Workshop layout optimization method based on sparrow search algorithm: a new approach

References

• Bag S, Gupta S, Kumar S. Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development. Int J Prod Econ. 2021;231:107844. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado CG, Winroth MP, Ribeiro da Silva EHD. Sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0: an emerging research agenda. Int J P Res. 2020;58(5):1462–1484. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1652777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Li P, Zhou Y, et al. Toward new-generation intelligent manufacturing. Eng. 2018;4(1):11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2018.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Goetz SJ, Prince SD, Goward SN, et al. Satellite remote sensing of primary production: an improved production efficiency modeling approach. Ecol Modell. 1999;122(3):239–255. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00140-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifai AP, Windras Mara ST, Ridho H, et al. The double row layout problem with safety consideration: a two-stage variable neighborhood search approach. J Ind Prod Eng. 2022;39(3):181–195. doi: 10.1080/21681015.2021.1968964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khariwal S, Kumar P, Bhandari M. Layout improvement of railway workshop using systematic layout planning (SLP)–A case study. Mater Today Proc. 2021;44:4065–4071. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.444
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini-Nasab H, Fereidouni S, Fatemi Ghomi SMT, et al. Classification of facility layout problems: a review study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2018;94(1–4):957–977. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0895-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Guo H, Zhang S, et al. Optimum design of ship cabin equipment layout based on SLP method and genetic algorithm. Math Probl Eng. 2019;2019:1–14. doi: 10.1155/2019/9492583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel Zarandi MH, Dorry F. A hybrid fuzzy PSO algorithm for solving steelmaking-continuous casting scheduling problem. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 2018;20(1):219–235. doi: 10.1007/s40815-017-0331-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulturel-Konak S, Konak A. A new relaxed flexible bay structure representation and particle swarm optimization for the unequal area facility layout problem. Eng Optim. 2011;43(12):1263–1287. doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2010.548864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma HL, Chung SH, Chan HK, et al. An integrated model for berth and yard planning in container terminals with multi-continuous berth layout. Ann Oper Res. 2019;273(1–2):409–431. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2577-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovács G. Layout design for efficiency improvement and cost reduction. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci. 2019;67(3):547–555. doi:10.24425/bpasts.2019.129653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamer S, Barlas B, Gunbeyaz SA, et al. Adjacency-based facility layout optimization for shipyards: a case study. J Ship Prod Des. 2023;39(1):25–31. doi: 10.5957/JSPD.05210013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortorella GL, Fogliatto FS. Planejamento sistemático de layout com apoio de análise de decisão multicritério. Production. 2008;18(3):609–624. doi: 10.1590/S0103-65132008000300015
   Google Scholar
• Tarigan U, Ambarita MB, (2018, February)., Production layout improvement by using line balancing and systematic layout planning (SLP) at PT. XYZ IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. 309. No. 1. p. 012116. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/309/1/012116.
   Google Scholar
• Suhardi B, Juwita E, Astuti RD, et al. Facility layout improvement in sewing department with systematic layout planning and ergonomics approach. Cogent Eng. 2019;6(1):1597412. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2019.1597412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt MJ. The dynamics of plant layout. Manage Sci. 1986;32(1):76–86. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.32.1.76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Camp DJ, Carter MW, Vannelli A. A nonlinear optimization approach for solving facility layout problems. Eur J Oper Res. 1992;57(2):174–189. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(92)90041-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houshyar A, White B. Exact optimal solution for facility layout: deciding which pairs of locations should be adjacent. Comput Ind Eng. 1993;24(2):177–187. doi: 10.1016/0360-8352(93)90006-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadivar F, Wang J. Facility layout optimization using simulation and genetic algorithms. Int J P Res. 2000;38(17):4369–4383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu B, Yang B. A particle swarm optimization algorithm for multi-row facility layout problem in semiconductor fabrication. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2019;10:3201–3210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Baz MA. A genetic algorithm for facility layout problems of different manufacturing environments. Comput Ind Eng. 2004;47(2–3):233–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitayasak S, Pongcharoen P, Hicks C. A tool for solving stochastic dynamic facility layout problems with stochastic demand using either a Genetic Algorithm or modified backtracking search Algorithm. Int J Prod Econ. 2017;190:146–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourhassan MR, Raissi S. An integrated simulation-based optimization technique for multi-objective dynamic facility layout problem. J Ind Inf Integr. 2017;8:49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue J, Shen B. A novel swarm intelligence optimization approach: sparrow search algorithm. Syst Sci Contr Eng. 2020;8(1):22–34. doi: 10.1080/21642583.2019.1708830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharehchopogh FS, Namazi M, Ebrahimi L, et al. Advances in sparrow search algorithm: a comprehensive survey. Archiv Comput Methods Eng. 2023;30(1):427–455. doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09804-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao T, Niu D, Ji Z, et al. Mid-term electricity demand forecasting using improved variational mode decomposition and extreme learning machine optimized by sparrow search algorithm. Energy. 2022;261:125328. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An G, Jiang Z, Chen L, et al. Ultra short-term wind power forecasting based on sparrow search algorithm optimization deep extreme learning machine. Sustainability. 2021;13(18):10453. doi: 10.3390/su131810453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Shi Y, Lin R, et al. A novel oil pipeline leakage detection method based on the sparrow search algorithm and CNN. Measurement. 2022;204:112122. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M, Liu Y. Research on the potential for China to achieve carbon neutrality: a hybrid prediction model integrated with elman neural network and sparrow search algorithm. J Environ Manage. 2023;329:117081. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, He R, Yang K. A bioinspired path planning approach for mobile robots based on improved sparrow search algorithm. Adv Manuf. 2022;10(1):114–130. doi: 10.1007/s40436-021-00366-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathy A, Alanazi TM, Rezk H, et al. Optimal energy management of micro-grid using sparrow search algorithm. Energy Rep. 2022;8:758–773. doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan F, Li R, Liu SQ, et al. An improved sparrow search algorithm for solving the energy-saving flexible job shop scheduling problem. Machines. 2022;10(10):847. doi: 10.3390/machines10100847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, et al. A digital twin-based layout optimization method for discrete manufacturing workshop. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2021;112(5–6):1307–1318. doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-06568-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Duan J, Zhang Q. Multi-objective integrated scheduling optimization of semi-combined marine crankshaft structure production workshop for green manufacturing. Trans Inst Meas Control. 2021;43(3):579–596. doi: 10.1177/0142331220945917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman E, Uysal M, Alkaya AF. Migrating birds optimization: a new metaheuristic approach and its performance on quadratic assignment problem. Inf Sci. 2012;217:65–77. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.06.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X, Yuan S, Ye Y. Optimizing facility layout planning for reconfigurable manufacturing system based on chaos genetic algorithm. Prod Manuf Res. 2019;7(1):109–124. doi: 10.1080/21693277.2019.1602486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnwal S, Dharmadhikari P. Optimization of plant layout using SLP method. Int J Innov Res Technol Sci Eng Technol. 2016;5(3):3008–3015. doi:10.15680/IJIRSET.2016.0503046.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhang H, He K et al. Multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on objective space division for the unequal-area facility layout problem. Expert Syst Appl. 2018;102:179–192. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.02.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzhi S, Zhang H, Tseng ML, et al. Hierarchical energy optimization management of active distribution network with multi-microgrid system. J Ind Prod Eng. 2022;39(3):210–229. doi: 10.1080/21681015.2021.1972478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar BS, Mahesh V, Kumar BS. Modeling and analysis of flexible manufacturing system with FlexSim. Int J Comput Eng Res. 2015;5(10):1–6.
   Google Scholar