Optimum process mean setting based on variable sampling plans with specified consumer’s risk

References

• Belmiro, P. M. D. and M. S. Pedro, “An optimization-based framework for designing acceptance sampling plans by variables for non-conforming proportions,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27, 794–814 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, T. and M. Jafari, “The optimum target value for single filling operations with quality sampling plans,” Journal of Quality Technology, 23, 44–47 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling, S. R., M. T. Khasawneh, S. Kaewkuekool and B. R. Cho, “A Markovian approach to determining optimum process target levels for a multi-stage serial production system,” European Journal of Operational Research, 159, 636–650 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boylan, G. L., P. L. Goethals and B. R. Cho, “Robust parameter design in resource-constrained environments: an investigation of trade-offs between costs and precision within variable processes,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 2394–2416 (2013).
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, O., “Determining the most profitable process level for a production process under different sales conditions,” Journal of Quality Technology, 16, 44–49 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, O., “Economic selection of a process level under acceptance sampling by variables,” Engineering Costs and Production Economics, 16, 69–78 (1989).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. H., “Rectifying inspection plans applied in the determination of the optimum process mean,” International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 16, 85–95 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Darwish, M. A. and F. Abdulmalek, “An integrated single-vendor single-buyer targeting problem with time-dependent process mean,” International Journal of Logistics and Management, 13, 51–64 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Darwish, M. A., F. Abdulmalek and M. Alkhedher, “Optimal selection of process mean for a stochastic inventory model,” European journal of Operational Research, 226, 481–490 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwish, M. A. and S. O. Duffuaa, “A mathematical model for the joint determination of optimal process and sampling plan parameters,” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 16, 181–189 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, H. F. and H. G. Romig, Sampling Inspection Tables, John Wiley, New York, NY (1959).
   Google Scholar
• Duffuaa, S. O. and A. El-Ga’aly, “A multi-objective mathematical optimization model for process targeting using 100% inspection policy,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 1545–1552 (2013a).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffuaa, S. O. and A. El-Ga’aly, “A multi-objective optimization model for process targeting using sampling plans,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 64, 309–317 (2013b).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goethals, P. L. and B. R. Cho, “The development of multi-response experimental designs for process parameter optimization,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 28, 628–648 (2011a).
   Google Scholar
• Goethals, P. L. and B. R. Cho, “Using higher precision-based response surface designs to determine the optimal process target,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56, 13–30 (2011b).
   Google Scholar
• Goethals, P. L. and B. R. Cho, “Reverse programming the optimal process mean problem to identify a factor space profile,” European Journal of Operational Research, 215, 204–217 (2011c).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, W. and C. Kartha, “Determining the most profitable target value for a production process,” Journal of Quality Technology, 9, 176–181 (1977).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeang, A., “Production order quantity for economical and quality consideration,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 224, 1277–1295 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeang, A., “Concurrent product and process parameters determination under deterioration process,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219, 9132–9141 (2013).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klufa, J., “Acceptance sampling by variables when the remainder of rejected lots is inspected,” Statistical Papers, 35, 337–349 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klufa, J., “Dodge-Romig AOQL single sampling plans for inspection by variables,” Statistical Papers, 38, 111–119 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., H. M. Kwon, S. H. Hong and Y. J. Kim, “Determination of the optimum target value for a production process with multiple products,” International Journal of Production Economics, 107, 173–178 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearn, W. L. and C. W. Wu, “Critical acceptance values and sample sizes of a variables sampling plan for very low fraction of defective,” Omega, 26, 90–101 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Pulak, M. F. S. and K. S. Al-Sultan, “The optimum targeting for a single filling operation with rectifying inspection,” Omega, 24, 727–733 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selim, S. Z. and W. K. Al-Zu’bi, “Optimal means for continuous processes in series,” European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 618–623 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S., P. Kongsuwon and B. R. Cho, “Development of the parametric tolerance modeling and optimization schemes and cost-effective solutions,” European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1728–1741 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, C., “A method for determining the most economic position of a process mean,” Industrial Quality Control, 8, 36–39 (1951).
   Google Scholar
• Tahera, K., R. N. Ibahim and P. B. Lochert, “The effect of non-constant process variance in determining the optimal process means and production run of a deteriorating process,” Production Planning & Control, 219, 9132–9141 (2010).
   Google Scholar