In-vitro digestion models: a critical review for human and fish and a protocol for in-vitro digestion in fish

References

• UN, “The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020,” 2020.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. In: Rome. 2020; 164–175.
   Google Scholar
• Egerton S, Wan A, Murphy K, et al. Replacing fishmeal with plant protein in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) diets by supplementation with fish protein hydrolysate. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):4194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibbetts SM, Mann J, Dumas A. Apparent digestibility of nutrients, energy, essential amino acids and fatty acids of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) diets containing whole-cell or cell-ruptured Chlorella vulgaris meals at five dietary inclusion levels. Aquaculture. 2017;481:25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tacon AGJ, Metian M. Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: trends and future prospects. Aquaculture. 2008;285(1–4):146–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornber K, Verner-Jeffreys D, Hinchliffe S. Evaluating antimicrobial resistance in the global shrimp industry. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2020;12(2):966–986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordin NM, Kader MA, Morni MM, et al. Application of fish bone meal from byproducts of fish processing industry in diets of juvenile striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. AACL Bioflux. 2017;10:1395–1403.
   Google Scholar
• Moutinho S, Martínez-Llorens S, Tomás-Vidal A, et al. Corrigendum to Meat and bone meal as partial replacement for fish meal in diets for gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) juveniles: growth, feed efficiency, amino acid utilization, and economic efficiency [Aquaculture 468 (2017) 271–277]. Aquaculture. 2018;491:398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang B, Bu X, Lian X, et al. Effect of replacing fish meal with meat and bone meal on growth, feed utilization and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion for juvenilePseudobagrus ussuriensis. Aquaculture Nutr. 2018;24(2):894–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao S, Li P, Huang B, et al. Assessing feasibility of replacement of fishmeal with enzyme-treated feather meal in the diet of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximusL.). Aquaculture Nutr. 2020;26(4):1340–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi S, Mahboobi Soofiani N, Lundh T, et al. Evaluation of Filamentous Fungal Biomass Cultivated on Vinasse as an Alternative Nutrient Source of Fish Feed: protein, Lipid, and Mineral Composition. Fermentation. 2019;5(4):99.
   Google Scholar
• Nogales‐Mérida S, Gobbi P, Józefiak D, et al. Insect meals in fish nutrition. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2019;11(4):1080–1103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharif M, Zafar MH, Aqib AI, et al. Single cell protein: sources, mechanism of production, nutritional value and its uses in aquaculture nutrition. Aquaculture. 2021;531:735885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi S, Mahboobi Soofiani N, Mahboubi A, et al. Use of Organic Wastes and Industrial By-Products to Produce Filamentous Fungi with Potential as Aqua-Feed Ingredients. Sustainability. 2018;10(9):3296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glencross BD, Booth M, Allan GL. A feed is only as good as its ingredients ? a review of ingredient evaluation strategies for aquaculture feeds. Aquaculture Nutr. 2007;13(1):17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cian RE, Bacchetta C, Cazenave J, et al. In vitro assays predicts mineral retention and apparent protein digestibility of different fish feed measured using a juvenile P. mesopotamicusmodel. Aquaculture Research. 2018;49(6):2267–2277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa R, Portmann R, Dubois S, et al. Protein digestion of different protein sources using the INFOGEST static digestion model. Food Res Int. 2020;130:108996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mota de Carvalho N, Oliveira DL, Saleh MAD, et al. Importance of gastrointestinal in vitro models for the poultry industry and feed formulations. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2021;271:114730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassone S, Fortina R, Peiretti PG. In Vitro Techniques Using the Daisy(II) Incubator for the Assessment of Digestibility: a Review. Animals (Basel). 2020;10:775.
   Google Scholar
• Moyano FJ, Saénz De Rodrigáñez MA, Díaz M. Application of in vitro digestibility methods in aquaculture: constraints and perspectives. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2015;7(4):223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji H, Hu J, Zuo S, et al. In vitro gastrointestinal digestion and fermentation models and their applications in food carbohydrates. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021;1–23. DOI:10.1080/10408398.2021.1884841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra A, Etienne-Mesmin L, Livrelli V, et al. Relevance and challenges in modeling human gastric and small intestinal digestion. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(11):591–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilannejad N, Martinez-Rodriguez G, Yufera M, et al. Modelling digestive hydrolysis of nutrients in fish using factorial designs and desirability function. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkorb A, Egger L, Alminger M, et al. INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion. Nat Protoc. 2019;14(4):991–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur SJ, Lim BO, Decker EA, et al. In vitro human digestion models for food applications. Food Chem. 2011;125(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minekus M, Alminger M, Alvito P, et al. A standardised static in vitr digestion method suitable for food – an international consensus. Food Funct. 2014;5(6):1113–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao PS, Nolasco E, Handa A, et al. Effect of pH and Heat Treatment on the Antioxidant Activity of Egg White Protein-Derived Peptides after Simulated In-Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion. Antioxidants. 2020;9(11):1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aalaei K, Khakimov B, De Gobba C, et al. Digestion patterns of proteins in pasteurized and ultra-high temperature milk using in vitro gastric models of adult and elderly. J Food Eng. 2021;292:110305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogilvie O, Roberts S, Sutton K, et al. The effect of baking time and temperature on gluten protein structure and celiac peptide digestibility. Food Res Int. 2021;140:109988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegrzyn TF, Acevedo-Fani A, Loveday SM, et al. In vitro dynamic gastric digestion of soya protein/milk protein blended beverages: influence of protein composition and co-processing. Food Funct. 2021;12(6):2605–2616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao Y, Hu Y, Fu N, et al. Maillard conjugates of whey protein isolate-xylooligosaccharides for the microencapsulation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus: protective effects and stability during spray drying, storage and gastrointestinal digestion. Food Funct. 2021;12:4034–4045
   Google Scholar
• Bhat ZF, Morton JD, Bekhit AEA, et al. Non-thermal processing has an impact on the digestibility of the muscle proteins. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition; 2021. United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1918629
   Google Scholar
• Mao C, Wu J, Zhang XZ, et al. Improving the Solubility and Digestibility of Potato Protein with an Online Ultrasound-Assisted PH Shifting Treatment at Medium Temperature. Foods. 2020;9(12):1908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• do Nascimento TC, Pinheiro PN, Fernandes AS, et al. Bioaccessibility and intestinal uptake of carotenoids from microalgae Scenedesmus obliquus. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2021;140:110780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trigo JP, Engström N, Steinhagen S, et al. In vitro digestibility and Caco-2 cell bioavailability of sea lettuce (Ulva fenestrata) proteins extracted using pH-shift processing. Food Chem. 2021;356:129683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulet-Cabero A-I, Egger L, Portmann R, et al. A standardised semi-dynamic in vitro digestion method suitable for food – an international consensus. Food Funct. 2020;11(2):1702–1720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qazi HJ, Ye AQ, Acevedo-Fani A, et al. In vitro digestion of curcumin-nanoemulsion-enriched dairy protein matrices: impact of the type of gel structure on the bioaccessibility of curcumin. Food Hydrocoll. 2021;117:106692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corstens MN, Berton-Carabin CC, Schroen K, et al. Emulsion encapsulation in calcium-alginate beads delays lipolysis during dynamic in vitro digestion. J Funct Foods. 2018;46:394–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivas-Montoya E, Miguel Ochando-Pulido J, Manuel López-Romero J, et al. Application of a novel gastrointestinal tract simulator system based on a membrane bioreactor (SimuGIT) to study the stomach tolerance and effective delivery enhancement of nanoencapsulated macelignan. Chem Eng Sci. 2016;140:104–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ye AQ, Dave A, et al. In vitro digestion of soymilk using a human gastric simulator: impact of structural changes on kinetics of release of proteins and lipids. Food Hydrocoll. 2021;111:106235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson K, Harrysson H, Havenaar R, et al. Formation of malondialdehyde (MDA), 4-hydroxy-2-hexenal (HHE) and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) in fish and fish oil during dynamic gastrointestinal in vitro digestion. Food Funct. 2016;7(2):1176–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios-Villa KA, Bhattacharya M, La EH, et al. Interactions between whey proteins and cranberry juice after thermal or non-thermal processing during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Funct. 2020;11(9):7661–7680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting YW, Jian YK, Lan YQ, et al. Viscoelastic Emulsion Improved the Bioaccessibility and Oral Bioavailability of Crystalline Compound: a Mechanistic Study Using in Vitro and in Vivo Models. Mol Pharm. 2015;12(7):2229–2236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villemejane C, Wahl R, Aymard P, et al. In vitro digestion of short-dough biscuits enriched in proteins and/or fibres, using a multi-compartmental and dynamic system (1): viscosity measurement and prediction. Food Chem. 2015;182:55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthikeyan JS, Salvi D, Corradini MG, et al. Effect of bolus viscosity on carbohydrate digestion and glucose absorption processes: an in vitro study. Phys Fluids. 2019;31(11):111905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah P, Fritz JV, Glaab E, et al. A microfluidics-based in vitro model of the gastrointestinal human–microbe interface. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):11535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donkers JM, Eslami Amirabadi H, van de Steeg E. Intestine-on-a-chip: next level in vitro research model of the human intestine. Curr Opin Toxicol. 2021;25:6–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zihler Berner A, Fuentes S, Dostal A, et al. Novel Polyfermentor Intestinal Model (PolyFermS) for Controlled Ecological Studies: validation and Effect of pH. PLOS ONE. 2013;8(10):e77772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell MM, Rea MC, Shanahan F, et al. The Use of a Mini-Bioreactor Fermentation System as a Reproducible, High-Throughput ex vivo Batch Model of the Distal Colon. Front Microbiol. 2018;9. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornhorst GM, Gouseti O, Wickham MSJ, et al. Engineering Digestion: multiscale Processes of Food Digestion. J Food Sci. 2016;81(3):R534–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennah-Govela YA, Bornhorst GM. Breakdown mechanisms of whey protein gels during dynamic in vitro gastric digestion. Food Funct. 2021;12(5):2112–2125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng RX, Mars M, Van der Sman RGM, et al. The importance of swelling for in vitro gastric digestion of whey protein gels. Food Chem. 2020;330:7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornhorst GM. Gastric Mixing During Food Digestion: mechanisms and Applications. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2017;8(1):523–542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mennah-Govela YA, Bornhorst GM. Food buffering capacity: quantification methods and its importance in digestion and health. Food Funct. 2021;12(2):543–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger L, Schlegel P, Baumann C, et al. Physiological comparability of the harmonized INFOGEST in vitro digestion method to in vivo pig digestion. Food Res Int. 2017;102:567–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger L, Menard O, Baumann C, et al. Digestion of milk proteins: comparing static and dynamic in vitro digestion systems with in vivo data. Food Res Int. 2019;118:32–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boirie Y, Dangin M, Gachon P, et al., “Slow and fast dietary proteins differently modulate postprandial protein accretion,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 94, pp. 14930, 1997. United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Yokrattanasak J, De Gaetano A, Panunzi S, et al. A Simple, Realistic Stochastic Model of Gastric Emptying. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ménard O, Cattenoz T, Guillemin H, et al. Validation of a new in vitro dynamic system to simulate infant digestion. Food Chem. 2014;145:1039–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minekus M, Marteau P, Havenaar R, et al. A multicompartmental dynamic computer-controlled model simulating the stomach and small intestine. ATLA Altern Lab Anim. Altern Lab Anim. 1995;23(2):197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornhorst GM, Chang LQ, Rutherfurd SM, et al. Gastric emptying rate and chyme characteristics for cooked brown and white rice meals in vivo. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93(12):2900–2908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardioli PW, Sousa R Jr, Giordano RC, et al. Kinetic model of the hydrolysis of polypeptides catalyzed by Alcalase® immobilized on 10% glyoxyl-agarose. In: Enzyme and Microbial Technology. Vol. 36. 2005. p. 555–564.
   Google Scholar
• Qi W, He Z. Enzymatic hydrolysis of protein: mechanism and kinetic model. Frontiers of Chemistry in China. 2006;1(3):308–314.
   Google Scholar
• Bhumiratana S, Hill CG, Amundson CH. ENZYMATIC SOLUBILIZATION OF FISH PROTEIN CONCENTRATE IN MEMBRANE REACTORS. J Food Sci. 1977;42(4):1016–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bru R, Walde P. Product inhibition of alpha-chymotrypsin in reverse micelles. Eur J Biochem. 1991;199(1):95–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tharakan A, Norton IT, Fryer PJ, et al. Mass transfer and nutrient absorption in a simulated model of small intestine. J Food Sci. 2010;75(6):E339–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouseti O, Jaime-Fonseca MR, Fryer PJ, et al. Hydrocolloids in human digestion: dynamic in-vitro assessment of the effect of food formulation on mass transfer. Food Hydrocoll. 2014;42:378–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin Y, Xiao J, Wang Y, et al. Mechanistic exploration of glycemic lowering by soluble dietary fiber ingestion: predictive modeling and simulation. Chem Eng Sci. 2020;228:115965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard S. Mechanics of flow and mixing at antroduodenal junction. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(9):1365–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim YF, De Loubens C, Love RJ, et al. Flow and mixing by small intestine villi. Food Funct. 2015;6(6):1787–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaltdinov M, Trusov P, Zaitseva N, “A multiphase flow in the antroduodenum: some results of the mathematical modelling and computational simulation,” in 13th National Congress on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, vol. 145, MATEC Web of Conferences, Vassilev VM, Nikolov SG, Datcheva MD, et al, Eds., 2018. Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Palmada N, Cater JE, Cheng LK, et al., and Ieee, “Modelling Flow and Mixing in the Proximal Small Intestine,” in 42nd Annual International Conferences of the Ieee Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Enabling Innovative Technologies for Global Healthcare Embc’20, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Conference Proceedings, 2020, pp. 2496–2499. Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Pompa M, Capocelli M, Piemonte V. A new gastro-intestinal mathematical model to study drug bioavailability. Med Eng Phys. 2019;74:106–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinnott MD, Cleary PW, Harrison SM. Peristaltic transport of a particulate suspension in the small intestine. Appl Math Modell. 2017;44:143–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YN, Wu P, Jeantet R, et al. How motility can enhance mass transfer and absorption in the duodenum: taking the structure of the villi into account. Chem Eng Sci. 2020;213:115406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze K. Imaging and modelling of digestion in the stomach and the duodenum. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18(3):172–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong F, Oztop MH, Singh RP, et al. Physical Changes in White and Brown Rice during Simulated Gastric Digestion. J Food Sci. 2011;76(6):E450–E457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal A, Indireshkumar K, Schwizer W, et al. Gastric flow and mixing studied using computer simulation. Proc Royal Soc L. Ser B: Biol Sci. 2004;271(1557):2587–2594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoad C, Rayment P, Risse V, et al. Encapsulation of lipid by alginate beads reduces bio-accessibility: an in vivo 13C breath test and MRI study. Food Hydrocoll. 2011;25(5):1190–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala-Rabanal M, Ghezzi C, Hirayama BA, et al. Intestinal absorption of glucose in mice as determined by positron emission tomography. J Physiol. 2018;596(13):2473–2489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takashima T, Shingaki T, Katayama Y, et al. Dynamic Analysis of Fluid Distribution in the Gastrointestinal Tract in Rats: positron Emission Tomography Imaging after Oral Administration of Nonabsorbable Marker, [18F]Deoxyfluoropoly(ethylene glycol). Mol Pharm. 2013;10(6):2261–2269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cai J, Zhou X, Yan X, et al. Top 10 species groups in global aquaculture 2017. FAO; 2017. Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Trejo-Escamilla I, Galaviz MA, Flores-Ibarra M, et al. Replacement of fishmeal by soya protein concentrate in the diets ofTotoaba macdonaldi(Gilbert, 1890) juveniles: effect on the growth performance,in vitrodigestibility, digestive enzymes and the haematological and biochemistry parameters. Aquacult Res. 2017;48(8):4038–4057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmah S, Aliyu-Paiko M, Hashim R. In vivoandin vitroprotein digestibility in juvenile bagrid catfishMystus nemurus(Cuvier and Valenciennes 1840) fed soybean meal-based diets. Aquacult Res. 2016;47(5):1392–1401.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmah S, Hashim R, El‐Sayed A-FM. Digestive proteases and in vitro protein digestibility in bagrid catfishMystus nemurus(Cuvier and Valenciennes 1840). Aquacult Res. 2020;51(11):4613–4622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haard NF, Dimes LE, Arndt RE, et al. Estimation of Protein Digestibility—IV. Digestive Proteinases from the Pyloric Caeca of Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) Fed Diets Containing Soybean Meal. Comp Biochem Physiol Part B Biochem Mol Biol. 1996;115(4):533–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemus I, Maldonado C, Cuzon G, et al. In VitroandIn VivoFeedstuff Digestibility for Snook,Centropomus undecimalis, Juveniles. J World Aquacult Soc. 2018;49(1):205–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales GA, Moyano FJ, Marquez L. In vitro assessment of the effects of phytate and phytase on nitrogen and phosphorus bioaccessibility within fish digestive tract. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2011;170(3–4):209–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koven WM, Henderson RJ, Sargent JR. Lipid digestion in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus): in-vivo and in-vitro studies of the lipolytic activity in various segments of the digestive tract. Aquaculture. 1997;151(1–4):155–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo‐Solís FJ, Martínez‐García R, Díaz M, et al. Potential bioavailability of protein and lipids in feed ingredients for the three-spot cichlidAmphilophus trimaculatus: an in vitro assessment. Aquacult Res. 2020;51(7):2913–2925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdan M, Moyano FJ, Schuhardt D. Optimization of a gastrointestinal model applicable to the evaluation of bioaccessibility in fish feeds. J Sci Food Agric. 2009;89(7):1195–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainuzzo JR, Reitan KI, Olsen Y. The significance of lipids at early stages of marine fish: a review. Aquaculture. 1997;155(1–4):103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargent J, McEvoy L, Estevez A, et al. Lipid nutrition of marine fish during early development: current status and future directions. Aquaculture. 1999;179(1–4):217–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimes LE, Garcia-Carreno FL, Haard NF. Estimation of protein digestibility—III. Studies on the digestive enzymes from the pyloric ceca of rainbow trout and salmon. Comparative Biochem Physiol Part A. 1994;109(2):349–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JS, Lall SP, Anderson DM, et al. Evaluation of protein quality in fish meals by chemical and biological assays. Aquaculture. 1993;115(3–4):305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter CG, Bransden MP, van Barneveld RJ, et al. Alternative methods for nutrition research on the southern bluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii: in vitro digestibility. Aquaculture. 1999;179(1–4):57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyano FJ, Savoie L. Comparison of in vitro systems of protein digestion using either mammal or fish proteolytic enzymes. Comp Biochem Physiol A: Mol Integr Physiol. 2001;128(2):359–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimes LE, Haard NF. Estimation of protein digestibility - I. Development of an in vitro method for estimating protein digestibility in salmonids (Salmon gairdneri). Comp Biochem Physiol. 1994;108:249–362.
   Google Scholar
• Morales GA, Moyano FJ. Application of an in vitro gastrointestinal model to evaluate nitrogen and phosphorus bioaccessibility and bioavailability in fish feed ingredients. Aquaculture. 2010;306(1–4):244–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morken T, Moyano FJ, Márquez L, et al. Effects of autoclaving and sodium diformate supplementation to diets on amino acid composition, in vivo digestibility in mink (Neovison vison) and in vitro bioavailability using digestive enzymes from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012;178(1–2):84–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Márquez L, Øverland M, Martínez-Llorens S, et al. Use of a gastrointestinal model to assess potential amino acid bioavailability in diets for rainbow trout (Oncorrhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture. 2013;384-387:46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoie L, Gauthier SF. Dialysis Cell for the In Vitro Measurement of Protein Digestibility. J Food Sci. 1986;51(2):494–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier SF, Vachon C, Jones JD, et al. Assessment of Protein Digestibility by In Vitro Enzymatic Hydrolysis with Simultaneous Dialysis. Journal Nutr. 1982;112(9):1718–1725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazlum RE, Kurtoglu İZ, Alabdullah A. Effects of meal and body sizes on gastric evacuation of the endangered Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baerii) fed on either live or artificial diets: using radiography technique. Aquacult Res. 2020;51(4):1507–1512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder SK, Abd Ghaffar M, Das SK. Effect of temperature and diet on gastrointestinal evacuation of juvenile malabar blood snapper (Lutjanus malabaricus Bloch & Schneider, 1801). Aquaculture. 2020;522:735114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazlan AG, Grove DJ. Gastric digestion and nutrient absorption along the alimentary tract of whiting (Merlangius merlangusL.) fed on natural prey. J Appl Ichthyol. 2003;19(4):229–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadal AL, Ikeda-Ohtsubo W, Sipkema D, et al. Feed, Microbiota, and Gut Immunity: using the Zebrafish Model to Understand Fish Health. Front Immunol. 2020;11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan K, Ravichandran S, Muralisankar T, et al. Potential uses of fungal polysaccharides as immunostimulants in fish and shrimp aquaculture: a review. Aquaculture. 2019;500:250–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan A, Singh R. Probiotics in aquaculture: a promising emerging alternative approach. Symbiosis. 2019;77(2):99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RingØ E, Olsen RE, Gifstad TØ, et al. Prebiotics in aquaculture: a review. Aquaculture Nutr. 2010;16(2):117–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold JW, Roach J, Azcarate-Peril MA. Emerging Technologies for Gut Microbiome Research. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24(11):887–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristjansson MM. Purification and characterization of trypsin from the pyloric caeca of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Agric Food Chem. 1991;39(10):1738–1742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lallès J-P. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase in the gastrointestinal tract of fish: biology, ontogeny, and environmental and nutritional modulation. Rev Aquac. 2020;12(2):555–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolasco‐Soria H. Improving and standardizing protocols for alkaline protease quantification in fish. Rev Aquac. 2021;13(1):43–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolasco‐Soria H, Nolasco‐Alzaga H-R, Gisbert E. The importance of pepsin-like acid protease quantification in aquaculture studies: a revision of available procedures and presentation of a new protocol for its assessment. Rev Aquac. 2020. DOI:10.1111/raq.12417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibbetts SM, Milley JE, Ross NW, et al. In vitro pH-Stat protein hydrolysis of feed ingredients for Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua. 1. Development of the method. Aquaculture. 2011;319(3–4):398–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabner M. An in vitro method for measuring protein digestibility of fish feed components. Aquaculture. 1985;48(2):97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabner M, Hofer R. The digestibility of the proteins of broad bean (Vicia faba) and soya bean (Glycine max) under in vitro conditions simulating the alimentary tracts of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) and carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture. 1985;48(2):111–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibbetts SM, Verreth JAJ, Lall SP. In vitro pH-Stat protein hydrolysis of feed ingredients for Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua. 2. In vitro protein digestibility of common and alternative feed ingredients. Aquaculture. 2011;319(3–4):407–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solovyev M, Gisbert E. Influence of time, storage temperature and freeze/thaw cycles on the activity of digestive enzymes from gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Fish Physiol Biochem. 2016;42(5):1383–1394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gisbert E, Nolasco H, Solovyev M. Towards the standardization of brush border purification and intestinal alkaline phosphatase quantification in fish with notes on other digestive enzymes. Aquaculture. 2018;487:102–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougatef A, Souissi N, Fakhfakh N, et al. Purification and characterization of trypsin from the viscera of sardine (Sardina pilchardus). Food Chem. 2007;102(1):343–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougatef A. Trypsins from fish processing waste: characteristics and biotechnological applications – comprehensive review. J Clean Prod. 2013;57:257–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anson ML. The estimation of pepsin, trypsin, papain, and cathepsin with hemoglobin. J Gen Physiol. 1938;22(1):79–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walter HE. 1984. Proteinase: methods with hemoglobin casein and azocoll as substrates. In:  Hans UB, editor. Methods of enzymatic analysis. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie. p. 270–277.
   Google Scholar
• Toyota E, Iyaguchi D, Sekizaki H, et al. Kinetic properties of three isoforms of trypsin isolated from the pyloric caeca of chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta). Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30(9):1648–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilannejad N, Martínez-Rodríguez G, Yúfera M, et al. Estimating the effect of different factors on the digestive bioaccessibility of protein by the Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis); combination of response surface methodology and in vitro assays. Aquaculture. 2017;477:28–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilannejad N, Silva T, Martínez-Rodríguez G, et al. Effect of feeding time and frequency on gut transit and feed digestibility in two fish species with different feeding behaviours, gilthead seabream and Senegalese sole. Aquaculture. 2019;513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamberoni P, Yúfera M, de las Heras V, et al. Ontogeny and diurnal patterns of molecular gene expression and activity of digestive enzymes in developing greater amberjack. Aquaculture. 2021;534:736330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He EQ, Wurtsbaugh WA. An Empirical Model of Gastric Evacuation Rates for Fish and an Analysis of Digestion in Piscivorous Brown Trout. Trans Am Fish Soc. 1993;122(5):717–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain H, Haylor H, Beveridge B. The influence of food particle size on gastric emptying and growth rates of fingerling African catfish,Clarias gariepinusBurchell, 1822. Aquaculture Nutr. 2000;6(2):73–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azaza MS, Dhraief MN, Kraiem MM, et al. Influences of food particle size on growth, size heterogeneity, food intake and gastric evacuation in juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, L., 1758. Aquaculture. 2010;309(1–4):193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2018). Guidance Document on Good In Vitro Method Practices (GIVIMP), OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 286. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304796-en
   Google Scholar
• Becker AG, Gonçalves JF, Garcia LO, et al. Ion levels in the gastrointestinal tract content and plasma of four teleosts with different feeding habits. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2006;32(2):105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen J. Enzymic hydrolysis of food proteins. Barking: Elsevier applied science publishers; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Yasumaru F, Lemos D. Species specific in vitro protein digestion (pH-stat) for fish: method development and application for juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), cobia (Rachycentron canadum), and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture. 2014;426-427:74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mat DJL, Le Feunteun S, Michon C, et al. In vitro digestion of foods using pH-stat and the INFOGEST protocol: impact of matrix structure on digestion kinetics of macronutrients, proteins and lipids. Food Res Int. 2016;88:226–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes M. Measuring Protein Content in Food: an Overview of Methods. Foods. 2020;9(10):1340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church FC, Swaisgood HE, Porter DH, et al. Spectrophotometric Assay Using o-Phthaldialdehyde for Determination of Proteolysis in Milk and Isolated Milk Proteins. J Dairy Sci. 1983;66(6):1219–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panasiuk R, Amarowicz R, Kostyra H, et al. Determination of α-amino nitrogen in pea protein hydrolysates: a comparison of three analytical methods. Food Chem. 1998;62(3):363–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen PM, Petersen D, Dambmann C. Improved Method for Determining Food Protein Degree of Hydrolysis. J Food Sci. 2001;66(5):642–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manditsera FA, Luning PA, Fogliano V, et al. Effect of domestic cooking methods on protein digestibility and mineral bioaccessibility of wild harvested adult edible insects. Food Res Int. 2019;121:404–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan X-D, Feng L, Jiang W-D, et al. The dynamic process of dietary soybean β-conglycinin in digestion, absorption, and metabolism among different intestinal segments in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2020;46(4):1361–1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáenz de Rodrigáñez MÁ, Medina E, Moyano FJ, et al. Evaluation of protein hydrolysis in raw sources by digestive proteases of Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis, Kaup 1858) using a combination of an in vitro assay and sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis of products. Aquacult Res. 2011;42(11):1639–1652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcon A, Moyano M, Diaz D, et al. Optimization of the protein fraction of microcapsules used in feeding of marine fish larvae usingin vitrodigestibility techniques. Aquaculture Nutr. 1999;5(2):107–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Román-Gavilanes AI, Martínez-Montaño E, Viana MT. Comparative Characterization of Enzymatic Digestion from Fish and Soybean Meal from Simulated Digestive Process of Pacific Bluefin Tuna,Thunnus orientalis. J World Aquacult Soc. 2015;46(4):409–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Lopez E, Espinoza-Villegas RE, Viana MT. In vitro digestion comparison from fish and poultry by-product meals from simulated digestive process at different times of the Pacific Bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis. Aquaculture. 2016;458:187–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colosimo R, Warren FJ, Finnigan TJA, et al. Protein bioaccessibility from mycoprotein hyphal structure: in vitro investigation of underlying mechanisms. Food Chem. 2020;330:127252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Lou H, Ritzoulis C, et al. Structural characterization of soybean milk particles during in vitro digestive/non-digestive simulation. Lwt. 2019;108:326–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Fish and Shrimp. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pianesso D, Adorian TJ, Mombach PI, et al. Nutritional assessment of linseed meal (Linum usitatissimum L.) protein concentrate in feed of silver catfish. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2020;265:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyben D, Vidakovic A, Nyman A, et al. Effects of dietary yeast inclusion and acute stress on post-prandial whole blood profiles of dorsal aorta-cannulated rainbow trout. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2017;43(2):421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardakou M, Mercuri A, Barker SA, et al. Achieving antral grinding forces in biorelevant in vitro models: comparing the USP dissolution apparatus II and the dynamic gastric model with human in vivo data. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011;12(2):620–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong F, Singh RP. A human gastric simulator (HGS) to study food digestion in human stomach. J Food Sci. 2010;75(9):E627–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Fortner L, Kong F. Development of a Gastric Simulation Model (GSM) incorporating gastric geometry and peristalsis for food digestion study. Food Res Int. 2019;125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozu H, Nakata Y, Nakajima M, et al. Development of a Human Gastric Digestion Simulator Equipped with Peristalsis Function for the Direct Observation and Analysis of the Food Digestion Process. Food Sci Technol Res. 2014;20:225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros L, Retamal C, Torres H, et al. Development of an in vitro mechanical gastric system (IMGS) with realistic peristalsis to assess lipid digestibility. Food Res Int. 2016;90:216–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wu P, Liu M, et al. An advanced near real dynamic in vitro human stomach system to study gastric digestion and emptying of beef stew and cooked rice. Food Funct. 2019;10:2914–2925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Wu X, Chen XD. Comparison between the digestive behaviors of a new in vitro rat soft stomach model with that of the in vivo experimentation on living rats – motility and morphological influences. J Food Eng. 2013;117:183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard-Champod M, Blanquet-Diot S, Cardot JM, et al. Development and validation of a continuous in vitro system reproducing some biotic and abiotic factors of the veal calf intestine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:5592–5600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatopoulos K, Batchelor HK, Simmons MJH. Dissolution profile of theophylline modified release tablets, using a biorelevant Dynamic Colon Model (DCM). Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016;108:9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minekus M, Smeets-Peeters M, Bernalier A, et al. A computer-controlled system to simulate conditions of the large intestine with peristaltic mixing, water absorption and absorption of fermentation products,”. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;53:108–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molly K, Vande Woestyne M, Verstraete W. Development of a 5-step multi-chamber reactor as a simulation of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993;39:254–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barroso E, Cueva C, Peláez C, et al. Development of human colonic microbiota in the computer-controlled dynamic SIMulator of the GastroIntestinal tract SIMGI. LWT - Food Sc Technol. 2015;61:283–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra A, Denis S, Le Goff O, et al. Development and validation of a new dynamic computer-controlled model of the human stomach and small intestine. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113:1325–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña E, Hernández C, Ibarra-Castro L, et al. In vitro protein digestibility of different grow-out stages of spotted rose snapper (Lutjanus guttatus, Steindachner, 1869). Aquaculture Nutr. 2017;23:1204–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibbetts SM, Yasumaru F, Lemos D. In vitro prediction of digestible protein content of marine microalgae (Nannochloropsis granulata) meals for Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Algal Res. 2017;21:76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzakhani MK, Abedian Kenari A, Motamedzadegan A. Prediction of apparent protein digestibility by in vitro pH-stat degree of protein hydrolysis with species-specific enzymes for Siberian sturgeon (Acipenser baeri, Brandt 1869). Aquaculture. 2018;496:73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis MJ, Francis DS, Blyth D, et al. A comparison of in-vivo and in-vitro methods for assessing the digestibility of poultry by-product meals using barramundi (Lates calcarifer); impacts of cooking temperature and raw material freshness. Aquaculture. 2019;498:187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vizcaíno AJ, Sáez MI, Martínez TF, et al. Differential hydrolysis of proteins of four microalgae by the digestive enzymes of gilthead sea bream and Senegalese sole. Algal Res. 2019;37:145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Silva MS, Prabhu PAJ, Ornsrud R, et al. In vitro digestion method to evaluate solubility of dietary zinc, selenium and manganese in salmonid diets. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2020;57:126418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar