Adaptive warehouse storage location assignment with considerations to order-picking efficiency and worker safety

References

• Reyes JJR, Solano-Charris EL, Montoya-Torres JR. The storage location assignment problem: a literature review. Int J Ind Eng Comput. 2019;10(2):199–224. doi: 10.5267/j.ijiec.2018.8.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofler M. Optimising the storage location assignment problem under dynamic conditions[dissertation]. Linz (Austria): Johannes Kepler University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Frazelle EH. Stock location assignment and order picking productivity[dissertation]. Atlanta(GA), USA: Georgia Institute of Technology; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Barreto L, Amaral A, Pereira T. Industry 4.0 implications in logistics: an overview. Procedia Manuf. 2017;13:1245–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.045
   Google Scholar
• Mosallaeipour S, Nazerian R, Ghadirinejad M. Industrial Engineering in the industry 4.0 era. Industrial Engineering in the industry 4.0 era. 2018; pp. 63–81. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-71225-3_6
   Google Scholar
• Rouwenhorst B, Reuter B, Stockrahm V, et al. Warehouse design and control: framework and literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 2000;122(3):515–533. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00020-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanheusden S, van Gils T, Ramaekers K, et al. Practical factors in order picking planning: state-of-the-art classification and review. Int J Prod Res. 2022;61(6):2032–2056. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2053223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lombaert T, Braekers K, De Koster R, et al. In pursuit of humanised order picking planning: methodological review, literature classification and input from practice. Int J Prod Res. 2022;61(10):3300–3330. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2079437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo M, Iranmanesh M, Tseng ML, et al. Behind the definition of industry 5.0: a systematic review of technologies, principles, components, and values. J Ind Prod Eng. 2023;40(6):432–447. doi: 10.1080/21681015.2023.2216701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aneziris ON, Papazoglou IA, Mud M, et al. Occupational risk quantification owing to falling objects. Saf Sci. 2014;69:57–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan X, Wu W, Shen L, et al. Industrial internet of things and unsupervised deep learning enabled real-time occupational safety monitoring in cold storage warehouse. Saf Sci. 2022;152:105766. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Most Common Areas for Warehouse Dangers. American National Standard Institute. 2018. https://blog.ansi.org/2018/06/most-common-areas-warehouse-dangers/#gref
   Google Scholar
• Hofstra N, Petkova B, Dullaert W, et al. Assessing and facilitating warehouse safety. Saf Sci. 2018;105:134–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gille C, Gunn E. A review of warehouse models. Eur J Oper Res. 1992;58(1):3–13. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90231-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RQ, Wang M, Pan X. New model of the storage location assignment problem considering demand correlation pattern. Comput Ind Eng. 2019;129:210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen CG. The impact of routing and storage policies on warehouse efficiency. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 1999;19(10):1053–1064. doi: 10.1108/01443579910287073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner S. Joint Multi-item Storage Location Assignment Capacitated Lot Sizing Problem[master’s thesis]. Windsor(ON): University of Windsor; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi JP, Renaud J, Ruiz A. On storage assignment policies for unit-load automated storage and retrieval systems. Int J Prod Res. 2012;50(3):879–892. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2010.543939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramtin F, Pazour JA. Product allocation problem for an AS/RS with multiple in-the-aisle pick positions. IIE Trans Institute Ind Eng. 2015;47(12):1379–1396. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1027458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Nishi T, Turner SDO, et al. An integrated strategy for a production planning and warehouse layout problem: modeling and solution approaches. Omega (United Kingdom). 2017;68:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2016.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Lesch V, Müller PBM, Krämer M, et al. Optimizing storage assignment, order picking, and their interaction in mezzanine warehouses. Appl Intell. 2023;53(15):18605–18629. doi: 10.1007/s10489-022-04443-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang P, Miao L, Xue Z, et al. An integrated optimization of location assignment and storage/retrieval scheduling in multi-shuttle automated storage/retrieval systems. J Intell Manuf. 2015;26(6):1145–1159. doi: 10.1007/s10845-013-0846-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero F, Musmanno R, Pisacane O, et al. A mathematical model for the multi-levels product allocation problem in a warehouse with compatibility constraints. Appl Math Model. 2013;37(6):4385–4398. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanei O, Nasiri V, Marjani MR, et al. A heuristic algorithm for the warehouse space assignment problem considering operational constraints: with application in a case study. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management; Kuala lumpur (Malaysia). 2011. 258–264.
   Google Scholar
• Silva A, Coelho LC, Darvish M, et al. Integrating storage location and order picking problems in warehouse planning. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2020;140(April):102003. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102003
   Google Scholar
• Kübler P, Glock CH, Bauernhansl T. A new iterative method for solving the joint dynamic storage location assignment, order batching and picker routing problem in manual picker-to-parts warehouses. Comput Ind Eng. 2020;147:106645. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolini M, Botti L, Cascini A, et al. Unit-load storage assignment strategy for warehouses in seismic areas. Comput Ind Eng. 2015;87:481–490. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2015.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larco JA, de Koster R, Roodbergen KJ, et al. Managing warehouse efficiency and worker discomfort through enhanced storage assignment decisions. Int J Prod Res. 2017;55(21):6407–6422. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1165880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heragu SS, Du L, Mantel RJ, et al. Mathematical model for warehouse design and product allocation. Int J Prod Res. 2005;43(2):327–338. doi: 10.1080/00207540412331285841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaerpour N, De Koster RBM, Yu Y. Storage policies and optimal shape of a storage system. Int J Prod Res. 2013;51(23–24):6891–6899. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.774502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács A. Optimizing the storage assignment in a warehouse served by milkrun logistics. Int J Prod Econ. 2011;133(1):312–318. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borangiu T, Trentesaux D, Thomas A, et al. Adaptive storage location assignment for warehouses using intelligent products. Stud Comput Intell. 2016;271–279. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15159-5_25
   Google Scholar
• Mirzaei M, Zaerpour N, de Koster R. The impact of integrated cluster-based storage allocation on parts-to-picker warehouse performance. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2021;146:146. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Moghaddam M, Nof SY. Dynamic storage assignment with product affinity and ABC classification—a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;84(9–12):2179–2194. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7806-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang DMH, Lin CP, Chen MC. The adaptive approach for storage assignment by mining data of warehouse management system for distribution centres. Enterp Inf Syst. 2011;5(2):219–234. doi: 10.1080/17517575.2010.537784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming-Huang Chiang D, Lin CP, Chen MC. Data mining based storage assignment heuristics for travel distance reduction. Expert Syst. 2014;31(1):81–90. doi: 10.1111/exsy.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter R, Boysen N, Scholl A. The discrete forward-reserve problem - allocating space, selecting products, and area sizing in forward order picking. Eur J Oper Res. 2013;229(3):585–594. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou YC, Chen YH, Chen HM. Recency-based storage assignment and warehouse configuration for recurrent demands. Comput Ind Eng. 2012;62(4):880–889. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy KL, Ho GTS, Lee CKH. A RFID-based storage assignment system for enhancing the efficiency of order picking. J Intell Manuf. 2017;28(1):111–129. doi: 10.1007/s10845-014-0965-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Xu Y, Zheng Y, et al. Research on location assignment model of intelligent warehouse with RFID and improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. 2017. Int Conf Comput Syst Electron Control ICCSEC 2017. 2018;1262–1266. doi: 10.1109/ICCSEC.2017.8446952
   Google Scholar
• Courtin P, Grimault A, Lhommeau M, et al. Dynamic storage location assignment problem at Knapp company : toward reinforcement learning? Problematic and state of the art. Angers, Fr: Artif Intell Platform; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabaei S-K, Valilai OF, Abedian A, et al. A novel framework for storage assignment optimization inspired by finite element method. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021;7:e378. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.378
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wachter JK, Yorio PL. A system of safety management practices and worker engagement for reducing and preventing accidents: an empirical and theoretical investigation. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;68:117–130. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Koster R, Le-Duc T, Roodbergen KJ. Design and control of warehouse order picking: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;182(2):481–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durdevic D, Andrejic M, Pavlov N. Framework for improving warehouse safety. 5th Logist Int Conf. 2022;304–313. doi: 10.37528/FTTE/9788673954530.LO
   Google Scholar
• Kostrzewski M. Securing of safety by monitoring of technical parameters in warehouse racks, in high-bay warehouses and high storage warehouses – literature review of the problem. LogForum. 2017;13(2):125–134. doi: 10.17270/J.LOG.2017.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Downie B, Gyöngyösi M, Kuehl C. Artificial intelligence in materials handling: how machine learning tools boost warehouse safety, productivity and cost-effectiveness. J Supply Chain Manag Logist Procure. 2021;4(1):6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gu J, Goetschalckx M, McGinnis LF. Research on warehouse operation: a comprehensive review. Eur J Oper Res. 2007;177(1):1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WorkSafe Victoria. A guide to handling large, bulky or awkward items. Australia; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• WorkSafe Victoria. Pallet racking operation and maintenance. Australia; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholdi J, Hankman S. Warehouse & distribution Science Release 0.98. Vol. 25. Atlanta (GA): Supply Chain Logist Inst; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Wales DJ, Doye JPK. Global optimization by basin-hopping and the lowest energy structures of Lennard-Jones clusters containing up to 110 atoms. J Phys Chem A. 1997;101(28):5111–5116. doi: 10.1021/jp970984n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang Y, Gubian S, Suomela B, et al. Generalized simulated annealing for global optimization: the GenSA package. R J. 2013;5(1):13–28. doi: 10.32614/RJ-2013-002
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ameur W. Computing the initial temperature of simulated annealing. Comput Optim Appl. 2004;29(3):369–385. doi: 10.1023/B:COAP.0000044187.23143.bd
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Chen X, Li J. Tgmin: a global-minimum structure search program based on a constrained basin-hopping algorithm. Nano Res. 2017;10(10):3407–3420. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1553-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žunić E, Beširević A, Delalić S, et al. A generic approach for order picking optimization process in different warehouse layout. 41st International Convention On Information And Communication Technology, Electronics And Microelectronics (MIPRO). 2018;1000–1005. doi: 10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400183
   Google Scholar
• Bestuzheva K, Besançon M, Chen W-K, et al. The SCIP optimization suite 8.0. 2021. https://optimization-online.org/?p=18429
   Google Scholar
• Perron L, Furnon V. OR-Tools v9.5. Google. 2022. Available from: https://developers.google.com/optimization/
   Google Scholar
• Curtin K. Operations research. In Encyclopedia of social measurement. Elsevier; 2005. pp. 925–931. doi:10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00534-X.
   Google Scholar
• Alrawahi AS, Lee K, Lotfi A. A multiobjective QoS model for trading cloud of Things Resources. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019;6(6):9447–9463. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2943284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarinchang A, Faghih N, Zarinchang J. An application of genetic algorithm toward solving the reliability problem of multiobjective series-parallel systems. Eksploat i Niezawodn. 2012;14(3):243–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar