Pricing strategy in remanufacturing using a spatial model approach

References

• Shekarian E. A review of factors affecting closed-loop supply chain models. J Clean Prod. 2020;253:119823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazoki M, Samarghandi H. Take-back regulation: remanufacturing or eco-design? Int J Prod Econ. 2020;227:107674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng S, Ping J, Li T, et al. Environmental benefits of remanufacturing mechanical products: a harmonized meta-analysis of comparative life cycle assessment studies. J Environ Manage. 2022;306:114479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YC, Sun XC. Robust optimal inventory and acquisition effort decisions in a hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing system. J Ind Prod Eng. 2019;36(5):335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilgin MA, Gupta SM. Remanufacturing modeling and analysis. CRC Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Chen JM, Chi CY. Reverse channel choice in a closed-loop supply chain with new and differentiated remanufactured goods. J Ind Prod Eng. 2019;36(2):81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saidani M, Yannou B, Leroy Y, et al. Heavy Vehicles on the Road towards the Circular Economy: analysis and Comparison with the Automotive Industry. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;135:108–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CH, Ma X, Talluri S, et al. (2021). Optimal core acquisition and remanufacturing decisions with discrete core quality grades. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
   Google Scholar
• Kurilova-Palisaitiene J, Sundin E, Poksinska B. Remanufacturing challenges and possible lean improvements. J Clean Prod. 2018;172:3225–3236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngu HJ, Lee MD, Osman MSB. Review on current challenges and future opportunities in Malaysia sustainable manufacturing: remanufacturing industries. J Clean Prod. 2020;273:123071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Zhou T, Zhang H, et al. Reliability and cost optimization for remanufacturing process planning. J Clean Prod. 2016;135:1602–1610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund RT, Hauser W. The database of remanufacturers. Boston Massachusetts: Boston University; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra JL, Hopkinson PG, Tidridge G. Value creation from circular economy-led closed loop supply chains: a case study of fast-moving consumer goods. Prod Plann Control. 2018;29(6):509–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi-Amiri A, Zahedi A, Gholian-Jouybari F, et al. Designing a closed-loop supply chain network considering social factors; a case study on avocado industry. Appl Math Modell. 2022;101:600–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guide VDR Jr, Van Wassenhove LN. The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper Res. 2009;57(1):10–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taleizadeh AA, Moshtagh MS, Moon I. Pricing, product quality, and collection optimization in a decentralized closed-loop supply chain with different channel structures: game theoretical approach. J Clean Prod. 2018;189:406–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjbar Y, Sahebi H, Ashayeri J, et al. A competitive dual recycling channel in a three-level closed loop supply chain under different power structures: pricing and collecting decisions. J Clean Prod. 2020;272:122623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal C, Giri BC. Pricing and used product collection strategies in a two-period closed-loop supply chain under greening level and effort dependent demand. J Clean Prod. 2020;265:121335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He P, He Y, Xu H. Channel structure and pricing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government subsidy. Int J Prod Econ. 2019;213:108–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Li B-Y, Li KW, et al. Pricing and warranty decisions in a two-period closed-loop supply chain. Int J P Res. 2020;58(6):1688–1704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X-M, Li Q-W, Liu Z, et al. Optimal pricing and remanufacturing mode in a closed-loop supply chain of WEEE under government fund policy. Comput Ind Eng. 2021;151:106951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Chen J, Diallo C, et al. Pricing and production decisions in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with (re) manufacturing. Int J Prod Econ. 2021;232:107935.
   Google Scholar
• Boorsma N, Balkenende R, Bakker C, et al. Incorporating design for remanufacturing in the early design stage: a design management perspective. J Remanufacturing. 2021;11(1):25–48
   Google Scholar
• Leal JM, Pompidou S, Charbuillet C, et al. Product recoverability: a review of assessment methods. Procedia CIRP. 2018;69:710–715.
   Google Scholar
• Padhy N, Panigrahi R, Satapathy SC Identifying the reusable components from component-based system: proposed metrics and model. In: Information systems design and intelligent applications. Springer; 2019. p. 89–99.
   Google Scholar
• Meng K, Cao Y, Peng X, et al. Demand-dependent recovery decision-making of a batch of products for sustainability. Int J Prod Econ. 2020;224:107552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James AT, Kumar G, Arora A, et al. (2021). Development of a design based remanufacturability index for automobile systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 235(12), 3138–3156.
   Google Scholar
• Lindkvist Haziri L, Sundin E. Supporting design for remanufacturing-A framework for implementing information feedback from remanufacturing to product design. J. Remanufacturing. 2020;10(1):57–76
   Google Scholar
• Misran E, Bani O, Situmeang EM, et al. Banana stem based activated carbon as a low-cost adsorbent for methylene blue removal: isotherm, kinetics, and reusability. Alexandria Eng J. 2022;61(3):1946–1955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Li KW, Li B-Y, et al. Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2019;124:75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salop SC. Monopolistic competition with outside goods. Bell J Econ. 1979;10(1):141–156
   Google Scholar
• Chen J-M, Hsu Y-T. Competitive pricing and reusability choice for remanufacturable products. Aktual’ni Problemy Ekonomiky= Actual Problems in Economics(193). 2017;169.
   Google Scholar
• Correani L, Di Dio F. R&D networks and absorptive capacity in a Salop model. Res Econ. 2019;73(2):123–128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C-H, Chamnisampan N. Platform entry and homing as competitive strategies under cross-sided network effects. Decis Support Syst. 2021;140:113428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanh NTM, Chen JM, Van Hop N. Pricing strategy and order quantity allocation with price-sensitive demand in three-echelon supply chain. Expert Syst Appl. 2022;206:117873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder C, Seidenstricker S. How does a component from a supplier with high reputation for product innovation improve the perception of a final offering? A process perspective. Eur Manage J. 2018;36(2):288–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian R, Subramanyam R. Key factors in the market for remanufactured products. Manuf Serv Oper Manage. 2012;14(2):315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive E. Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on waste electrical and electronic equipment, WEEE. Official Journal of the European Union L. 2012;197:38–71.
   Google Scholar
• Neto JQF, Bloemhof J, Corbett C. Market prices of remanufactured, used and new items: evidence from eBay. Int J Prod Econ. 2016;171:371–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal VV, Atasu A, Van Ittersum K. Remanufacturing, third-party competition, and consumers’ perceived value of new products. Manage Sci. 2015;61(1):60–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar