A stochastic data envelopment analysis approach for multi-criteria ABC inventory classification

References

• Hadi-Vencheh A, Mohamadghasemi A. A fuzzy AHP-DEA approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(4):3346–3352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guvenir HA, Erel E. Multi criteria inventory classification using a genetic algorithm. Eur J Oper Res. 1998;105(1):29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Li KW, Kilgour DM, et al. A case-based distance model for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Comput Oper Res. 2008;35(3):776–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabi S, Hatefi S, Pay BS. ABC inventory classification in the presence of both quantitative and qualitative criteria. Comput Ind Eng. 2012;63(2):530–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai C, Yeh S. A multiple objective particle swarm optimization approach for inventory classification. Int J Prod Econ. 2008;114(2):656–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunovic K, Draganjac T, Simunovic G. Application of different quantitative techniques to inventory classification. Tehnicki vjesnik-Technical Gazette. 2008;15(4):41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei J, Dowlatshahi S. A rule-based multi-criteria approach to inventory classification. Int J P Res. 2010;48(23):7107–7126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen. Peer-estimation for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification. Computers and Operations Research. 2011; 38(12): 1784–1791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi-Vencheh A. An improvement to multiple criteria ABC inventory classification. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;201(3):962–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal H, Cebi F. Support vector machines for multi-attribute ABC analysis. Int J Mach Learn Comput. 2013;3(1):154–157.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir G, Hasin M. Multiple criteria inventory classification using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Int J Ind Eng Computations. 2012;2(3):123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hadad Y, Keren B. ABC inventory classification via linear discriminant analysis and ranking methods. Int J Logist Syst Manage. 2013;14(4):387–404.
   Google Scholar
• Millstein MA, Yang L, Li H. Optimizing ABC inventory grouping decisions. Int J Prod Econ. 2014;148(C):71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Faramarzi GR, Farzipoor Saen R. Multi-criteria ABC inventory classification using DEA-discriminant analysis to predict group membership of new items. Int J Appl Manage Sci. 2014a;6(2):171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Babai M, Ladhari T, Lajili I. On the inventory performance of multi-criteria classification methods: empirical investigation. Int J P Res. 2015;53(1):279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kartal H, Oztekin A, Gunasekaran A, et al. An integrated decision analytic framework of machine learning with multi-criteria decision making for multi-attribute inventory classification. Comput Ind Eng. 2016;101:599–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Li H, Campbell JF, et al. Integrated multi-period dynamic inventory classification and control. Int J Prod Econ. 2017;189(189):86–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka A, Lolli F, Balugani E, et al. DEASort: assigning items with data envelopment analysis in ABC classes. Int J Prod Econ. 2018;199:7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarty, A. K. Multi-item inventory aggregation into groups. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1981; 32(1):19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, V. A closed‐from approach for multi‐item inventory grouping. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly. 1983; 30(3); 471–485.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst R, Cohen MA. Operations related groups (ORGs): a clustering procedure for production/inventory systems. Journal of Operations Management. 1990; 9(4):574–98.
   Google Scholar
• Farzipoor Saen R. A decision model for selecting technology suppliers in the presence of nondiscretionary factors. Appl Math Comput. 2006;181(2):1609–1615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izadikhah M, Farzipoor Saen R. Assessing sustainability of supply chains by chance-constrained two-stage DEA model in the presence of undesirable factors. Comput Oper Res. 2018;100:343–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiani Mavi R, Farzipoor Saen R, Goh M. Joint analysis of eco-efficiency and eco-innovation with common weights in two-stage network DEA: a big data approach. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2019;144:553–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2(6):429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker R, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1984;30(9):1078–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzipoor Saen R. A decision model for ranking suppliers in the presence of cardinal and ordinal data, weight restrictions, and nondiscretionary factors. Ann Oper Res. 2009;172(1):177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzipoor Saen R. Developing a new data envelopment analysis methodology for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;51(9–12):1243–1250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Faramarzi GR, Farzipoor Saen R. A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for the best supplier selection using integrated data envelopment analysis approach. J Math Operat Res. 2014c;6(1):146–153.
   Google Scholar
• Yousefi S, Shabanpour H, Fisher R, et al. Evaluating and ranking sustainable suppliers by robust dynamic data envelopment analysis. Measurement. 2016;83:72–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H, Lu YC, Chung JT. Assurance region context-dependent DEA with an application to Taiwanese hotel industry. Int J Oper Res. 2010;8(3):292–312.
   Google Scholar
• Guo X, Lu C, Lee JH, et al. Applying the dynamic DEA model to evaluate the energy efficiency of OECD countries and China. Energy. 2017;134:392–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Badizadeh T, Farzipoor Saen R. Performance assessment of airlines using range-adjusted measure, strong complementary slackness condition, and discriminant analysis. J Air Trans Manage. 2015b;54:42–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Ghaderi F, Anvari M, et al. Performance assessment and optimization of thermal power plants by DEA-BCC and multivariate analysis. J Sci Ind Res. 2007;66(1):860–872.
   Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Ghaderi F, Omrani H. A deterministic approach for performance assessment and optimization of power distribution units in Iran. Energy Policy. 2009;37(1):274–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi T, Goto M. Measurement of a linkage among environmental, operational, and financial performance in Japanese manufacturing firms: a use of data envelopment analysis with strong complementary slackness condition. Eur J Oper Res. 2010;207(3):1742–1753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Farzipoor Saen R, Faramarzi GR. A new super-efficiency model in the presence of both zero data and undesirable outputs. Sci Iran. 2014b;21(6):2360–2367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Faramarzi GR, Farzipoor Saen R. Ranking electricity distribution units using slacks-based measure, strong complementary slackness condition, and discriminant analysis. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst. 2015a;64:1214–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CM, Hsu HS, Wang ST, et al. A performance evaluation model based on AHP and DEA. J Chin Inst Ind Eng. 2005;22(3):243–251.
   Google Scholar
• López FJ, Ho JC, Ruiz-Torres AJ. A computational analysis of the impact of correlation and data translation on DEA efficiency scores. J Ind Prod Eng. 2016;33(3):192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo HP, Chiu MC. A service family design and business development methodology with a home service case study. J Ind Prod Eng. 2014;31(7):458–470.
   Google Scholar
• Kritikos M. A full ranking methodology in data envelopment analysis based on a set of dummy decision making units. Expert Syst Appl. 2017;77(2):211–225.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW. Deterministic equivalents for optimizing and satisficing under chance constraints. Oper Res. 1963;11(1):18–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta JK. Efficiency measurement in stochastic input–output systems. Int J Soc Syst Sci. 1982;13(3):187–273.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta JK. Transformations in stochastic DEA models. J Econom. 1990;46(1–2):109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta JK. Efficiency analysis by stochastic data envelopment analysis. Appl Econ Lett. 2000;7(6):379–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land KC, Lovell CAK, Thore S. Chance-constrained data envelopment analysis. Manage Dec Eco. 1993;14(6):541–554.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta JK. Data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement in the stochastic case. Comput Oper Res. 1987;14(2):117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai A, Ratick SJ, Schinnar AP. Data envelopment analysis with stochastic variations in data. Socio-Econ Plann Sci. 2005;39(2):147–164.
   Google Scholar
• Razavyan S, Tohidi G. Ranking of efficient DMUs with stochastic data. Int Math Forum. 2008;3(2):79–83.
   Google Scholar
• Azadi M, Farzipoor Saen R. A new chance-constrained data envelopment analysis for selecting third party reverse logistics providers in the existence of dual-role factors. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(10):12231–12236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazhayil JP, Balasubramanian R. Optimization of India’s power sector strategies using weight-restricted stochastic data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy. 2013;56:456–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher RA. The Use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugenics. 1936;7(2):179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi T. DEA-discriminant analysis in the view of goal programming. Eur J Oper Res. 1999;115(3):564–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Farzipoor Saen R. Predicting group membership of sustainable suppliers via data envelopment analysis and discriminant analysis. Sustainable Prod Consumption. 2019;18:41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Demerdash EB, El-Khodary IA, Tharwat AA. A stochastic data envelopment analysis model considering variation in input and output variables. Int J Data Envelop Anal Operation Res. 2016;2(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi T, Hwang SN. A use of nonparametric test for DEA-DA: a methodological comparison. Asia-Pacific J Oper Res. 2004;21(2):179–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan R. ABC inventory classification with multiple-criteria using weighted linear optimization. Comput Oper Res. 2006;33(3):695–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Faramarzi GR, Farzipoor Saen R. Multi-criteria ABC inventory classification using DEA-discriminant analysis to predict group membership of new items. International journal of applied management science. 2014; 6(2):171–89.
   Google Scholar
• Talluri S, Narasimhan R, Nair A. Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained DEA approach. International Journal of Production Economics. 2006;100(2):212–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi, T., X. Financial ratio analysis of the electric power industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research. 2005; 22(03); 349–376
   Google Scholar
• Hwang SN, Lin CT, Chuang WC. Stock selection using data envelopment analysis-discriminant analysis. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences. 2007;28(1):33–50.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M.C., Lin, S.P., Cheng, C.C. and Lin, Y.P.The consumer loan default predicting model–An application of DEA–DA and neural network. Expert Systems with applications. 2009; 36(9); 11682–11690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi T, Goto M. DEA–DA for bankruptcy-based performance assessment: Misclassification analysis of Japanese construction industry. European Journal of Operational Research. 2009;199(2);576–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi T, Goto M. Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: a combined use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and DEA-discriminant analysis (DA). Energy Economics. 2012;34(3);634–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Sun L, Xiang J, Hu S, Su S. Pyrolysis and dehalogenation of plastics from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE): A review. Waste management. 2013;33(2);462–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Faramarzi GR, Saen RF. Ranking electricity distribution units using slacks-based measure, strong complementary slackness condition, and discriminant analysis. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2015;64;1214–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli M, Badizadeh T, Saen RF. Performance assessment of airlines using range-adjusted measure, strong complementary slackness condition, and discriminant analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management. 2016;54;42–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rousseau J, Semple J. Data Envelopment Analysis and Axiomatic Notions of Efficiency and Reference Sets. TEXAS UNIV AT AUSTIN CENTER FOR CYBERNETIC STUDIES. 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology. 1932.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou P, Fan L. A note on multi-criteria ABC inventory classification using weighted linear optimization. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;182(3):1488–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores BE, Olson DL, Dorai VK. Management of multicriteria inventory classification. Mathematical and Computer Modelling. 1992;16(12):71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar