Validating 3D face morphing towards improving pre-operative planning in facial reconstruction surgery

References

• Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. 2001. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat. 29(4):1165–1188.
   Google Scholar
• Blanz V, Vetter T. 1999. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. Proc 26th Annu Conf Comput Graph Interact Tech - SIGGRAPH ’99 [Internet]. 187–194. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=311535.311556.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkart T, Wuhrer S. 2015. 3D faces in motion: fully automatic registration and statistical analysis. Comput Vis Image Underst [Internet]. 131(2015):100–115. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2014.06.013.
   Google Scholar
• Booth J, Antonakos E, Ploumpis S, Trigeorgis G, Panagakis Y, Zafeiriou S. 2017. 3D face morphable models “In-the-Wild;” [cited 2017 Jan 19]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.05360
   Google Scholar
• Booth J, Roussos A, Ponniah A, Dunaway D, Zafeiriou S. 2015. Large scale 3D morphable models. Int J Comput Vis. 2017:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Brunton A, Bolkart T, Wuhrer S. 2014a. Multilinear wavelets: a statistical shape space for human faces. arXiv14012818 [Cs] [Internet]. 297–312. http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.2818%5Cnhttp://www.arxiv.org/pdf/1401.2818.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brunton A, Salazar A, Bolkart T, Wuhrer S. 2014b. Review of statistical shape spaces for 3D data with comparative analysis for human faces. Comput Vis Image Underst [Internet]. 128:1–17. doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2014.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Chang FJ, Tuan Tran A, Hassner T, Masi I, Nevatia R, Medioni G. 2018. ExpNet: landmark-free, deep, 3D facial expressions. Proc - 13th IEEE Int Conf Autom Face Gesture Recognition, FG. 2018:122–129.
   Google Scholar
• Claes P, Walters M, Shriver MD, Puts D, Gibson G, Clement J, Baynam G, Verbeke G, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P, et al. 2012. Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics. J Anat. 221(2):97–114. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01528.x
   Google Scholar
• Dai H, Pears N, Smith W, Duncan C. 2017 Oct. A 3D morphable model of craniofacial shape and texture variation. Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis [Internet]. 3104–3112. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8237597/.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas LG, Kolar JC, Munro IR. 1986. Geography of the nose: A morphometric study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 10(1):191–223. doi:10.1007/BF01575292.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Wu F, Shao X, Wang Y, Zhou X. 2018a. Joint 3d face reconstruction and dense alignment with position map regression network. Lect Notes Comput Sci (Including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics). 11218 LNCS:557–574.
   Google Scholar
• Feng ZH, Huber P, Kittler J, Hancock P, Wu XJ, Zhao Q, Koppen P, Raetsch M. 2018b. Evaluation of dense 3D reconstruction from 2D face images in the wild. Proc - 13th IEEE Int Conf autom face gesture recognition. FG. 2018:780–786.
   Google Scholar
• Gerig T, Morel-Forster A, Blumer C, Egger B, Lüthi M, Schönborn S, Vetter T. 2017. Morphable face models - an open framework [Internet]. [cited 2017 Sep 26]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.08398
   Google Scholar
• Gu Y, McNamara JA, Sigler LM, Baccetti T. 2011. Comparison of craniofacial characteristics of typical Chinese and Caucasian young adults. Eur J Orthod. 33(2):205–211. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjq054.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt N, Kuttenberger J Craniofacial Trauma. Vol. 5, Facial plastic surgery: FPS. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy DK, Cubas YP, Orellana MF. 2012. Prevalence of angle class III malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Open J Epidemiol. 02(4):75–82. doi:10.4236/ojepi.2012.24012.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero H, De VA, Herrero Antón de Vez H, Herrero Jover J, Silva-Vergara C. 2018. Personalized 3d printed surgical tool for guiding the chisel during hump reduction in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 6(2):3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hierl T, Arnold S, Kruber D, Schulze FP, Hümpfner-Hierl H. 2013. CAD-CAM-assisted esthetic facial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 71(1):e15–23. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2012.08.020.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch DL, Garfein ES, Christensen AM, Weimer KA, Saddeh PB, Levine JP. 2009. Use of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: a paradigm shift in head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 67(10):2115–2122. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.02.007.
   Google Scholar
• Hohman MH, Kim SW, Heller ES, Frigerio A, Heaton JT, Hadlock TA. 2014. Determining the threshold for asymmetry detection in facial expressions. Laryngoscope. 124(4):860–865. doi:10.1002/lary.24331.
   Google Scholar
• Huber P, Hu G, Tena R, Mortazavian P, Koppen WP, Christmas WJ, Rätsch M, Kittler J. 2016. A multiresolution 3D morphable face model and fitting framework. Proc 11th Jt Conf Comput Vision, Imaging Comput Graph Theory Appl [Internet]. Vol. 4. Rome, Italy; p. 79–86. http://www.scitepress.org/DigitalLibrary/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0005669500790086
   Google Scholar
• Jackson AS, Bulat A, Argyriou V, Tzimiropoulos G. 2017. Large pose 3D face reconstruction from a single image via direct volumetric CNN regression [Internet]. [cited 2017 Sep 8]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.07834
   Google Scholar
• Lee RWW, Vasudavan S, Hui DS, Prvan T, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA, Cistulli PA. 2010. Differences in craniofacial structures and obesity in Caucasian and Chinese patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep. 33(8):1075–1080. doi:10.1093/sleep/33.8.1075.
   Google Scholar
• Levine JP, Patel A, Saadeh PB, Hirsch DL. 2012 Jan. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniomaxillofacial surgery: the new state of the art. J Craniofac Surg [Internet]. 23(1):288–293. [cited 2014 Sep 2]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22337427.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller AA, Paysan P, Schumacher R, Zeilhofer HF, Berg-boerner BI, Maurer J, Vetter T, Schkommodau E, Juergens P, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, et al. 2011. Missing facial parts computed by a morphable model and transferred directly to a polyamide laser-sintered prosthesis: an innovation study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg [Internet]. 49(8):e67–71. Available from:. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.02.007.
   Google Scholar
• Ngan PW, Sung JH. 2015. Treatment strategies for developing and nondeveloping class III malocclusions. In: Esthetics and biomechanics in orthodontics, Second Edition. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Inc.; p. 246–293.  doi:10.1016/B978-1-4557-5085-6.00014-X
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg EL, Farris AL, Hung BP, Dias M, Garcia JR, Dorafshar AH, Grayson WL. 2017. 3D-printing technologies for craniofacial rehabilitation, reconstruction, and regeneration. Ann Biomed Eng. 45(1):45–57. doi:10.1007/s10439-016-1668-5.
   Google Scholar
• Paysan P, Knothe R, Amberg B, Romdhani S, Vetter T. 2009. A 3D face model for pose and illumination invariant face recognition. 2009 Sixth IEEE Int Conf Adv Video Signal Based Surveill [Internet]. Genova, Italy: IEEE; p. 296–301. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5279762.
   Google Scholar
• Peng Q, Tang Z, Liu O, Peng Z. 2015. Rapid prototyping-assisted maxillofacial reconstruction. Ann Med. 47(3):186–208. doi:10.3109/07853890.2015.1007520.
   Google Scholar
• Schönborn S, Egger B, Morel-Forster A, Vetter T. 2017. Markov Chain Monte Carlo for automated face image analysis. Int J Comput Vis. 123(2):160–183. doi:10.1007/s11263-016-0967-5.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber JE, Stern CS, Garfein ES, Weichman KE, Tepper OM, Novel A. 2016. Approach to surgical markings based on a topographic map and a projected three-dimensional image. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137(5):855e–859e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002098.
   Google Scholar
• Sela M, Richardson E, Kimmel R. 2017 Oct. Unrestricted facial geometry reconstruction using image-to-image translation. Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis. 1585–1594; [Cited 2017 Sep 15]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.10131
   Google Scholar
• Stern CS, Schreiber JE, Surek CC, Garfein ES, Jelks EB, Jelks GW, Tepper OM. 2016. Three-dimensional topographic surface changes in response to compartmental volumization of the medial cheek: defining a malar augmentation zone. Plast Reconstr Surg. 137(5):1401–1408. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002066.
   Google Scholar
• Tran AT, Hassner T, Masi I, Medioni G 2017 Jan. Regressing robust and discriminative 3D morphable models with a very deep neural network. Proc - 30th IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI: CVPR; p. 1493–1502.
   Google Scholar
• Tsounis M, Papadopoulou D, Faris C. 2017. Intraoperative use of a tablet computer to aid rhinoplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 99(1):37–38. doi:10.1308/rcsann.2016.0289.
   Google Scholar
• Weissler JM, Stern CS, Schreiber JE, Amirlak B, Tepper OM. 2017. The evolution of photography and three-dimensional imaging in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 139(3):761–769. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003146.
   Google Scholar
• Yen CI, Zelken JA, Chang CS, Lo LJ, Yang JY, Chuang SS, Araniego CA, Hsiao Y-C. 2019. Computer-aided design and three-dimensional printing improves symmetry in heminasal reconstruction outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg [Internet]. 72(7):1198–1206. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.012.
   Google Scholar
• Yin L, Wei X, Sun Y, Wang J, Rosato MJ. 2006. A 3D Facial Expression Database For Facial Behavior Research. 7th Int Conf Autom Face Gesture Recognit [Internet]. 2006:211–216. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1613022.
   Google Scholar