Shared decision-making in physical therapy: a cross-sectional observational study

References

• Organizations IAoP. What is patient-centred health care?: a review of definitions and principles. 2nd ed. London: IAPO; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Stacey D. Shared decision-making: the implications for health care teams and practice. In: Edwars A, Elwyn G, eds. Shared decision making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice.  Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2009. p.23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Truglio-Londrigan M, Slyer JT, Singleton JK, et al. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633–4646.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards A, Elwyn G, Wood F, et al. Shared decision making and risk communication in practice: a qualitative study of Gps’ experiences. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(510):6–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lown BA, Clark WD, Hanson JL. Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians. Health Expect. 2009;12(2):160–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson S. Power imbalance between nurses and patients: a potential inhibitor of partnership in care. J Clin Nurs. 2003;12(4):501–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx K, Deveugele M, Roosen P, et al. Implementation of shared decision making in physical therapy: observed level of involvement and patient preference. Phys Ther. 2013;93(10):1321–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(5):681–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):651–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, et al. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50(460):892–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, et al. Shared decision making: developing the option scale for measuring patient involvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(2):93–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elwyn G, Edwards A, Gwyn R, et al. Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):753–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):766–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd HL, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Factors which motivate cancer doctors to involve their patients in reaching treatment decisions. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84(2):229–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truglio-Londrigan M. Shared decision-making in home-care from the nurse's perspective: sitting at the kitchen table-a qualitative descriptive study. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22(19-20):2883–2895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoffmann V, Harder I, Kirkevold M. A person-centered communication and reflection model: sharing decision-making in chronic care. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(5):670–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore CL, Kaplan SL. A framework and resources for shared decision making: opportunities for improved physical therapy outcomes. Phys Ther. 2018;98(12):1022–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeb V, Burge E. Perceptions of patients and physiotherapists on patient participation: a narrative synthesis of qualitative studies. Physiother Res Int. 2012;17(2):80–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schoeb V. The goal is to be more flexible"-detailed analysis of goal setting in physiotherapy using a conversation analytic approach. Man Ther. 2009;14(6):665–670.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boivin A, Legare F, Gagnon MP. Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):79–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber C, Müller KG, Blumenstiel K, et al. Long-term effects of a shared decision-making intervention on physician-patient interaction and outcome in fibromyalgia. A qualitative and quantitative 1 year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(3):357–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandman L, Munthe C. Shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Theor Med Bioeth. 2009;30(4):289–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seale C, Chaplin R, Lelliott P, et al. Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: a qualitative study of psychiatrists' experiences. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(11):2861–2873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson KA, Bastani R, Rubenstein LV, et al. Effect of mental health care and shared decision making on patient satisfaction in a community sample of patients with depression. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(4):416–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dulmen AM, Bensing JM. The effect of context in healthcare: a programming study (Advisory reports - 2001 Mar 15). RGO, the Hague. 2001;(3). [cited 2018 Dec 20]. Available from: www.healthcouncil.nl
   Google Scholar
• Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, et al. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;67(3):324–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman AE, Fardy HJ, Harris PG. Getting it right: why bother with patient-centred care? Med J Aust. 2003;179(5):253–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin SJ, Kinmonth A-L, Veltman MW, et al. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):595–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik AD, Kallen MA, Walder A, et al. Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication. Circulation. 2008;117(11):1361–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parchman ML, Zeber JE, Palmer RF. Participatory decision making, patient activation, medication adherence, and intermediate clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a Starnet study. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(5):410–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan E, Best C, Hagen S. Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Alexanders J, Anderson A, Henderson S. Musculoskeletal physiotherapists' use of psychological interventions: a systematic review of therapists' perceptions and practice. Physiotherapy. 2015;101(2):95–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijs J, Roussel N, Paul van Wilgen C, et al. Thinking beyond muscles and joints: therapists' and patients' attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic musculoskeletal pain are key to applying effective treatment. Man Ther. 2013;18(2):96–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implement Sci. 2016;11:114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montori VM, Brito JP, Murad MH. The optimal practice of evidence-based medicine: incorporating patient preferences in practice guidelines. JAMA. 2013;310(23):2503–2504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politi MC, Wolin KY, Legare F. Implementing clinical practice guidelines about health promotion and disease prevention through shared decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(6):838–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark NM, Nelson BW, Valerio MA, et al. Consideration of shared decision making in nursing: a review of clinicians' perceptions and interventions. Open Nurs J. 2009;3:65–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu RH, Wong EL. Involvement in shared decision-making for patients in public specialist outpatient clinics in Hong Kong. PPA. 2017;11:505–512.
   Google Scholar
• Song HS, Choi J, Son YJ. The relationship between professional communication competences and nursing performance of critical care nurses in South Korea. Int J Nurs Pract. 2017;23(5):e12576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morfeld M, Bürger W, Dietsche S, et al. Subjective estimations of the treatment programmes offered in inpatient and outpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation. Rehabilitation (Stuttg)). 2002;41(2-3):112–118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elwyn G, Edwards A, Wensing M, et al. Shared decision making measurement using the option instrument. Cardiff: Cardiff University; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preferences Scale. Can J Nurs Res. 1997;29(3):21–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Las Cuevas C, Penate W. Validity of the control preferences scale in patients with emotional disorders. Patient Prefer Adher. 2016;10:2351–2356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luszczynska A, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. J Psychol. 2005;139(5):439–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard J, Turrisi R. Two-way interactions. interaction effects in multiple regression. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dancey CP, Reidy J. Statistics without maths for psychology. Harlow (UK): Pearson Education; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell R, Milliken G, Stroup W, et al. Sas system for mixed models. 2nd ed. Cary NC: SAS Institute; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the Cosmin checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(4):651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss MC, Peters TJ. Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the option and informed decision making instruments. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(1):79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonntag U, Wiesner J, Fahrenkrog S, et al. Motivational interviewing and shared decision making in primary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87(1):62–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Jensen GM. Using clinical outcomes to explore the theory of expert practice in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2003;83(12):1090–1106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen GM, Gwyer J, Shepard KF. Expert practice in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2000;80(1):28–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield BH, Jensen GM. Understanding the lived experiences of patients: application of a phenomenological approach to ethics. Phys Ther. 2010;90(8):1185–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton D, Blundell N, Jones M, et al. Shared decision-making in cardiology: do patients want it and do doctors provide it? Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80(2):173–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delany CM, Edwards I, Jensen GM, et al. Closing the gap between ethics knowledge and practice through active engagement: an applied model of physical therapy ethics. Phys Ther. 2010;90(7):1068–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulis I. Bioethics and physiotherapy. J Med Ethics. 2007;33(8):435–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swisher LL. A retrospective analysis of ethics knowledge in physical therapy (1970-2000). Phys Ther. 2002;82(7):692–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basques BA, Erickson BJ, Leroux T, et al. Comparative outcomes of outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of the medicare dataset. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-b(7):934–938.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vortel MA, Adam S, Port-Thompson AV, et al. Comparing the ability of option(12) and option(5) to assess shared decision-making in genetic counselling. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(10):1717–1723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chewning B, Bylund CL, Shah B, et al. Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86(1):9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale L, Bennett D, Bentley M, et al. Stroke rehabilitation-comparing hospital and home-based physiotherapy: the patient’s perception. N Z J Physiother. 2003;31(2):84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Melander Wikman A, Fältholm Y. Patient empowerment in rehabilitation: somebody told me to get rehabilitated. Adv Physiother. 2006;8(1):23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Conneeley AL. Interdisciplinary collaborative goal planning in a post-acute neurological setting: a qualitative study. Br J Occup Therapy. 2004;67(6):248–255.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlin Wottrich A, Stenstrom CH, Engardt M, et al. Characteristics of physiotherapy sessions from the patient's and therapist's perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(20):1198–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, et al. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(11):2883–2885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decision-making. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(3):329–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R. Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60(2):102–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaens H, Van Royen P, Pavlic DR, et al. Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;68(1):33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson A, Ruusuvuori J, Britten N, et al. An integrative approach to patient participation in consultations. Patient participation in health care consultations qualitative perspectives Maidenhead. Maidenhead (UK): Open University; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Stahler GJ, Mennis J, Cotlar R, et al. The influence of neighborhood environment on treatment continuity and rehospitalization in dually diagnosed patients discharged from acute inpatient care. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166(11):1258–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Gannon-Rowley T. Assessing “Neighborhood Effects”: social processes and new directions in research. Annu Rev Sociol. 2002;28(1):443–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries AM, de Roten Y, Meystre C, et al. Clinician characteristics, communication, and patient outcome in oncology: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2014;23(4):375–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay LH, Hegney D, Ang E. Factors affecting effective communication between registered nurses and adult cancer patients in an inpatient setting: a systematic review. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011;9(2):151–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alegria M, Nakash O, Johnson K, et al. Effectiveness of the decide interventions on shared decision making and perceived quality of care in behavioral health with multicultural patients: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(4):325–1001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melbourne E, Sinclair K, Durand MA, et al. Developing a dyadic option scale to measure perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):177–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melbourne E, Roberts S, Durand MA, et al. Dyadic option: measuring perceptions of shared decision-making in practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;83(1):55–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar