Rheological and flow characteristics of fresh concrete in the rotational rheometer

References

• Morris BA. The science and technology of flexible packaging: multilayer films from resin and process to end use. William Andrew, United States: Cambridge, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Tattersall GH, Banfill PFG. The rheology of fresh concrete. No. Monograph. London, UK: Pitman, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Feys D, Khayat KH. Recent developments in evaluating pumping behavior of flowable and self-consolidating concretes. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials. 2015;4(3-4):238–251. doi:10.1080/21650373.2014.997321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraris CF, De Larrard F, Martys N. Fresh concrete rheology: recent developments. In S. Mindess, J. Skalny, editor. Materials science of concrete VI. Amer. Cer. Soc. Wiley, 2001. p. 215–241.
   Google Scholar
• Heirman G, Vandewalle L, Van Gemert D, et al. Integration approach of the Couette inverse problem of powder type self-compacting concrete in a wide-gap concentric cylinder rheometer. Journal of non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics. 2008;150(2–3):93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Askarian M, Fakhretaha Aval S, Joshaghani A. A comprehensive experimental study on the performance of pumice powder in self-compacting concrete (SCC). Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials. 2018;7(6):340–356. doi:10.1080/21650373.2018.1511486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Lu A, Wang K. Effect of interparticle action on shear thickening behavior of cementitious composites: modeling and experimental validation. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials. 2020;9(2):78–93. doi:10.1080/21650373.2019.1692257.
   Google Scholar
• Roussel N. Correlation between yield stress and slump: Comparison between numerical simulations and concrete rheometers results. Mater Struct. 2007;39(4):501–509. doi:10.1617/s11527-005-9035-2.
   Google Scholar
• Feys D, Khayat KH. Particle migration during concrete rheometry: How bad is it? Mater Struct. 2017;50(2):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Badry F, Kulasegaram S, Karihaloo BL. Estimation of the yield stress and distribution of large aggregates from slump flow test of self-compacting concrete mixes using smooth particle hydrodynamics simulation. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials. 2016;5(3):117–134. doi:10.1080/21650373.2014.979266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahia A, Khayat KH. Analytical models for estimating yield stress of high-performance pseudoplastic grout. Cement Concr Res. 2001;31(5):731–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Larrard F, Ferraris CF, Sedran T. Fresh concrete: a Herschel-Bulkley material. Mat Struct. 1998;31(7):494–498.
   Google Scholar
• Le HD, De Schutter G, Kadri EH, et al. Computational fluid dynamics calibration of tattersall MK-II type rheometer for concrete. Appl Rheol. 2013;23:3.
   Google Scholar
• Li M, et al. Calculation of rheological parameters of cement-based materials based on solution to the Couette inverse problem. J Chin Ceram Soc. 2020;48:1302–1309.
   Google Scholar
• Feys D, Verhoeven R, De Schutter G. Evaluation of time independent rheological models applicable to fresh self-compacting concrete. Appl Rheol. 2007;17(5):56244–1–56244-10.
   Google Scholar
• Feys D, Wallevik JE, Yahia A, et al. Extension of the Reiner–Riwlin equation to determine modified bingham parameters measured in coaxial cylinders rheometers. Mater Struct. 2013;46(1–2):289–311.
   Google Scholar
• Reiner M. Deformation and flow: an elementary introduction to theoretical rheology. HK Lewis. Great Britain: H.K. Lewis & Co, Limited. 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Heirman G, Hendrickx R, Vandewalle L, et al. Integration approach of the Couette inverse problem of powder type self-compacting concrete in a wide-gap concentric cylinder rheometer: Part II. Influence of mineral additions and chemical admixtures on the shear thickening flow behaviour. Cement Concr Res. 2009;39(3):171–181.
   Google Scholar
• Wallevik JE. Rheology of particle suspensions: fresh concrete, mortar and cement paste with various types of lignosulfonates. Fakultet for ingeniørvitenskap og teknologi. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, Ep, and Dw Fowler. “Development of a Portable Rheometer for Fresh Portland Cement Concrete.” International Center of Aggregates Research (2004): 321. Research report ICAR-105-3. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/handle/2152/35338
   Google Scholar
• Nazari B, Moghaddam RH, Bousfield D. A three-dimensional model of a vane rheometer. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 2013;42:289–295.
   Google Scholar
• Yan J, James AE. The yield surface of viscoelastic and plastic fluids in a vane viscometer. J non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 1997;70(3):237–253.
   Google Scholar
• Dzuy NQ, Boger DV. Yield stress measurement for concentrated suspensions. J Rheol. 1983;27(4):321–349.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes HA, Carnali JO. The vane‐in‐cup as a novel rheometer geometry for shear thinning and thixotropic materials. J Rheol. 1990;34(6):841–866.
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Kee DD, Khismatullin D. Numerical simulation of power law and yield stress fluid flows in double concentric cylinder with slotted rotor and vane geometries. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2011;166(12–13):734–744.
   Google Scholar
• Baravian C, Lalante A, Parker A. Vane rheometry with a large, finite gap. Appl Rheol. 2002;12(2):81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Shankaran GV, Baris Dogruoz M. “Validation of an advanced fan model with multiple reference frame approach.” 2010 12th IEEE intersociety conference on thermal and thermomechanical phenomena in electronic systems. IEEE, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Han J, Liu Y, et al. Integration approach to solve the Couette inverse problem based on nonlinear rheological models in a coaxial cylinder rheometer. J Rheol. 2019;63(1):55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Secrieru E, Mechtcherine V, Schröfl C, et al. Rheological characterisation and prediction of pumpability of strain-hardening cement-based-composites (SHCC) with and without addition of superabsorbent polymers (SAP) at various temperatures. Construct Build Mater. 2016;112:581–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallevik JE. Relationship between the Bingham parameters and slump. Cement Concr Res. 2006;36(7):1214–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm G. A practical approach to rheology and rheometry. Karlsruhe: Haake; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wallevik JE. Minimizing bottom-effects in the coaxial cylinders viscometer: Viscoplastic flow inside the ConTec BML Viscometer 3. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 2008;155(3):116–123.
   Google Scholar
• Savarmand S, Heniche M, Bechard V, et al. Analysis of the vane rheometer using 3D finite element simulation. J. Rheol. 2007;51(2):161–177.
   Google Scholar
• Liu G, Cheng W, Chen L, et al. Rheological properties of fresh concrete and its application on shotcrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020;243:118180 doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118180.
   Google Scholar
• Wallevik OH, Feys D, Wallevik JE, et al. Avoiding inaccurate interpretations of rheological measurements for cement-based materials. Cement Concr Res. 2015;78:100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyola FR, de Lima e Silva W, Campos LGC, et al. Rheometric assessment and numerical simulation of steady-state and periodic flows of fabric-water mixtures in household top-load washing machines. Chem Eng Res Design. 2018;137:273–290.
   Google Scholar
• Malvern LE. Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium. No. Monograph. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, the United States: Prentice Hall Inc.1969.
   Google Scholar
• Franzke R, Sebben S, Bark T, et al. Evaluation of the multiple reference frame approach for the modelling of an axial cooling fan. Energies. 2019;12(15):2934.
   Google Scholar
• Roache PJ. Quantification of uncertainty in computational fluid dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 1997;29(1):123–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anne-Archard D, Marouche M, Boisson H-C. Hydrodynamics and Metzner–Otto correlation in stirred vessels for yield stress fluids. Chem Eng J. 2006;125(1):15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Laskar AI, Bhattacharjee R. Torque–speed relationship in a concrete rheometer with vane geometry. Constr Build Mater. 2011;25(8):3443–3449.
   Google Scholar
• Ovarlez G, Mahaut F, Bertrand F, et al. Flows and heterogeneities with a vane tool: Magnetic resonance imaging measurements. J Rheol. 2011;55(2):197–223.
   Google Scholar
• Montomoli F, et al. Limitations in turbomachinery CFD. Uncertainty quantification in computational fluid dynamics and aircraft engines.Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 21–32.
   Google Scholar