An investigation of the measurement properties of the physiotherapy therapeutic relationship measure in patients with musculoskeletal conditions

References

• Miciak M. Bedside Matters: A Conceptual Framework of the Therapeutic Relationship in Physiotherapy. Doctor of Philosophy, University of Alberta; 2015. Available from: https://era.library.ualberta.ca/files/9z903246q#.WEWHhmQrIfE.
   Google Scholar
• Rossettini G, Carlino E, Testa M. Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother Theory,Res Pract. 1979;16(3):252–260.
   Google Scholar
• Babatunde F, MacDermid J, MacIntyre N. Characteristics of therapeutic alliance in musculoskeletal physiotherapy and occupational therapy practice: a scoping review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Besley J, Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Assessing therapeutic relationships in physiotherapy: literature review. New Zealand JPhysiother. 2011;39:81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Miciak M, Mayan M, Brown C, et al. The necessary conditions of engagement for the therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy: an interpretive description study. Arch Physiother. 2018;8:3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morera-Balaguer J, Botella-Rico JM, Martínez-González MC, et al. Physical therapists’ perceptions and experiences about barriers and facilitators of therapeutic patient-centred relationships during outpatient rehabilitation: a qualitative study. Braz J Phys Ther. 2018;22(6):484–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morera-Balaguer J, Botella-Rico JM, Catalán-Matamoros D, et al. Patients’ experience regarding therapeutic person-centered relationships in physiotherapy services: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2021;37(1):17–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keeffe M, Cullinane P, Hurley J, et al. What influences patient-therapist interactions in musculoskeletal physical therapy? Qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Phys Ther. 2016;96(5):609–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndenå P, Dalusio-King G, Hebron C. Conceptualisation of the therapeutic alliance in physiotherapy: is it adequate? Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020;46:102131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe E, Miciak M, Dennett L, et al. Measuring therapeutic relationship in the care of patients with haemophilia: a scoping review. Health Expect. 2018;21(6):1208–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miciak M, Mayan M, Brown C, et al. A framework for establishing connections in physiotherapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019;35(1):40–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alodaibi F, Beneciuk J, Holmes R, et al. The relationship of the therapeutic alliance to patient characteristics and functional outcome during an episode of physical therapy care for patients with low back pain: an observational study. Phys Ther. 2021;101(4).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, et al. The therapeutic alliance between clinicians and patients predicts outcome in chronic low back pain. Phys Ther. 2013;93(4):470–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes J, Armijo-Olivo S, Funabashi M, et al. Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental controlled study. Phys Ther. 2014;94(4):477–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall AM, Ferreira PH, Maher CG, et al. The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2010;90(8):1099–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Human technologies in rehabilitation: ‘who’ and ‘how’ we are with our clients. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(22):1907–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney M, Seider J, Beaty AF, et al. The impact of therapeutic alliance in physical therapy for chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of the literature. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020;36(8):886–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taccolini Manzoni AC, Bastos de Oliveira NT, Nunes Cabral CM, et al. The role of the therapeutic alliance on pain relief in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;34(12):901–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawford BJ, Bennell KL, Campbell PK, et al. Association between therapeutic alliance and outcomes following telephone-delivered exercise by a physical therapist for people with knee osteoarthritis: secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;8(1):e23386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Araujo AC, Filho RN, Oliveira CB, et al. Measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the working alliance inventory (patient and therapist short-forms) and session rating scale for low back pain. BMR. 2017;30(4):879–887.
   Google Scholar
• Besley J, Kayes NM, McPherson KM. Assessing the measurement properties of two commonly used measures of therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy. New Zealand J Physiother. 2011;39:75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hall AM, Ferreira ML, Clemson L, et al. Assessment of the therapeutic alliance in physical rehabilitation: a RASCH analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(3):257–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paap D, Schrier E, Dijkstra PU. Development and validation of the working alliance inventory dutch version for use in rehabilitation setting. Physiother Theory Pract. 2019;35(12):1292–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe E, Miciak M, Roduta Roberts M, et al. Development of the physiotherapy therapeutic relationship measure. Eur J Physiother. 2021;1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe E, Miciak M, Mary RR, et al. Measuring therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy: conceptual foundations. Physiother Theory Pract. 1–13. DOI:10.1080/09593985.2021.1987604
   Google Scholar
• DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics: the bare essentials with SPSS. 4th ed. Shelton, Connecticut: People’s Medical Publishing House-USA; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen DS, Colliver JA, Marcy MF, et al. Psychometric proporties of a standardized-patient checklist and rating-scale form used to access interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med. 1996;71:S87–S89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan E, Trachtenberg F, Hall MA. Development of abbreviated measures to assess patient trust in a physician, a health insurer, and the medical profession. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Jamovi project. Jamovi [Computer Software]. Version 1.6. Sydney, Australia; 2021. Available from: https://www.jamovi.org.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Revelle W. Psych: procedures for personality and psychological research. R, Evanston, Illinois, USA: Northwestern University; 2020. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Soft. 2012;48(2):1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponterotto JG, Ruckdeschel DE. An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;105(3 Pt 1):997–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall MA, Camacho F, Dugan E, et al. Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(5):1419–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prinsen C, Mokkink L, Bouter L, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez Nogueira O, Botella-Rico J, Martinez Gonzalez MC, et al. Construction and content validation of a measurement tool to evaluate person-centered therapeutic relationships in physiotherapy services. PLOS One. 2020;15(3):e0228916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Nogueira Ó, Morera Balaguer J, Nogueira López A, et al. The psychometric properties of the person-centered therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy scale. PLOS One. 2020;15(11):e0241010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. JCouns Psychol. 1989;36(2):223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsdottir T, Jonsdottir H, Gunnarsdottir S. Validation of the patients’ perceived involvement in care scale among patients with chronic pain. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27(3):740–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MY, Winkel G, Egert J, et al. Patient-physician communication in the context of persistent pain: validation of a modified version of the patients’ perceived involvement in care scale. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006;32(1):71–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright F. A S, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couch A, Keniston K. Yeasayers and naysayers: agreeing response set as a personality variable. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1960;60:151–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gideon L. Handbook of survey methodology for the social sciences. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Paap D, Schepers M, Dijkstra PU. Reducing ceiling effects in the working alliance inventory-rehabilitation Dutch version. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(20):2944–2950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments; 2019. Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf#.
   Google Scholar