Rheology control of limestone calcined clay cement pastes by modifying the content of fine-grained metakaolin

References

• Juenger MCG, Winnefeld F, Provis JL, et al. Advances in alternative cementitious binders. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(12):1232–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzenda TR, Hou P, Kawashima S, et al. The role of limestone and calcined clay on the rheological properties of LC3. Cem Concr Compos. 2020;107:103516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair N, Mohammed Haneefa K, Santhanam M, et al. A study on fresh properties of limestone calcined clay blended cementitious systems. Constr Build Mater. 2020;254:119326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snellings R. Assessing, understanding and unlocking supplementary cementitious materials. RILEM Tech Lett. 2016;1:50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lothenbach B, Scrivener K, Hooton RD. Supplementary cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res. 2011;41(12):1244–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrivener K, Martirena F, Bishnoi S, et al. Calcined clay limestone cements (LC3). Cem Concr Res. 2018;114:49–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma M, Bishnoi S, Martirena F, et al. Limestone calcined clay cement and concrete: a state-of-the-art review. Cem Concr Res. 2021;149:106564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoni M, Rossen J, Martirena F, et al. Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(12):1579–1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhandapani Y, Santhanam M. Assessment of pore structure evolution in the limestone calcined clay cementitious system and its implications for performance. Cem Concr Compos. 2017;84:36–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay R, Li L, Celik K. Shrinkage, hydration, and strength development of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) with different sulfation levels. Cem Concr Compos. 2022;127:104403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez Berriel S, Favier A, Rosa Domínguez E, et al. Assessing the environmental and economic potential of limestone calcined clay cement in Cuba. J Clean Prod. 2016;124:361–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui H, Hou P, Liu Y, et al. Limestone calcined clay cement: mechanical properties, crystallography, and microstructure development. J Sustain Cem Mater. 2022;11:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Zunino F, Scrivener K. The influence of the filler effect on the sulfate requirement of blended cements. Cem Concr Res. 2019;126:105918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet F, Li X, Scrivener K. Determination of the amount of reacted metakaolin in calcined clay blends. Cem Concr Res. 2018;106:40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet F, Boehm-Courjault E, Scrivener K. Investigation of C-A-S-H composition, morphology and density in limestone calcined clay cement (LC3). Cem Concr Res. 2019;115:70–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal IMR, Aranda MAG, Santacruz I, et al. Early-age reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays in LC3 cements: a multitechnique investigation including pair distribution function analysis. J Sustain Cem Mater. 2022;11:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, He S, Gan Y, et al. A review of printing strategies, sustainable cementitious materials and characterization methods in the context of extrusion-based 3D concrete printing. J Build Eng. 2022;45:103599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alujas A, Fernández R, Quintana R, et al. Pozzolanic reactivity of low grade kaolinitic clays: influence of calcination temperature and impact of calcination products on OPC hydration. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015;108:94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avet F, Snellings R, Alujas Diaz A, et al. Development of a new rapid, relevant and reliable (R3) test method to evaluate the pozzolanic reactivity of calcined kaolinitic clays. Cem Concr Res. 2016;85:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Rodriguez CR, Li Z, et al. Effect of different grade levels of calcined clays on fresh and hardened properties of ternary-blended cementitious materials for 3D printing. Cem Concr Compos. 2020;114:103708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paiva H, Velosa A, Cachim P, et al. Effect of metakaolin dispersion on the fresh and hardened state properties of concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(4):607–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee S, Basavaraj AS, Rahul AV, et al. Sustainable materials for 3D concrete printing. Cem Concr Compos. 2021;122:104156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreiro S, Herfort D, Damtoft JS. Effect of raw clay type, fineness, water-to-cement ratio and fly ash addition on workability and strength performance of calcined clay – limestone Portland cements. Cem Concr Res. 2017;101:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sposito R, Maier M, Beuntner N, et al. Physical and mineralogical properties of calcined common clays as SCM and their impact on flow resistance and demand for superplasticizer. Cem Concr Res. 2022;154:106743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassagnabère F, Diederich P, Mouret M, et al. Impact of metakaolin characteristics on the rheological properties of mortar in the fresh state. Cem Concr Compos. 2013;37:95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beigh MAB, Nerella VN, Schröfl C, et al. Studying the rheological behavior of limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) mixtures in the context of extrusion-based 3D-printing, in: 3rd Int. Conf. Calcined Clays Sustain. Concr. Delhi; 2019. pp. 1–8. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336616922_Studying_the_rheological_behavior_of_limestone_calcined_clay_cement_LC_mixtures_in_the_context_of_extrusion-_based_3D-printing.
   Google Scholar
• Kandagaddala RK, Nanthagopalan P. Rheological characterization of cementitious suspensions with limestone calcined clay for pumping applications. J Mater Civ Eng. 2022;34(8):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ez-Zaki H, Marangu JM, Bellotto M, et al. A fresh view on limestone calcined clay cement (LC3) pastes. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(11):3037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Jia Z, Luo Z, et al. Printability and pore structure of 3D printing low carbon concrete using recycled clay brick powder with various particle features. J Sustain Cem Mater. 2022;11:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Boddepalli U, Panda B, Ranjani Gandhi IS. Rheology and printability of Portland cement based materials: a review. J Sustain Cem Mater. 2022;11:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Roussel N, Bessaies-Bey H, Kawashima S, et al. Recent advances on yield stress and elasticity of fresh cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res. 2019;124:105798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahaut F, Mokéddem S, Chateau X, et al. Effect of coarse particle volume fraction on the yield stress and thixotropy of cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res. 2008;38(11):1276–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrot A, Lecompte T, Estellé P, et al. Structural build-up of rigid fiber reinforced cement-based materials. Mater Struct. 2013;46(9):1561–1568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel N, Ovarlez G, Garrault S, et al. The origins of thixotropy of fresh cement pastes. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(1):148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Kawashima S. Distinguishing dynamic and static yield stress of fresh cement mortars through thixotropy. Cem Concr Compos. 2018;86:288–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian Y, Kawashima S. Use of creep recovery protocol to measure static yield stress and structural rebuilding of fresh cement pastes. Cem Concr Res. 2016;90:73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struble LJ, Schultz MA. Using creep and recovery to study flow behavior of fresh cement paste. Cem Concr Res. 1993;23(6):1369–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beigh MAB, Nerella VN, Schröfl C, et al. Studying the Rheological Behavior of Limestone Calcined Clay Cement (LC 3) Mixtures in the Context of Extrusion-Based 3D-Printing. In Calcined clays for sustainable concrete (pp. 229-236). Springer, Singapore. Calcined clays for sustainable concrete. 2010;25:229–236. Springer, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Roussel N. A thixotropy model for fresh fluid concretes: theory, validation and applications. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(10):1797–1806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel N. Rheological requirements for printable concretes. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma S, Qian Y, Kawashima S. Experimental and modeling study on the non-linear structural build-up of fresh cement pastes incorporating viscosity modifying admixtures. Cem Concr Res. 2018;108:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Q, Zhou D, Khayat KH, et al. On the measurement of evolution of structural build-up of cement paste with time by static yield stress test vs. small amplitude oscillatory shear test. Cem Concr Res. 2017;99:183–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao D, El Cheikh K, Shi C, et al. Structural build-up of cementitious paste with nano-Fe3O4 under time-varying magnetic fields. Cem Concr Res. 2019;124:105857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeini MA, Hosseinpoor M, Yahia A. Effectiveness of the rheometric methods to evaluate the build-up of cementitious mortars used for 3D printing. Constr Build Mater. 2020;257:119551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khayat KH, Meng W, Vallurupalli K, et al. Rheological properties of ultra-high-performance concrete — an overview. Cem Concr Res. 2019;124:105828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feys D, Wallevik JE, Yahia A, et al. Extension of the Reiner-Riwlin equation to determine modified Bingham parameters measured in coaxial cylinders rheometers. Mater Struct. 2013;46(1–2):289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerella VN, Beigh MAB, Fataei S, et al. Strain-based approach for measuring structural build-up of cement pastes in the context of digital construction. Cem Concr Res. 2019;115:530–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova I, Mechtcherine V. Possibilities and challenges of constant shear rate test for evaluation of structural build-up rate of cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res. 2020;130:105974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezger TG. The rheology handbook. 4th ed. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; Hanover, Germany. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dai X, Aydın S, Yardımcı MY, et al. Effects of activator properties and GGBFS/FA ratio on the structural build-up and rheology of AAC. Cem Concr Res. 2020;138:106253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai X, Aydin S, Yücel Yardimci M, et al. Rheology, early-age hydration and microstructure of alkali-activated GGBFS-Fly ash-limestone mixtures. Cem Concr Compos. 2021;124:104244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEN-EN 196-3. Methods of testing cement. Determination of setting times and soundness, NEN; 2016. 18. https://shop.bsigroup.com.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa AM, Diederich P, Yahia A. Effectiveness of rotational shear in dispersing concentrated cement suspensions. J Sustain Cem Mater. 2015;4:205–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelardi G, Flatt RJ. Working mechanisms of water reducers and superplasticizers. Elsevier Ltd; Cambridge, UK. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Marchon D, Kawashima S, Bessaies-Bey H, et al. Hydration and rheology control of concrete for digital fabrication: potential admixtures and cement chemistry. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:96–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchon D, Flatt RJ. Impact of chemical admixtures on cement hydration. Elsevier Ltd, Cambridge, UK. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Steins P, Poulesquen A, Diat O, et al. Structural evolution during geopolymerization from an early age to consolidated material. Langmuir. 2012;28(22):8502–8510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauffinet-Garrault S. The rheology of cement during setting, in: underst. Rheol. Concr., Elsevier; Cambridge, UK. 2012; p. 96–113.
   Google Scholar
• Zunino F, Scrivener K. Insights on the role of alumina content and the filler effect on the sulfate requirement of PC and blended cements. Cem Concr Res. 2022;160:106929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, He S, Zhang Y, et al. 3D printing of calcined clay-limestone-based cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res. 2021;149:106553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel N, Lemaître A, Flatt RJ, et al. Steady state flow of cement suspensions: a micromechanical state of the art. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40:77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Larrard F. Concrete mixture proportioning: a scientific approach. London: CRC Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fung WWS, Kwan AKH. Role of water film thickness in rheology of CSF mortar. Cem Concr Compos. 2010;32:255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LG, Chen XQ, Chu SH, et al. Seawater cement paste: effects of seawater and roles of water film thickness and superplasticizer dosage. Constr Build Mater. 2019;229:116862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coussot P. Introduction to the rheology of complex fluids. Woodhead Publishing; Cambridge, UK. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wong HHC, Kwan AKH. Packing density of cementitious materials: part 1-measurement using a wet packing method. Mater Struct Constr. 2008;41:689–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntke W. Wasseranspruch von feinen kornhaufwerken. Beton. 2002;52:242–248.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen AM, Flatt RJ, Bergström L. Relating the molecular structure of comb-type superplasticizers to the compression rheology of MgO suspensions. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36:1231–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu C, de Larrard F. The rheology of fresh high-performance concrete. Cem Concr Res. 1996;26:283–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance K, Kumar A, Sant G, et al. The rheological properties of ternary binders containing Portland cement, limestone, and metakaolin or fly ash. Cem Concr Res. 2013;52:196–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanthagopalan P, Haist M, Santhanam M, et al. Investigation on the influence of granular packing on the flow properties of cementitious suspensions. Cem Concr Compos. 2008;30:763–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahul AV, Sharma A, Santhanam M. A desorptivity-based approach for the assessment of phase separation during extrusion of cementitious materials. Cem Concr Compos. 2020;108:103546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunger M, Brouwers HJH. Flow analysis of water-powder mixtures: application to specific surface area and shape factor. Cem Concr Compos. 2009;31:39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favier A, Hot J, Habert G, et al. Flow properties of MK-based geopolymer pastes. A comparative study with standard Portland cement pastes. Soft Matter. 2014;10(8):1134–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrot A, Lecompte T, Khelifi H, et al. Yield stress and bleeding of fresh cement pastes. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42:937–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berodier E, Scrivener K. Understanding the filler effect on the nucleation and growth of C-S-H. J Am Ceram Soc. 2014;97:3764–3773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Sha S, Zhou B, et al. Adsorption and dispersion capability of polycarboxylate-based superplasticizers: a review. J Sustain Cem Mater. 2022;11:319–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plank J, Yang F, Storcheva O. Study of the interaction between cement phases and polycarboxylate superplasticizers possessing silyl functionalities. J Sustain Cem Mater. 2014;3:77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Schlangen E, Çopuroğlu O. Effect of slags of different origins and the role of sulfur in slag on the hydration characteristics of cement-slag systems. Constr Build Mater. 2022;316:125266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar