Time-dependent buildability evaluation of 3D printed concrete: experimental validation and numerical simulation

References

• Pegna J. Exploratory investigation of solid freeform construction. Autom Constr. 1997;5(5):427–437. doi: 10.1016/S0926-5805(96)00166-5.
   Google Scholar
• Labonnote N, Rønnquist A, Manum B, et al. Additive construction: state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Autom Constr. 2016;72:347–366. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshnevis B. Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr. 2004;13(1):5–19. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs RJM, Bos FP, Salet TAM. Early age mechanical behaviour of 3D printed concrete: numerical modelling and experimental testing. Cem Concr Res. 2018;106:103–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuyan L, Zhao D, Hou X, et al. Overview of the development of 3D-printing concrete: a review. Appl Sci. 2021;11(21):9822. doi: 10.3390/app11219822.
   Google Scholar
• Akbar M, Hussain Z, Imran M, et al. Concrete matrix based on marble powder, waste glass sludge, and crumb rubber: pathways towards sustainable concrete. Front Mater. 2024;10. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2023.1329386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul SC, Van GP, Tan MJ, et al. A review of 3D concrete printing systems and materials properties: current status and future research prospects. Rapid Prototyp J. 2018;24(4):784–798. doi: 10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos F, Wolfs R, Ahmed Z, et al. Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2016;11(3):209–225. doi: 10.1080/17452759.2016.1209867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Wang J, Wang X. A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Autom Constr. 2016;68:21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gizem SH, Aghabaglou AM. Assessment of materials, design parameters and some properties of 3D printing concrete mixtures; a state-of-the-art review. Constr Build Mater. 2022;316:125865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanqun X, Yuan Q, Li Z, et al. Correlation of interlayer properties and rheological behaviors of 3DPC with various printing time intervals. Addit Manuf. 2021;47:102327. doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayathilakage R, Rajeev P, Sanjayan JG. Yield stress criteria to assess the buildability of 3D concrete printing. Constr Build Mater. 2020;240:117989. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Wu Q, Ma H, et al. Corrosion resistance of magnesium ammonium phosphate cement-based coatings modified by calcium sulfoaluminate cement on carbon steel in a saline medium. J Mater Civ Eng. 2024;36(6). doi: 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suiker A. Mechanical performance of wall structures in 3D printing processes: theory, design tools and experiments. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;137:145–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs R, Suiker A. Structural failure during extrusion-based 3D printing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2019;104(1–4):565–584. doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-03844-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman AU, Kim JH. 3D concrete printing: a systematic review of rheology, mix designs, mechanical, microstructural, and durability characteristics. Materials. 2021;14(14):3800. doi: 10.3390/ma14143800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An D, Zhang YX, Yang R. Numerical modelling of 3D concrete printing: material models, boundary conditions and failure identification. Eng Struct. 2024;299:117104. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA. Mix suitable for concrete 3D printing: a review. Mater Today Proc. 2020;32:831–837. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.825.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfs RJM, Bos FP, Salet TAM. Triaxial compression testing on early age concrete for numerical analysis of 3D concrete printing. Cem Concr Compos. 2019;104:103344. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.103344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel N. Rheological requirements for printable concretes. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo D, Khoshnevis B, Carlson A. Experimental and numerical techniques to characterize structural properties of fresh concrete. In: ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2013. doi: 10.1115/IMECE2013-63993.
   Google Scholar
• Akbar M, Hussain Z, Pan H, et al. Impact of waste crumb rubber on concrete performance incorporating silica fume and fly ash to make a sustainable low carbon concrete. Struct Eng Mech. 2023;85(2):275–287. doi: 10.12989/sem.2023.85.2.275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong H, Han S, Choi S, et al. Rheological property criteria for buildable 3D printing concrete. Materials. 2019;12(4):657. doi: 10.3390/ma12040657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Zeranka S, Zijl GV. 3D concrete printing: a lower bound analytical model for buildability performance quantification. Autom Constr. 2019;106:102904. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhametrakhimov R. Investigation of plasticizing additives based on polycarboxylate esters on the properties of concretes formed by 3D printing. Constr Mater Prod. 2022;5(5):42–58. doi: 10.58224/2618-7183-2022-5-5-42-58.
   Google Scholar
• Perrot A, Rangeard D, Pierre A. Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques. Mater Struct. 2016;49(4):1213–1220. doi: 10.1617/s11527-015-0571-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbar M, Pan H, Huang J, et al. Influence of various earth-retaining walls on the dynamic response comparison, based on 3D modeling. Comput Model Eng Sci. 2024;139(3):2835–2863. doi: 10.32604/cmes.2024.046993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amran M, Abdelgader HS, Onaizi AM, et al. 3D-printable alkali-activated concretes for building applications: a critical review. Constr Build Mater. 2022;319:126126. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter G, Lesage K, Mechtcherine V, et al. Vision of 3D printing with concrete—technical, economic and environmental potential. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengesha, M., Schmidt, A., Göbel, L., Lahmer, T. (2020). Numerical Modeling of an Extrusion-Based 3D Concrete Printing Process Considering a Spatially Varying Pseudo-Density Approach. In: Bos, F., Lucas, S., Wolfs, R., Salet, T. (eds) Second RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication. DC 2020. RILEM Bookseries, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_33.
   Google Scholar
• Akbar M, Umar T, Hussain Z, et al. Effect of human hair fibers on the performance of concrete incorporating high dosage of silica fume. Appl Sci. 2022;13(1):124. doi: 10.3390/app13010124.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt T, Mbele J-J, Wang K, et al. Using fly ash, clay, and fibers for simultaneous improvement of concrete green strength and consolidatability for slip-form pavement. J Mater Civ Eng. 2010;22(2):196–206. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2010)22:2(196).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W-F, Han D-J. Plasticity for structural engineers. J. Ross Publishing; 2007. ISBN 1932159754, 9781932159752
   Google Scholar
• Lloret E, Shahab AR, Linus M, et al. Complex concrete structures: merging existing casting techniques with digital fabrication. Comput Aided Des. 2015;60:40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüsken G, Brouwers H. On the early-age behavior of zero-slump concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(3):501–510. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu G, Wang K. Investigation into yield behavior of fresh cement paste: model and experiment. ACI Mater J. 2010;107(1):8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel N. A thixotropy model for fresh fluid concretes: theory, validation and applications. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(10):1797–1806. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfani R, Guerrini GL. Rheological test methods for the characterization of extrudable cement-based materials—a review. Mater Struct. 2005;38(2):239–247. doi: 10.1007/BF02479349.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C150/C150M-20. Standard specification for sulfoaluminate and Portland cement. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wille K, Naaman AE, Parra-Montesinos G. Ultra-high performance concrete with compressive strength exceeding 150 MPa (22 ksi): a simpler way. ACI Mater J. 2011;108(1):46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umar T, Yousaf M, Akbar M, et al. An experimental study on non-destructive evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of a sustainable concrete incorporating industrial waste. Materials. 2023;15(20):7346. doi: 10.3390/ma15207346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiva B, Sedghi R, Hojati M. Evaluating the printability and rheological and mechanical properties of 3D-printed earthen mixes for carbon-neutral buildings. Sustainability. 2023;15(21):15617. doi: 10.3390/su152115617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil; 2013. ASTM, Designation: D 2166-00.
   Google Scholar
• Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil; 2013. ASTM, Designation: D 2166-00
   Google Scholar
• Akbar M, Huali P, Guoqiang O, et al. Investigation of the displacement-based seismic performance of geogrid earth-retaining walls using three-dimensional finite element modeling. Results Eng. 2024;21:101802. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101802.
   Google Scholar
• Sun B, Li P, Wang D, et al. Evaluation of mechanical properties and anisotropy of 3D printed concrete at different temperatures. J. Struct. 2023;51:391–401. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad Q, Wang X, Wang W, et al. Coordinated adjustment and optimization of setting time, flowability, and mechanical strength for construction 3D printing material derived from solid waste. Constr Build Mater. 2020;259:119854. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad Q, Abbas N, Akbar M, et al. Influence of print speed and nozzle diameter on the fiber alignment in 3D printed ultra-high-performance concrete. Front Mater. 2024;11:1355647. doi: 10.3389/fmats.2024.1355647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waqar S, Sun Q, Liu J, et al. Numerical investigation of thermal behavior and melt pool morphology in multi-track multi-layer selective laser melting of the 316L steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;112(3–4):879–895. doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-06360-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waqar S, Guo K, Sun J. Evolution of residual stress behavior in selective laser melting (SLM) of 316L stainless steel through preheating and in-situ re-scanning techniques. Opt Laser Technol. 2022;149:107806. doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waqar S, Guo K, Sun J. FEM analysis of thermal and residual stress profile in selective laser melting of 316L stainless steel. J Manuf Process. 2021;66:81–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad Q, Shen J, Naseem R, et al. Influence of phase change material on concrete behavior for construction 3D printing. Constr Build Mater. 2021;309:125121. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad Q, Muhammad U, Waqar S. Bibliographic analysis on 3D printing in the building and construction industry: printing systems, material properties, challenges, and future trends. J Sustain Constr Mater Technol. 2022;7(3):198–220. doi: 10.47481/jscmt.1143239.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Hussain A, Hussain Z, et al. Effect of carbon black and hybrid steel–polypropylene fiber on the mechanical and self-sensing characteristics of concrete considering different coarse aggregates’ sizes. Materials. 2021;14(23):7455. doi: 10.3390/ma14237455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain Z, Pu Z, Hussain A, et al. Effect of fiber dosage on water permeability using a newly designed apparatus and crack monitoring of steel fiber–reinforced concrete under direct tensile loading. Struct Health Monit. 2022;21(5):2083–2096. doi: 10.1177/14759217211052855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar