Writing the Conceptual Article: A Practical Guide

References

• Becker, H. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think about Your Research While You’re Doing It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berglez, Peter. 2008. “What Is Global Journalism.” Journalism Studies 9 (6): 845–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglez, P., and A. Gearing. 2018. “The Panama and Paradise Papers: The Rise of a Global Fourth Estate.” International Journal of Communication 12: 4573–4592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. 1954. “What Is Wrong with Social Theory?” American Sociological Review 19 (1): 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. 2019. Are Filter Bubbles Real? Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., and E. Hurcombe. 2019. “Digital Journalism as a Symptom, Response, and Agent of Change.” Digital Journalism 7 (3): 359–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M., D. Scheufele, and S. Iyengar. 2016. “The End of Framing as We Know It … and the Future of Media Effects.” Mass Communication and Society 19 (1): 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., and S. Lewis. 2015. Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. 1991. Communication Concepts 1: Explication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, M. 2015. “Clarifying Journalism’s Quantitative Turn.” Digital Journalism 3 (3): 331–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., J. LaPorte, and J. Seawright. 2012. “Putting Typologies to Work: Concept Formation, Measurement, and Analytic Rigor.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (1): 217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. 2005. “What is Journalism?: Professional Identity and Ideology of Journalists Reconsidered.” Journalism: Theory, Practice, Criticism 6 (4): 442–464.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, A., and P. H. Ang. 2019. “Digital Journalism: Defined, Refined, or Re-Defined.” Digital Journalism 7 (3): 378–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldridge, S., K. Hess, E. Tandoc, and O. Westlund. 2019. “Navigating the Scholarly Terrain: Introducing the Digital Journalism Studies Compass.” Digital Journalism 7 (3): 386–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, S. K., K. E. Pearce, J. Vitak, and J. W. Treem. 2017. “Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22 (1): 35–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. 1978. “Meda Sociology: The Dominant Paradigm.” In Mass Communication Review Yearbook, edited by G. C. Wilhoit and H. De Bock, Vol. 2, 73–122. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hafez, K. 2007. The Myth of Media Globalization. Malden, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, J. 1972. Techniques and Problems of Theory Construction in Sociology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., and P. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. 2002. “Interactivity: A Concept Explication.” New Media & Society 4 (3): 355–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2017. “Three Concepts to Retire.” Annals of the International Communication Association 41 (1): 92–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. 2020. “What Is Communication Research for? Wrestling with the Relevance of What We Do.” In Rethinking Media Research for Changing Societies, edited by M. Powers and A. Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., and N. Usher. 2013. “Open Source and Journalism: Toward New Frameworks for Imagining News Innovation.” Media, Culture & Society 35 (5): 602–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. 2015. “Mobile Activism and Contentious Politics in Contemporary China.” In Networked China: Global Dynamics of Digital Media and Civic Engagement, edited by W. Chen and S. Reese, 97–113. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, S. 2020. “Taking the Temperature of the Room”: How Political Campaigns Use Social Media to Understand and Represent Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 84 (s1): 236–256.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J., and Z. Pan. 2005. “Concept Explication and Theory Construction.” In The Evolution of Key Mass Communication Concepts, edited by S. Dunwoody, L. B. Becker, D. McLeod, and G. Kosicki, 13–76. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York, NY: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. W. 1963. “Two Styles of Social Science Research.” In Power, Politics, People, edited by I. Horowitz, 553–567. New York: Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. 2001. “Understanding the Global Journalist: A Hierarchy-of-Influences Approach.” Journalism Studies 2 (2): 173–187.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. 2016. “The New Geography of Journalism Research: Levels and Spaces.” Digital Journalism 4 (7): 816–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. 2021. The Crisis of the Institutional Press. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., S. Lewis, and M. Carlson. 2019. “Locating the ‘Digital’ in Journalism Studies: Transformations in Research.” Digital Journalism 7 (3): 368–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P., and S. D. Reese. 2014. Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P., J. Tankard, and D. Lasorsa. 2004. How to Build Social Science Theories. Sage
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. and T. Vos. 2009. Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Steensen, S., A. Larsen, Y. Hagvar, and B. Fonn. 2019. “What Does Digital Journalism Studies Look like.” Digital Journalism 3 (1): 320–342.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, T., and F. Heinderycks. 2015. Gatekeeping in Transition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. 2019. “The 5ws and the 1h of Digital Journalism.” Digital Journalism 7 (3): 351–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardle, C. 2017. Fake News. It’s Complicated. First Draft.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, S., and P. Howard. 2019. Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. 1993. “Journalists as Interpretive Communities.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10 (3): 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. 2019. “Why Journalism Is about More than Digital Technology.” Digital Journalism 7 (3): 343–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar