Self-monitoring – usability evaluation of heart rate monitoring using wearable devices in patients with acquired brain injury

References

• West T, Bernhardt J. Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Millán M, Dávalos A. The need for new therapies for acute ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22:3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:2532–2553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer JH. Barriers associated with exercise and community access for individuals with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:315–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capela NA, Lemaire ED, Baddour N, et al. Evaluation of a smartphone human activity recognition application with able-bodied and stroke participants. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016;13:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk GD, Combs SA, Danks KA, et al. Accuracy of 2 activity monitors in detecting steps in people with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther. 2014;94:222–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2016:47:e98–e169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weippert M, Kumar M, Kreuzfeld S, et al. Comparison of three mobile devices for measuring R-R intervals and heart rate variability: polar S810i, Suunto t6 and an ambulatory ECG system. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:779–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engström E, Ottosson E, Wohlfart B, et al. Comparison of heart rate measured by Polar RS400 and ECG, validity and repeatability. Adv Physiother. 2012;14:115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Sundhedsstyrelsen. National klinisk retningslinje for fysioterapi og ergoterapi til voksne med nedsat funktionsevne som følge af erhvervet hjerneskade, herunder apopleksi: 8 udvalgte indsatser. 108. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou K, Larentzakis AV, Khamis NN, et al. Can wearable devices accurately measure heart rate variability? A systematic review. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2018;60:7–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parak J, Korhonen I. Evaluation of wearable consumer heart rate monitors based on photopletysmography. Conf Proc Ieee Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:3670–3673.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gillinov S, Etiwy M, Wang R, et al. Variable accuracy of wearable heart rate monitors during aerobic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49:1697–1703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spierer DK, Rosen Z, Litman LL, et al. Validation of photoplethysmography as a method to detect heart rate during rest and exercise. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39:264–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fallow AB, Tarumi T, Tanaka H. Influence of skin type and wavelength on light wave reflectance. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27:313–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias A, Fisterer B, Lamla G, et al. Measuring physical activity with sensors: a qualitative study. Stud Heal Technol Inform. 2009;150:475–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JM, Kim Y, Welk GJ. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46:1840–1848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, et al. How is physical activity monitored in people following stroke? Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1717–1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehmen H, Haesner M, Steinke I, et al. Comparison of four different mobile devices for measuring heart rate and ECG with respect to aspects of usability and acceptance by older people. Appl Ergon. 2012;43:582–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman DR, Patel VL, Hilliman C, et al. Usability in the real world: assessing medical information technologies in patients’ homes. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36:45–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The inpatient rehabiltiation facility patient assessment instrument (IRF-PAI) training manual. Baltimore (MD): Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl SE, An HS, Dinkel DM, et al. How accurate are the wrist-based heart rate monitors during walking and running activities? Are they accurate enough? BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016;2:e000106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Støve MP, Haucke E, Nymann ML, et al. Accuracy of the wearable activity tracker Garmin Forerunner 235 for the assessment of heart rate during rest and activity. J Sports Sci. 2018;0:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wallen MP, Gomersall SR, Keating SE, et al. Accuracy of heart rate watches: implications for weight management. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer EH, Needham DM, Miller J, et al. Functional status impairment is associated with unplanned readmissions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1951–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv in Health Sci Educ. 2010;15:625–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers WA, Fisk AD. Age-related differences in the maintenance and modification of automatic processes: arithmetic stroop interference. Hum Factors. 1991;33:45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contreras-Vidal JL, Teulings HL, Stelmach GE. Elderly subjects are impaired in spatial coordination in fine motor control. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1998;100:25–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Li P, Mao Z, et al. Changes in motor function in the unaffected hand of stroke patients should not be ignored. Neural Regen Res. 2014;9:1323–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaportzis E, Clausen MG, Gow AJ. Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: a focus group study. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim FS, Wallace T, Luszcz MA, et al. Usability of tablet computers by people with early-stage dementia. Gerontology. 2013;59:174–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmily A, Mowafi Y, Mashal E. Study of the usability of spaced retrieval exercise using mobile devices for Alzheimer’s disease rehabilitation. Jmir Mhealth Uhealth. 2014;16:e31.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer A, Vagedes J. How accurate is pulse rate variability as an estimate of heart rate variability: a review on studies comparing photoplethysmographic technology with an electrocardiogram. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:15–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 2007;28:R1–R39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelboom G, Camacho E, Abraham ME, et al. Smart wearable body sensors for patient self-assessment and monitoring. Arch Public Heal. 2014;72:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hickey AM, Freedson PS. Utility of consumer physical activity trackers as an intervention tool in cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58:613–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shcherbina A, Mattsson C, Waggott D, et al. Accuracy in wrist-worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. J Pers Med. 2017;7:3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JH, Janssen H, Jordan L, et al. Tablet technology during stroke recovery: a survivor’s perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1186–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held JP, Klaassen B, van Beijnum BJ, et al. Usability evaluation of a vibrotactile feedback system in stroke subjects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;4:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar