112
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measurement of patient satisfaction with physical therapy care: revisiting the semantic and dimensional structure equivalence of MedRisk instrument in the Brazilian context

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 19-26 | Received 13 Mar 2019, Accepted 02 Jun 2019, Published online: 24 Jun 2019

References

  • Bleich SN, Özaltinb E, Murray CJ. How does satisfaction with the health-care system relate to patients experience. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:271–278.
  • Schoenfelder T, Klewer J, Kugler J. Determinants of patient satisfaction: a study among 39 hospitals in an in-patient setting in Germany. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:503–509.
  • Algudairi G, Al-Eisa ES, Alghadir AH, et al. Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy in Saudi Arabia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:888.
  • Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. J Retailing. 1988;64:12–40.
  • IOM. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC (WA): National Academies Press; 2001.
  • Shaw C, Groene O, Mora N, et al. Accreditation and ISO certification: do they explain differences in quality management in European hospitals? Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22:445–451.
  • Rashid WE, Jusoff HK. Service quality in health care setting. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2009;22:471–482.
  • Forbes DR, Nolan D. Factors associated with patient-satisfaction in student-led physiotherapy clinics: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34:705–713.
  • Boyer L, Baumstarck-Barrau K, Cano N, et al. Assessment of psychiatric inpatient satisfaction: a systematic review of self-reported instruments. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24:540–549.
  • Machado NP, Nogueira LP. Evaluation of physical therapy service user satisfaction. Braz J Phys Ther. 2008;12:401–408
  • Goldstein MS, Elliott SD, Guccione AA. The development of an instrument to measure satisfaction with physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2000;80:853–863.
  • Knigh PK, Cheng ANJ, Lee GM. Results of a survey of client satisfaction with outpatient physiotherapy care. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:297.
  • Roush S, Sonstroem R. Development of the physical therapy outpatient satisfaction survey (PTOPS). Phys Ther. 1999;79:12.
  • Monnin D, Perneger G. Scale to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2002;82:9.
  • Mendonça K, Guerra R. Desenvolvimento e validação de um instrumento de medida da satisfação do paciente com a fisioterapia. Braz J Phys. 2007;11:8.
  • Beattie PF, Pinto MB, Nelson MK, et al. Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy: instrument validation. Phys Ther. 2002;82:557–565.
  • Beattie PF, Turner C, Dowda M, et al. The MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care: a psychometric analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:9.
  • Beattie PF, Nelson R, Murphy DR. Development and preliminary validation of the MedRisk instrument to measure patient satisfaction with chiropractic care. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011;34:23–29.
  • Hush JM, Lee H, Yung V, et al. Intercultural comparison of patient satisfaction with physiotherapy care in Australia and Korea: an exploratory factor analysis. J Man Manip Ther. 2013;21:103–112.
  • Oliveira NFC, Costa LOP, Neslson R, et al. Measurement properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44:879–889.
  • Beattie PF, Nelson RM, Lis A. Spanish-language version of the MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care (MRPS): preliminary validation. Phys Ther. 2007;87:793–800.
  • Yesilyaprak SS, Ozyurek S, Tomruk M, et al. The Turkish version of the MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction: measurement properties in physical therapy care among inpatients. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;6:1–8.
  • Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–657.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.
  • Reichenheim ME, Hokerberg YH, Moraes CL. Assessing construct structural validity of epidemiological measurement tools: a seven-step roadmap. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014;30:927–939.
  • Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL. Adaptação transcultural de instrumentos de aferição epidemiológicos: uma proposta de operacionalização. Rev Saúde Pública. 2007;41:665–673.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2000;25:3186–3191.
  • Almeida RS, Martins M, Reichenheim M, et al. Medrisk's cross-cultural adaptation: Brazilian version. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45:720–721.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94–104.
  • Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2015. p. 462.
  • Marsh HW, Muthén B, Asparouhov T, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Struct Equ Modeling. 2009;16:439–476.
  • Finney S, Distefano C. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, editors. Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing; 2013. p. 439–492.
  • Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Modeling. 2009;16:397–438.
  • Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles (CA): Muthén & Muthén; 1996–2018.
  • AERA, APA, NCME & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC (WA): American Educational Research Association; 2014.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.