A review of silhouette extraction algorithms for use within visual hull pipelines

References

• Abrams GD, Harris AH, Andriacchi TP, Safran MR. 2014. Biomechanical analysis of three tennis serve types using a markerless system. Br J Sports Med. 48(4):339–342. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achanta R, Shaji A, Smith K, Lucchi A, Fua P, Süsstrunk S. 2012. Slic superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 34(11):2274–2282. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2012.120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitken A, Ledig C, Theis L, Caballero J, Wang Z, Shi W. 2017. Checkerboard artifact free sub-pixel convolution: A note on sub-pixel convolution, resize convolution and convolution resize. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1707 02937.
   Google Scholar
• Arlen T. 2018. Understanding the map evaluation metric for object detection. [Online]. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://medium.com/@timothycarlen/understanding-the-map-evaluation-metric-for-object-detection-a07fe6962cf3
   Google Scholar
• Bakkay M, Rashwan H, Salmane H, Khoudour L, Puigtt D, Ruichek Y. 2018. Bscgan: deep background subtraction with conditional generative adversarial networks. In 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). Athens, Greece: IEEE. p. 4018–4022.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett R, Wheat J, Robins M. 2007. Is movement variability important for sports biomechanists? Sports Biomech. 6(2):224–243. doi:10.1080/14763140701322994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behzadfar N, Soltanian-Zadeh H. 2012. Automatic segmentation of brain tumors in magnetic resonance images. In Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), 2012 IEEEEMBS International Conference on. Hong Kong and Shenzhen, China: IEEE. p. 329–332.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sensing. 65(1):2–16. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauensteiner P, Kampel M. 2004. Visual surveillance of an airport’s apron-An overview of the AVITRACK project. na.
   Google Scholar
• Boughorbel S, Jarray F, El-Anbari M, Zou Q. 2017. Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using matthews correlation coefficient metric. PLoS One. 12(6):e0177678. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdev L, Maji S, Brox T, Malik J. 2010. Detecting people using mutually consistent poselet activations. In European conference on computer vision. Heraklion, Crete, Greece: Springer. p. 168–181.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdev L, Malik J. 2009. Poselets: body part detectors trained using 3d human pose annotations. In Computer Vision, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on. Kyoto, Japan: IEEE. p. 1365–1372.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwmans T. 2014. Traditional and recent approaches in background modeling for foreground detection: an overview. Comput Sci Rev. 11:31–66. doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2014.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Brox T, Bourdev L, Maji S, Malik J. 2011. Object segmentation by alignment of poselet activations to image contours. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 IEEE Conference on. Colorado Springs, CO: IEEE. p. 2225–2232.
   Google Scholar
• Butler DE, Bove VM, Sridharan S. 2005. Real-time adaptive foreground/background segmentation. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2005(14):841926. doi:10.1155/ASP.2005.2292.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell ND, Vogiatzis G, Hern´andez C, Cipolla R. 2011. Automatic object segmentation from calibrated images. In Visual Media Production (CVMP), 2011 Conference for. London, UK: IEEE. p. 126–137.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell ND, Vogiatzis G, Hernández C, Cipolla R. 2010. Automatic 3d object segmentation in multiple views using volumetric graph-cuts. Image Vis Comput. 28(1):14–25. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2008.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camplani M, Maddalena L, Alcover GM, Petrosino A, Salgado L. 2017. A benchmarking framework for background subtraction in rgbd videos. In International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing. Catania, Italy: Springer. p. 219–229.
   Google Scholar
• Cappozzo A, Cappello A, Croce UD, Pensalfini F. 1997. Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-d bone movement reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 44(12):1165–1174. doi:10.1109/10.649988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, Benedetti M, Della Croce U. 1996. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: experimental artefacts. Clin Biomech. 11(2):90–100. doi:10.1016/0268-0033(95)00046-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceseracciu E, Sawacha Z, Fantozzi S, Cortesi M, Gatta G, Corazza S, Cobelli C. 2011. Markerless analysis of front crawl swimming. J Biomech. 44(12):2236–2242. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla NV, Japkowicz N, Kotcz A. 2004. Special issue on learning from imbalanced data sets. ACM Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter. 6(1):1–6. doi:10.1145/1007730.1007733.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L. C., Collins, M., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Zoph, B., Schroff, F., ... & Shlens, J. 2018. Searching for efficient multi-scale architectures for dense image prediction. In Advances in neural information processing systems; pp. 8699–8710.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L-C, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, Murphy K, Yuille AL. 2018b. Deeplab: semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 40(4):834–848. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2699184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L-C, Papandreou G, Schroff F, Adam H. 2017. Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1706 05587.
   Google Scholar
• Chen L-C, Zhu Y, Papandreou G, Schroff F, Adam H. 2018c. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1802 02611.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng H-D, Jiang XH, Sun Y, Wang J. 2001. Color image segmentation: advances and prospects. Pattern Recognit. 34(12):2259–2281. doi:10.1016/S0031-3203(00)00149-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung SCS, Kamath C. 2005. Robust background subtraction with foreground validation for urban traffic video. EURASIP J Adv Signal Process. 2005(14):726261. doi:10.1155/ASP.2005.2330.
   Google Scholar
• Chilamkurthy S. 2017. A 2017 guide to semantic segmentation with deep learning. [Online]. Retrieved September 2, 2019, from http://blog.qure.ai/notes/semantic-segmentation-deep-learning-review
   Google Scholar
• Chollet F. 2017. Xception: deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. arXiv Preprint. pp. 1610–02357.
   Google Scholar
• Cire¸san D, Meier U, Schmidhuber J. 2012. Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1202 2745.
   Google Scholar
• Corazza S, Mündermann L, Chaudhari A, Demattio T, Cobelli C, Andriacchi TP. 2006. A markerless motion capture system to study musculoskeletal biomechanics: visual hull and simulated annealing approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 34(6):1019–1029. doi:10.1007/s10439-006-9122-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza S, Mündermann L, Gambaretto E, Ferrigno G, Andriacchi TP. 2010. Markerless motion capture through visual hull, articulated icp and subject specific model generation. Int J Comput Vis. 87(1–2):156. doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0284-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordts M, Omran M, Ramos S, Rehfeld T, Enzweiler M, Benenson R, Franke U, Roth S, Schiele B. 2016. The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. Las Vegas, NV: IEEE. p. 3213–3223.
   Google Scholar
• Crane JC, Olson MP, Nelson SJ. 2013. Sivic: open-source, standards-based software for dicom mr spectroscopy workflows. J Biomedl Imaging. 2013:12.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl GE, Sainath TN, Hinton GE. 2013. Improving deep neural networks for lvcsr using rectified linear units and dropout. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2013 IEEE International Conference on. Vancouver, Canada: IEEE. p. 8609–8613.
   Google Scholar
• Djelouah A, Franco J-S, Boyer E, Le Clerc F, P´erez P. 2012. N-tuple color segmentation for multi-view silhouette extraction. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Florence, Italy: Springer. p. 818–831.
   Google Scholar
• Djelouah A, Franco J-S, Boyer E, Le Clerc F, P´erez P. 2013. Multi-view object segmentation in space and time. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Syndey, Australia: IEEE. p. 2640–2647.
   Google Scholar
• Djelouah A, Franco J-S, Boyer E, Le Clerc F, P´erez P. 2015. Sparse multi-view consistency for object segmentation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 37(9):1890–1903. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2385704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djelouah A, Franco J-S, Boyer E, P´erez P, Drettakis G. 2016. Cotemporal multiview video segmentation. In 3D Vision (3DV), 2016 Fourth International Conference on. Stanford, CA: IEEE. p. 360–369.
   Google Scholar
• Doll´ar P, Zitnick CL. 2013. Structured forests for fast edge detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. Syndey, Australia: IEEE. p. 1841–1848.
   Google Scholar
• Elhabian SY, El-Sayed KM, Ahmed SH. 2008. Moving object detection in spatial domain using background removal techniques-state-of-art. Recent Pat Comput Sci. 1(1):32–54. doi:10.2174/1874479610801010032.
   Google Scholar
• Everingham M, Van Gool L, Williams CK, Winn J, Zisserman A. 2010. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge. Int J Comput Vis. 88(2):303–338. doi:10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farabet C, Couprie C, Najman L, LeCun Y. 2013. Learning hierarchical features for scene labeling. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 35(8):1915–1929. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2012.231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldmann T, Dießelberg L, W¨orner A. 2009. Adaptive foreground/background segmentation using multiview silhouette fusion. In Joint Pattern Recognition Symposium: Jena, Germany: Springer. p. 522–531.
   Google Scholar
• Fern’ndez-Baena A, Sus´ın A, Lligadas X. 2012. Biomechanical validation of upperbody and lower-body joint movements of kinect motion capture data for rehabilitation treatments. In Intelligent networking and collaborative systems (INCoS), 2012 4th international conference on. Bucharest, Romania: IEEE. p. 656–661.
   Google Scholar
• Furukawa Y, Ponce J. 2006. Carved visual hulls for image-based modeling. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Florence, Italy: Springer. p. 564–577.
   Google Scholar
• Gall J, Stoll C, De Aguiar E, Theobalt C, Rosenhahn B, Seidel H-P. 2009. Motion capture using joint skeleton tracking and surface estimation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on. Miami, FL: IEEE. p. 1746–1753.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego J, Salvador J, Casas JR, Pardas M. 2011. Joint multi-view foreground segmentation and 3d reconstruction with tolerance loop. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on. Brussels, Belgium, IEEE. p. 997–1000.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Garcia A, Orts-Escolano S, Oprea S, Villena-Martinez V, GarciaRodriguez J. 2017. A review on deep learning techniques applied to semantic segmentation. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1704 06857.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiasi G, Fowlkes CC. 2016. Laplacian pyramid reconstruction and refinement for semantic segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Springer. p. 519–534.
   Google Scholar
• Golovin D, Solnik B, Moitra S, Kochanski G, Karro J, Sculley D. 2017. Google vizier: A service for black-box optimization. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Halifax, Canada: ACM. p. 1487–1495.
   Google Scholar
• Goyette N, Jodoin P-M, Porikli F, Konrad J, Ishwar P 2012. Changedetection. net: A new change detection benchmark dataset. In CVPR Workshops, no. 2012. Providence, USA: IEEE. p.1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Grauman K, Shakhnarovich G, Darrell T. 2003. A bayesian approach to image-based visual hull reconstruction. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on; vol. 1. Madison, WI: IEEE. p. I–I.
   Google Scholar
• He H, Garcia EA. 2008. Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 21(9):1263–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. 2016. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Las Vegas, NV: IEEE. p. 770–778.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschmuller H. 2008. Stereo processing by semiglobal matching and mutual information. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 30(2):328–341. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden JP, Orsini JA, Siegel KL, Kepple TM, Gerber LH, Stanhope SJ. 1997. Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait. Gait Posture. 5(3):217–227. doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01088-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou X, Yuille A, Koch C. 2013. Boundary detection benchmarking: beyond fmeasures. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Portland, OR: IEEE.  p. 2123–2130.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidou A, Chatzilari E, Nikolopoulos S, Kompatsiaris I. 2017. Deep learning advances in computer vision with 3d data: A survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR). 50(2):20. doi:10.1145/3042064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jodoin P-M, Maddalena L, Petrosino A, Wang Y. 2017. Extensive benchmark and survey of modeling methods for scene background initialization. IEEE Trans Image Process. 26(11):5244–5256. doi:10.1109/TIP.2017.2728181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaewTraKulPong, P. and Bowden, R., 2002. An improved adaptive background mixture model for real-time tracking with shadow detection. In Video-based surveillance systems (pp. 135–144). Boston, MA: Springer..
   Google Scholar
• Kim B, Son J, Sohn K. 2011. Illumination invariant road detection based on learning method. In Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on. Washington, DC: IEEE. p. 1009–1014.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S-H, Tai Y-W, Park J, Kweon IS. 2016. Multi-view object extraction with fractional boundaries. IEEE Trans Image Process. 25(8):3639–3654. doi:10.1109/TIP.2016.2555698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolev K, Brox T, Cremers D. 2012. Fast joint estimation of silhouettes and dense 3d geometry from multiple images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 34(3):493–505. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2011.150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowdle A, Batra D, Chen W-C, Chen T. 2010. Imodel: interactive co-segmentation for object of interest 3d modeling. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Heraklion, Crete. Springer. p. 211–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kowdle A, Sinha SN, Szeliski R. 2012. Multiple view object cosegmentation using appearance and stereo cues. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Florence, Italy: Springer. p. 789–803.
   Google Scholar
• Kr¨ahenbu¨hl P, Koltun V. 2011. Efficient inference in fully connected crfs with gaussian edge potentials. In Advances in neural information processing systems. p. 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems. Lake Tahoe, NV. p. 1097–1105.
   Google Scholar
• Lallier C, Reynaud E, Robinault L, Tougne L. 2011. A testing framework for background subtraction algorithms comparison in intrusion detection context. In 2011 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS). Klagenfurt, Austria: IEEE. p. 314–319.
   Google Scholar
• Laurentini A. 1994. The visual hull concept for silhouette-based image understanding. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 16(2):150–162. doi:10.1109/34.273735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazebnik S, Furukawa Y, Ponce J. 2007. Projective visual hulls. Int J Comput Vis. 74(2):137–165. doi:10.1007/s11263-006-0008-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee C-Y, Xie S, Gallagher P, Zhang Z, Tu Z. 2015. Deeply-supervised nets. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. San Diego, CA. p. 562–570.
   Google Scholar
• Lee W, Woo W, Boyer E. 2011. Silhouette segmentation in multiple views. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 33(7):1429–1441. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2010.196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leykin A, Tuceryan M. 2007. Detecting shopper groups in video sequences. In Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2007. AVSS 2007. IEEE Conference on. Londom, UK: IEEE. p. 417–422.
   Google Scholar
• Lhuillier M, Quan L. 2005. A quasi-dense approach to surface reconstruction from uncalibrated images. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 27(3):418–433. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2005.44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Meng MQH. 2009. Computer-based detection of bleeding and ulcer in wireless capsule endoscopy images by chromaticity moments. Comput Biol Med. 39(2):141–147. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2008.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim LA, Keles HY. 2018a. Foreground segmentation using a triplet convolutional neural network for multiscale feature encoding. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1801 02225.
   Google Scholar
• Lim LA, Keles HY. 2018b. Foreground segmentation using convolutional neural networks for multiscale feature encoding. Pattern Recognit Lett. 112:256–262. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2018.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim LA, Keles HY. 2018c. Learning multi-scale features for foreground segmentation. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1808 01477.
   Google Scholar
• Lin D, Ji Y, Lischinski D, Cohen-Or D, Huang H. 2018. Multi-scale context intertwining for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). Munich, Germany: IEEE. p. 603–619.
   Google Scholar
• Lin G, Milan A, Shen C, Reid ID. 2017. Refinenet: multi-path refinement networks for high-resolution semantic segmentation. Cvpr. 1(2):5.
   Google Scholar
• Lin T-Y, Maire M, Belongie S, Hays J, Perona P, Ramanan D, Doll´ar P, Zitnick CL. 2014. Microsoft coco: common objects in context. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Zurich, Switzerland: Springer. p. 740–755.
   Google Scholar
• Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Boston, MA: IEEE. p. 3431–3440.
   Google Scholar
• Luo Z, Jodoin P-M, Li S-Z, Su S-Z. 2015. Traffic analysis without motion features. In Image Processing (ICIP), 2015 IEEE International Conference on. Québec City, Canada: IEEE. p. 3290–3294.
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevan V, Vasconcelos N. 2010. Spatiotemporal saliency in dynamic scenes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 32(1):171–177. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2009.112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Basc´on S, Lafuente-Arroyo S, Gil-Jimenez P, G´omez-Moreno H, L´opez-Ferreras F. 2007. Road-sign detection and recognition based on support vector machines. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Sys. 8(2):264–278. doi:10.1109/TITS.2007.895311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhnevich M, Laurendeau D. 2014. Shape from silhouette in space, time and light domains. In Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP), 2014 international conference on; vol. 3. Lisbon, Portugal: IEEE. p. 368–377.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza M, Osindero S. 2014. Conditional generative adversarial networks. Manuscript. Retrieved June 19, 2019, from https://arxiv. org/abs/1709.02023
   Google Scholar
• Moeslund TB, Hilton A, Krüger V. 2006. A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and analysis. Comput Vision Image Understanding. 104(2–3):90–126. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2006.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon N, Bullitt E, Van Leemput K, Gerig G. 2002. Automatic brain and tumor segmentation. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. Tokyo, Japan: Springer. p. 372–379.
   Google Scholar
• Mottaghi R, Chen X, Liu X, Cho N-G, Lee S-W, Fidler S, Urtasun R, Yuille A. 2014. The role of context for object detection and semantic segmentation in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Colombus, OH: IEEE. p. 891–898.
   Google Scholar
• Mündermann L, Corazza S, Andriacchi TP. 2006. The evolution of methods for the capture of human movement leading to markerless motion capture for biomechanical applications. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 3(1):6. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-3-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mundermann L, Corazza S, Chaudhari AM, Alexander EJ, Andriacchi TP. 2005. Most favorable camera configuration for a shape-from-silhouette markerless motion capture system for biomechanical analysis. In: Videometrics VIII. vol. 5665. International Society for Optics and Photonics. p. 56650T.
   Google Scholar
• Newswanger A, Xu C. 2017. One-shot video object segmentation with iterative online fine-tuning. In CVPR Workshop. Honolulu, HI: IEEE. vol. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Nobuhara S, Matsuyama T. 2006. Deformable mesh model for complex multi-object 3d motion estimation from multi-viewpoint video. in 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission, Third International Symposium on. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE. p. 264–271.
   Google Scholar
• Nobuhara S, Tsuda Y, Ohama I, Matsuyama T. 2009. Multi-viewpoint silhouette extraction with 3d context-aware error detection, correction, and shadow suppression. IPSJ Trans Comput Vision Appl. 1:242–259. doi:10.2197/ipsjtcva.1.242.
   Google Scholar
• Olkkonen H, Pesola P. 1996. Gaussian pyramid wavelet transform for multiresolution analysis of images. Graphical Models Image Process. 58(4):394–398. doi:10.1006/gmip.1996.0032.
   Google Scholar
• Peng C, Zhang X, Yu G, Luo G, Sun J. 2017. Large kernel matters—improve semantic segmentation by global convolutional network. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017 IEEE Conference on. Honolulu, HI: IEEE. p. 1743–1751.
   Google Scholar
• Pham V-Q, Takahashi K, Naemura T. 2011. Foreground-background segmentation using iterated distribution matching. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2011 IEEE Conference on. Colorado Springs, CO:  IEEE. p. 2113–2120.
   Google Scholar
• Qi H, Zhang Z, Xiao B, Hu H, Cheng B, Wei Y, Dai J. 2017. Deformable convolutional networks–coco detection and segmentation challenge 2017 entry. In ICCV COCO Challenge Workshop. Venice, Italy. vol. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Raja Y, McKenna SJ, Gong S. 1998. Segmentation and tracking using colour mixture models. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Hong Kong, China: Springer. p. 607–614.
   Google Scholar
• Reinbacher C, Rüther M, Bischof H. 2012. Fast variational multi-view segmentation through backprojection of spatial constraints. Image Vis Comput. 30(11):797–807. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2012.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinschmidt C, Van Den Bogert A, Nigg B, Lundberg A, Murphy N. 1997. Effect of skin movement on the analysis of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech. 30(7):729–732. doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(97)00001-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. 2015. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Munich, Germany: Springer. p. 234–241.
   Google Scholar
• Rotaru C, Graf T, Zhang J. 2008. Color image segmentation in hsi space for automotive applications. J Real-Time Image Process. 3(4):311–322. doi:10.1007/s11554-008-0078-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rother C, Kolmogorov V, Blake A. 2004. Grabcut: interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. In: ACM transactions on graphics (TOG). Vol. 23, no. 3. ACM New York, NY; p. 309–314.
   Google Scholar
• Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, Krause J, Satheesh S, Ma S, Huang Z, Karpathy A, Khosla A, Bernstein M, et al. 2015. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput Vis. 115(3):211–252. doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sati M, de Guise JA, Larouche S, Drouin G. 1996. Quantitative assessment of skinbone movement at the knee. Knee. 3(3):121–138. doi:10.1016/0968-0160(96)00210-4.
   Google Scholar
• Seide F, Li G, Yu D. 2011. Conversational speech transcription using context-dependent deep neural networks. In Twelfth annual conference of the international speech communication association. Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Senior AW, Tian Y, Lu M. 2010. Interactive motion analysis for video surveillance and long term scene monitoring. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Queenstown, New Zealand: Springer. p. 164–174.
   Google Scholar
• Sheets AL, Abrams GD, Corazza S, Safran MR, Andriacchi TP. 2011. Kinematics differences between the flat, kick, and slice serves measured using a markerless motion capture method. Ann Biomed Eng. 39(12):3011. doi:10.1007/s10439-011-0418-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberman N, Hoiem D, Kohli P, Fergus R. 2012. Indoor segmentation and support inference from rgbd images. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Florence, Italy: Springer. p. 746–760.
   Google Scholar
• Simonyan K, Zisserman A. 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1409 1556.
   Google Scholar
• Song S, Lichtenberg SP, Xiao J. 2015. Sun rgb-d: A rgb-d scene understanding benchmark suite. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Boston, MA: IEEE. p. 567–576.
   Google Scholar
• Sormann M, Zach C, Karner K. 2006. Graph cut based multiple view segmentation for 3d reconstruction. In 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission, Third International Symposium on. Chapel Hill, NC: IEEE. p. 1085–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Sun C, Shrivastava A, Singh S, Gupta A. 2017. Revisiting unreasonable effectiveness of data in deep learning era. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2017 IEEE International Conference on. Venice, Italy: IEEE. p. 843–852.
   Google Scholar
• Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, Sermanet P, Reed S, Anguelov D, Erhan D, Vanhoucke V, Rabinovich A. 2015. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Boston, MA: IEEE. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Thoma M. 2016. A survey of semantic segmentation. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1602 06541.
   Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Senior A, Lu M. 2012. Robust and efficient foreground analysis in complex surveillance videos. Mach Vis Appl. 23(5):967–983. doi:10.1007/s00138-011-0377-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyama K, Krumm J, Brumitt B, Meyers B. 1999. Wallflower: principles and practice of background maintenance. In Computer Vision, 1999. The Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on. Kerkyra, Greece. vol. 1; IEEE. p. 255–261.
   Google Scholar
• Unzueta L, Nieto M, Cortés A, Barandiaran J, Otaegui O, Sànchez P. 2012. Adaptive multicue background subtraction for robust vehicle counting and classification. IEEE Trans Intell Transpo Sys. 13(2):527–540. doi:10.1109/TITS.2011.2174358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacavant A, Chateau T, Wilhelm A, Lequi`evre L. 2012. A benchmark dataset for outdoor foreground/background extraction. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision. Daejeon, South Korea: Springer. p. 291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Vlasic D, Baran I, Matusik W, Popovi´c J. 2008. Articulated mesh animation from multi-view silhouettes.In: ACM transactions on graphics (TOG). Vol. 27, no. 3. ACM New York, NY; p. 97.
   Google Scholar
• Vosters L, Shan C, Gritti T. 2012. Real-time robust background subtraction under rapidly changing illumination conditions. Image Vis Comput. 30(12):1004–1015. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2012.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voulodimos A, Doulamis N, Doulamis A, Protopapadakis E. 2018. Deep learning for computer vision: A brief review. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018:1–13. doi:10.1155/2018/7068349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Luo Z, Jodoin P-M. 2017. Interactive deep learning method for segmenting moving objects. Pattern Recognit Lett. 96:66–75. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2016.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 13(4):600–612. doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windolf M, Götzen N, Morlock M. 2008. Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems—exemplified on the vicon-460 system. J Biomech. 41(12):2776–2780. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.06.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter DA. 2009. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Waterloo, Ontario: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wojek C, Schiele B. 2008. A dynamic conditional random field model for joint labeling of object and scene classes. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Marseille, France: Springer. p. 733–747.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Wang J, Tan P, Quan L. 2007. Joint affinity propagation for multiple view segmentation. In Computer Vision, 2007. ICCV 2007. IEEE 11th International Conference on. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IEEE. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Xie S, Girshick R, Doll´ar P, Tu Z, He K. 2017. Aggregated residual transformations for deep neural networks. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017 IEEE Conference on. Honolulu, HI: IEEE. p. 5987–5995.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zhang X, Peng C, Cheng D, Sun J. 2018. Exfuse: enhancing feature fusion for semantic segmentation. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1804 03821.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Shi J, Qi X, Wang X, Jia J. 2017. Pyramid scene parsing network. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Honolulu, HI: IEEE. p. 2881–2890.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Meng F, Cai J, Lu S. 2016. Beyond pixels: A comprehensive survey from bottom-up to semantic image segmentation and cosegmentation. J Vis Commun Image Represent. 34:12–27. doi:10.1016/j.jvcir.2015.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoph B, Le QV. 2016. Neural architecture search with reinforcement learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1611 01578.
   Google Scholar
• Zoph B, Vasudevan V, Shlens J, Le QV. 2017. Learning transferable architectures for scalable image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
   Google Scholar