The Generative Dialogue Framework and the Pursuit of Better Listening by Journalists: A Design-Centered Approach for More Constructive Conversations with Audiences

References

• Barge, Kevin J. 2002. “Enlarging the Meaning of Group Deliberation: From Discussion to Dialogue.” In New Directions in Group Communication, edited by Lawrence R. Frey, 159–178. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Belair-Gagnon, Valerie, Jacob L. Nelson, and Seth C. Lewis. 2019. “Audience Engagement, Reciprocity, and the Pursuit of Community Connectedness in Public Media Journalism.” Journalism Practice 13 (5): 558–575.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Laura W. 2008. “Deliberation, Storytelling, and Dialogic Moments.” Communication Theory 18 (1): 93–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, David. 1996. On Dialogue. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Williemien. 2017. Visual Thinking: Empowering People and Organisations through Visual Collaboration. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Tim. 2020. “Design Thinking.” In Harvard Business Review, edited by Tim Brown, Clayton M. Christensen, Indra Nooyi, Vijay Govindarajan. On Design Thinking, 1–22. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, Jerome. 1991. “The Narrative Construction of Reality.” Critical Inquiry 18 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, Jerome. 2003. Making Stories: Law, Literature, Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel. 2005. Gatewatching: Collaborative Online News Production. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, Martin. 1970. I and Thou. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Buber, Martin. 1998. The Knowledge of Man: Selected Essays. New York: Humanity Books.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Richard. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, Mark, Seth C. Lewis, and Valerie Belair-Gagnon. 2021. “The Imagined Audience for News: Where Does a Journalist’s Perception of the Audience Come from?” Journalism Studies 22 (8): 1028–1046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costera Meijer, Irene. 2020. “Understanding the Audience Turn in Journalism: From Quality Discourse to Innovation Discourse as Anchoring Practices 1995–2020.” Journalism Studies 21 (16): 2326–2342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJarnette, Ben. 2016. “Before Interviewing, Journalists Must Listen Deeply.” MediaShift. http://mediashift.org/2016/01/before-interviewing-journalists-must-listen-deeply
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrakopoulou, Dimitra. 2021. “Designing Generative Dialogue Spaces to Enhance Focus Group Research: A Case Study in the Context of COVID-19 Vaccination.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods. DOI:10.1177/16094069211066704.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, Skye. 2018. Journalism Design Interactive Technologies and the Future of Storytelling. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrucci, Patrick, Jacob L. Nelson, and Miles P. Davis. 2020. “From ‘Public Journalism’ to ‘Engaged Journalism’: Imagined Audiences and Denigrating Discourse.” International Journal of Communication 14: 1586–1604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaver, William. 2012. “What Should We Expect from Research through Design?” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, Texas, May 2012, 937–946.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Barber, Lindsay, and Eric Garcia McKinley. 2019. “Engaged Journalism: Practices for Building Trust, Generating Revenue, and Fostering Civic Engagement.” Impact Architects/News Integrity Initiative: 1–62. https://bit.ly/3xGmbQD
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Adam. 2021. Think Again: The Power of Knowing What You Don’t Know. New York: Penguin Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, Marilys, and Sarah Drew. 2010. “Questions of Process in Participant-Generated Visual Methodologies.” Visual Studies 25 (2): 175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnlaugson, Olen. 2014. “Bohmian Dialogue: A Critical Retrospective of Bohm’s Approach to Dialogue as a Practice of Collective Communication.” Journal of Dialogue Studies 2 (1): 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, William. 1999. Dialogue and the Art of Thinking Together: A Pioneering Approach to Communicating in Business and in Life. New York: Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, Jeff. 2006. “Networked Journalism.” Buzzmachine, November 30. www.buzzmachine.com/2006/07/05/networked-journalism
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, Tom, and David Kelley. 2013. Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential within Us All. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kubin, Emily, Curtis Puryearb, Chelsea Schein, and Kurt Gray. 2021. “Personal Experiences Bridge Moral and Political Divides Better than Facts.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118 (6): e2008389118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, Regine G., Damian Radcliffe, and Thomas R. Schmidt. 2018. “Practicing Engagement: Participatory Journalism in the Web 2.0 Era.” Journalism Practice 12 (10): 1220–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, Regina G., Eric Gordon, Andrew DeVigal, Caroline Mellor, and Jonathan Elbaz. 2019. “Building Engagement: Supporting the Practice of Relational Journalism.” Agora Journalism Center at the University of Oregon. http://bit.ly/building-engagement
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Seth C., Avery E. Holton, and Mark. Coddington. 2014. “Reciprocal Journalism: A Concept of Mutual Exchange between Journalists and Audiences.” Journalism Practice 8 (2): 229–241.
   Google Scholar
• Lewrick, Michael, Patrick Link, and Larry J. Leifer. 2020. The Design Thinking Toolbox: A Guide to Mastering the Most Popular and Valuable Innovation Methods. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Liedtka, Jeanne. 2020. “Putting Technology in Its Place: Design Thinking’s Social Technology at Work.” California Management Review 62 (2): 53–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, Donella H. 2008. Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Claudia. 2011. Doing Visual Research. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Jacob L. 2018. “The Elusive Engagement Metric.” Digital Journalism 6 (4): 528–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, Jacob L. 2021. Imagined Audiences: How Journalists Perceive and Pursue the Public. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qvist-Sørensen, Ole, and Loa Baarstrup. 2019. Visual Collaboration: A Powerful Toolkit for Improving Meetings, Projects, and Processes. Hoboken, NJ: Willey.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, Amanda. 2019. “Complicating the Narratives.” The Medium. https://thewholestory.solutionsjournalism.org/complicating-the-narratives-b91ea06ddf63
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Sue, Kelly Jensen, and Carlos Dávalos. 2021. “Listening Literacies’ as Keys to Rebuilding Trust in Journalism: A Typology for a Changing News Audience.” Journalism Studies 22 (9): 1219–1237.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, D. K. 2021. “Trust, Society, and Democracy.” Talk delivered at the Chautauqua Institution, Chautauqua, July 15.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B.-N. 2000. “Generative Tools for CoDesigning.” In Collaborative Design, edited by Stephen A. R. Scrivener, Linden J. Ball, and Andrée Woodcock, 3–12. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Scharmer, Otto C. 2009. Theory U: Leading from the Future as It Emerges: The Social Technology of Presencing. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Thomas R., and Regina G. Lawrence. 2020. “Engaged Journalism and News Work: A Sociotechnical Analysis of Organizational Dynamics and Professional Challenges.” Journalism Practice 14 (5): 518–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Thomas R., Jacob L. Nelson, and Regina G. Lawrence. 2022. “Conceptualizing the Active Audience: Rhetoric and Practice in ‘Engaged Journalism.” Journalism 23 (1): 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, Peter. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Sicart, Miguel. 2017. Play Matters. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Jane B., Alfred. Hermida, David. Domingo, Ari. Heinonen, Steve. Paulussen, Thorsten. Quandt, Zvi. Reich, and Marina. Vujnovic. 2011. Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stains, Robert, Jr. 2014. “Repairing the Breach: The Power of Dialogue to Heal Relationships and Communities.” Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (1), Art. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Storr, Will. 2020. Science of Storytelling: Why Stories Make Us Human and How to Tell Them Better. London: William Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, Nicola, Amanda E. Cravens, Anja Svetina Nabergoj, Sebastian Kernbach, and Adam Royalty. 2020. Creativity in Research: Cultivate Clarity, Be Innovative, and Make Progress in Your Research Journey. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2020. “An Emotional Turn in Journalism Studies?” Digital Journalism 8 (2): 175–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiser, Marc. 1994. “The World Is Not a Desktop.” Interactions 1 (1): 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, Andrea. 2019. “Public Media and Marginalized Publics: Online and Offline Engagement Strategies and Local Storytelling Networks.” Digital Journalism 7 (1): 146–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, Andrea. 2020. Community-Centered Journalism: Engaging People, Exploring Solutions, and Building Trust. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, Yiping, Sue Robinson, Megan Zahay, and Deen Freelon. 2020. “The Evolving Journalistic Roles on Social Media: Exploring “Engagement” as Relationship-Building between Journalists and Citizens.” Journalism Practice 14 (5): 556–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamith, Rodrigo. 2018. “Quantified Audiences in News Production.” Digital Journalism 6 (4): 418–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar