polyurethane foam. Cem Concr Compos. 2010;32:672–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colangelo F, Roviello G, Ricciotti L, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight geopolymer composites. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;86:266–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan P, Song L, Yan C, et al. Novel thermal insulating and lightweight composites from metakaolin geopolymer and polystyrene particles. Ceram Int. 2017;43:5115–5120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayadi AA, Tapia JV, Neitzert TR, et al. Effects of expanded polystyrene (EPS) particles on fire resistance, thermal conductivity and compressive strength of foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2016;112:716–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard MSZ EN 196-1.2005. Methods of testing cement. Part 1: Determination of strength. Hungarian Standards Institution (MSZT).
   Google Scholar
• Mucsi G, Szenczi Á, Molnár Z, et al. Structural formation and leaching behavior of mechanically activated lignite fly ash based geopolymer. J Environ Eng Landscape Manage. 2016;24:48–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gábor M, Roland S, Ádám R, et al. Combined utilization of red mud and mechanically activated fly ash in geopolymers. Min Geol Petrol Eng Bull. 2019;27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó R, Molnár Z, Balogh T, et al. Development of geopolymer based composite from secondaries (Geopolimer alapú kompozit fejlesztése melléktermékekből). Epitoanyag JSBCM. 2016;1:25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler M, Colombo P. 2005. Cellular ceramics: structure, manufacturing, properties and applications. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. ISBN: 3-527-31320-6.
   Google Scholar
• Méar F, Yot P, Cambon M, et al. The characterization of waste cathode-ray tube glass. Waste Manage (Oxford). 2006;26:1468–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnár Z, Kristály F, Mucsi G. Mechanical activation of deposited brown coal fly ash in stirred media mill. Acta Phys Polym A. 2014;126:988–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucsi G, Kumar S, Csőke B, et al. Control of geopolymer properties by grinding of land filled fly ash. Int J Miner Process. 2015;143:50–58.
   Google Scholar
• Chukanov NV. Infrared spectra of mineral species. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 1726. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7128-4.
   Google Scholar
• Valeev D, Kunilova I, Alpatov A, et al. Complex utilisation of ekibastuz brown coal fly ash: iron & carbon separation and aluminum extraction. J Cleaner Prod. 2019;218:192–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar