Study of 3D printed concrete with low-carbon cementitious materials based on its rheological properties and mechanical performances

References

• Web of URBANIST. World's First 3D-Printed Apartment Complex. (2015-01-20). https://weburbanist.com/2015/01/20/made-in-china-worlds-first-3d-printed apartment-complex/.
   Google Scholar
• Salet TAM, Ahmed ZY, Bos FP, et al. Design of a 3D printed concrete bridge by testing, Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2018;13(3):222–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Cheikh K, Remond S, Khalil N, et al. Numerical and experimental studies of aggregate blocking in mortar extrusion. Construct Build Mater. 2017;145:452–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasser G, Pammer L, Koell H, et al. Complex architecture in printed concrete: the case of the innsbruck university 350th anniversary pavilion cohesion. In: Bos F, Lucas S, Wolfs R, Salet T, Editors. Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication: Digital Concrete 2020, RILEM book series. Vol. 28. Springer; 2020, p. 1116–1127.
   Google Scholar
• Weger D, Stengel T, Gehlen C, et al. Approval for the construction of the first 3D printed detached house in Germany – significance of large scale element testing. In: Jones SZ, Kreiger EL, editors. Standards development for cement and concrete for use in additive construction. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2021. p. 144–169.
   Google Scholar
• Weger D, Gehlen C, Korte W, et al. Building rethoght – 3D concrete printing in building practice. Construction Robotics. 2021;5;203-210.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan MK, Rahul AV, VAN Tittelboom K, et al. Rheological and pumping behaviour of 3D printable cementitious materials with varying aggregate content. Cem Concr Res. 2021;139:106258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishijo K, Ohno M, Ishida T. Quantitative evaluation of buildability in 3D concrete printing based on shear vane test. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 2019. p.1891-1901
   Google Scholar
• Boddepalli U, Panda B, Ranjani Gandhi IS. Rheology and printability of Portland cement based materials: a review. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2022;9;1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza MT, Ferreira IM, Guzi DE Moraes E, et al. 3D printed concrete for large-scale buildings: an overview of rheology, printing parameters, chemical admixtures, reinforcements, and economic and environmental prospects. J Build Eng. 2020;32:101833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel N. Rheological requirements for printable concretes. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahul AV, Santhanam M, Meena H, et al. 3D printable concrete: mixture design and test methods, cement. Concr Compos. 2019;97:13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao D, De Schryver R, Shi C, et al. Thixotropic structural build-up of cement-based materials: a state-of-the-art review. Cem Concr Compos. 2021;122:104152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Tian Z, Ma G, et al. Interlayer bonding improvement of 3D printed concrete with polymer modified mortar: experiments and molecular dynamics studies, cement concr. Compos 2020;110:103571.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Hou Z, Chen C, et al. Mix design concepts for 3D printable concrete: a review. Cem Concr Compos. 2021;122:104155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger. An ab initio approach for thixotropy characterisation of (nanoparticle-infused) 3D printable concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;224:372–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter G, Lesage K, Mechtcherine V, et al. Vision of 3D printing with concrete – technical, economic and environmental potentials. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Veer F, Copuroglu O, et al. Feasibility of using low CO2 concrete alternatives in extrusion-based 3D concrete printing. In: Wangler T, Flatt RJ, editors. First Rilem International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication – Digital Concrete 2018. Dordrecht: Springer; 2019. p. 269–276.
   Google Scholar
• Panda B, Tan MJ. Rheological behavior of high volume fly ash mixtures containing micro silica for digital construction application. Mater Lett. 2019;237:348–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CK, Noh MH, Park TH. Rheological properties of cementitious materials containing mineral admixtures. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35(5):842–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay YWD, Ting GHA, Qian Y. Time gap effect on bond strength of 3D-printed concrete. Virtual Phys Prototyping. 2019;14(1):104–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Wang L, Ma G. Mechanical improvement of continuous steel microcable reinforced geopolymer composites for 3D printing subjected to different loading conditions. Compos B Eng. 2020;187:107796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda B, Unluer C, Tan MJ. Investigation of the rheology and strength of geopolymer mixtures for extrusion-based 3D printing. Cement Concr Compos. 2018;94:307–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghamdi H, Nair SAO, Neithalath N. Insights into material design, extrusion rheology, and properties of 3D-printable alkali-activated fly ash-based binders. Mater Des. 2019;167:107634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahul AV, Santhanam M. Evaluating the printability of concretes containing lightweight coarse aggregates. Cem Concr Compos. 2020;109:103570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, et al. Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete. Cement Concr. Res. 2012;42(3):558–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay YWD, Qian Y, Tan MJ. Printability region for 3D concrete printing using slump and slump flow test. Compos B Eng. 2019;174:106968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddel PV, Boger DV. Yield stress measurements with the vane. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech. 1996;63:235–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham EC. Fluidity and plasticity. vol. 2, McGraw-Hill; 1922. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wallevik OH, Feys D, Wallevik JE, et al. Avoiding inaccurate interpretations of rheological measurements for cement-based materials. Cem Concr Res. 2015;78:100–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibragimov R, Fediuk R. Improving the early strength of concrete: effect of mechanochemical activation of the cementitious suspension and using of various superplasticizers. Constr Build Mater. 2019;226:839–848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndahirw D, Zmamou H, Lenormand H, et al. The role of supplementary cementitious materials in hydration, durability and shrinkage of cement-based materials, their environmental and economic benefits: a review. Clean Mater. 2022;5:100123.
   Google Scholar
• Nerella VN. Development and characterisation of cement-based materials for extrusion-based 3D-printing. Technische Universitat Dresden; 2019,Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Hou Z, Chen C, et al. Design of 3D printable concrete based on the relationship between flowability of cement paste and optimum aggregate content. Cement Concr Compos. 2019;104:103406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil N, Aouad G, El Cheikh K, et al. Use of calcium sulfoaluminate cements for setting control of 3D-printing mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2017;157:382–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Li L, Zheng Y, et al. Yield stress and thixotropy control of 3D-printed calcium sulfoaluminate cement composites with metakaolin related to structural build-up. Constr Build Mater. 2020;252:119090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar