Multifactor correlation analysis and modeling for product low-carbon design

References

• He B, Wang J, Huang S, et al. Low-carbon product design for product life cycle. J Eng Des. 2015;26:321–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann IT, Hauschild MZ. Effects of globalisation on carbon footprints of products. CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology. 2009;58:13–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su JCP, Chu CH, Wang YT. A decision support system to estimate the carbon emission and cost of product designs. Int J Precision Eng Manufacturing. 2012;13:1037–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo L, Buckingham M, Dekoninck E, et al. The importance of understanding the business context when planning eco-design activities. J Ind Production Eng. 2015;32:3–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisingh D, Zhang ZH, Moore JC, et al. Recent advances in carbon emissions reduction: polices, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modelling. J Clean Prod. 2015;103:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo TC. The construction of a collaborative framework in support of low carbon product design. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 2013;29:174–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu ZZ, Wang YS, Teng ZR, et al. Low-carbon product multi-objective optimization design for meeting requirements of enterprise, user and government. J Clean Prod. 2015;103:747–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards Institute. PAS2050-specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. London: BSI; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Song JS, Lee KM. Development of a low-carbon product design system based on embedded GHG emissions. Resources, Conservation, Recycling. 2010;54:547–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stéphane N, Hector R, Marc LLJ. Effective retrieval and new indexing method for case based reasoning: application in chemical process design. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2010;23:880–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schank R. Dynamic memory: a theory of learning in computers and people. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes ER, Negny S, Robles GC, et al. Improvement of online adaptation knowledge acquisition and reuse in case-based reasoning: application to process engineering design. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2015;41:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson I, Marir F. Case-based reasoning: a review. Knowl Eng Rev. 1994;9:327–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chebel-Morello B, Haouchine MK, Zerhouni N. Case-based maintenance: structuring and incrementing the case base. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2015;88:165–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altshuller G. And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving. Worcester, MA: Technical Innovation Center Inc; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Chou JR. An ARIZ-based life cycle engineering model for eco-design. J Clean Prod. 2014;66:210–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YW, Su N. Extension design. Beijing: Science Press; 2010. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Yang CY, Cai W. Extenics: theory, method and application. Beijing: Science Press; 2013. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Aamodt A, Plaza E. Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications. 1994;7:39–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentin S. Extenics in higher dimensions. Columbus, Ohio, USA: Education Publisher; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Li QX, Yang CY. Dimensionless one-dimensional dependent function in extension set. Syst Eng. 2014;32: 154–8. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Wu CT, Pan TS, Shao MH, et al. An extensive QFD and evaluation procedure for innovative design. Math Probl Eng. 2013;19:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero JS. Design prototypes – a knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine. 1990;11:26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh NP. A theory of complexity, periodicity and the design axioms. Res Eng Des. 1999;11:116–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeswiet J, Kara S. Carbon emissions and CES™ in manufacturing. CIRP Annals- Manufacturing Technology. 2008;57:17–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XF, Zhang SY, Hu ZY, et al. Identification of connection units with high GHG emissions for low-carbon product structure design. J Clean Prod. 2012;27:118–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briers M, Chua WF. The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 2001;26:237–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Williams HJ, McGaughey RE. Performance measurement and costing system in new enterprise. Technovation. 2005;25:523–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan R, Anderson S. Time-driven activity based costing. Harv Bus Rev. 2004;82:131–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang RZ, Jia S, Lv JX. Activity-based carbon-computing method for manufacturing process. J Mechanical Electrical Eng. 2011;28: 639–44. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Bracewell R, Wallace K, Moss M, et al. Capturing design rationale. Computer-Aided Des. 2009;41:173–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasegaran SK, Ramani K, Sriram RD, et al. The evolution, challenges, and future of knowledge representation in product design systems. Computer-Aided Des. 2013;45:204–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen R, Horvath I, Towards product-related knowledge asset warehousing in enterprises. Proceedings of the fourth international symposium on tools and methods of competitive engineering, Apr.22–26, Wuhan, China, 155–70 p. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JH, Wang FL, Wang CK. Integrating case-based with rule-based reasoning in body-in-white fixture design. Int J Advanced Manufacturing Technol. 2016;85:1807–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao XF, Cao HJ, Li HC, et al. Assessment model of product material consumption based on carbon intensity coefficient and its application. Syst Eng. 2011;29: 123–6. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar