Advances in therapeutic options for esophageal and esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma

References

• Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108.
   Google Scholar
• Trivers KF, Sabatino SA, Stewart SL. Trends in esophageal cancer incidence by histology, United States, 1998-2003. Int J Cancer. 2008;123:1422–1428.
   Google Scholar
• Bosetti C, Levi F, Ferlay J, et al. Trends in oesophageal cancer incidence and mortality in Europe. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:1118–1129.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl H, Sirovich B, Welch HG. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence: are we reaching the peak? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1468–1470.
   Google Scholar
• Turati F, Tramacere I, La Vecchia C, et al. A meta-analysis of body mass index and esophageal and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:609–617.
   Google Scholar
• El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, et al. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63:871–880.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, et al. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:30–50. quiz 51
   Google Scholar
• Elimova E, Mizrak Kaya D, Harada K, et al. Potentially curable cancers of the esophagus and stomach. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:1307–1318.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrak Kaya D, Harada K, Shimodaira Y, et al. Advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: optimizing therapy options. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2017;10:263–271.
   Google Scholar
• Siewert JR, Holscher AH, Becker K, et al. [Cardia cancer: attempt at a therapeutically relevant classification]. Chirurg. 1987;58:25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Siewert JR, Feith M. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: competition between Barrett and gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:S49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1457–1459.
   Google Scholar
• Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction. In AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th Edition. New York: Springer; 2010. 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction. In AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8 Edition. New York: Springer; 2017. 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips WA, Lord RV, Nancarrow DJ, et al. Barrett’s esophagus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:639–648.
   Google Scholar
• Haidry R, Lovat L. Long-term durability of radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s-related neoplasia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31:316–320.
   Google Scholar
• Titi M, Overhiser A, Ulusarac O, et al. Development of subsquamous high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma after successful radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(564–566):e561.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Yamamoto Y, Wilson LH, et al. Cloning and variation of ground state intestinal stem cells. Nature. 2015;522:173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto Y, Wang X, Bertrand D, et al. Mutational spectrum of Barrett’s stem cells suggests paths to initiation of a precancerous lesion. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10380.
   Google Scholar
• Quante M, Bhagat G, Abrams JA, et al. Bile acid and inflammation activate gastric cardia stem cells in a mouse model of Barrett-like metaplasia. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Jang BG, Lee BL, Kim WH. Intestinal stem cell markers in the intestinal metaplasia of stomach and Barrett’s esophagus. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127300.
   Google Scholar
• Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;513:202–209.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrak Kaya D, Harada K, Ajani JA. Is targeted therapy possible for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17:2371–2374.
   Google Scholar
• Cancer Genome Atlas Research N, Analysis Working Group; Asan U, Agency BCC et al. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature. 2017; 541:169–175.
   Google Scholar
• Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:194–227.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, Van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–2084.
   Google Scholar
• Ychou M, Boige V, Pignon JP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1715–1721.
   Google Scholar
• Berry MF, Zeyer-Brunner J, Castleberry AW, et al. Treatment modalities for T1N0 esophageal cancers: a comparative analysis of local therapy versus surgical resection. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:796–802.
   Google Scholar
• Sturm EC, Zahnd W, Mellinger JD, et al. National trends in local excision and esophagectomy for cT1N0 esophageal cancer. In: 2017 ASCO Gastrointestinal cancers symposium. San Francisco/CA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Portale G, Hagen JA, Peters JH, et al. Modern 5-year survival of resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma: single institution experience with 263 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:588-596; discussion 596-588.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsen DP, Winter KA, Gunderson LL, et al. Long-term results of RTOG trial 8911 (USA Intergroup 113): a random assignment trial comparison of chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3719–3725.
   Google Scholar
• Groth SS, Virnig BA, Whitson BA, et al. Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: data from the surveillance epidemiology and end results database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:612–620.
   Google Scholar
• Martin JT, Mahan A, Zwischenberger JB, et al. Should gastric cardia cancers be treated with esophagectomy or total gastrectomy? A comprehensive analysis of 4,996 NSQIP/SEER patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:510–520.
   Google Scholar
• Kneuertz PJ, Hofstetter WL, Chiang YJ, et al. Long-term survival in patients with gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with preoperative therapy: do thoracic and abdominal approaches differ? Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:626–632.
   Google Scholar
• Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Almhanna K, et al. Gastric cancer, version 3.2016, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016;14:1286–1312.
   Google Scholar
• Allum WH, Stenning SP, Bancewicz J, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial of surgery with or without preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5062–5067.
   Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council Oesophegeal Cancer Working Party.Surgical resection with or without preoperative chemotherapy in oesophageal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1727–1733.
   Google Scholar
• Kelsen DP, Ginsberg R, Pajak TF, et al. Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1979–1984.
   Google Scholar
• Davies AR, Gossage JA, Zylstra J, et al. Tumor stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determines survival after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2983–2990.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson D, Langley RE, Nankivell MG et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable oesophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma: results from the UK Medical Research Council randomised OEO5 trial (ISRCTN 01852072). In ASCO Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL: 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZX, Gu XZ, Yin WB, et al. Randomized clinical trial on the combination of preoperative irradiation and surgery in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of gastric cardia (AGC)–report on 370 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;42:929–934.
   Google Scholar
• Tepper J, Krasna MJ, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Phase III trial of trimodality therapy with cisplatin, fluorouracil, radiotherapy, and surgery compared with surgery alone for esophageal cancer: CALGB 9781. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1086–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Klevebro F, Alexandersson von Dobeln G, Wang N, et al. A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:660–667.
   Google Scholar
• Spicer JD, Stiles BM, Sudarshan M, et al. Preoperative chemoradiation therapy versus chemotherapy in patients undergoing modified en bloc esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: is radiotherapy beneficial? Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1262-1269; discussion 1969-1270.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl M, Walz MK, Stuschke M, et al. Phase III comparison of preoperative chemotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:851–856.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Stenning SP, Smyth EC, et al. Peri-operative chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in operable oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (UK Medical Research Council ST03): primary analysis results of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2-3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):357–370.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth E, Rowley S, Allum W et al. A randomised phase II study of perioperative epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) ± lapatinib for operable, HER-2 positive gastric, oesophagogastric junctional (OGJ) or lower oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the UK MRC ST03 lapatinib feasibility study (ISRCTN 46020948). In ESMO 2016 Congress. Copenhagen/Denmark: 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shiozaki H, Slack RS, Chen HC, et al. Metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with systemic therapy followed by consolidative local therapy: a nomogram associated with long-term survivors. Oncology. 2016;91:55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ajani JA, Ilson DH, Daugherty K, et al. Activity of taxol in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:1086–1091.
   Google Scholar
• Albertsson M, Johansson B, Friesland S, et al. Phase II studies on docetaxel alone every third week, or weekly in combination with gemcitabine in patients with primary locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent esophageal cancer. Med Oncol. 2007;24:407–412.
   Google Scholar
• Enzinger PC, Kulke MH, Clark JW, et al. A phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with previously untreated advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:2218–2223.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4991–4997.
   Google Scholar
• Shah MA, Janjigian YY, Stoller R, et al. Randomized multicenter phase II study of modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) versus DCF plus growth factor support in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: a study of the US gastric cancer consortium. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3874–3879.
   Google Scholar
• Ochenduszko S, Puskulluoglu M, Konopka K, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of first-line palliative chemotherapy with EOX and mDCF regimens in patients with locally advanced inoperable or metastatic HER2-negative gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase 3 trial. Med Oncol. 2015;32:242.
   Google Scholar
• Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E, et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1224–1235.
   Google Scholar
• Elimova E, Janjigian YY, Mulcahy M, et al. It is time to stop using epirubicin to treat any patient with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:475–477.
   Google Scholar
• Dank M, Zaluski J, Barone C, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid to cisplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil in chemotherapy naive patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1450–1457.
   Google Scholar
• Guimbaud R, Louvet C, Ries P, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter, phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a French intergroup (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, and Groupe Cooperateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie) study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3520–3526.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Assersohn L, Brown G, Cunningham D, et al. Phase II study of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with primary refractory or relapsed advanced oesophageal and gastric carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:64–69.
   Google Scholar
• Leary A, Assersohn L, Cunningham D, et al. A phase II trial evaluating capecitabine and irinotecan as second line treatment in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer who have progressed on, or within 3 months of platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64:455–462.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner M, Hollmen M, Junttila TT, et al. Amplification of HER-2 in gastric carcinoma: association with Topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification, intestinal type, poor prognosis and sensitivity to trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2005;16:273–278.
   Google Scholar
• Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–697.
   Google Scholar
• Bang Y, Chung H, Xu J et al. Pathological features of advanced gastric cancer (GC): relationship to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity in the global screening programme of the ToGA trial. In ASCO Annual Meeting. Orlando, Florida: 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht JR, Bang YJ, Qin SK, et al. Lapatinib in combination with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced or metastatic gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: TRIO-013/LOGiC–A randomized PHASE III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:443–451.
   Google Scholar
• Kang YK, Shah MA, Ohtsu A, et al. A randomized, open-label, multicenter, adaptive phase 2/3 study of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus a taxane (TAX) in patients (pts) with previously treated HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (LA/MGC/GEJC). In 2016 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; 2016 January 21-23; San Francisco, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3968–3976.
   Google Scholar
• Shen L, Li J, Xu J, et al. Bevacizumab plus capecitabine and cisplatin in Chinese patients with inoperable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: randomized, double-blind, phase III study (AVATAR study). Gastric Cancer. 2015;18:168–176.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ, et al. Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014;383:31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Qin S, Xu J, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial of apatinib in patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1448–1454.
   Google Scholar
• Lordick F, Kang YK, Chung HC, et al. Capecitabine and cisplatin with or without cetuximab for patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer (EXPAND): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:490–499.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham D, Tebbutt NC, Davidenko I, et al. Phase III, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo (P)-controlled trial of rilotumumab (R) plus epirubicin, cisplatin and capecitabine (ECX) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced MET-positive (pos) gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer: RILOMET-1 study. In 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting; 2015 May 29-June 2; Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Doi T, Kang YK, Muro K, et al. A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of rilotumumab in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine (CX) as first-line therapy for Asian patients (pts) with advanced MET-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) adenocarcinoma: the RILOMET-2 trial. In 2015 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; 2015 January 15-17; San Francisco, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shah MA, Bang Y-J, Lordick F, et al. METGastric: a phase III study of onartuzumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with metastatic HER2-negative (HER2-) and MET-positive (MET+) adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction (GEC). In 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting; 2015 May 29-June 2; Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Ohtsu A, Ajani JA, Bai YX, et al. Everolimus for previously treated advanced gastric cancer: results of the randomized, double-blind, phase III GRANITE-1 study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:3935–3943.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Batran S-E, Riera-Knorrenschild J, Pauligk C, et al. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase III study evaluating paclitaxel with and without RAD001 in patients with gastric cancer who have progressed after therapy with a fluoropyrimidine/platinum-containing regimen (RADPAC). In Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. San Francisco, CA, USA: 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Muro K, Chung HC, Shankaran V, et al. Pembrolizumab for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-012): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:717–726.
   Google Scholar
• Hironaka S, Ueda S, Yasui H, et al. Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4438–4444.
   Google Scholar
• Janjigian YY, Bendell JC, Calvo E, et al. CheckMate-032: phase I/II, open-label study of safety and activity of nivolumab (nivo) alone or with ipilimumab (ipi) in advanced and metastatic (A/M) gastric cancer (GC). In 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting; 2016 June 3-7; Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Kang Y-K, Satoh T, Ryu M-H et al. Nivolumab (ONO-4538/BMS-936558) as salvage treatment after second or later-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer (AGC): a double-blinded, randomized, phase III trial. In Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. San Francisco, CA: 2017.
   Google Scholar