Effect of packing conditions and materials properties on loose packing fraction of rigid particles: a theoretical and experimental review

References

• Sweley JC, Rose DJ, Jia X, et al. Effect of flake shape on packing characteristics of popped popcorn. J Food Eng. 2014;127:75–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Y, Li C-H, Liu J-A, et al. Towards fabrication of high-performance Al2O3 ceramics by indirect selective laser sintering based on particle packing optimization. Ceram Int. 2019;45(10):12654–12662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Bharti A, Saxena KK. A re-investigation: effect of powder metallurgy parameters on the physical and mechanical properties of aluminium matrix composites. Mater Today Proc. 2021;44:2188–2193.
   Google Scholar
• Nanthagopalan P, Haist M, Santhanam M, et al. Investigation on the influence of granular packing on the flow properties of cementitious suspensions. Cem Concr Compos. 2008;30(9):763–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansoutre S, Colombet P, Damme HV. Water retention and granular rheological behavior of fresh C 3 S paste as a function of concentration 1. Cem Concr Res. 1999;29(9):1441–1453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdipour I, Khayat KH. Elucidating how particle packing controls rheology and strength development of dense cementitious suspensions. Cem Concr Compos. 2019;104:103413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struble L, Sun GK. Viscosity of Portland cement paste as a function of concentration. Adv Cem Based Mater. 1995;2(2):62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Zuo W, Wei L, Du Z, et al. Design of robust self-compacting concrete based on analysis of component properties. Constr Build Mater. 2021;301:124063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafid H, Ovarlez G, Toussaint F, et al. Effect of particle morphological parameters on sand grains packing properties and rheology of model mortars. Cem Concr Res. 2016;80:44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hettiarachchi HACK, Mampearachchi WK. Effect of vibration frequency, size ratio and large particle volume fraction on packing density of binary spherical mixtures. Powder Technol. 2018;336:150–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao S, Zhang N, Zhou X, et al. Particle shape effects on fabric of granular random packing. Powder Technol. 2017;310:175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao B, An X, Wang Y, et al. Packing of different shaped tetrahedral particles: DEM simulation and experimental study. Powder Technol. 2020;360:21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Hern CS, Langer SA, Liu AJ, et al. Random packings of frictionless particles. Phys Rev Lett. 2002;88(7):075507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan et al. A simple mix design method for self-compacting concrete. Cem Concrete Res. 2001;31(12):1799–1807.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Zhang J, Qian G, et al. Three-dimensional simulation of aggregate and asphalt mixture using parameterized shape and size gradation. J Mater Civ Eng. 2019;31(3):04019004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CY, Chow JK, Wang Y-H. Pore-size changes and responses of kaolinite with different structures subject to consolidation and shearing. Eng Geol. 2016;202:122–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, et al. A new approach for designing fluid concrete with low cement content: optimization of packing density of aggregates. Materials 2020;13(18):4082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo W, Liu J, Tian Q, et al. Optimum design of low-binder self-compacting concrete based on particle packing theories. Constr Build Mater. 2018;163:938–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong V, Kwan A. A 3-parameter model for packing density prediction of ternary mixes of spherical particles. Powder Technol. 2014;268:357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan AKH, Fung WWS, Wong HHC. Water film thickness, flowability and rheology of cement–sand mortar. Adv Cem Res. 2010;22(1):3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Larrard F. Concrete mixture proportioning Information Storage & Retrieval, 2017, 4(2):113–131.
   Google Scholar
• Furnas CC. Grading aggregates I – mathematical relations for beds of broken solids of maximum density. Ind Eng Chem. 1931;23(9):1052–1058.
   Google Scholar
• Larrard FD, Sedran T. Optimization of ultra-high-performance concrete by the use of a packing model. Cem Concr Res. 1994;24(6):997–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouchiyama N, Tanaka T. Porosity estimation from particle size distribution. Ind Eng Chem Fund. 1986;25(1):125–129.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney GW, Hilton JE, Cleary PW. Defining random loose packing for nonspherical grains. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011;83(5 Pt 1):051305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flatt RJ, Bowen P. Yodel: a yield stress model for suspensions. J Am Ceram Soc. 2006;89(4):1244–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo W, Zhang L, Wang P, et al. A multi-scale approach for assessing the robustness of cement-based materials from a yield stress perspective. Constr Build Mater. 2021;300:123998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Li S, Chen S. Computer simulation of random loose packings of micro-particles in presence of adhesion and friction. Powder Technol. 2016;302:414–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell GR, Martini KM, Menon N. Loose packings of frictional spheres. Soft Matter. 2010;6(13):2925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowke D, Dini E, Perrot A, et al. Particle-bed 3D printing in concrete construction – possibilities and challenges. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:50–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowke D, Talke D, Dressler I, et al. Particle bed 3D printing by selective cement activation – applications, material and process technology. Cem Concr Res. 2020;134:106077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Song C, Jin Y, et al. Jamming II: Edwards’ statistical mechanics of random packings of hard spheres. Phys A. 2011;390(3):427–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onoda GY, Liniger EG. Random loose packings of uniform spheres and the dilatancy onset. Phys Rev Lett. 1990;64(22):2727–2730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RY, Zou RP, Yu AB. Effect of material properties on the packing of fine particles. J Appl Phys. 2003;94(5):3025–3034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang RY, Zou RP, Yu AB. Computer simulation of packing of fine particles. Phys Rev E. 2000;62(3):3900–3908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David GS. Packing of spheres: packing of equal spheres. Nature. 1960;159(4050):817–817.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro AP, Probstein RF. Random packings of spheres and fluidity limits of monodisperse and bidisperse suspensions. Phys Rev Lett. 1992;68(9):1422–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tory EM, Church BH, Tam MK, et al. Simulated random packing of equal spheres. Can J Chem Eng. 1973;51(4):484–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangri H, Guo Y, Curtis JS. Packing of cylindrical particles: DEM simulations and experimental measurements. Powder Technol. 2017;317:72–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan J, Yu A. DEM study on the packing density and randomness for packing of ellipsoids. Powder Technol. 2020;361:424–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgeary RK. Mechanical packing of spherical particles. J Am Ceram Soc. 1961;44(10):513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayer JE, Soppet FE. Vibratory compaction: I, compaction of spherical shapes. J Am Ceram Soc. 1965; 48(4):180–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowke D, Gehlen C. The zeta potential of cement and additions in cementitious suspensions with high solid fraction. Cem Concr Res. 2017;95:195–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou P, Muzenda TR, Li Q, et al. Mechanisms dominating thixotropy in limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Cem Concr Res. 2021;140:106316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong KJ, Yang RY, Zou RP, et al. Role of interparticle forces in the formation of random loose packing. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;96(14):145505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu AB, Bridgwater J, Burbidge A. On the modelling of the packing of fine particles. Powder Technol. 1997;92(3):185–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Shi C, Yuan Q, et al. Influences of chloride immersion on zeta potential and chloride concentration index of cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res. 2018;106:49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel N, Lemaître A, Flatt RJ, et al. Steady state flow of cement suspensions: a micromechanical state of the art. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40(1):77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessaies-Bey H, Palacios M, Pustovgar E, et al. Non-adsorbing polymers and yield stress of cement paste: effect of depletion forces. Cem Concr Res. 2018;111:209–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCW, editor. CRS handbook of chemistry and physics. Cleveland, OH: Chemical Rubber Company; 1970:50.
   Google Scholar
• Flatt RJ, Bowen P. Electrostatic repulsion between particles in cement suspensions: domain of validity of linearized Poisson–Boltzmann equation for nonideal electrolytes. Cem Concr Res. 2003;33(6):781–791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchon D, Juilland P, Gallucci E, et al. Molecular and submolecular scale effects of comb-copolymers on tri-calcium silicate reactivity: toward molecular design. J Am Ceram Soc. 2017;100(3):817–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo W, She W, Li W, et al. Effects of fineness and substitution ratio of limestone powder on yield stress of cement suspensions. Mater Struct. 2019;52(4):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar