Algorithmic News Diversity and Democratic Theory: Adding Agonism to the Mix

References

• Amoore, L. 2020. Cloud Ethics: Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aytac, U. 2021. “On the Limits of the Political: The Problem of Overly Permissive Pluralism in Mouffe’s Agonism.” Constellations 28 (3): 417–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodó, B. 2019. “Selling News to Audiences – a Qualitative Inquiry into the Emerging Logics of Algorithmic News Personalization in European Quality News Media.” Digital Journalism 7 (8): 1054–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdag, E., and J. Van den Hoven. 2015. “Breaking the Filter Bubble: Democracy and Design.” Ethics and Information Technology 17 (4): 249–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. 2018. If… Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. 2009. “Radical Pluralism and Free Speech in Online Public Spaces: The Case of North Belgian Extreme Right Discourses.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 12 (6): 555–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N., and B. Cammaerts. 2006. “Hegemony, Democracy, Agonism and Journalism: An Interview with Chantal Mouffe.” Journalism Studies 7 (6): 964–975.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, A., S. Ghosh, N. Ganguly, and K. P. Gummadi. 2019. “Optimizing the Recency-Relevance-Diversity Trade-Offs in Non-Personalized News Recommendations.” Information Retrieval Journal 22 (5): 447–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G., T. L. Glasser, D. McQuail, K. Nordenstreng, and R. A. White. 2009. Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Society. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. 2005. Pluralism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curran, J. 2015. “Reinterpreting the Democratic Roles of the Media.” Brazilian Journalism Research 10 (2): 28–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. 2004. “The Habermasian Public Sphere: A Specification of the Idealized Conditions of Democratic Communication.” Studies in Social and Political Thought 10 (10): 2–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. 2005. “The Habermasian Public Sphere: Taking Difference Seriously?” Theory and Society 34 (2): 111–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. 2007. “Rethinking the Fragmentation of the Cyberpublic: From Consensus to Contestation.” New Media & Society 9 (5): 827–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, L. 2011. “Re-Constructing Digital Democracy: An Outline of Four ‘Positions.” New Media & Society 13 (6): 855–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deveaux, M. 1999. “Agonism and Pluralism.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 25 (4): 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N. 2019. Automating the News: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Media. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N., and M. Koliska. 2017. “Algorithmic Transparency in the News Media.” Digital Journalism 5 (7): 809–828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, E. 2009. “What is Wrong with Agonistic Pluralism? Reflections on Conflict in Democratic Theory.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 35 (9): 1039–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M., W. A. Gamson, J. Gerhards, and D. Rucht. 2002. “Four Models of the Public Sphere in Modern Democracies.” Theory and Society 31 (3): 289–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Volume 1, trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1992. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by C. Calhoun, 421–461. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1998. “There Are Alternatives.” New Left Review 231 (September/October): 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Helberger, N. 2019. “On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders.” Digital Journalism 7 (8): 993–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helberger, N., K. Karppinen, and L. D’Acunto. 2018. “Exposure Diversity as a Design Principle for Recommender Systems.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (2): 191–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, D. 2006. Models of Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, B. 1994. “Difference, Dilemmas, and the Politics of Home.” Social Research 61 (3): 563–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idhe, D. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, M., D. Jannach, and M. Jugovac. 2018. “News Recommender Systems – Surveys and Roads Ahead.” Information Processing & Management 54 (6): 1203–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppinen, K. 2013a. “Uses of Democratic Theory in Media and Communication Studies.” Observatorio Journal 7 (3): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen, K. 2013b. Rethinking Media Pluralism. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knijnenburg, B. P., S. Sivakumar, and D. Wilkonson. 2016. “Recommender Systems for Self-Actualization.” RecSys ’16: Proceedings of the 10^th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959189
   Google Scholar
• Knops, A. 2007. “Debate: Agonism as Deliberation – on Mouffe’s Theory of Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 15 (1): 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 1992. “Two Models of Pluralism and Tolerance.” Analyse & Kritik 14 (1): 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lanzing, M. 2019. “Strongly Recommended”: Revisiting Decisional Privacy to Judge Hypernudging in Self-Tracking Technologies.” Philosophy & Technology 32 (3): 549–568.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, F., A. Dumitrache, and D. Graus. 2020. “Beyond Optimizing for Click: Incorporating Editorial Values in News Recommendations.” UMAP ’20: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaption and Personalization, pp. 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340631.3394864
   Google Scholar
• Maeseele, P., and D. Raeijmaekers. 2020. “Nothing on the News but the Establishment Blues? Toward a Framework of Depoliticization and Agonistic Media Pluralism.” Journalism 21 (11): 1593–1610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattis, N. M., P. K. Masur, J. Moeller, and W. Van Atteveldt. 2021. “Nudging towards Diversity: A Theoretical Framework for Facilitating Diverse News Consumption through Recommender Design.” New Media & Society, 1–26. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614448221104413.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research 66 (3): 745–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2002. “Which Public Sphere for a Democratic Society?” Theories: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 49 (99): 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2018. For a Left Populism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, P. M. 1999. “The Marketplace of Ideas Metaphor in Communications Regulation.” Journal of Communication 49 (4): 151–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, D. 1995. Nietzsche, Politics and Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, M. 2020. Agonistic Democracy: Rethinking Political Institutions in Pluralist Times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. 2018. Is Facebook Making Us Less Free? Digital Oligopolies Currently Hold Too Much Power. IAI News. https://iai.tv/articles/the-big-brotherhood-of-digital-giants-is-taking-away-our-freedom-auid-884.
   Google Scholar
• Raeijmaekers, D., and P. Maeseele. 2015. “Media, Pluralism and Democracy: What’s in a Name?” Media, Culture & Society 37 (7): 1042–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeijmaekers, D., and P. Maeseele. 2017. “In Objectivity We Trust? Pluralism, Consensus, and Ideology in Journalism Studies.” Journalism 18 (6): 647–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuver, M., N. Mattis, M. Sax, S. Verberne, N. Tintarev, N. Helberger, J. Moeller, S. Vrijenhoek, A. Fokkens, and W. Van Atteveldt. 2021. “Are We Human, or Are We User? The Role of Natural Language Processing in Human-Centric News Recommenders That Nudge Users to Diverse Content.” Proceedings of the 1^st Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact, Bangkok, Thailand (Online), August 5, 2021, pp. 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sax, M. 2021. “Optimization of What? For-Profit Health Apps as Manipulative Digital Environments.” Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3): 345–361. 10.1007/s10676-020-09576-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. 2005. “In Search of a Standard: Four Models of Democracy and Their Normative Implications for Journalism.” Journalism Studies 6 (3): 331–345.
   Google Scholar
• Susser, D. 2019. “Invisible Influence: Artificial Intelligence and the Ethics of Adaptive Choice Architectures.” Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314286
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., and C. S. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurman, N., J. Moeller, N. Helberger, and D. Trilling. 2019. “My Friends, Editors, Algorithms, and I: Examining Audience Attitudes to News Selection.” Digital Journalism 7 (4): 447–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tintarev, N., and J. Masthoff. 2015. “Explaining Recommendations: Design and Evaluation.” In Recommender Systems Handbook, edited by F. Ricci, L. Rokach, and B. Shapira, 353–382. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, J. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Véliz, C. 2020. Privacy is Power: Why and How You Should Take Back Control of Your Data. London: Bantam Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P.-P. 2005. What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology. Agency, and Design. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vrijenhoek, S., M. Kaya, N. Metoui, J. Moeller, D. Odijk, and N. Helberger. 2021. “Recommenders with a Mission: Assessing Diversity in News Recommendations.” Chiir ’21, March 14-19, 2021, Canberra, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wenman, M. 2013. Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wessler, H. 2018. Habermas and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar