Investigating strategies of a green closed-loop supply chain for substitutable products under government subsidy

References

• Lin YH, Tseng ML. Assessing the competitive priorities within sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty. J Clean Prod. 2016;112:2133–2144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Zhu M, Jiang Y, et al. Pricing policies of a competitive dual-channel green supply chain. J Clean Prod. 2016;112:2029–2042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JCP, Yang PC, Lai XC. Integrated manufacturer-retailer closed-loop inventory system with price-sensitive return and demand rates. J Ind Prod Eng. 2019;36(3):134–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Lin Y. The effects of supply chain collaboration on green innovation performance: an interpretive structural modeling analysis. Sustain Prod Consum. 2020;23:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahr JG, Pasandideh SHR, Niaki STA. A robust optimization approach for multi-objective, multi-product, multiperiod, closed-loop green supply chain network designs under uncertainty and discount. J Ind Prod Eng. 2020;37(1):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma P, Zhang C, Hong X, et al. Pricing decisions for substitutable products with green manufacturing in a competitive supply chain. J Clean Prod. 2018;183:618–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Tong Y, Ye F, et al. The choice of the government green subsidy scheme: innovation subsidy vs. product subsidy. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(16):4932–4946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen I, Majumder S, Szwarc E, Saha S. Impact of strategic cooperation under competition on green product manufacturing. Sustainability. 2020a;12(24):10248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhang J, Meng Q, Zheng W, Du J. Influence of government subsidy on remanufacturing decision under different market models. Math Prob Eng. 2019;9460315:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Toktas-Palut P. An integrated contract for coordinating a three-stage green forward and reverse supply chain under fairness concerns. J Clean Prod. 2021;279:123735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Sarmah SP, Moon I. Dual channel closed-loop supply chain coordination with a reward-driven remanufacturing policy. Int J Prod Res. 2016;54(5):1503–1517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Leng M, Liang L, et al. Qualifying for a government’s scrappage program to stimulate consumers’ trade-in transactions? Analysis of an automobile supply chain involving a manufacturer and a retailer. Eur J Oper Res. 2014;239(2):363–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motavalli J. China to start pilot program, providing subsidies for electric cars and hybrids. New York Times. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Li B, Chen W, Xu C, et al. Impacts of government subsidies for environmental-friendly products in a dual-channel supply chain. J Clean Prod. 2018;171:1558–1576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen I, Majumder S, Saha S. Game-theoretic analysis to examine how government subsidy policies affect a closed-loop supply chain decision. Appl Sci. 2020b;10(1):145.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Geng Y. Green supply chain management in China: pressures, practices and performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2005;25(5):449–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh D, Shah J. A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures. Int J Prod Econ. 2012;135(2):568–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swami S, Shah J. Channel coordination in green supply chain management. J Oper Res Soc. 2013;64(3):336–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su JCP, Wang L, Ho JC. The timing of green product introduction in relation to technological evolution. J Ind Prod Eng. 2016;34(3):159–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri BC, Mondal C, Maiti T. Analysing a closed-loop supply chain with selling price, warranty period and green sensitive consumer demand under revenue sharing contract. J Clean Prod. 2018;190:822–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng ML, Islam S, Karia N, et al. A literature review on green supply chain management: trends and future challenges. Resource Conserv Recycl. 2019;141:145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourjavad E, Shahin A. A hybrid model for analyzing the risks of green supply chain in a fuzzy environment. J Ind Prod Eng. 2020;37(8):422–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Fan R, Shen L, et al. Decisions and coordination of green e-commerce supply chain considering green manufacturer’s fairness concerns. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(24):7471–7489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahangar SS, Sadati A, Rabbani M. Sustainable design of a municipal solid waste management system in an integrated closed-loop supply chain network using a fuzzy approach: a case study. J Ind Prod Eng. 2021;38(5):323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh D, Shah J. Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract. Int J Prod Econ. 2015;164:319–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Zhao D, He L. Contracting emission reduction for supply chains considering market low-carbon preference. J Clean Prod. 2016;120:72–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Q, Chen M, Xu L. Revenue and promotional cost-sharing contract versus two-part tariff contract in coordinating sustainable supply chain systems with deteriorating items. Int J Prod Econ. 2017;187:85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Zhang W, Liang L, et al. The revenue and cost sharing contract of pricing and servicing policies in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain. J Clean Prod. 2018;191:361–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raj A, Biswas I, Srivastava SK. Designing supply contracts for the sustainable supply chain using game theory. J Clean Prod. 2018;185:275–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Zhang R, Zhao S, Liu B. Low carbon strategy analysis under revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contracts. J Clean Prod. 2019;212:1462–1477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X-Y, Fan Z-P, Cao -B-B. Cost-sharing strategy for carbon emission reduction and sales effort: a Nash game with government subsidy. J Ind Manag Opt. 2019; DOI:https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2019040.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal C, Giri BC. Pricing and used product collection strategies in a two-period closed-loop supply chain under greening level and effort dependent demand. J Clean Prod. 2020a;265:121335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian J, Li B, Zhang N, et al. Decision-making and coordination of green closed-loop supply chain with fairness concern. J Clean Prod. 2021;298:126779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Wu H, Sethi SP, et al. Contracting green product supply chains considering marketing efforts in the circular economy era. Int J Prod Econ. 2021;234:108041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Webster S. Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies. Int J Prod Econ. 2008;111(2):287–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Leng M, Liang L, et al. Promoting electric automobiles: supply chain analysis under a government’s subsidy incentive scheme. IIE Transac. 2013;45(8):826–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo D, He Y, Wu Y, et al. Analysis of supply chain under different subsidy policies of the government. Sustainability. 2016;8(12):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madani SR, Rasti-Barzoki M. Sustainable supply chain management with pricing, greening and governmental tariffs determining strategies: a game theoretic approach. Comput Ind Eng. 2017;105:287–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Xiao T. Pricing and green level decisions of a green supply chain with governmental interventions under fuzzy uncertainties. J Clean Prod. 2017;149:1174–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue J, Gong R, Zhao L, et al. A green supply-chain decision model for energy-saving products that accounts for government subsidies. Sustainability. 2019;11(8):2209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He P, He Y, Xu H. Channel structure and pricing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government subsidy. Int J Prod Econ. 2019;213:108–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaur R-C. The optimal pricing analysis for remanufactured notebooks in a duopoly environment. Sustainability. 2020;12(2):636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng Q, Li M, Liu W, et al. Pricing policies of dual-channel green supply chain: considering government subsidies and consumers’ dual preferences. Sustain Prod Consum. 2021;26:1021–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosroshahi H, Dimitrov S, Hejazi SR. Pricing, greening, and transparency decisions considering the impact of government subsidies and CSR behavior in supply chain decisions. J Retail Consum Serv. 2021;60:102485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bish EK, Suwandechochai R. Optimal capacity for substitutable products under operational postponement. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;207(2):775–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Wei J, Li Y. Pricing decisions for substitutable products in a two-echelon supply chain with firms’ different channel powers. Int J Prod Econ. 2014;153:243–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang CT, Wang HX, Ren ML. Research on pricing and coordination strategy of green supply chain under hybrid production mode. Comput Ind Eng. 2014;72:24–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Wang J, You J. Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;241(1):63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basiri Z, Heydari J. A mathematical model for green supply chain coordination with substitutable products. J Clean Prod. 2017;145:232–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali MB, Rasti-Barzoki M. A game theoretic approach for green and non-green product pricing in chain-to-chain competitive sustainable and regular dual-channel supply chains. J Clean Prod. 2018;170:1029–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini-Motlagh S-M, Nematollahi M, Nouri M. Coordination of green quality and green warranty decisions in a two-echelon competitive supply chain with substitutable products. J Clean Prod. 2018;196:961–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty T, Chauhan SS, Ouhimmou M. Cost-sharing mechanism for product quality improvement in a supply chain under competition. Int J Prod Econ. 2019;208:566–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleizadeh AA, Akhavizadegan F, Ansarifar J. Pricing and quality level decisions of substitutable products in online and traditional selling channels: game-theoretical approaches. Int Transac Oper Res. 2019;26(5):1718–1751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi T, Chaharsooghi SK, Sheikhmohammady M, et al. Pricing strategy for a green supply chain with hybrid production modes under government intervention. J Clean Prod. 2020;268:121945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal C, Giri BC. Retailers’ competition and cooperation in a closed-loop green supply chain under governmental intervention and cap-and-trade policy. Oper Res. 2020b. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-020-00596-0.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Dou Y. A game model for GSC management based on government subsidies. J Manag Sci China. 2011;14:86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Heydari J, Govindan K, Basiri Z. Balancing price and green quality in presence of consumer environmental awareness: a green supply chain coordination approach. Int J Prod Res. 2021;59(7):1957–1975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar