Activity representation by SURF-based templates

References

• Aggarwal JK, Park S. 2004. Human motion: modeling and recognition of actions and interactions. In: International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Visualization and Transmission. Thessaloniki, Greece: IEEE; p. 640–647.10.1109/TDPVT.2004.1335299
   Google Scholar
• Ahad MAR. 2011. Computer vision and action recognition – a guide for image processing and computer vision community for action understanding. Springer /Atlantis Press. ISBN: 978-94-91216-19-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ahad MAR, Tan J, Kim H, Ishikawa S. 2008. Human activity recognition: various paradigms. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Control Automation and Systems. Korea: IEEE; p. 1896–1901.
   Google Scholar
• Ahad MAR, Tan J, Kim H, Ishikawa S. 2009a. Temporal motion recognition and segmentation approach. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 19:91–99.10.1002/ima.v19:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahad MAR, Tan J, Kim H, Ishikawa S. 2009b. Analysis of motion self-occlusion problem due to motion overwriting for human activity recognition. J Multimedia. 5(1):36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ahad MAR, Tan J, Kim H, Ishikawa S. 2010. Lower-dimensional feature sets for template-based motion recognition approaches. J Comp Sci. 6(8):920–927.10.3844/jcssp.2010.920.927
   Google Scholar
• Ahad MAR, Tan J, Kim H, Ishikawa S. 2012. Motion history image: its variants and applications. Mach Vision Appl. 23(2):255–281.10.1007/s00138-010-0298-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Hossain MZ. 2008. SEI and SHI representations for human movement recognition. In: International Conference on Computer and Information Technology. Khulna, Bangladesh: IEEE; p. 521–526.
   Google Scholar
• Albu A, Beugeling T. 2007. A three-dimensional spatiotemporal template for interactive human motion analysis. J Multimedia. 2(4):45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Avci A, Bosch S, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, Havinga P. 2010. Activity recognition using inertial sensing for healthcare, wellbeing and sports applications: a survey. In: 23rd International Conference on Architecture of Computing Systems, p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bashir K, Xiang T, Gong S. 2008. Feature selection on gait energy image for human identification. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Las Vegas, USA: IEEE; p. 985–988.
   Google Scholar
• Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Van Gool L. 2008. Speeded-up robust features (SURF). Comp Vision Image Understanding. 110(3):346–359.10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradski G, Davis J. 2002. Motion segmentation and pose recognition with motion history gradients. Mach Vision Appl. 13(3):174–184.10.1007/s001380100064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregler C, Malik J. 1997. Learning and recognizing human dynamics in video sequences. IEEE Comp Vision Pattern Recognit. Puerto Rico, USA: IEEE; p. 568–674.
   Google Scholar
• Canton-Ferrer C, Casas JR, Pardas M. 2006. Human model and motion based 3D action recognition in multiple view scenarios. Conference of European Signal Processing. Florence, Italy: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Jafari R, Kehtarnavaz N. 2015. A real-time human action recognition system using depth and inertial sensor fusion. IEEE Sens J. 16(3):773–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmas W. 1998. Spatial filtering requirements for gradient-based optical flow measurement. In: British Machine Vision Conference. Southampton, UK: BMVA Press; p. 185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal N, Triggs B. 2005. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. San Diego (CA): IEEE; p. 886–893.
   Google Scholar
• Del Vecchio D., Murray R, Perona P. 2002. Primitives for human motion: a dynamical approach. IFAC World Congress on Automatic Control. Barcelona, Spain: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Deng H, Zhang W, Mortensen E, Dietterich T, Shapiro L. 2007. Principal curvature-based region detector for object recognition. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Minnesota, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Efros A, Berg A, Mori G, Malik J. 2003. Recognizing action at a distance. In: International Conference on Computer Vision. Nice, France: IEEE; p. 726–733.
   Google Scholar
• Ehsan S, McDonald-Maier K. 2009. Exploring integral image word length reduction techniques for SURF detector. International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering. Dubai, UAE: IEEE; p. 635–639.
   Google Scholar
• Fischler M, Bolles R. 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun ACM. 24(6):381–395.10.1145/358669.358692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flusser J. 2007. Moment invariants in image analysis. Int J of Comp Elec Auto Cont Info Engg. 1(11):3708–3713.
   Google Scholar
• Gaidon A, Harchaoui Z, Schmid C. 2011. Actom sequence models for efficient action detection. IEEE Comp Vision Pattern Recognit. Colorado Springs, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Goncalves L, Di Bernardo E, Perona P. 1998. Reach out and touch space (motion learning). IEEE Autom Face Gesture Recognit. Nara, Japan: IEEE; p. 234–239.10.1109/AFGR.1998.670954
   Google Scholar
• Han J, Bhanu B. 2006. Individual recognition using gait energy image. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 28(2):316–322.10.1109/TPAMI.2006.38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu M. 1962. Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans Info Theory. 8:179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kameda Y, Ohta Y. 2010. Image retrieval of first-person vision for pedestrian navigation in urban area. International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Istanbul, Turkey: IEEE.10.1109/ICPR.2010.1140
   Google Scholar
• Ke Y, Sukthankar R. 2004. PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. IEEE CVPR.
   Google Scholar
• Khotanzad A, Hong Y. 1990. Invariant image recognition by Zernike moments. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 12(5):489–497.10.1109/34.55109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan T, Wang Y, Yang W, Mori, G. 2010. Beyond actions: discriminative models for contextual group activities. In: Lafferty JD, Williams CK, Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel RS, Culotta, A, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems. Curran Associates; p. 1216–1224. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4158-beyond-actions-discriminative-models-for-contextual-group-activities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Laptev I, Marszalek M, Schmid C, Rozenfield B. 2008. Learning realistic human actions from movies. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Alaska, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lazebnik S, Schmid C, Ponce J. 2004. Semi-Local affine parts for object recognition. British Machine Vision Conference. London, UK: BMVA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeberg T. 1998. Feature detection with automatic scale selection. Int J Comp Vision. 30(2):79–116.10.1023/A:1008045108935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe D. 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2. Kerkyra, Greece: IEEE; p. 1150–1157.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe D. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comp Vision. 60:91–110.10.1023/B:VISI.0000029664.99615.94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas B, Kanade T. 1981. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. 7th International Joint Conference Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco (CA): Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lucena M, Pérez de la Blanca N, Fuertes J, Marín-Jiménez M. 2009. Human action recognition using optical flow accumulated local histograms. Lecture Notes Comp Sci. 5524:32–39.10.1007/978-3-642-02172-5
   Google Scholar
• Lucena M, Pérez de la Blanca N, Fuertes JM. 2012. Human action recognition based on aggregated local motion estimates. Mach Vision Appl. 23(1):135–150.10.1007/s00138-010-0305-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui YM, Beveridge JR. 2011. Tangent bundle for human action recognition. IEEE AFGR. Santa Barbara (CA): IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mahbub U, Imtiaz H, Ahad, MAR. 2011. An optical flow based approach for action recognition. 14th International Conference Computer and Information Technology. Dhaka, Bangladesh: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Matas J, Chum O, Urba M, Pajdla T. 2002. Robust wide baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. British Machine Vision Conference. Cardiff, UK: BMVA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meng H, Pears N, Bailey C. 2006. Recognizing human actions based on motion information and SVM. In: Proceedings of IEE International Conference on Intelligent Environments. p. 239–245.
   Google Scholar
• Meng H, Pears N, Bailey C 2007. A human action recognition system for embedded computer vision application. Proceedings of workshop on embedded computer vision. USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk K, Schmid C. 2004. Scale and affine invariant interest point detectors. Int J Comp Vision. 60(1):63–86.10.1023/B:VISI.0000027790.02288.f2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk K., Schmid C. 2005. A performance evaluation of local descriptors IEEE Transactions on PAMI. 27(10):1615–1630.
   Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk K, Tuytelaars T, Schmid C, Zisserman A, Matas J, Schaffalitzky F, Kadir T, Gool L. 2005. A comparison of affine region detectors. Int J Comp Vision. 65:43–72.10.1007/s11263-005-3848-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeslund T, Hilton A, Krüger V. 2006. A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and analysis. Comp Vision Image Understanding. 104:90–126.10.1016/j.cviu.2006.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara S, Lui Y, Draper B. 2011. Unsupervised learning of human expressions, gestures, and actions. IEEE AFGR. Santa Barbara (CA): IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Pantic M, Patras I, Valstar M. 2005. Learning spatio-temporal models of facial expressions. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Measuring Behaviour. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Noldus Information Technology; p. 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Poppe R. 2007. Vision-based human motion analysis: an overview. Comp Vision Image Understanding. 108(1–2):4–18.10.1016/j.cviu.2006.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosten E, Drummond T. 2005. Fusing points and lines for high performance tracking. International Conference on Computer Vision. Beijing, China: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Ryoo M, Aggarwal J. 2009. Spatio-temporal relationship match: video structure comparison for recognition of complex human activities. International Conference on Computer Vision. Nara, Japan: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Satkin S, Hebert M. 2010. Modeling the temporal extent of actions. European Conference on Computer Vision. Crete, Greece: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler K., Van Gool L. 2008. Action snippets: how many frames does human action recognition require. IEEE Comp Vision Pattern Recognit. Alaska, USA: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger F, Zeisl B, Georgel P, Schroth G, Steinbach E, Navab N. 2009. Maximum detector response markers for SIFT and SURF. Vision, modeling and visualization workshop. TU Braunschweig, Germany: Eurographics Association.
   Google Scholar
• Smith S, Brady J. 1997. SUSAN – a new approach to low level image processing. Int J Comp Vision. 23:45–78.10.1023/A:1007963824710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trajković M, Hedley M. 1998. Fast corner detection. Image Vision Comp. 16(2):75–87.10.1016/S0262-8856(97)00056-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Brady M. 1995. Real-time corner detection algorithm for motion estimation. Image Vision Comp. 13(9):695–703.10.1016/0262-8856(95)98864-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinland D, Ronfard R, Boyer E. 2006. Free viewpoint action recognition using motion history volumes. Comp Vision Image Understanding. 104(2–3):249–257.10.1016/j.cviu.2006.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willamowski J, Arregui D, Csurka G, Dance CR, Fan L. 2004. Categorizing nine visual classes using local appearance descriptors. ICPR Workshop on Learning for Adaptive Visual Systems. Cambridge, UK: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan C, Li X, Hu W, Wang H. 2009. Human action recognition using pyramid vocabulary tree. In: Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Xi’an, China: Springer; p. 527–537.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Sawchuk A. 2013. Human daily activity recognition with sparse representation using wearable sensors. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 17(3):553–560.10.1109/JBHI.2013.2253613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar