The body participating: a qualitative study of early rehabilitation participation for patients with severe brain injury and low level of consciousness

References

• Chamberlain D. The experience of surviving traumatic brain injury. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54:407–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker G. Continuity after a stroke: implications of life-course disruption in old age. Gerontologist. 1993;33:148–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilkington B. A qualitative study of life after stroke. J Neurosci Nurs. 1999;31:336–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Secrest J, Thomas S. Continuity and discontinuity: the quality of life following stroke. Rehabil Nurs. 1999;24:240–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burton C. Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:301–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowswell Investigating recovery from stroke: a qualitative study. J Clin Nurs. 2000;9:507–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis-Hill C, Payne S, Ward C. Using stroke to explore the life thread model: an alternative approach to understanding rehabilitation following an acquired disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:150–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette A, Tribble D, Desrosiers J, et al. Adaptation and coping following a first stroke: a qualitative analysis of a phenomenological orientation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006;29:247–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haun J, Rittman M, Sberna M. The continuum of connectedness and social isolation during post stroke recovery. J Aging Stud. 2008;1:54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson A, et al. “If only I manage to get home I’ll get better” – interviews with stroke patients after emergency stay in hospital on their experiences and needs. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:433–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilertsen G. 'Everything is the same, but nothing is what it used to be’ - Old Women’s Experiences of Life after a Stroke). Norway: University of Oslo (in Norwegian); 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Borg T. Livsførelse i hverdagen under rehabilitering. Et socialpsykologisk studie. (Conduct of live in everyday during rehabilitation). Sundhed, menneske og kultur. Institut for Sociale Forhold og Organisation, Ålborg Universitet (in Danish); 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg T. Adults with acquired traumatic brain injury: experiences of a changeover process and consequences in everyday life. Soc Work Health Care. 2009;48:276–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyesanya T. The experience of patients with ABI and their families during the hospital stay: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Brain Inj. 2017;31:151-173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolittle N. A clinical ethnography of stroke recovery. In: Brenner, editor. Interpretive phenomenology: embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994. p. 211–223.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S. How the body shapes the mind. New York: Oxford University; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Perez M, Lundbye-Jensen J, Nielsen J. Changes in corticospinal drive to spinal motorneurones following visuomotor skill learning in humans. J Physiol. 2006;573:843–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmied A, et al. Selective enhancement of motoneurone short-term synchrony during an attention-demanding task. Exp Brain Res. 2000;133:377–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. New York: Humanities Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S. Lived body and environment. Research in Phenomenology.1986;16:139–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundhedsstyrelsen (The National Board of Health, Denmark). Hjerneskaderehabilitering – en medicinsk teknologivurdering [Braininjury Rehabilitation – A Health Technology Assessment]; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschberg R, Giacino J. The vegetative and minimally conscious states: diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Neurol Clin. 2011;29:773–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Roe C, Nordenbo A, et al. Trends and challenges in the early rehabilitation of patients with traumatic brain injury: a Scandinavian perspective. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;90:65–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen C, Malkmus D, Durham P. Levels of cognitive function; 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Katz D, Polyak M, Coughlan D, et al. Natural history of recovery from brain injury after prolonged disorders of consciousness: outcome of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation with 1-4 year follow-up. Prog Brain Res. 2009;177:73–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasell R, Bayona N, Marshall S, et al. A systematic review of the rehabilitation of moderate to severe acquired brain injuries. Brain Injury. 2007;21:107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andelic N, Bautz-Holter E, Ronning P, et al. Does an early onset and continuous chain of rehabilitation improve the long-term functional outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury?. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29:66–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott L, Walker L. Rehabilitation interventions for vegetative and minimally conscious patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005;15:480–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhl I, Pallesen H. Early rehabilitation of patients with severe acquired brain injury: strategies to promote participation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:181–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piškur B, Daniëls R, Jongmans MJ, Ketelaar M, Smeets RJ, Norton M, Beurskens AJHM. Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts? Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:211-220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen H, Buhl I, Roenn-Smidt H. Early rehabilitation and participation in focus – a Danish perspective on patients with severe acquired brain injury. Eur J Physiother. 2016;18:233–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallesen H, Buhl I. Interdisciplinary facilitation of the minimal participation of patients with severe brain injury in early rehabilitation. Eur J Physiother. 2017;19:13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahavi D. Hussler’s phenomenology. Stanford, CA: Stanford; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S, Zahavi A. The phenomenological mind. London and New York: Routledge; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Edinburgh; New York: Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen C. Videoobservation, videografisk deltagelse og filmisk etnografi (Videoobservation, videographic participation and cinematic ethnography. In: Thing L, Ottesen L, editors. Metoder i idræt- og fysioterapiforskning: Munksgaard, København; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews – learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2008. p. 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Thornquist E. Face-to-face and hands-on: assumptions and assessments in the physiotherapy clinic. Med Anthropol. 2006;25:65–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey J. Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan; 1916.
   Google Scholar
• Illeris K. Transformative learning and identity. New York: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Stern D. The process of therapeutic change involving implicit knowledge: some implications of developmental observations for adult psychotherapy. Infant Ment Health J. 1998;19:300–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern D. The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kissow A-MPH. Mennesket i bevægelse. Krop, læring, bevægelse og deltagelse.(Moving man. Body, learning, activity and participation). 4th ed. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lund L, Andersen A, Arentsen K, et al. An observation based intervention study: clinical changes in interaction behaviour as response to guided tactual interaction therapy in 5 adults with acquired, severe brain injury. J Nov Physiother. 2013;4:188–194.
   Google Scholar
• Affolter F. From action to interaction as primary root for development. In: Stockman IJ, editor. Movement and action in learning and development. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon S, Ashburn A. The Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: a focus group study of the experienced physiotherapists' perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:665–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham J, Eustace C, Brock K, et al. The Bobath concept in contemporary clinical practice. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16:1601–1657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trondalen G. Present moments. Nordic J Music Ther. 2013;22:3–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar