Patient engagement in research: lessons learned from CAPTURE ALS, a longitudinal observational ALS study

References

• Picher-Martel V, Magnussen C, Blais M, Bubela T, Das S, Dionne A, et al. CAPTURE ALS: the comprehensive analysis platform to understand, remedy and eliminate ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2023;24:33–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington RL, Hanna ML, Oehrlein EM, Camp R, Wheeler R, Cooblall C, et al. Defining patient engagement in research: results of a systematic review and analysis: report of the ISPOR patient-centered special interest group. Value Health. 2020; Jun 123:677–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubin D, Hebert M, Eurich D. The importance of measuring the impact of patient-oriented research. Cmaj. 2019; Aug 6191:E860–E864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A. Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. J Comp Eff Res. 2015; Mar4:133–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K, Froggatt K, Gibson A, Jacoby A, et al. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect. 2015;18:661–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childerhose JE, Finnila CH, Yu JH, Koenig BA, McEwen J, Berg SL, et al. Participant engagement in translational genomic research: respect for persons—and then some. Ethics Hum Res. 2019; Sep41:2–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox G, Fergusson DA, Daham Z, Youssef M, Foster M, Poole E, et al. Patient engagement in preclinical laboratory research: a scoping review. eBioMedicine [Internet]. 2021 Aug 1 [cited 2023 Jan 12];70. Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(21)00277-2/fulltext
   Google Scholar
• Ochieng CA, Minion JT, Turner A, Blell M, Murtagh MJ. What does engagement mean to participants in longitudinal cohort studies? A qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics. 2021; Jun 2422:77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 2014;17:637–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; Feb 2614:89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsythe LP, Carman KL, Szydlowski V, Fayish L, Davidson L, Hickam DH, et al. Patient engagement in research: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019; Mar38:359–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musson LS, McDermott CJ, Hobson EV. Exploring patient and public involvement in motor neuron disease research. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2019; Oct 220:511–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mader LB, Harris T, Kläger S, Wilkinson IB, Hiemstra TF. Inverting the patient involvement paradigm: defining patient led research. Res Involv Engagem. 2018; Jul 104:21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poleshuck E, Wittink M, Crean H, Gellasch T, Sandler M, Bell E, et al. Using patient engagement in the design and rationale of a trial for women with depression in obstetrics and gynecology practices. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015; Jul 143:83–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry JD, Bedlack R, Mathews D, Agnese W, Apple S. Engaging ALS patients and caregivers (the ALS research ambassadors) to help design the REFINE-ALS biomarker study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2021; Jan 222:147–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderwood L, Brown M, Gilbert E, Wong E. Innovations in participant engagement and tracking in longitudinal surveys. In: Advances in Longitudinal Survey Methodology [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 2]. p. 47–73. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119376965.ch3
   Google Scholar
• Edwards V, Wyatt K, Logan S, Britten N. Consulting parents about the design of a randomized controlled trial of osteopathy for children with cerebral palsy. Health Expect. 2011;14:429–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Planner C, Bower P, Donnelly A, Gillies K, Turner K, Young B. Trials need participants but not their feedback? A scoping review of published papers on the measurement of participant experience of taking part in clinical trials. Trials 2019; Jun 2420:381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Canada CI of HR. Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 May 31]. Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41204.html
   Google Scholar
• NIHR. NIHR, National Institute for Health and Care Research. 2021 [cited 2023 Jan 11]. Briefing notes for researchers - public involvement in NHS, health and social care research. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/briefing-notes-for-researchers-public-involvement-in-nhs-health-and-social-care-research/27371
   Google Scholar
• Garcia M, Luecke E, Mayo AJ, Scheckter R, Ndase P, Kiweewa FM, et al. Impact and experience of participant engagement activities in supporting dapivirine ring use among participants enrolled in the phase III MTN-020/ASPIRE study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:2041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park A, Calderwood L, Wong E. Participant engagement in longitudinal studies: current practice, opportunities and challenges. Soc Res Pract. 2019;7:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqi B, Gibaldi J. Retention strategies for keeping participants engaged. Appl Clin Trials 2019; Aug 3128:20–1.
   Google Scholar
• Barn P, Rideout KL, Lo W, Josey D, Vint Z, Sha C, et al. Better together: Launching and nurturing a community stakeholder committee to enhance care and research for asthma and COPD. Chest 2022; Feb 1161:382–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green G, Johns T. Exploring the relationship (and power dynamic) between researchers and public partners working together in applied health research teams. Front Sociol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 10];4. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoc.2019.00020/full
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg LH, Sorenson E, Gronseth G, Macklin EA, Andrews J, Baloh RH, et al. Revised Airlie House consensus guidelines for design and implementation of ALS clinical trials. Neurology 2019; Apr 292:e1610–23–e1623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALS Society of Canada. ALS Society of Canada. [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Ambassadors. Available from: https://als.ca/get-involved/volunteer/ambassadors/
   Google Scholar
• Bedlack R, Pogemiller A, Shefner J, Cudkowicz M, Heiman-Patterson T. ALS clinical research learning institutes (ALS-CRLI): empowering people with ALS to be research ambassadors. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2020; Apr 221:216–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews JA, Bruijn LI, Shefner JM. ALS drug development guidances and trial guidelines: Consensus and opportunities for alignment. [Review]. Neurology 2019;93:66–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz AE, Schneid I, Carmi E, Kedem O, Lerner B. Engaging patients in identifying risk factors for ALS. SSM - Qual Res Health. 2022; Dec 12:100179.
   Google Scholar
• Howe A, Mathie E, Munday D, Cowe M, Goodman C, Keenan J, et al. Learning to work together – lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement. Res Involv Engagem. 2017; Jan 93:(1. 1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manafo E, Petermann L, Mason-Lai P, Vandall-Walker V. Patient engagement in Canada: a scoping review of the ‘how’ and ‘what’ of patient engagement in health research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16:5. Feb 7 [cited 2019 Mar 20]Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5804082/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Association for Public Participation. iap2 International Association for Public Participation. [cited 2023 Jan 10]. IAP2 Resources - International Association for Public Participation. Available from: https://www.iap2.org/page/resources
   Google Scholar
• Organizing Engagement [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Jan 31]. Spectrum of Public Participation. Available from: https://organizingengagement.org/models/spectrum-of-public-participation/
   Google Scholar
• Bammer G. Key issues in co-creation with stakeholders when research problems are complex. Evid Policy. 2019; Aug 115:423–35.
   Google Scholar
• Beck M, Frank B, Minaeian S, Nicholls SG. Decision-making about newborn screening panels in Canada: Risk management and public participation. In: Gattinger M, editor. Democratizing risk governance: bridging science, expertise, deliberation and public values [Internet]. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature; 2023. p. 217–43. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24271-7
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb J, Ferguson GM, Sun J, Walton GH, Highfield L. Stakeholder engagement in adoption, implementation, and sustainment of an evidence-based intervention to increase mammography adherence among low-income women. J Cancer Educ. 2022; Oct 137:1486–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALS Society of Canada [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 31]. ALS Canada. Available from: https://als.ca/
   Google Scholar
• itracks [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 19]. itracks. Available from: https://www.itracks.com/
   Google Scholar
• Genuis SK, Luth W, Weber G, Bubela T, Johnston WS. Asynchronous online focus groups for research with people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and family caregivers: usefulness, acceptability and lessons learned. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; Oct 623:222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genuis SK, Luth W, Bubela T, Johnston WS. What do people affected by amyotrophic lateral sclerosis want from health communications? Evidence from the ALS Talk Project. Muscle Nerve. 2023;68:286–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman M, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 4th edition. Los Angeles London New Delhi Singapore Washington DC Melbourne: Sage Publications; 2019. 408 p.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb EM, Meurer W, Harney D, Silbergleit R, Lake BP, Clark C, et al. Patient engagement in neurological clinical trials design: A conference summary. Clin Transl Sci. 2015; Dec8:776–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston W, Magnussen C, Vande Velde C, Luth W, Participant Partner Advisory Council, Genuis SK. Operationalizing meaningful participant engagement in ALS research: Early lessons from CAPTURE ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Front Degener 2022;23:144.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton CB, Hoens AM, Backman CL, McKinnon AM, McQuitty S, English K, et al. An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research. Health Expect. 2018; Feb21:396–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meet the Team – Capture ALS [Internet]. [cited 2023 Oct 11]. Available from: https://captureals.ca/meet-the-team/
   Google Scholar
• Dudley L, Gamble C, Preston J, Buck D, Hanley B, Williamson P, et al. What difference does patient and public involvement make and what are its pathways to impact? Qualitative study of patients and researchers from a cohort of randomised clinical trials. PLoS One. 2015; Jun 810:e0128817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocloo J, Matthews R. From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; Aug 125:626–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wit MPT, Elberse JE, Broerse JEW, Abma TA. Do not forget the professional – the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research. Health Expect. 2015; Aug18:489–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffett L. Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about. Thromb Res. 2017; Feb150:113–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiò A, Canosa A, Gallo S, Cammarosano S, Moglia C, Fuda G, et al. ALS clinical trials: do enrolled patients accurately represent the ALS population? Neurology 2011; Oct77:1432–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eijk RPA, Westeneng HJ, Nikolakopoulos S, Verhagen IE, van Es MA, Eijkemans MJC, et al. Refining eligibility criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials. Neurology 2019; Jan 2992:e451–60–e460.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson P, Mathie E, Keenan J, McNeilly E, Goodman C, Howe A, et al. ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study [Internet]. NIHR Journals Library; 2015 [cited 2023 Jan 12]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK315999/
   Google Scholar
• Traxinger K, Kelly C, Johnson BA, Lyles RH, Glass JD. Prognosis and epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurol Clin Pract. 2013; Aug3:313–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardiman O, Al-Chalabi A, Chio A, Corr EM, Logroscino G, Robberecht W, et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017; Oct 53:17071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoun SM, Bentley B, Funk L, Toye C, Grande G, Stajduhar KJ. A 10-year literature review of family caregiving for motor neurone disease: Moving from caregiver burden studies to palliative care interventions. Palliat Med. 2013; May 127:437–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin M, Carney S, Corr B, Mays I, Pender N, Hardiman O. Needs of informal caregivers across the caregiving course in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a qualitative analysis. BMJ Open. 2018; Jan 278:e018721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker JC, Ricci-Cabello I, Parker A, Hirst JA, Chant A, Petit-Zeman S, et al. Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj. 2018; Nov 28363:k4738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechtman L, Jordan H, Wagner L, Horton DK, Kaye W. Racial and ethnic differences among amyotrophic lateral sclerosis cases in the United States. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015; Mar16:65–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham J, Taylor J, Nomikos D. Integrating patient-centred research in the Canadian cancer trials group. Curr Oncol. 2021; Jan 2128:630–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier CN. Considerations for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trial design. Neurotherapeutics. 2022; Jul 119:1180–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar