Genetically modified proteins: functional improvement and chimeragenesis

References

• Stalz H, Roth U, Schleuder D, Macht M, Haebel S, Strupat K, Peter-Katalinic J, Hanisch FG. The Geodia cydonium galectin exhibits prototype and chimera-type characteristics and a unique sequence polymorphism within its carbohydrate recognition domain. Glycobiology 2006; 16:402-14; PMID:16449348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan K-H, Cervantes V, So SP. Engineering of a novel hybrid enzyme: an anti-inflammatory drug target with triple catalytic activities directly converting arachidonic acid into the inflammatory prostaglandin E2. Prot Engin Design Select 2009; 22:733-40; http:/dx.doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzp058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruel L, Sulzenbacher G, Tison MC, Pujol A, Nicoletti C, Perrier J, Galinier A, Ropartz D, Fons M, Pompeo F, et al. α-Galactosidase/sucrose kinase (AgaSK), a novel bifunctional enzyme from the human microbiome coupling galactosidase and kinase activities. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:40814-23; PMID:21931163; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.286039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meceron R, Foucault M, Haser R, Mattes R, Watzlawick H, Gouet P. Crystal structure of liganded rat peroxisomal multifunctional enzyme type 1: a flexible molecule with two interconnected active sites. J Biol Chem 2012; 28:39642-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.394114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin C, Mukherjee S, Hanson AM, Frick DN, Schiffer CA. The interdomain interface in bifunctional enzyme protein 3/4A (NS3/4A) regulates protease and helicase activities Prot Sci 2013; 22:1786-98; PMID:24123290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasaragod P, Venkatesan R, Kiema TR, Hiltunen JK, Wierenga RK. Crystal structure of liganded rat peroxisomal multifunctional enzyme type 1: a flexible molecule with two interconnected active sites. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:24089-98; PMID:20463028; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.117606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia B, Cheong GW, Zhang S. Multifunctional enzymes in archaea: promiscuity and moonlight. Extremophiles 2013; 17:193-203; PMID:23283522; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00792-012-0509-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankhala RS, Lokareddy RK, Cingolani G. Structure of Human PIR1, an Atypical Dual-Specificity Phosphatase. Biochemistry 2014; 53:862-871; PMID:24447265; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi401240x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu X. Functional divergence in protein (family) sequence evolution. Genetica 2003; 118:133-41; PMID:12868604; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024197424306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippe H, Casane D, Gribaldo S, Lopez P, Meunier J. Heterotachy and functional shift in protein evolution. IUBMB Life 2003; 55:257-65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siltberg-Liberles J, Grahnen JA, Liberles DA. The evolution of protein structures and structural ensembles under functional constraint. Genes (Basel) 2011; 2:748-62; PMID:24710290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms MJ, Thornton JW. Evolutionary biochemistry: revealing the historical and physical causes of protein properties. Nat Rev Genet 2013; 14:559-71; PMID:23864121; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberles DA, Teichmann SA, Bahar I, Bastolla U, Bloom J, Bornberg-Bauer E, Colwell LJ, de Koning APJ, Dokholyan NV, Echave J, et al. The interface of protein structure, protein biophysics, and molecular evolution. Prot Sci 2012; 21:769-85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch M. Evolutionary diversification of the multimeric states of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:E2821-28; PMID:23836639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang TT, del Valle Marcos ML, Hwang JK, Echave J. A mechanistic stress model of protein evolution accounts for site-specific evolutionary rates and their relationship with packing density and flexibility. BMC Evol Biol 2014; 14:78; PMID:24716445; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcos ML, Echave J. Too packed to change: side-chain packing and site-specific substitution rates in protein evolution. PeerJ 2015; 3:e911; PMID:25922797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulenburg C, Hilvert D. Protein conformational disorder and enzyme catalysis. Top Curr Chem 2013; 337:41-67; PMID:23536241; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/128_2012_411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee R, Buljan M, Lang B, Weatheritt RJ, Daughdrill GW, Dunker AK, Fuxreiter M, Gough J, Gsponer J, Jones DT. Classification of intrinsically disordered regions and proteins. Chem Rev 2014; 114:6589-631; PMID:24773235; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr400525m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Huang Y. Advantages of proteins being disordered. Prot Sci 2014; 23:539-50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pro.2443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke T, Weber CC, Hurst LD. Why there is more to protein evolution than protein function: splicing, nucleosomes and dual-coding sequence. Biochem Soc Trans 2009; 37:756-61; PMID:19614589; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0370756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishida H, Kondo S, Nojiri H, Noma K, Oshima K. Evolutionary mechanisms of microbial genomes. Int J Evol Biol 2011; 2011:319479; PMID:21716727
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaparro-Riggers JF, Polizzi KM, Bommarius AS. Better library design: data-driven protein engineering. Biotechnol J 2007; 2:180-191; PMID:17183506; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/biot.200600170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basit N, Wechsler H. Prediction of enzyme mutant activity using computational mutagenesis and incremental transduction. Adv Bioinformatics 2011; 2011:958129; PMID:22007208; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/958129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vyas VK, Ukawala RD, Ghate M, Chintha C. Homology modeling a fast tool for drug discovery: current perspectives. Indian J Pharm Sci 2012; 74:1-17; PMID:23204616; http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0250-474X.102537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor WR, Hamilton RS, Sadowski MI. Prediction of contacts from correlated sequence substitutions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013; 23:473-79; PMID:23680395; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2013.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronk S, Páll S, Schulz R, Larsson P, Bjelkmar P, Apostolov R, Shirts MR, Smith JC, Kasson PM, van der Spoel D, et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 2013; 29:845-54; PMID:23407358; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose PW, Prli A, Bi C, Bluhm WF, Christie CH, Dutta S, Green RK, Goodsell DS, Westbrook JD, Woo J, et al. The RCSB Protein Data Bank: views of structural biology for basic and applied research and education. Nuc Acids Res 2014; 43:D345-56; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker M. Protein engineering: navigating between chance and reason. Nat methods 2011; 8:623-26; PMID:21799494; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koga N, Tatsumi-Koga R, Liu G, Xiao R, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Baker D. Principles for designing ideal protein structures. Nature 2012; 8: 491(7423):222-7; PMID:23135467; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang WH, Otting G, Jackson CJ. Protein engineering with unnatural amino acids. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2013; 23:581-87; PMID:23835227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2013.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadahalli S, Hemanth VV, Rao G, Gosavi S. Modeling non-native interactions in designed proteins. Isr J Chem 2014; 54:1230-40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201400035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthaei JF, DiMaio F, Richards JJ, Pozzo LD, Baker D, Baneyx F. Designing two-dimensional protein arrays through fusion of multimers and computational interface redesign. Nano Lett 2015; PMID:25986921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov DS. Therapeutic proteins. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 899:1-26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang P. Nanoscale engineering for smart biocatalysts with fine-tuned properties and functionalities. Top Catal 2012; 55(16-18):1107-13; PMID:22752519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger B, Liang C, Prell F, Fieselmann A, Moya A, Schuster S, Volker U, Dandekar T. Metabolic adaptation and protein complexes in prokaryotes. Metabolites 2012; 2:940-58; PMID:24957769; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo2040940
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carrera J, Estrela R, Luo J, Rai N, Tsoukalas A, Tagkopoulos I. An integrative, multi-scale, genome-wide model reveals the phenotypic landscape of Escherichia coli. Mol Syst Biol 2014; 10:735; PMID:24987114; http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20145108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler U, Saftel W, Stabenau H. A new type of a multifunctional - oxidation enzyme in Euglena. Plant Physiol 2003; 131:753-62; PMID:12586899; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.013151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam H, Lewis NE, Lerman JA, Lee DH, Chang RL, Kim D, Palsson BO. Network context and selection in the evolution to enzyme specificity. Science 2012; 337:1101-04; PMID:22936779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohrer C, RajBhandary UL. Protein Engineering. Nucleic Acids and Molecular Biology, edited by Gross HJ, 2009. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
   Google Scholar
• Turanli-Yildiz B, Alkim C, Cakar ZP. Protein Engineering Methods and Applications. Protein Engineering, edited by Kaumaya P, 2012. InTech, http://www.intechopen.com/books/protein-engineering/protein-engineering-methods-and-applications
   Google Scholar
• Meunier B. Hybrid molecules with a dual mode of action: dream or reality? Acc Chem Res 2008; 41:69-77; PMID:17665872; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar7000843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer AE, Qin Y, Park JG, McCombs JE. Design and application of genetically encoded biosensors. Trends Biotechnol 2011; 29:144-52; PMID:21251723; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SB, Izumi H. Functional artificial luciferases as an optical readout for bioassays Sung Bae Kim, Hiroshi Izumi. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 2014; 448:418-23; PMID:24802399; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.04.128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balabanova L, Golotin V, Kovalchuk S, Bulgakov A, Likhatskaya G, Son O, Rasskazov V. A novel bifunctional hybrid with marine bacterium alkaline phosphatase and Far Eastern holothurian mannan-binding lectin activities. PLoS One 2014; 9(11):e112729; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLachlan MJ, Sullivan RP, Zhao H. Directed enzyme evolution and high-throughput screening. Biocatalysis for the pharmaceutical industry: discovery, development, and manufacturing, edited by Tao J, Lin GQ, Liese A, 2009. John Wiley & Sons Asia (Pte) Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Amin SR, Erdin S, Ward RM, Lua RC, Lichtarge O. Prediction and experimental validation of enzyme substrate specificity in protein structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110:E4195-202; PMID:24145433; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305162110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golotin V, Balabanova L, Likhatskaya G, Rasskazov V. Recombinant production and characterization of a highly active alkaline phosphatase from marine bacterium Cobetia marina. Mar Biotechnol 2015; 17:130-43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takehiro N, Takeshi S, Tomoaki M, Tetsuya Y. Directed evolution of proteins through in vitro protein synthesis in liposomes. J Nucleic Acids 2012; 2012:923214; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/923214; PMID:22957209
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yong KJ, Scott DJ. Rapid directed evolution of stabilized proteins with cellular high-throughput encapsulation solubilization and screening (CHESS). Biotechnol Bioeng 2015; 112:438-46; PMID:25220691; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.25451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond A, Lovell S, Lorimer D, Walchli J, Mixon M, Wallace E, Thompkins K, Archer K, Burgin A, Stewart L. Combined protein construct and synthetic gene engineering for heterologous protein expression and crystallization using Gene Composer. BMC Biotechnol 2009; 9:37; PMID:19383143; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-9-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makino T, Skretas G, Georgiou G. Strain engineering for improved expression of recombinant proteins in bacteria. Microb Cell Fact 2011; 10:32.; PMID:21569582; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaepe S, Levisauskas D, Simutis R, Lübbert A. Data-based optimization of protein production processes. Biotechnol Lett 2014; 36:929-35; PMID:24557076; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-013-1448-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes S, Leonor IB, Mano JF, Reis RL, Kaplan DL. Natural and genetically engineered proteins for tissue engineering. Prog Polym Sci 2012; 37:1-17; PMID:22058578; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrilli E, Papa R, Tutino ML, Sannia G, Engineering of a psychrophilic bacterium for the bioremediation of aromatic compounds. Bioeng Bugs 2010; 1:213-16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mukherjee AK, Rai SK, Bordoloi NK. Biodegradation of waste chicken-feathers by an alkaline b-keratinase (Mukartinase) purified from a mutant Brevibacillus sp. strain AS-S10-II. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 2011; 65:1229-37; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zahrani NHM. Improving ability of Pseudomonas putida strain to biosynthesis of L-tryptophan. Life Sci J 2014; 11:476-81
   Google Scholar
• Sadhu S, Ghosh PK, Aditya G, Maiti TK. Optimization and strain improvement by mutation for enhanced cellulase production by Bacillus sp. (MTCC10046) isolated from cow dung. J King Saud Univ Sci 2014; 26:323-32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2014.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Blagodatski A, Katanaev VL. Technologies of directed protein evolution in vivo. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011; 68:1207-14; PMID:21190058; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-010-0610-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelik E, Çalık P. Production of recombinant proteins by yeast cells. Biotechnol Adv 2012; 30(5):1108-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Production of biopharmaceutical proteins by yeast. Bioengineered 2013; 4:207-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal GJ, Kumar A. Strategies for the production of recombinant protein in Escherichia coli. Protein J 2013; 32:419-25; PMID:23897421; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10930-013-9502-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstock MT, Jacobsen MT, Kay MS. Synthesis and folding of a mirror-image enzyme reveals ambidextrous chaperone activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:11679-84; PMID:25071217; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410900111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakob F, Lehmann C, Martinez R, Schwaneberg V. Increasing protein production by directed vector backbone evolution. AMB Express 2013; 3:39; PMID:23890095; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-0855-3-39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman RNZRA, Zakaria II, Salleh AB, Basri M. Enzymatic properties and mutational studies of chalcone synthase from Physcomitrella patens. Int J Mol Sci 2012; 13:9673-91; PMID:22949824; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms13089673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisurek M, Simgen B, Antes I, Bernhardt R. Theoretical and experimental evaluation of a CYP106A2 low homology model and production of mutants with changed activity and selectivity of hydroxylation. ChemBioChem 2008; 9:1439-49; PMID:18481342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbic.200700670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadiut O, Pisanelli I, Maischberger T, Peterbauer C, Gorton L, Chaiyen P, Haltrich D. Engineering of pyranose 2-oxidase: improvement for biofuel cell and food applications through semi-rational protein design. J Biotechnol 2009; 139:250-57; PMID:19095017; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umekawa M, Li C, Higashiyama T, Huang W, Ashida H, Yamamoto K, Wang L-X. Efficient glycosynthase mutant derived from Mucor hiemalis endo-β-N- acetylglucosaminidase capable of transferring oligosaccharide from both sugar Oxazoline and natural N-glycan. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:511-21; PMID:19880511; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.059832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hediger MR, De Vico L, Rannes JB, Jäckel C, Besenmatter W, Svendsen A, Jensen JH. In silico screening of 393 mutants facilitates enzyme engineering of amidase activity in CalB. PeerJ 2013; 1:e145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han R, Liu L, Shin H-D, Chen RR, Li J, Du G, Chend J. Systems engineering of tyrosine 195, tyrosine 260, and glutamine 265 in cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase from Paenibacillus macerans to enhance maltodextrin specificity for 2-O-D-glucopyranosyl-L-ascorbic acid synthesis. App Environ Microbiol 2013; 79:672-77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02883-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Q, Wang J, Yang H, Wei C, Yu J, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Zhang XE, Wei H. Construction of a chimeric lysin Ply187N-V12C with extended lytic activity against staphylococci and streptococci. Microb Biotechnol 2014; 8:210-20; PMID:25219798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston CA, Whitney DS, Volkman BF, Doe CQ, Prehoda KE. Conversion of the enzyme guanylate kinase into a mitotic-spindle orienting protein by a single mutation that inhibits GMP-induced closing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108:E973-8; PMID:21990344; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104365108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn WS, Nims E, O'Connor SE. Reengineering a tryptophan halogenase to preferentially chlorinate a direct alkaloid precursor. J Am Chem Soc 2011; 133:19346-9; PMID:22050348; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja2089348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishioka T, Yasutake Y, Nishiya Y, Tamura T. Structure-guided mutagenesis for the improvement of substrate specificity of Bacillus megaterium glucose1-dehydrogenase IV. FEBS J 2012; 279:3264-75; PMID:22804868; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2012.08713.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Cui W, Ning Ding, Zhongmei Liu, Yaping Tian, Zhemin Zhou. Structure-based approach to alter the substrate specificity of Bacillus subtilis aminopeptidase. Prion 2013; 7:328-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster CI, Burrell M, Olsson L-L, Fowler SB, Digby S, Sandercock A, Snijder A, Tebbe J, Haupts U, Grudzinska J, et al. Engineering neprilysin activity and specificity to create a novel therapeutic for Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One 2014; 9:e104001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida T. Effects of point mutation on enzymatic activity: correlation between protein electronic structure and motion in chorismate mutase reaction. J Am Chem Soc 2010; 132:7104-18; PMID:20426479; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja100744h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currin A, Swainston N, Day PJ, Kell DB. Synthetic biology for the directed evolution of protein biocatalysts: navigating sequence space intelligently. Chem Soc Rev 2015; 44:1172-239; PMID:25503938; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00351A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Melo FHM, Butera D, Medeiros RS, Andrade LNS, Nonogaki S, Soares FA, Alvarez RA, da Silva AMM, Chammas R. Biological applications of a chimeric probe for the assessment of galectin-3 ligands. J Histochem Cytochem 2007; 55:1015-26; PMID:17565118; http://dx.doi.org/10.1369/jhc.7A7174.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelow SC, Dong M, Mungall BA, Yantosca LM, Lear C, Ji X, Karpel M, Rootes CL, Brudner M, Houen G, et al. A novel L-ficolin/mannose-binding lectin chimeric molecule with enhanced activity against Ebola virus. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:24729-39; PMID:20516066; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.106260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grebenik EA, Generalova AN, Nechaev AV, Khaydukov EV, Mironova KE, Stremovskiy OA, Lebedenko EN, Zvyagin AV, Deyev SM. Specific visualization of tumor cells using upconversion nanophosphors. Acta Naturae 2014; 6:48-53; PMID:25558394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter A, Eggenstein E, Skerra A. Anticalins: Exploiting a non-Ig scaffold with hypervariable loops for the engineering of binding proteins. FEBS Lett 2014; 588:213-18; PMID:24239535; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VA, Venu K, Rao DE, Rao KV, Reddy VD. Chimeric gene construct coding for bi-functional enzyme endowed with endoglucanase and phytase activities. Arch Microbiol 2009; 191:171-5; PMID:18987844; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00203-008-0437-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado GP, Ribeiro LF, Lourenzoni MR, Ward RJ. A designed bifunctional laccase/b-1,3–1,4-glucanase enzyme shows synergistic sugar release from milled sugarcane bagasse. Protein Eng Des Sel 2013; 26:15-23; PMID:23012443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizk M, Elleuche S, Antranikian G. Generating bifunctional fusion enzymes composed of heat-active endoglucanase (Cel5A) and endoxylanase (XylT). Biotechnol Lett 2015; 37:139-45; PMID:25214221; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1654-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuka R, Imai S, Murata T, Nomura Y, Okamoto M, Tsumori H, Kakuta E, Hanada N, Momoi Y. Application of chimeric glucanase comprising mutanase and dextranase for prevention of dental biofilm formation. Microbiol Immunol 2015; 59:28-36; PMID:25411090; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1348-0421.12214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy Chichili VP, Kumar V, Sivaraman J. Linkers in the structural biology of protein–protein interactions. Prot Sci 2013; 22:153-67
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deyev SM, Lebedenko EN. Modern technologies for creating synthetic antibodies for clinical application. Acta naturae 2009; 1:32-50; PMID:22649585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon JP, O'Driscoll M, Litman GW. Construction, expression, and purification of chimeric protein reagents based on immunoglobulin fc regions. Methods Mol Biol 2011; 48:51-67; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-139-0_4
   Google Scholar
• Banta S, Dooley K, Shur O. Replacing antibodies: engineering new binding proteins. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2013; 15:93-113; PMID:23642248; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alewine C, Hassan R, Pastan I. Advances in anticancer immunotoxin therapy. The Oncologist 2015; 20:176-85; PMID:25561510; http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Huang S, Jiang WZ, Wright D, Spalding MH, Weeks DP, Yang B. TAL nucleases (TALNs): hybrid proteins composed of TAL effectors and FokI DNA-cleavage domain. Nuc Acids Res 2011; 39:359-72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheybi E, Amani J, Salmanian AH, Mashayekhi F, Khodi S. Designing a recombinant chimeric construct contain MUC1 and HER2 extracellular domain for prediagnostic breast cancer. Tumour Biol 2014; 35:11489-97; PMID:25128064; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2483-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan X, Sack DA, Zhang W. Genetic fusions of a CFA/I/II/IV MEFA (Multiepitope Fusion Antigen) and a toxoid fusion of heat-stable toxin (STa) and heat-labile toxin (LT) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) retain broad anti-CFA and antitoxin antigenicity. PLoS One 2015; 10(3):e0121623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugwu SO, Apte SP. The effect of buffers on protein conformational stability. Pharmaceutical Technology 2004; 86-113
   Google Scholar
• Zarrine-Afsar A, Zhang Z, Schweiker KL, Makhatadze GI, Davidson AR, Chan HS. Kinetic consequences of native state optimization of surface-exposed electrostatic interactions in the Fyn SH3 domain proteins. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012; 80:858-70
   Google Scholar
• Griffin MD, Gerrard JA. The relationship between oligomeric state and protein function. Adv Exp Med Biol 2012; 747:74-90; PMID:22949112; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3229-6_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karan R, Capes MD, Sarma SD. Function and biotechnology of extremophilic enzymes in low water activity. Aquat Biosyst 2012, 8:4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Struvay C, Feller G. Optimization to low temperature activity in psychrophilic enzymes. Int J Mol Sci 2012; 13:11643-65; PMID:23109875; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms130911643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morelli A, Haugner J, Seelig B. Thermostable artificial enzyme isolated by in vitro selection. PLoS One 2014; 9(11):e112028; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Huang H. Engineering proteins for thermostability through rigidifying flexible sites. Biotechnol Adv 2014; 32:308-15; PMID:24211474; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar