A proposed approach to improve current sustainable product development

References

• Ashby, M. F., Materials and the Environment: Eco-informed Material Choice, Elsevier, Waltham (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Baumann, H., F. Boons and A. Bragd, “Mapping the green product development field: Engineering, policy and business perspectives,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 409–425 (2002).10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00015-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berchicci, L. and W. Bodewes, “Bridging environmental issues with new product development,” Business Strategy and the Environment, 14, 272–285 (2005).10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836
   Google Scholar
• Bhander, G. S., M. Hauschild and T. McAloone, “Implementing life cycle assessment in product development,” Environmental Progress, 22, 255–267 (2003).10.1002/ep.670220414
   Google Scholar
• Bovea, M. and R. Vidal, “Inreasing product value by integrating environmental impact, costs and customer valuation,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41, 133–145 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Byggeth, S. and E. Hochschorner, “Handling trade-offs in Ecodesign tools for sustainable product development and procurement,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1420–1430 (2006).10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byggeth, S., G. Broman and K. Robèrt, “A method for sustainable product development based on a modular system of guiding questions,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1–11 (2007).10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, W. M., R. Marsh, L. B. Newnes, A. R. Mileham and J. D. Lanham, “Cost data modelling and searching to support low-volume, high-complexity, long-life defence system development,” Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 5, 1–12 (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. and S. J. Edgett, “Maximizing productivity in product innovation,” Research-Technology Management, 51, 47–58 (2008).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenfeld, J. and M. J. Lenox, “The development and implementation of DfE programmes,” The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 1, 17–27 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Ertuğrul, I. and N. Karakaşoğlu, “Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods,” Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 702–715 (2009).10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiksel, J., Design for Environment: Creating Eco-efficient Products and Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Fiksel, J., J. McDaniel and D. Spitzley, “Measuring product sustainability,” Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 1, 7–19 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F., Advanced Quality Function Deployment, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2001).10.1201/9781420025439
   Google Scholar
• Fung, R. Y. K., J. Tang, Y. Tu and D. Wang, “Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model,” International Journal of Production Research, 40, 585–599 (2002).10.1080/00207540110061634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorabi, H. O. A., V. S. Purohit, N. Seier, Y. Dereli and W. Haas, “Understanding requirements for a holistic tool for Ecodesign-first steps,” International journal of fundamental physical science, 1, 68–73 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Hallstedt, S., A Foundation for Sustainable Product Development, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, N. A. J., Physical Asset Management, Springer, London (2010).10.1007/978-1-84882-751-6
   Google Scholar
• Hochschorner, E. and G. Finnveden, “Evaluation of two simplified life cycle assessment methods,” LCA Methodology, 8, 119–128 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. G., T. K. Boguski, K. Weitz and A. Sharma, “Case studies examining LCA streamlining techniques,” LCA Case Studies, 3, 36–42 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, G., “Success factors for integration of ecodesign in product development,” Environmental Management and Health, 13, 98–107 (2002).10.1108/09566160210417868
   Google Scholar
• Kautto, P., “New instruments – Old practices? The implications of environmental management systems and extended producer responsibility for design for the environment,” Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 377–388 (2006).10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, İ. and C. Kahraman, “Evaluation of green and renewable energy system alternatives using a multiple attribute utility model: The case of turkey,” in Soft Computing in Green & Renewable Energy Systems, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 157–182 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993).10.1017/CBO9781139174084
   Google Scholar
• Keoleian, G. A. and D. Menerey, “Sustainable development by design: Review of life cycle design and related approaches,” Air & Waste, 5, 645–668 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Khan, F., R. Sadiq and B. Veitch, “Life cycle iNdeX (LInX): A new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 59–76 (2004).10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00194-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer, P. R., K. Singhal and L. N. V. Wassenhove, “Sustainable operations management,” Production and Operations Management, 14, 482–492 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klöpffer, W., “Life-cycle based methods for sustainable product development,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 3, 157–159 (2003).10.1007/BF02978462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, P. and J. O. Jenkins, “Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: A practitioners perspective,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 549–558 (2009).10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kota, S. and A. Chakrabarti, “Use of DFE methodologies and tools – Major barriers and challenges.” Guidelines for a Decision Support Method Adapted to NPD Processes (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Le Pochat, S. L., G. Bertoluci and D. Froelich, “Integrating ecodesign by conducting changes in SMEs,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 671–680 (2007).10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenox, M., B. Jordan and J. Ehrenfeld, “The diffusion of design for enviroinment: A survey of current practice,” in 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, May 6–8, Dallas, 25–30, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, M., Engineering Designers’ Requirements on Design for Environment Methods and Tools, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ljungberg, L. Y., “Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products,” Materials and Design, 28, 466–479 (2007).10.1016/j.matdes.2005.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, V., “Ecodesign tools for designers: defining the requirements,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1386e1395 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttropp, C. and J. Lagerstedt, “EcoDesign and The Ten Golden Rules: Generic advice for merging environmental aspects into product development,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 1396e1408 (2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masui, K., T. Sakao, M. Kobayashi and A. Inaba, “Applying quality function deployment to environmentally conscious design,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20, 90–106 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, D. and R. v. d. Vorst, “Developing sustainable products and services,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 1883–1895 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, G., M. Taisch and E. Kerga, “Assessment of sustainable practices in new product development,” in Gökan May, Marco Taisch, Endris Kerga, (Eds.), Advances in Production Management Systems. Value Networks: Innovation, Technologies, and Management, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 437–447 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Mulder, K., Sustainable Development for Engineers, Greenleaf, Sheffield (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Plouffe, S., P. Lanoie, C. Berneman and M.-F. Vernier, “Economic benefits tied to ecodesign,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 573–579 (2011).10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramani, K., D. Ramanujan, W. Z. Bernstein, F. Zhao, J. Sutherland, C. Handwerker, J.-K. Choi, H. Kim and D. Thurston, “Integrated sustainable life cycle design: A review,” Journal of Mechanical Design, 132, 1–15 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthil, K. D., S. Ong, A. Nee and R. B. Tan, “A proposed tool to integrate environmental and economical assessments of products,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23, 51–72 (2003).10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00032-X
   Google Scholar
• Sherwin, C. and T. Bhamra, Beyond Engineering: Ecodesign as a Proactive Approach to Product Innovation, Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing. Proceedings. EcoDesign'99: First International Symposium On. IEEE, Tokyo (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M., S. Poole, A. Sweatman, S. Evans, T. Bhamra and T. Mcaloone, “Environmental priorities in strategic product development,” Bussiness Strategy and the Environment, 9, 367–377 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Tingström, J., Product Development with a Focus on Integration of Environmental, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Todd, J. A. and M. A. Curran, Streamlined life-cycle assessment: A final report from the SETAC North AmericaStreamlined LCA Workgroup, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry and SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. and S. Eppinger, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, G. S., “On how to prioritise design requirements during the QFD planning process,” IIE Transactions, 25, 59–65 (1993).10.1080/07408179308964291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, W., R. Züst and K.-M. Lee, ECODESIGN Implementation, A Systematic Guidance on Integrating Environmental Considerations into Product Development, Springer, Dordrecht (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, N., H. U. D. Haes, U. Triebswetter, P. Eder and C. Roland, Analytical Tools for Environmental Design and Management in a Systems Perspective, Springer, Farnham (2002).10.1007/978-94-010-0456-5
   Google Scholar
• Yarwood, J. M. and P. D. Eagan, Design for the Environment: A Competitive Edge for the Future, Minnesota Office of Environmental Assistance, Minnesota (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Yim, H. J., Consumer Oriented Development of Ecodesign Products, Vulkan-Verlag, Essen (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., H.-P. Wang and C. Zhang, “Green QFD-II: A life cycle approach for environmentally conscious manufacturing by integrating LCA and LCC into QFD matrices,” International Journal of Production Research, 37, 1075–1091 (1999).10.1080/002075499191418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., T. Lu, M. Shuaib, G. Rotella, A. Huang, S. Feng, K. Rouch, F. Badurdeen and I. Jawahir, “A metrics-based methodology for establishing product sustainability index (ProdSI) for manufactured products,” in International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Springer, Berkeley, 435–441 (2012).
   Google Scholar