Potential use of olive oil mill wastewater for bacterial cellulose production

References

• Römling U, Galperin MY. Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23(9):545–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhania RR, Patel AK, Tsai ML, et al. Genetic modification for enhancing bacterial cellulose production and its applications. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):6793–6807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco Parte FG, Santoso SP, Chou CC, et al. Current progress on the production, modification, and applications of bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2020;40(3):397–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SP, Calvar IL, Catchmark JM, et al. Biosynthesis, production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose. 2013;20(5):2191–2219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu W, Chen S, Yang J, et al. Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;101:1043–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacicedo ML, Castro MC, Servetas I, et al. Progress in bacterial cellulose matrices for biotechnological applications. Bioresour Technol. 2016;213:172–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SM, Shin EJ. The nanofication and functionalization of bacterial cellulose and its applications. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(3):406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniri M, Boroumand Moghaddam A, Azizi S, et al. Production and status of bacterial cellulose in biomedical engineering. Nanomaterials. 2017;7(9):257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgieva S, Trček J. Bacterial cellulose: production, modification and perspectives in biomedical applications. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(10):1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun B, Sar T, Ata A, et al. Pyrolyzed bacterial cellulose-supported SnO2 nanocomposites as high-capacity anode materials for sodium-ion batteries. Cellulose. 2016;23(4):2597–2607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik KB, Cengiz EC, Sar T, et al. In-situ wrapping of tin oxide nanoparticles by bacterial cellulose derived carbon nanofibers and its application as freestanding interlayer in lithium sulfide based lithium-sulfur batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;530:137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reshmy R, Philip E, Thomas D, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose: engineering, production, and applications. Bioengineered. 2021;12(2):11463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Zhang Y, Phillips GO, et al. Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll. 2014;35:539–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JK, Jung JY, Khan T Bacterial cellulose. In Eds: Phillips G.O. and Williams P.A.,Handbook of hydrocolloids. Cambridge, UK.: Woodhead Publishing; 2009. p. 724–739.
   Google Scholar
• Son HJ, Kim HG, Kim KK, et al. Increased production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter sp. V6 in synthetic media under shaking culture conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2003;86(3):215–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain Z, Sajjad W, Khan T, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose from industrial wastes: a review. Cellulose. 2019;26(5):2895–2911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sar T, Ozturk M, Taherzadeh MJ, et al. New insights on protein recovery from olive oil mill wastewater through bioconversion with edible filamentous fungi. Processes. 2020;8(10):1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dermeche S, Nadour M, Larroche C, et al. Olive mill wastes: biochemical characterizations and valorization strategies. Process Biochem. 2013;48(10):1532–1552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papazi A, Pappas I, Kotzabasis K. Combinational system for biodegradation of olive oil mill wastewater phenolics and high yield of bio-hydrogen production. J Biotechnol. 2019;306:47–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrunhosa L, Oliveira F, Dantas D, et al. Lipase production by Aspergillus ibericus using olive mill wastewater. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2013;36(3):285–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Annibale A, Sermanni GG, Federici F, et al. Olive-mill wastewaters: a promising substrate for microbial lipase production. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97(15):1828–1833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneses DP, Gudiña EJ, Fernandes F, et al. The yeast-like fungus Aureobasidium thailandense LB01 produces a new biosurfactant using olive oil mill wastewater as an inducer. Microbiol Res. 2017;204:40–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cioffi G, Pesca MS, De Caprariis P, et al. Phenolic compounds in olive oil and olive pomace from Cilento (Campania, Italy) and their antioxidant activity. Food Chem. 2010;121(1):105–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin AR, Dalgıç AC. Biogas production from olive pomace. ResouConserv Recycl. 2000;30(4):301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes FP, Silva NH, Trovatti E, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;55:205–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Piñeiro A, Murillo S, Barreto C, et al. Changes in organic matter and residual effect of amendment with two-phase olive-mill waste on degraded agricultural soils. SciTotal Environ. 2007;378(1–2):84–89.
   Google Scholar
• Garcı́a AM, Moumen A, Ruiz DY, et al. Chemical composition and nutrients availability for goats and sheep of two-stage olive cake and olive leaves. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2003;107(1–4):61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sar T, Stark BC, Akbas MY. Effective ethanol production from whey powder through immobilized E. coli expressing Vitreoscilla hemoglobin. Bioengineered. 2017;8(2):171–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestrin S, Schramm MJBJ. Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J. 1954;58(2):345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadkazemi F, Azin M, Ashori A. Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;117:518–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal LGJMA, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr, et al. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J. 1959;29(10):786–794.
   Google Scholar
• Arabi M, Elias A, Kamel Z, et al. Characterization of olive mill wastewater and gamma irradiation effects on some parameters of its composition. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2018;317(2):1095–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Yang XY, Xiong L, et al. Evaluating the possibility of using acetone‐butanol‐ethanol (ABE) fermentation wastewater for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015;60(5):491–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakaria J, Nazeri M (2012). Optimization of bacterial cellulose production from pineapple waste: effect of temperature, pH and concentration. In 5th Engineering Conference,” Engineering Towards Change-Empowering Green Solutions, Kuching Sarawak, Malaysia. (pp. 10–12).
   Google Scholar
• Vazquez A, Foresti ML, Cerrutti P, et al. Bacterial cellulose from simple and low cost production media by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. J Polym Environ. 2013;21(2):545–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramana KV, Tomar A, Singh L. Effect of various carbon and nitrogen sources on cellulose synthesis by Acetobacter xylinum. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;16(3):245–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naritomi T, Kouda T, Yano H, et al. Effect of ethanol on bacterial cellulose production from fructose in continuous culture. J Ferment Bioeng. 1998;85(6):598–603.
   Google Scholar
• Yang XY, Huang C, Guo HJ, et al. Beneficial effect of acetic acid on the xylose utilization and bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Indian J Microbiol. 2014;54(3):268–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güzel M, Akpınar Ö. Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose from citrus peels. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2019;10(8):2165–2175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurosumi A, Sasaki C, Yamashita Y, et al. Utilization of various fruit juices as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum NBRC 13693. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;76(2):333–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güzel M, Akpınar Ö. Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced from fruit and vegetable peels by Komagataeibacter hansenii GA2016. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;162:1597–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafidi M, Amir S, Revel JC. Structural characterization of olive mill waster-water after aerobic digestion using elemental analysis, FTIR and 13C NMR. Process Biochem. 2005;40(8):2615–2622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droussi Z, D’orazio V, Provenzano MR, et al. Study of the biodegradation and transformation of olive-mill residues during composting using FTIR spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. J Hazard Mater. 2009;164(2–3):1281–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Saied H, El-Diwany AI, Basta AH, et al. Production and characterization of economical bacterial cellulose. BioResources. 2008;3(4):1196–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trovatti E, Serafim LS, Freire CS, et al. Gluconacetobacter sacchari: an efficient bacterial cellulose cell-factory. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;86(3):1417–1420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Ramos P, Carrión-Prieto P, Ruiz-Potosme NM, et al. An analysis of the similarities in the ATR-FTIR spectra from Argania spinosa, Rosa rubiginosa and Elaeis guineensis oils. J Essent Oil Bear Plants. 2017;20(6):1651–1658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck KL, Hayball PJ. Major phenolic compounds in olive oil: metabolism and health effects. J Nutr Biochem. 2002;13(11):636–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barshan S, Rezazadeh-Bari M, Almasi H, et al. Optimization and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Komagatacibacter xylinus PTCC 1734 using vinasse as a cheap cultivation medium. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;136:1188–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahan F, Kumar V, Saxena RK. Distillery effluent as a potential medium for bacterial cellulose production: a biopolymer of great commercial importance. Bioresour Technol. 2018;250:922–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surma-Ślusarska B, Presler S, Danielewicz D. Characteristics of bacterial cellulose obtained from Acetobacter xylinum culture for application in papermaking. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe. 2008;16(4):108–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HI, Lee OM, Jeong JH, et al. Production and characterization of cellulose by Acetobacter sp. V6 using a cost-effective molasses-corn steep liquor medium. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;162(2):486–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HI, Jeong JH, Lee OM, et al. Influence of glycerol on production and structural-physical properties of cellulose from Acetobacter sp. V6 cultured in shake flasks. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(10):3602–3608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshk S, Sameshima K. The utilization of sugar cane molasses with/without the presence of lignosulfonate for the production of bacterial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;72(2):291–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto H, Horii F, Hirai A. In situ crystallization of bacterial cellulose II. Influences of different polymeric additives on the formation of celluloses Iα and Iβ at the early stage of incubation. Cellulose. 1996;3(1):229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Abdan KB, Yong SC, Chiang ECW, et al. Barrier properties, antimicrobial and antifungal activities of chitin and chitosan-based IPNs, gels, blends, composites, and nanocomposites. In Eds. Gopi S., Thomas S. and Pius A., Handbook of Chitin and Chitosan. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2020. p. 175–227.
   Google Scholar
• Golmohammadi H, Morales-Narváez E, Naghdi T, et al. Nanocellulose in sensing and biosensing. Chem Mater. 2017;29(13):5426–5446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhiono A, Rosidi B, Taher H, et al. Kinetic aspects of bacterial cellulose formation in nata-de-coco culture system. Carbohydr Polym. 1999;40(2):137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera B, Laavanya D, Balasubramanian P. Techno-economic feasibility assessment of bacterial cellulose biofilm production during the Kombucha fermentation process. Bioresour Technol. 2022;346:126659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu F, Wang CL, Shyu YT. Fermentation of Monascus purpureus on bacterial cellulose‐nata and the color stability of Monascus‐nata complex. J Food Sci. 2000;65(2):342–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purwadaria T, Gunawan L, Gunawan AW. The production of nata colored by Monascus purpureus J1 pigments as functional food. Microbiol Indonesia. 2010;4(1):2.
   Google Scholar