Effects of different patterns of maize-straw application on soil microorganisms, enzyme activities, and grain yield

References

• Mulumba LN, Lal R. Mulching effects on selected soil physical properties. Soil Tillage Res. 2008;98:106–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal KG, Misra AK, Hati KM, et al. Rice residue-management options and effects on soil properties and crop productivity. J Food Agric Environ. 2004;2:224–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaco S, Hatch DJ, Sacco D, et al. Changes in chemical and biochemical soil properties induced by 11-yr repeated additions of different organic materials in maize-based forage systems. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40:608–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg S, Bahl G. Phosphorus availability to maize as influenced by organic manures and fertilizer P associated phosphatase activity in soils. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:5773–5777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin K, Sleutel S, Buchan D, et al. Changes of soil enzyme activities under different tillage practices in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Soil Tillage Res. 2009;104:115–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens D, Johanson J, Frankenberger W Jr. Production and persistence of soil enzymes with repeated addition of organic residues. Soil Sci. 1992;153:53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duiker S, Lal R. Crop residue and tillage effects on carbon sequestration in Luvisol in central Ohio. Soil Tillage Res. 1999;52:73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou Y, Xu M, Wang W, et al. Return rate of straw residue affects soil organic C sequestration by chemical fertilization. Soil Tillage Res. 2011;113:70–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong W, Zhang X, Wang H, et al. Effect of different fertilizer application on the soil fertility of paddy soils in red soil region of southern China. PLoS One. 2012;7:e44504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Liu HH, Sun JQ, et al. Seedling characteristics and grain yield of maize grown under straw retention affected by sowing irrigation and splitting nitrogen use. Field Crops Res. 2018;225:22–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan W, Wu JG, Li JM, et al. Comparative effects of different maize straw returning modes on soil humus composition and humic acid structural characteristics in Northeast China. Chem Ecol. 2018;34(4):355–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzobair KA, Stromberger ME, Ippolito JA, et al. Contrasting effects of biochar versus manure on soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in an Aridisol. Chemosphere. 2016;142:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassink J, Lebbink G, Van Veen JA. Microbial biomass and activity of a reclaimed-polder and soil under a conventional or a reduced-input farming system. Soil Biol Biochem. 1991;23:07–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YG, Li YY, Wang J, et al. Buried straw layer plus plastic mulching reduces soil salinity and increases sunflower yield in saline soils. Soil Tillage Res. 2016;155:363–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y Y L, Huan C, Han XF, et al. Buried straw layer and plastic mulching increase microflora diversity in salinized soil. 2016;15(7).
   Google Scholar
• Abendroth LJ, Roger WE, Matthew JB, et al. Corn growth and development. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Extension; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Brookes PC, Cayuela ML, Contin M, et al. The mineralization of fresh and humified soil organic matter by the soil microbial biomass. Waste Manag. 2008;28:716–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossio DA, Scow KM, Gunapala N, et al. Determinants of soil microbial communities: effects of agricultural management, season, and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Microb Ecol. 1998;36:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buyer JS, Sasser M. High throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;61:127–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelles L, Bai QY. Fractionation of fatty acids derived from soil lipids by solid phase extraction and their quantitative analysis by GC-MS. Soil Biol Biochem. 1993;25:495–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelles L, Bai QY, Rackwitz R, et al. Determination of phospholipid- and lipopolysaccharide-derived fatty acids as an estimate of microbial biomass and community structure in soils. Biol Fertil Soils. 1995;19:115–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter-Boggs L, Kennedy AC, Reganold JP. Use of phospholipid fatty acids and carbon source utilization patterns to track microbial community succession in developing compost. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:4062–4064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson PA. Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination of the distribution and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1999;29:303–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA. Soil enzymes. In: Weaver RW, Angle JR, Bottomley PS, editors. Methods of soil analysis. Madison: Soil Society of America. 1994. p. 775–833.
   Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Wang P, Kong CH. Urease, invertase, dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities in paddy soil influenced by allelopathic rice variety. Eur J Soil Biol. 2009;45:436–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruccia P, Casucci C, Dumonte S. An improved method to evaluate the o-diphenol oxidase activity of soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2000;32:1927–1933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph SL, Hugenholtz P, Sangwan P, et al. Laboratory cultivation of widespread and previously uncultured soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:7210–7215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman DC, Crossley DA Jr. Fundamentals of soil ecology. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ibekwe AM, Kennedy AC. Phospholipid fatty acid profiles and carbon utilization patterns for analysis of microbial community structure under field and greenhouse conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1998;26:151–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark CH, Condron LM, O’Callaghan M, et al. Differences in soil enzyme activities, microbial community structure and short-term nitrogen mineralization resulting from farm management history and organic matter amendments. Soil Biol Biochem. 2008;40(6):1352–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo L, Pang HC, Zhao YG, et al. Buried straw layer plus plastic mulching improves soil organic carbon fractions in an arid saline soil from Northwest China. Soil Tillage Res. 2017;165:286–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabaglio V, Gavazzi C, Schulz M, et al. Alternative weed control using the allelopathic effect of natural benzoxazinoids from rye mulch. Agron Sustain Dev. 2008;28:397–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner GH, Wolf DC. Carbon transformations and soil organic matter formation. In: Sylvia DM, Fuhrmann JJ, Hartel PG, et al, editors. Principles and applications of soil microbiology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1998. p. 218–258.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira FMS, Siqueira JO. Microbiologia e bioquímica do solo. 2nd ed. Lavras: Universidade Federal deLavras; 2006. p. 729.
   Google Scholar
• Jin KM, Shen JB, Ashton RW, et al. How do roots elongate in a structured soil? J Exp Bot. 2013;64:4761–4777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Bakker MG, et al. Root exudation of phytochemicals in Arabidopsis follows specific patterns that are developmentally programmed and correlate with soil microbial functions. PloS ONE. 2013a;8(2):e55731. PMID:23383346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang XF, Chaparro JM, Reardon KF, et al. Rhizosphere interactions: root exudates, microbes, and microbial communities. Botany. 2014;92:267–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y. Active microorganisms in soil: critical review of estimation criteria and approaches. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;67:192–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick RP. Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. In: Pankhurst CE, Doube BM, Gupta VVSR, editors. Biological indicators of soil health. Wellingford: CAB International; 1997. p. 121–156.
   Google Scholar
• Burns RG. Soil enzymes. New York: Academic Press; 1978. p. 370–375.
   Google Scholar
• Utobo EB, Tewari L. Soil enzymes as bioindicators of soil ecosystem status. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 2013;13(1):147–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Pang DW, Chen J, et al. Straw return accompany with low nitrogen moderately promoted deep root. Field Crops Res. 2018;221:71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinton R, Varanini Z, Nannipieri P. The rhizosphere: biochemistry and organic substances at the soil–plant interface. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2001. p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan S, Ayyildiz Y, Dogan M, et al. Characterisation of polyphenol oxidase from Melissa officinalis L. subsp.officinalis(lemon balm). Czech J Fool Sci. 2013;31(2):156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XJ, Jia ZK, Liang LY, et al. Changes in soil characteristics and maize yield under straw returning system in dryland farming. Field Crops Res. 2018;218:11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Xu C, Dungait JAJ, et al. Straw incorporation increases crop yield and soil organic carbon sequestration but varies under different natural conditions and farming practices in China: a system analysis. Biogeosciences. 2018;15:1933–1946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Sun BF, Lu F, et al. Straw incorporation strategy on cereal crop yield in China. Crop Sci. 2014;55:1773–1781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar