Recent advances of natural biopolymeric culture scaffold: synthesis and modification

References

• Pattanashetti NA, Hiremath C, Naik SR, et al. Development of nanofibrous scaffolds by varying the TiO2 content in crosslinked PVA for bone tissue engineering. New J Chem. 2020;44(5):2111–2121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salado M, Lanceros-Mendez S, Lizundia E. Free-standing intrinsically conducting polymer membranes based on cellulose and poly(vinylidene fluoride) for energy storage applications. Eur Polym J. 2021; 144:110240.
   Google Scholar
• Yin X, He Y, Wang Y, et al. Bio-inspired antifouling Cellulose nanofiber multifunctional filtration membrane for highly efficient emulsion separation and application in water purification. Korean J Chem Eng. 2020;37(10):1751–1760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourabadeh A, Mirjalili M, Shahvazian M. Modification of silk fibroin nanofibers scaffold by PAMAM dendrimer for cell culture. J Exp Nanosci. 2020;15(1):297–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf R, Sofi HS, Akram T, et al. Fabrication of multifunctional cellulose/TiO2/Ag composite nanofibers scaffold with antibacterial and bioactivity properties for future tissue engineering applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2020;108(4):947–962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research GV Primary Cell Culture Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Product (Reagents & Supplements, Media), By Application (Virology, Vaccine Production), By Separation Methods, By Cell Type, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2021 - 2028. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Markets MA Cell Culture Market by Product (Consumables (Media Serum, Vessels) Equipment (Bioreactor, Centrifuge, Incubator, Autoclave)), Application (Therapeutic Proteins, Vaccines, Diagnostics, Stem cells), End User (Pharma, Biotech) - Global Forecast to 2025. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Scientific TF. Products. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Merck S-A. Cellusponge-Collagen. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Merck S-A Nanofiber cell culture dish, with random oriented nanofibers. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Corning LS Corning® PureCoat™ Amine 100 mm Dish, 10/Pack, 40/Case. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Badekila AK, Kini S, Jaiswal AK. Fabrication techniques of biomimetic scaffolds in three-dimensional cell culture: a review. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(2):741–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlăsceanu GM, Iovu H, Ioniţă M. Graphene inks for the 3D printing of cell culture scaffolds and related molecular arrays. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;162:712–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Suvarnapathaki S, Walsh K, et al. Paper as a scaffold for cell cultures: teaching an old material new tricks. MRS Commun. 2018;8(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shams A, Eslahi N, Movahedin M, et al. Future of spermatogonial stem cell culture: application of nanofiber scaffolds. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;12(7):544–553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy AR, Laslett A, O’Brien CM, et al. Scaffolds for 3D in vitro culture of neural lineage cells. Acta Biomater. 2017;54:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan C, Wang DA. Macroporous Hydrogel Scaffolds for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture and Tissue Engineering. Tissue Eng Part B: Rev. 2017;23(5):451–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila-Parrondo C, García-Astrain C, Liz-Marzán LM. Colloidal systems toward 3D cell culture scaffolds. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2020 283 ;102237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alghuwainem A, Alshareeda AT, Alsowayan B. Scaffold-free 3-D cell sheet technique bridges the gap between 2-D cell culture and animal models. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4926.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yi T, Huang S, Liu G, et al. Bioreactor synergy with 3D scaffolds: new era for stem cells culture. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1(2):193–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qin K, Parisi C, Fernandes FM. Recent advances in ice templating: from biomimetic composites to cell culture scaffolds and tissue engineering. J Mat Chem B. 2021;9(4):889–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campuzano S, Pelling AE. Scaffolds for 3D Cell Culture and Cellular Agriculture Applications Derived From Non-animal Sources. Front Sustainable Food Syst. 2019;3:38.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolova MP, Chavali MS. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: a review. Bioact Mater. 2019;4:271–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Abdalla AME, Xiao L, et al. Biopolymer-Based Microcarriers for Three-Dimensional Cell Culture and Engineered Tissue Formation. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmond M, Bernier SM, Pantcheva MB, et al. Collagen and collagen-chondroitin sulfate scaffolds with uniaxially aligned pores for the biomimetic, three dimensional culture of trabecular meshwork cells. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114(4):915–923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pustlauk W, Paul B, Brueggemeier S, et al. Modulation of chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in jellyfish collagen scaffolds by cell density and culture medium. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(6):1710–1722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speer JE, Gunasekara DB, Wang Y, et al. Molecular transport through primary human small intestinal monolayers by culture on a collagen scaffold with a gradient of chemical cross-linking. J Biol Eng. 2019;13:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcor JD, Hunter EJ, Davidenko N, et al. Collagen scaffolds functionalized with triple-helical peptides support 3D HUVEC culture. Regen Biomater. 2021;7(5):471–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Ma J, Gao Y, et al. Epithelial differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) undergoing three-dimensional (3D) cultivation with collagen sponge scaffold (CSS) via an indirect co-culture strategy. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Drunen R, Jimenez-Vergara AC, Tsai EH, et al. Collagen Based Multicomponent Interpenetrating Networks as Promising Scaffolds for 3D Culture of Human Neural Stem Cells, Human Astrocytes, and Human Microglia. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2(3):975–980.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rieu C, Parisi C, Mosser G, et al. Topotactic Fibrillogenesis of Freeze-Cast Microridged Collagen Scaffolds for 3D Cell Culture. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(16):14672–14683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng D, Lei X, Li Y, et al. Three dimensional polyvinyl alcohol scaffolds modified with collagen for HepG2 cell culture. J Biomater Appl. 2020;35(4–5):459–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier R, Harrison RE. Methods for studying MLO-Y4 osteocytes in collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds in the rotary cell culture system. Connect Tissue Res. 2020;62(4):436–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Han SH, Kook YM, et al. A novel 3D indirect co-culture system based on a collagen hydrogel scaffold for enhancing the osteogenesis of stem cells. J Mat Chem B. 2020;8(41):9481–9491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imashiro C, Yamasaki K, Tanaka RI, et al. Perfusable system using porous collagen gel scaffold actively provides fresh culture media to a cultured 3d tissue. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:6780.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Westin CB, Trinca RB, Zuliani C, et al. Differentiation of dental pulp stem cells into chondrocytes upon culture on porous chitosan-xanthan scaffolds in the presence of kartogenin. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;80:594–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson AE, Lan Levengood SK, Sun J, et al. Fabrication and Characterization of Chitosan–Hyaluronic Acid Scaffolds with Varying Stiffness for Glioblastoma Cell Culture. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(15):1800295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu C, Bao Z, Zhang X, et al. A thermosensitive RGD-modified hydroxybutyl chitosan hydrogel as a 3D scaffold for BMSCs culture on keloid treatment. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;125:78–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao C, Li Y, Peng G, et al. Decellularized liver matrix-modified chitosan fibrous scaffold as a substrate for C3A hepatocyte culture. J Biomater Sci Poly Ed. 2020;31(8):1041–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radwan-Pragłowska J, Piątkowski M, Kitala D, et al. Microwave-assisted synthesis and characterization of bioactive chitosan scaffolds doped with Au nanoparticles for mesenchymal stem cells culture. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2019;68(7):351–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruppke B, Heinemann C, Farack J, et al. Hemocyanin modification of chitosan scaffolds with calcium phosphate phases increase the osteoblast/osteoclast activity ratio—A co-culture study. Molecules. 2020; 25:4580.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhattacharjee P, Maiti TK, Bhattacharya D, et al. Effect of different mineralization processes on in vitro and in vivo bone regeneration and osteoblast-macrophage cross-talk in co-culture system using dual growth factor mediated non-mulberry silk fibroin grafted poly (Є-caprolactone) nanofibrous scaffold. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;156:270–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalvuran H, Elçin AE, Elçin YM. Nanofibrous silk fibroin/reduced graphene oxide scaffolds for tissue engineering and cell culture applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;114:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirikia M, Shariatzadeh SMA, Jorsaraei SGA, et al. Impact of pre-incubation time of silk fibroin scaffolds in culture medium on cell proliferation and attachment. Tissue Cell. 2017;49(6):657–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal P, Pramanik K, Biswas A, et al. In vitro cartilage construct generation from silk fibroin- chitosan porous scaffold and umbilical cord blood derived human mesenchymal stem cells in dynamic culture condition. J Biomed Mater Res - Part A. 2018;106(2):397–407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal P, Pramanik K, Vishwanath V, et al. Enhanced chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells over silk fibroin/chitosan-chondroitin sulfate three dimensional scaffold in dynamic culture condition. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2018;106(7):2576–2587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal P, Pramanik K. Enhanced chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in silk fibroin/chitosan/glycosaminoglycan scaffolds under dynamic culture condition. Differentiation. 2019;110:36–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj N, Singh YP, Mandal BB. Silk Fibroin Scaffold-Based 3D Co-Culture Model for Modulation of Chondrogenesis without Hypertrophy via Reciprocal Cross-talk and Paracrine Signaling. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(10):5240–5254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Wang Q, Gu Y, et al. Production of composite scaffold containing silk fibroin, chitosan, and gelatin for 3D cell culture and bone tissue regeneration. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:5311–5320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang TY, Wang GS, Ko CS, et al. A study of the differentiation of stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth on 3D silk fibroin scaffolds using static and dynamic culture paradigms. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;109:110563.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shim K, Kim SH, Lee D, et al. Fabrication of micrometer-scale porous gelatin scaffolds for 3D cell culture. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017;50:183–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao HH, Kuo CY, Chen KS, et al. Preparation of gelatin and gelatin/hyaluronic acid cryogel scaffolds for the 3D culture of mesothelial cells and mesothelium tissue regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20 :4527.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahin A, Ramazani SAA, Mehraji S, et al. Synthesis and characterization of a chitosan/gelatin transparent film crosslinked with a combination of EDC/NHS for corneal epithelial cell culture scaffold with potential application in cornea implantation. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2020:1865349. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2020.1865349. .
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Jiao Y, Wang C, et al. Design and characterization of small-diameter tissue-engineered blood vessels constructed by electrospun polyurethane-core and gelatin-shell coaxial fiber. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):5769–5788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilirgen AC, Toker M, Odabas S, et al. Plant-Based Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7(3):926–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhania RR, Patel AK, Tsai M-L, et al. Genetic modification for enhancing bacterial cellulose production and its applications. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):6793–6807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao SN, Tsujita Y, Kondo T. Surface modification of oriented polysaccharide scaffolds using biotic nanofibers for epidermal cell culture. Cellulose. 2019;26(13–14):7971–7981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felgueiras HP, Teixeira MA, Tavares TD, et al. Antimicrobial action and clotting time of thin, hydrated poly(vinyl alcohol)/cellulose acetate films functionalized with LL37 for prospective wound-healing applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 2020;137:48626.
   Google Scholar
• Unal S, Arslan S, Yilmaz BK, et al. Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose scaffold and its modification with hyaluronic acid and gelatin for glioblastoma cell culture. Cellulose. 2021;28(1):117–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He W, Zhang Z, Zheng Y, et al. Preparation of aminoalkyl-grafted bacterial cellulose membranes with improved antimicrobial properties for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2020;108(5):1086–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atoufi Z, Zarrintaj P, Motlagh GH, et al. A novel bio electro active alginate-aniline tetramer/ agarose scaffold for tissue engineering: synthesis, characterization, drug release and cell culture study. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2017;28(15):1617–1638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowski WM, Gibson DJ, Craft SL, et al. Development and assessment of a novel ex vivo corneal culture technique involving an agarose-based dome scaffold for use as a model of in vivo corneal wound healing in dogs and rabbits. Am J Vet Res. 2020;81(1):47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada Y, Yoshida C, Hamada K, et al. Development of Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Scaffolds Using Laminin Peptide-Conjugated Agarose Microgels. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21(9):3765–3771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson AG, Laughlin TD, Romereim SM, et al. A Tunable, Three-Dimensional In Vitro Culture Model of Growth Plate Cartilage Using Alginate Hydrogel Scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2018;24(1–2):94–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed S, Chauhan VM, Ghaemmaghami AM, et al. New generation of bioreactors that advance extracellular matrix modelling and tissue engineering. Biotechnol Lett. 2019;41:1–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaspar DA, Gomide V, Monteiro FJ. The role of perfusion bioreactors in bone tissue engineering. Biomatter. 2012;2(4):167–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varley MC, Markaki AE, Brooks RA. Effect of Rotation on Scaffold Motion and Cell Growth in Rotating Bioreactors. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017;23(11–12):522–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid J, Schwarz S, Meier-Staude R, et al. A perfusion bioreactor-system for cell seeding and oxygen-controlled cultivation of 3D-cell cultures. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2018;24:585–595.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halldorsson S, Lucumi E, Gómez-Sjöberg R, et al. Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;63:218–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar