Trust through Transparency? How Journalistic Reactions to Media-Critical User Comments Affect Quality Perceptions and Behavior Intentions

References

• Aust, F., B. Diedenhofen, S. Ullrich, and J. Musch. 2013. “Seriousness Checks Are Useful to Improve Data Validity in Online Research.” Behavior Research Methods 45 (2): 527–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., B. Sayre, and H. Rojas. 2015. “Perceptions of the Media and the Public and Their Effects on Political Participation in Colombia.” Mass Communication and Society 18 (3): 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., and K. H. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism. The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, C. M., and D. R. Thadani. 2012. “The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication. A Literature Analysis and Integrative Model.” Decision Support Systems 54 (1): 461–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, W. T. 2006. “The Protective Powers of Crisis Response Strategies: Managing Reputational Assets during a Crisis.” Journal of Promotion Management 12 (3–4): 241–260.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, S., and K. Heim. 2009. “Transparency in Journalism: Meanings, Merits, and Risks.” In The Handbook of Mass Media Ethics, edited by L. Wilkins and C. G. Christians, 217–228. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, S., T. P. Vos, and J. D. Wolfgang. 2016. “Reader Comments as Press Criticism: Implications for the Journalistic Field.” Journalism 17 (6): 677–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohle, M. 2018. “Recipients’ Assessment of Journalistic Quality. Do Online User Comments or the Actual Journalistic Quality Matter?” Digital Journalism 6 (5): 563–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., S. Lewandowsky, and D. T. W. Tang. 2010. “Explicit Warnings Reduce but Do Not Eliminate the Continued Influence of Misinformation.” Memory & Cognition 38 (8): 1087–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawzi, N., and C. Mothes. 2020. “Perceptions of Media Performance: Expectation-Evaluation Discrepancies and Their Relationship with Media-Related and Populist Attitudes.” Media and Communication 8 (3): 335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanitzsch, T., A. Van Dalen, and N. Steindl. 2018. “Caught in the Nexus: A Comparative and Longitudinal Analysis of Public Trust in the Press.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 23 (1): 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2018. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hölig, S., and U. Hasebrink. 2017. “Germany.” In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017, edited by N. Newman, R. Fletcher, A. Kalogeropoulos, D. A. Levy, and R. K. Nielsen, 70–71. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, K., T. U. Figenschou, and L. Frischlich. 2019. “Key Dimensions of Alternative News Media.” Digital Journalism 7 (7): 860–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, I., L. Janis, and H. H. Kelley. 1953. Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. M., and C. M. Seifert. 1994. “Sources of the Continued Influence Effect: When Misinformation in Memory Affects Later Inferences.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 (6): 1420–1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. 2010. “Rituals of Transparency.” Journalism Studies 11 (4): 535–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M., C. Clerwall, and L. Nord. 2017. “Do Not Stand Corrected: Transparency and Users’ Attitudes to Inaccurate News and Corrections in Online Journalism.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 94 (1): 148–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kümpel, A. S., and N. Springer. 2016. “Commenting Quality. Effects of User Comments on Perceptions of Journalistic Quality.” Studies in Communication and Media 5: 353–366.
   Google Scholar
• Kümpel, A. S., and J. Unkel. 2020. “Negativity Wins at Last: How Presentation Order and Valence of User Comments Affect Perceptions of Journalistic Quality.” Journal of Media Psychology 32 (2): 89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, D. 2012. “Transparency and Other Journalistic Norms on Twitter: The Role of Gender.” Journalism Studies 13 (3): 402–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrman, S. 2021. “The 8 Trust Indicators.” The Trust Project. https://thetrustproject.org/#indicators
   Google Scholar
• Leiner, D. J. 2016. “Our Research’s Breadth Lives on Convenience Samples. A Case Study of the Online Respondent Pool “SoSci Panel.” Studies in Communication and Media 5 (4): 367–396.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C., A. E. Holton, and M. Coddington. 2014. “Reciprocal Journalism.” Journalism Practice 8 (2): 229–241.
   Google Scholar
• Loosen, W., J. Reimer, and S. Hölig. 2020. “What Journalists Want and What They Ought to Do: (in)Congruences between Journalists’ Role Conceptions and Audiences’ Expectations.” Journalism Studies 21 (12): 1744–1774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosen, W., and J. -H. Schmidt. 2012. “(Re-)Discovering the Audience.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (6): 867–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowrey, W., and W. Anderson. 2005. “The Journalist behind the Curtain: Participatory Functions on the Internet and Their Impact on Perceptions of the Work of Journalism.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masullo, G. M., and J. Kim. 2021. “Exploring “Angry” and “Like” Reactions on Uncivil Facebook Comments That Correct Misinformation in the News.” Digital Journalism 9 (8): 1103–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masullo, G. M., M. J. Riedl, and Q. Elyse Huang. 2020. “Engagement Moderation: What Journalists Should Say to Improve Online Discussions.” Journalism Practice 30 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Masullo, G. M., A. Curry, and K. Whipple. 2019. Building Trust: What Works for News Organizations. Austin, TX: Center for Media Engagement. https://mediaengagement.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/CME-Building-Trust-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Masullo, G. M., and O. Tenenboim. 2020. Gaining Trust in TV News. Austin, TX: Center for Media Engagement. https://mediaengagement.org/research/trust-in-tv-news/
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. 2003. Media Accountability and Freedom of Publication. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. 2013. Journalism and Society. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K., and J. Reimer. 2011. “Transparenz im Journalismus.” Publizistik 56 (2): 133–155.
   Google Scholar
• Naab, T. K., D. Heinbach, M. Ziegele, and M. ‑T. Grasberger. 2020. “Comments and Credibility: How Critical User Comments Decrease Perceived News Article Credibility.” Journalism Studies 21 (6): 783–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuberger, C. 2014. “The Journalistic Quality of Internet Formats and Services.” Digital Journalism 2 (3): 419–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurauter-Kessels, M. 2011. “Im/Polite Reader Responses on British Online News Sites.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 7 (2): 187–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermaier, M. 2020. Vertrauen in journalistische Medien aus Sicht der Rezipienten. Zum Einfluss von soziopolitischen und performanzbezogenen Erklärgrößen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Pingree, Raymond J., Brian Watson, Mingxiao Sui, Kathleen Searles, Nathan P. Kalmoe, Joshua P. Darr, Martina Santia, and Kirill Bryanov. 2018. “Checking Facts and Fighting Back. Why Journalists Should Defend Their Profession.” PloS One 13 (12): e0208600–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkleton, B. E., E. W. Austin, Y. Zhou, J. F. Willoughby, and M. Reiser. 2012. “Perceptions of News Media, External Efficacy, and Public Affairs Apathy in Political Decision Making and Disaffection.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89 (1): 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochazka, F., and W. Schweiger. 2016. “Medienkritik Online. Was Kommentierende Nutzer Am Journalismus Kritisieren.” Studies in Communication and Media 5: 454–469.
   Google Scholar
• Prochazka, F., P. Weber, and W. Schweiger. 2018. “Effects of Civility and Reasoning in User Comments on Perceived Journalistic Quality.” Journalism Studies 19 (1): 62–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochazka, F. 2020. Vertrauen in Journalismus unter Online-Bedingungen: Zum Einfluss von Personenmerkmalen, Qualitätswahrnehmungen und Nachrichtennutzung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30227-6
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, J. 2017. “Vertrauen Durch Transparenz? Potenziale Und Probleme Journalistischer Selbstoffenbarung.” In Öffentliches Vertrauen in der Mediengesellschaft, edited by M. Haller, 139–157. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C., N. Fawzi, and M. Obermaier. 2017. “Die „Vertrauenskrise“ der Medien – Fakt oder Fiktion? Zu Entwicklung, Stand und Ursachen des Medienvertrauens in Deutschland.” In Lügenpresse: Anatomie eines politischen Kampfbegriffs, edited by V. Lilienthal and I. Neverla, 77–94. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
   Google Scholar
• Risch, J., and R. Krestel. 2020. “A Dataset of Journalists' Interactions with Their Readership.” In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 3117–3124.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, H. 2010. “Corrective” Actions in the Public Sphere. How Perceptions of Media and Media Effects Shape Political Behaviors.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22 (3): 343–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossini, P. 2020. “Beyond Incivility: Understanding Patterns of Uncivil and Intolerant Discourse in Online Political Talk.” Communication Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santana, A. D. 2016. “Controlling the Conversation. The Availability of Commenting Forums in Online Newspapers.” Journalism Studies 17 (2): 141–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, T., M. Ziegele, I. Jakobs, N. Jackob, O. Quiring, and C. Schemer. 2020. “Medienzynismus weiterhin verbreitet, aber mehr Menschen widersprechen. Mainzer Langzeitstudie Medienvertrauen 2019.” Media Perspektiven 50 (6): 322–330.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, C. M. 2002. “The Continued Influence of Misinformation in Memory: What Makes a Correction Effective?” The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 41: 265–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, N., I. Engelmann, and C. Pfaffinger. 2015. “User Comments: Motives and Inhibitors to Write and Read.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (7): 798–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., Y. Tsfati, H. Boomgaarden, A. Damstra, E. Lindgren, R. Vliegenthart, and T. Lindholm. 2020. “News Media Trust and Its Impact on Media Use: Toward a Framework for Future Research.” Annals of the International Communication Association 44 (2): 139–156.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., J. M. Scacco, A. Muddiman, and A. L. Curry. 2015. “Changing Deliberative Norms on News Organizations’ Facebook Sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20 (2): 188–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toff, B., and A. Kalogeropoulos. 2020. “All the News That’s Fit to Ignore.” Public Opinion Quarterly 84 (S1): 366–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, J., and W. Schweiger. 2014. “News Quality from the Recipients’ Perspective.” Journalism Studies 15 (6): 821–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wurff, Richard, and Klaus Schoenbach. 2014. “Civic and Citizen Demands of News Media and Journalists: What Does the Audience Expect from Good Journalism?” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91 (3): 433–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanacker, B., and G. Belmas. 2009. “Trust and the Economics of News.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 24 (2–3): 110–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, P., F. Prochazka, and W. Schweiger. 2019. “Why User Comments Affect the Perceived Quality of Journalistic Content.” Journal of Media Psychology 31 (1): 24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., L. S. Aiken, and J. L. Krull. 1996. “Experimental Psychology Designs: Analyzing Categorical by Continuous Variable Interactions.” Journal of Personality 64 (1): 1–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, W. N. 2007. Critical Conversations. A Theory of Press Criticism. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yale, R. N., J. D. Jensen, N. Carcioppolo, Y. Sun, and M. Liu. 2015. “Examining First- and Second-Order Factor Structures for News Credibility.” Communication Methods and Measures 9 (3): 152–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegele, M., and P. B. Jost. 2020. “Not Funny? The Effects of Factual versus Sarcastic Journalistic Responses to Uncivil User Comments.” Communication Research 47 (6): 891–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegele, M., P. Jost, M. Bormann, and D. Heinbach. 2018a. “Journalistic Counter-Voices in Comment Sections: Patterns, Determinants, and Potential Consequences of Interactive Moderation of Uncivil User Comments.” Studies in Communication and Media 7 (4): 525–554.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegele, M., T. Schultz, N. Jackob, V. Granow, O. Quiring, and C. Schemer. 2018b. “Lügenpresse-Hysterie ebbt ab. Mainzer Langzeitstudie „Medienvertrauen.” Media Perspektiven 48 (4): 150–162.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegele, M., N. Springer, P. Jost, and S. Wright. 2017. “Online User Comments across News and Other Content Formats: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, New Directions.” Studies in Communication and Media 6 (4): 315–332. Editorial.
   Google Scholar